Sanders says whites don't know what's it like to be poor

[protectionist]

Breitbart!

Plenty of good stuff in Breitbart. I have sourced from it many times and it's articles are very reliable. Liberals are programmed to reject any media other than liberal propaganda media. Ho hum. What else is new ?

Invalidation is hard-wired into liberals.

 

[daws101]

Correct.

Generational welfare. Perpetual poverty.

In saying that Democrats keep blacks on the planation doesn't mean, like NYcarbineer implies, that whites don't stay on the same plantation for the same reason.

So you want to argue that the use of the word 'plantation' is race neutral? ******* hell.

Since poor whites, during the days of slavery, had to farm the least desirable pieces of land owned by the plantation owners, had no way to get out of it, were indebted to the planter class, etc., yes. That you don't is more proof you don't know history. I bet you think every white person in the South owned slaves.

Your point ?
There is a gigantic difference between being free and poor and slavery.
Not everyone in the south owned slaves but those who didn't benefited from it anyway.
Trying to whitewash history are we?

There is no difference when the result of you staying there not having a choice to go elsewhere doesn't exist. I wouldn't expect you to know that.

Tell me how poor whites who, because of debt, were put in prison benefited from slavery. Tell me how poor whites who suffered from diseases benefited from slavery.

Sounds to me as if you are trying to blackwash history.

Way to rationalize, poor whites had a choice.
Their debt was of their own making.
Disease? ***** please.
Medicine was at best primative even for the rich.
Keep grasping at those straws.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Good to see Bernie wants to drop the millions of whites from welfare and food stamps.

 

[daws101]

Really? then either you lying about your mom's masters degree or you are bullshitting about the rest.

You can have a masters degree and be unemployed, or severely underemployed. Many people with masters degrees fall into both categories. And you can especially be in these categories if you are white, and therefore victimized by AFFIRMATIVE ACTION.

Yes dear now take your meds.

 

[Auld Phart]

Doesn't he know voting demographics? He must be campaigning in Detroit because if you tried that shit out west where forefathers had to actually tie a colored rope to the outhouse so you didn't get lost in a blizzard at minus 40 freaking degrees they'd laugh you off the stage.

The forefathers never went out west .
Unless you consider Kentucky the west.

At that time, yes, Kentucky was the west, as was Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois.

Not the west TD was yammering about .
But you just had to say something.

I do enjoy making you look like a fool, but at the time of the forefathers, the explored west was what I named.

In fact, many parts of NY and Pa were considered the 'west'.

It's you who's looking foolish defending trivia.
The story TD is taking about is from the 1840's long after any of the states you mentioned were considered the west.

Right.

Because areas like Boonesborough and the surrounding farms had indoor facilities in the mid 1700s, and the winters were always so mild.

The same for most of Ohio, Illinois, West Pennsyvania, northern NY.

Read some books, little boy

 

[daws101]

Breitbart!

Plenty of good stuff in Breitbart. I have sourced from it many times and it's articles are very reliable. Liberals are programmed to reject any media other than liberal propaganda media. Ho hum. What else is new ?

Invalidation is hard-wired into liberals.

Thanks for proving my point.
If nutsacks like yourself use it as a credible source there's no better evidence of it's lack of fact.

 

[Conservative65]

In saying that Democrats keep blacks on the planation doesn't mean, like NYcarbineer implies, that whites don't stay on the same plantation for the same reason.

So you want to argue that the use of the word 'plantation' is race neutral? ******* hell.

Since poor whites, during the days of slavery, had to farm the least desirable pieces of land owned by the plantation owners, had no way to get out of it, were indebted to the planter class, etc., yes. That you don't is more proof you don't know history. I bet you think every white person in the South owned slaves.

Your point ?
There is a gigantic difference between being free and poor and slavery.
Not everyone in the south owned slaves but those who didn't benefited from it anyway.
Trying to whitewash history are we?

There is no difference when the result of you staying there not having a choice to go elsewhere doesn't exist. I wouldn't expect you to know that.

Tell me how poor whites who, because of debt, were put in prison benefited from slavery. Tell me how poor whites who suffered from diseases benefited from slavery.

Sounds to me as if you are trying to blackwash history.

Way to rationalize, poor whites had a choice.
Their debt was of their own making.
Disease? ***** please.
Medicine was at best primative even for the rich.
Keep grasping at those straws.

Way to ignore history. Not when the choice they would have made was impossible due to them being poor.

