Sanders Tweets 'How Many Yachts Do Billionaires Need? How Many Cars?

View attachment 122629

Twitterers respond with how many houses do you need?
Once again, the lack of self awareness of the left is mind boggling.

Sanders Asks How Many Yachts Billionaires Need, Twitter Asks How Many Houses He Needs

Dude, he's a socialist.

Did you say something about lack of awareness?

You do realize that yachts are a tax dodge. They're an excellent way to bring monies to the US without paying tax.

You mean something like what John Kerry did?

No at all. Kerry's yacht broker who charters his boat when he wasn't using it to off-set the costs moved the boat to their location. Nothing illegal, just perceived illegal by the deceivers and eaten up by the ignorant.
 
His vacation home was inherited by his wife when her parents died, she swapped it for a cottage closer to where they live so they can utilize it.
Not one of the news articles have ever said inherited, it's all he purchased. But if that's the theme you're going for then why would you insist everyone but him have their inheritance taxed so the wealth can't be just given to someone like...Oh, I don't know maybe a senator who never made a dime on his own and should be the least deserving of any inheritance? Shouldn't the government get that property?

"A senator who never made a dime on his own?" What, Senators (and Congressmen, and mayors) don't get paid now?

Anyway Rump has never been a Senator.
Trump made his own money. Sanders was on welfare until he found a much better form of doing nothing for a lot more money. He doesn't even have the self awareness of railing against someone making their own and buying cars when he the ultimate welfare recipient has three homes and how pathetic that looks.
 
"Vermont magazine Seven Days reported Tuesday that the 74-year-old senator and his wife, Jane Sanders, have purchased a four-bedroom house on the shore of Lake Champlain for roughly $600,000. Jane told Seven Days that they had recently sold a house in Maine that had belonged to her family since the 1900s, and used the proceeds to purchase the new property, which is located in North Hero (population 803, as of the 2010 census). With this purchase, Sanders now owns at least three houses, the others being in Burlington, VT, and Capitol Hill in D.C."

One must always remember that the people advocating things like socialism never intend it for themselves. Just us lil folk.

Of course. The Socialist/ Communist way is for nobody to have money except for people in government.

Doesn't the company you work have any directly or indirectly publicly funded contracts? That would make you one of the people you hate.
 
Here is a guy who wants to be your President who says "You can't have it all."

Sorry, but we want it all. Ambition is what made America the greatest nation in human history.

No more proof of that than Democrat run cities that have people with no ambition.

I take it you've never been to southern red States.......There's plenty of no ambition to go around.
 
Sanders is a total fraud and hypocrite. Can't Sanders live in a cheap apartment why does he need a house? He should sell all his belongings and give his money to the government to be redistributed then he can talk shit.

Sanders is pro-American worker. Trump isn't.
 
Our budget problems are not because the rich aren't being taxed enough. That is a simplistic, retarded, and most especially ignorant, "solution".

Our budget problems are primarily because of tax expenditures which tilt the playing field to the advantage of a select few who own our government.

Our budget problems are caused by the 72% aren't making enough money.
 
A thief comes into your house and takes your television. He is provided a police escort as he robs your house.

Bernie Sanders then gets up on a stump and says the solution to this problem is to raise the taxes on the guy down the street who has a bigger house than you.

Joe Republican gets up on a stump and actually manages to convince you the thief is helping you keep more of your stuff!

This is the situation today with tax expenditures, idiot socialists, and retarded pseudocons.

What 'Joe' needs to understand is that the actual thief is his employer.
 
how many yachts?? As many as he wants? He may want yachts as much as a poor person wants TV's or shirts. In both cases it might be the incentive to get them up in the morning for work and in the case of the yachtsman the incentive to find a cure for cancer!!
 
A thief comes into your house and takes your television. He is provided a police escort as he robs your house.

Bernie Sanders then gets up on a stump and says the solution to this problem is to raise the taxes on the guy down the street who has a bigger house than you.

Joe Republican gets up on a stump and actually manages to convince you the thief is helping you keep more of your stuff!

This is the situation today with tax expenditures, idiot socialists, and retarded pseudocons.