Keep blackwashing history. It's how your kind does things.

 

[Conservative65]

Breitbart!

Plenty of good stuff in Breitbart. I have sourced from it many times and it's articles are very reliable. Liberals are programmed to reject any media other than liberal propaganda media. Ho hum. What else is new ?

Invalidation is hard-wired into liberals.

Thanks for proving my point.
If nutsacks like yourself use it as a credible source there's no better evidence of it's lack of fact.

Oh, you're one of those that argue the source makes it invalid.

 

[Auld Phart]

So you want to argue that the use of the word 'plantation' is race neutral? ******* hell.

Since poor whites, during the days of slavery, had to farm the least desirable pieces of land owned by the plantation owners, had no way to get out of it, were indebted to the planter class, etc., yes. That you don't is more proof you don't know history. I bet you think every white person in the South owned slaves.

Your point ?
There is a gigantic difference between being free and poor and slavery.
Not everyone in the south owned slaves but those who didn't benefited from it anyway.
Trying to whitewash history are we?

There is no difference when the result of you staying there not having a choice to go elsewhere doesn't exist. I wouldn't expect you to know that.

Tell me how poor whites who, because of debt, were put in prison benefited from slavery. Tell me how poor whites who suffered from diseases benefited from slavery.

Sounds to me as if you are trying to blackwash history.

Way to rationalize, poor whites had a choice.
Their debt was of their own making.
Disease? ***** please.
Medicine was at best primative even for the rich.
Keep grasping at those straws.

Way to ignore history. Not when the choice they would have made was impossible due to them being poor.

Keep blackwashing history. It's how your kind does things.

Bet he never heard of the 'company store' in mining towns

 

[daws101]

The forefathers never went out west .
Unless you consider Kentucky the west.

At that time, yes, Kentucky was the west, as was Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois.

Not the west TD was yammering about .
But you just had to say something.

I do enjoy making you look like a fool, but at the time of the forefathers, the explored west was what I named.

In fact, many parts of NY and Pa were considered the 'west'.

It's you who's looking foolish defending trivia.
The story TD is taking about is from the 1840's long after any of the states you mentioned were considered the west.

Right.

Because areas like Boonesborough and the surrounding farms had indoor facilities in the mid 1700s, and the winters were always so mild.

The same for most of Ohio, Illinois, West Pennsyvania, northern NY.

Read some books, little boy

Have read all the books .
I have hemorrhoids older than you.

 

[daws101]

Breitbart!

Plenty of good stuff in Breitbart. I have sourced from it many times and it's articles are very reliable. Liberals are programmed to reject any media other than liberal propaganda media. Ho hum. What else is new ?

Invalidation is hard-wired into liberals.

Thanks for proving my point.
If nutsacks like yourself use it as a credible source there's no better evidence of it's lack of fact.

Oh, you're one of those that argue the source makes it invalid.

Only because it's true.
If the source is not credible or bias it's automatically invalid.

 

[daws101]

Since poor whites, during the days of slavery, had to farm the least desirable pieces of land owned by the plantation owners, had no way to get out of it, were indebted to the planter class, etc., yes. That you don't is more proof you don't know history. I bet you think every white person in the South owned slaves.

Your point ?
There is a gigantic difference between being free and poor and slavery.
Not everyone in the south owned slaves but those who didn't benefited from it anyway.
Trying to whitewash history are we?

There is no difference when the result of you staying there not having a choice to go elsewhere doesn't exist. I wouldn't expect you to know that.

Tell me how poor whites who, because of debt, were put in prison benefited from slavery. Tell me how poor whites who suffered from diseases benefited from slavery.

Sounds to me as if you are trying to blackwash history.

Way to rationalize, poor whites had a choice.
Their debt was of their own making.
Disease? ***** please.
Medicine was at best primative even for the rich.
Keep grasping at those straws.

Way to ignore history. Not when the choice they would have made was impossible due to them being poor.

Keep blackwashing history. It's how your kind does things.

Bet he never heard of the 'company store' in mining towns

Again you'd be absolutely wrong.

 

[Auld Phart]

Have read all the books .

If I were you, I'd try to get a refund on my library card.

I have hemorrhoids older than you

Family inheritance?

 

[Auld Phart]

Breitbart!

Plenty of good stuff in Breitbart. I have sourced from it many times and it's articles are very reliable. Liberals are programmed to reject any media other than liberal propaganda media. Ho hum. What else is new ?

Invalidation is hard-wired into liberals.

Thanks for proving my point.
If nutsacks like yourself use it as a credible source there's no better evidence of it's lack of fact.

Oh, you're one of those that argue the source makes it invalid.

Only because it's true.
If the source is not credible or bias it's automatically invalid.

Like the NYTs, DNC.org, Mother Jones, etc?

 

[daws101]

Have read all the books .

If I were you, I'd try to get a refund on my library card.

I have hemorrhoids older than you

Family inheritance?

You wish .

 

[Auld Phart]

Your point ?
There is a gigantic difference between being free and poor and slavery.
Not everyone in the south owned slaves but those who didn't benefited from it anyway.
Trying to whitewash history are we?

There is no difference when the result of you staying there not having a choice to go elsewhere doesn't exist. I wouldn't expect you to know that.

Tell me how poor whites who, because of debt, were put in prison benefited from slavery. Tell me how poor whites who suffered from diseases benefited from slavery.

Sounds to me as if you are trying to blackwash history.

Way to rationalize, poor whites had a choice.
Their debt was of their own making.
Disease? ***** please.
Medicine was at best primative even for the rich.
Keep grasping at those straws.

Way to ignore history. Not when the choice they would have made was impossible due to them being poor.

Keep blackwashing history. It's how your kind does things.

Bet he never heard of the 'company store' in mining towns

Again you'd be absolutely wrong.

Then why are you making such stupid assumptions about poverty?

 

[daws101]

Breitbart!

Plenty of good stuff in Breitbart. I have sourced from it many times and it's articles are very reliable. Liberals are programmed to reject any media other than liberal propaganda media. Ho hum. What else is new ?

Invalidation is hard-wired into liberals.

Thanks for proving my point.
If nutsacks like yourself use it as a credible source there's no better evidence of it's lack of fact.

Oh, you're one of those that argue the source makes it invalid.

Only because it's true.
If the source is not credible or bias it's automatically invalid.

Like the NYTs, DNC.org, Mother Jones, etc?

Some times !
Unlike conservative sources which only get it right by accident.

 

[daws101]

There is no difference when the result of you staying there not having a choice to go elsewhere doesn't exist. I wouldn't expect you to know that.

Tell me how poor whites who, because of debt, were put in prison benefited from slavery. Tell me how poor whites who suffered from diseases benefited from slavery.

Sounds to me as if you are trying to blackwash history.

Way to rationalize, poor whites had a choice.
Their debt was of their own making.
Disease? ***** please.
Medicine was at best primative even for the rich.
Keep grasping at those straws.

Way to ignore history. Not when the choice they would have made was impossible due to them being poor.

Keep blackwashing history. It's how your kind does things.

Bet he never heard of the 'company store' in mining towns

Again you'd be absolutely wrong.

Then why are you making such stupid assumptions about poverty?

Because I grew up poor .
Everything thing you assholes have said about it is wrong.

 

[protectionist]

What folks may not realize is that the whining douchebags on the MSM and diplomats from ZOGs around the world are silent on the actual racism exhibited by Sanders and Clinton.

Absolutely. Like their support for the # 1 "institutional racism" that Blustering Bernie yammers about, + all the racists who they support, and who endorse them (ex. Beyonce', Jamie Foxx, Chris Rock, Snoop Dog, Kanye West, to name just a few. And also racist and malicious organizations they support and who endorse them >> NAACP, New Black Panthers, Black Lives Matter, La Raza ("the race"), LULAC, MALDEF, MECHA (also a terrorist org), CAIR, ISNA, MSA, et al Muslim Brotherhood bigot orgs, ,Planned Parenthood, NOW, etc etc..

 

[Conservative65]

Plenty of good stuff in Breitbart. I have sourced from it many times and it's articles are very reliable. Liberals are programmed to reject any media other than liberal propaganda media. Ho hum. What else is new ?

Invalidation is hard-wired into liberals.

Thanks for proving my point.
If nutsacks like yourself use it as a credible source there's no better evidence of it's lack of fact.

Oh, you're one of those that argue the source makes it invalid.

Only because it's true.
If the source is not credible or bias it's automatically invalid.

Like the NYTs, DNC.org, Mother Jones, etc?

Some times !
Unlike conservative sources which only get it right by accident.

You mean those conservative sites that say the same thing as non-conservative sites but are dismissed because they are a conservative SITE?