What 'Joe' needs to understand is that the actual thief is his employer.
Nope.
 
View attachment 122629

Twitterers respond with how many houses do you need?
Once again, the lack of self awareness of the left is mind boggling.

Sanders Asks How Many Yachts Billionaires Need, Twitter Asks How Many Houses He Needs



And the correct answer is:

However many they fucking want. It's their money.

In your opinion it's OK even if it's a tax dodge?


Is it a TAX DODGE, or is it a LEGAL LOOPHOLE? If it is illegal, prosecute. If it is legal and you don't like it, change the law.

Why do you continue to protect those (like me) that continue to fuck you?

Why do you continue (along with envious pricks like Sanders) to attack those who are richer (i.e. smarter) than you?

Attacking the rich would make me a hypocrite. I simply point out that thanks to Republicans, the rich pay a very small percentage of their income/revenue in tax, much less than you.
 
How are we going to save the planet if everybody buys more than they need.....think of how green the nuke family was....only one car....only one person commuting to work......just mandating only one car per household would reduce our green house emissions immensely

True, but if I were President today, I would be pushing this country into a four day work week.

You drive to work and put in an 8 hour day. Wouldn't it be better to put in two extra hours and work four days instead?

Think of the fuel savings. One less day of rush hour. One less day of busses and trains running. Some people travel 30,40,50 miles to get to work everyday. Their savings would really add up at the end of the month.

Who would object? The environmentalists can't object because a four day work week would result in less pollution. The right can't object because the decrease in fuel would lower the price at the pump. Families would welcome the idea because nearly everybody would have a three day weekend to spend together.
I would object...I do not want to lose the pay!

Perhaps you misunderstood. My idea is for Americans to work 4-10 hour days instead of 5-8 hour days. If you put in OT, then of course that has to be considered. Companies that work 6-8 hour days could be cut to 5-10 hour days and so on.

It couldn't apply to everybody just like 5-8 hour days we have today, but 5-8 hour days are considered the standard that the majority live by.
I haven't worked an 8 hour day in ten years.

Well like I said, one rule can't apply to everybody just like it doesn't apply to everybody today. But for those that do work 5-10 hour days, I think it would be great to change that standard.

Are you paid for all 50 hours, or is your employer taking advantage of you?
 
His vacation home was inherited by his wife when her parents died, she swapped it for a cottage closer to where they live so they can utilize it.
And so what's wrong with a yacht in Hawaii, one in San Francisco, and one in Miami?
Mote Carlo is the best place to have a yacht.

That would depend on what flag the yacht is flying under.

Why?

Taxes and tariffs.
 
A thief comes into your house and takes your television. He is provided a police escort as he robs your house.

Bernie Sanders then gets up on a stump and says the solution to this problem is to raise the taxes on the guy down the street who has a bigger house than you.

Joe Republican gets up on a stump and actually manages to convince you the thief is helping you keep more of your stuff!

This is the situation today with tax expenditures, idiot socialists, and retarded pseudocons.

What 'Joe' needs to understand is that the actual thief is his employer.
Nope.

I'll bet your employer told you that.
 
What 'Joe' needs to understand is that the actual thief is his employer.
employers have to provide best jobs and products just to survive in a capitalist system. Over your head??

No. Employers provide passable products or services for their customers and convince their employees that market price is their correct pay.
 
$1.4 trillion in annual tax expenditures. That is by far the biggest reason we have a $20 trillion debt, and Republicans are more guilty of putting them in the tax code than Democrats. It's a way to raise debt and taxes undetected by the ignorant herd which has been convinced they are getting to keep more of their own money when in fact they are being robbed.

If a man builds a better mousetrap, he deserves every dollar he earns. Bernie Sanders considers that person to be the thief, and Sanders believes that entrepreneur should be severely punished.

That kind of wealth is beautiful and good. Sanders and his envious leeches wants you to bleev it is ill-gotten gains.

But there is an entirely different kind of wealth concentration which has been occurring for quite some time now right under your noses. This kind of wealth concentration is achieved through legislation which tilts the playing field to the advantage of sclerotic special interests who can no longer compete on a level playing field.

And these thieves have all the legal protections of the State to rob you blind.
 
$1.4 trillion in annual tax expenditures. That is by far the biggest reason we have a $20 trillion debt, and Republicans are more guilty of putting them in the tax code than Democrats. It's a way to raise debt and taxes undetected by the ignorant herd which has been convinced they are getting to keep more of their own money when in fact they are being robbed.

If a man builds a better mousetrap, he deserves every dollar he earns. Bernie Sanders considers that person to be the thief, and Sanders believes that entrepreneur should be severely punished.

That kind of wealth is beautiful and good. Sanders and his envious leeches wants you to bleev it is ill-gotten gains.

But there is an entirely different kind of wealth concentration which has been occurring for quite some time now right under your noses. This kind of wealth concentration is achieved through legislation which tilts the playing field to the advantage of sclerotic special interests who can no longer compete on a level playing field.

And these thieves have all the legal protections of the State to rob you blind.

"Tax expenditure" is a euphemism used by tax and spend left-wingers to raise your taxes. It's propaganda. According to g5000, if you get a tax deduction for your mortgage, you're a thief who is robbing the food used to feed children. Notice that the "tax expenditure" cranks do now want their changes in the tax code to be revenue neutral. They want to eliminate the deductions without any corresponding reduction in the rates.

It's all a scam by big government douche bags.
 
$1.4 trillion in annual tax expenditures. That is by far the biggest reason we have a $20 trillion debt, and Republicans are more guilty of putting them in the tax code than Democrats. It's a way to raise debt and taxes undetected by the ignorant herd which has been convinced they are getting to keep more of their own money when in fact they are being robbed.

If a man builds a better mousetrap, he deserves every dollar he earns. Bernie Sanders considers that person to be the thief, and Sanders believes that entrepreneur should be severely punished.

That kind of wealth is beautiful and good. Sanders and his envious leeches wants you to bleev it is ill-gotten gains.

But there is an entirely different kind of wealth concentration which has been occurring for quite some time now right under your noses. This kind of wealth concentration is achieved through legislation which tilts the playing field to the advantage of sclerotic special interests who can no longer compete on a level playing field.

And these thieves have all the legal protections of the State to rob you blind.

If employees were better paid we'd not have a $20T debt.

It is ill-gotten gains.
 
$1.4 trillion in annual tax expenditures. That is by far the biggest reason we have a $20 trillion debt, and Republicans are more guilty of putting them in the tax code than Democrats. It's a way to raise debt and taxes undetected by the ignorant herd which has been convinced they are getting to keep more of their own money when in fact they are being robbed.

If a man builds a better mousetrap, he deserves every dollar he earns. Bernie Sanders considers that person to be the thief, and Sanders believes that entrepreneur should be severely punished.

That kind of wealth is beautiful and good. Sanders and his envious leeches wants you to bleev it is ill-gotten gains.

But there is an entirely different kind of wealth concentration which has been occurring for quite some time now right under your noses. This kind of wealth concentration is achieved through legislation which tilts the playing field to the advantage of sclerotic special interests who can no longer compete on a level playing field.

And these thieves have all the legal protections of the State to rob you blind.

"Tax expenditure" is a euphemism used by tax and spend left-wingers to raise your taxes. It's propaganda. According to g5000, if you get a tax deduction for your mortgage, you're a thief who is robbing the food used to feed children. Notice that the "tax expenditure" cranks do now want their changes in the tax code to be revenue neutral. They want to eliminate the deductions without any corresponding reduction in the rates.

It's all a scam by big government douche bags.
See? The tards have been convinced they are getting to keep more of their money! What a beautiful scam.

What innumerate tards like bripat don't get is that every tax deduction, credit, or exemption HAS TO BE MADE UP FOR WITH HIGHER TAX RATES.

That's right. They are no different than food stamps. They are government gifts paid for by every taxpayer. Our rates are as high as they are because of the $1.4 trillion in government gifts these poor dumb bastards take.

And when you read the current Republican individual and business tax reform plans, they make this fact very, very clear.

Tards like bripat obviously have not gotten the memo.
 
Back
Top Bottom