CDZ Same Sex Marriage (and the Bible)

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Agree or Disagree? Rebuttals?

How did marriage start? It began when God created Eve to be Adam's wife. God is the creator of the marriage relationship ... Genesis 2:18 - "Then the Lord God said, “It is not good for the man to be alone. I will make a helper who is just right for him.” And so he created Eve, a woman, to be a companion for Adam.
These scriptures make it clear that God designed marriage to be heterosexual. A man and a woman.

Homosexuality is not God's pattern for marriage and family relationships. The Bible makes that clear.
"Do not practice homosexuality, having sex with another man as with a woman. It is a detestable sin." (Leviticus 18:22)

Homosexual relationships are unnatural. They cause diseases. And worst of all, they dishonor God.

Religious mumbo jumbo causes diseases. Look at the Plague in medevel Europe. Thinking black cats were familars of the Devil, religious people slaughtered them en masse' when the cats were the only thing keeping the rats infested with plague-carrying fleas in check spreading the plague even faster.

By definition, anything other animals do is 'natural.'

Natural?

It's amazing how much the Left struggles with proper context. Just because something is natural, doesn't make it viable...

The Left claims that homosexual behavior is found in nature, therefore it is 'natural'.

Ya know what else is natural?

Syphillis is natural. The HIV... is natural.

Both are commonly found infecting homo- and bi-sexuals.

"Syphilis has returned with a vengeance to the gay community, U.S. health officials reported Friday.
Syphilis Cases Climbing Among Gay Men CDC WebMD


Cases of the sexually transmitted disease, once almost eliminated in the United States, have more than doubled among gay and bisexual men since the year 2000, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention."

"Gay and bisexual men are more severely affected by HIV than any other group in the United States.

Among all gay and bisexual men, black/African American gay and bisexual men bear a disproportionate burden of HIV.

From 2008 to 2010, HIV infections among young black/African American gay and bisexual men increased 20%."
CDC Fact Sheet - Gay and Bisexual Men Gender Risk HIV AIDS

Now those are the facts... and there's nothing viable about deadly, life altering disease that correlates with one's 'sexual choices'. Which means that if one's sexual choices.. results in the contraction of deadly disease, one's sexual choices are NOT VIABLE.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

No..she is p'ed off big time. She gets that way whenever folks down here justify their hatred and bigotry by faith in her.

Then you've got real trouble, given that the use of the word bigotry, is a demonstration OF bigotry... .

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

...Jesus was not nonviolent. His tantrum in the temple doesn't begin to cover it. He murdered at least 3 people. Read the Infancy Gospels sometime.

For starters, Killing is not murder. Murder is the morally, thus legally unjustified taking of a human life...

Read the dictionary sometime.

Second, the Infancy Gospels are not Scripture.

Third, Christ is not a pacifist... he is a bad ass beyond your means to comprehend. He came to earth to spare people who are not deserving of sparing. And when those people rejected his good news, as he knew they would, he allowed himself to be arrested, beaten to within an inch of his life and nailed to a cross and hung their to die... .

Now that is a serious man, doing serious work, in which he believes strongly.

Now the good news is that Christ will return some day... and those present on that day will come to find that the rumors that he's a dope smokin' free spirit hippy... but is instead an objective, well reasoned being, who did everything possible to help a species that is, at the end of the day, prone toward its own destruction and he will be holding the species to account... to the last man, woman and child.

 

[auditor0007]

There has always been homosexuality among higher animals. There is nothing unnatural about homosexuality or same sex /relationships/marriage.

THAT is what true Christians should believe because they also believe that a god created them. If they believe homosexuality is unnatural, they must also believe that their god makes mistakes.

The same could be said about male circumcision. The religious must believe their god made a mistake so they chop off the offending error.

More than anything else, what consenting adults do together is their business.

MYOB

God created MAN (human beings) to be heterosexual.

Had it not been for original sin, none of the other sexual deviancies would have entered the world.
Even so, God commands marriage and relationships be heterosexual. We have to deny ourselves impulses and feelings to the contrary.

God made man and woman in a perfect state, yet, made them to have a free will choice.
They chose wrong and have been paying the price ever since. Adam and Eve are to blame for homosexuality (and every other sin) being in the world. Not God.

God hates those who do not abide by his every word, because he really is concerned for us, and our being heterosexual is going to make a huge difference on what happens in the universe. If someone is gay, they will turn the universe upside down and Lucifer may actually take over. Ever ask yourself why God would give a crap over a person's sexual preference? Is God really that much of an authoritarian dictator that he will send someone to an afterlife of burning in Hell for being gay? Sorry, but I have a real problem with that.

 

[Bonzi]

There has always been homosexuality among higher animals. There is nothing unnatural about homosexuality or same sex /relationships/marriage.

THAT is what true Christians should believe because they also believe that a god created them. If they believe homosexuality is unnatural, they must also believe that their god makes mistakes.

The same could be said about male circumcision. The religious must believe their god made a mistake so they chop off the offending error.

More than anything else, what consenting adults do together is their business.

MYOB

God created MAN (human beings) to be heterosexual.

Had it not been for original sin, none of the other sexual deviancies would have entered the world.
Even so, God commands marriage and relationships be heterosexual. We have to deny ourselves impulses and feelings to the contrary.

God made man and woman in a perfect state, yet, made them to have a free will choice.
They chose wrong and have been paying the price ever since. Adam and Eve are to blame for homosexuality (and every other sin) being in the world. Not God.

God hates those who do not abide by his every word, because he really is concerned for us, and our being heterosexual is going to make a huge difference on what happens in the universe. If someone is gay, they will turn the universe upside down and Lucifer may actually take over. Ever ask yourself why God would give a crap over a person's sexual preference? Is God really that much of an authoritarian dictator that he will send someone to an afterlife of burning in Hell for being gay? Sorry, but I have a real problem with that.

BTW = Go Blackhawks!

Anyway, not, God has a problem with SIN of all kinds - he's perfect so, can't abide sin to have complete communion with us. When we are on this earth we will always sin; but as a Christian, you will want to OBEY God - and God said men with men is an abomination to him (so yes, he does care) -

If you are not a Christian, anything goes. Some non-Christians believe homosexuality is bad for society etc. as well though....

 

[Moonglow]

Adam had a wife before Eve, but she ran off....

 

[paddymurphy]

No..she is p'ed off big time. She gets that way whenever folks down here justify their hatred and bigotry by faith in her.

Then you've got real trouble, given that the use of the word bigotry, is a demonstration OF bigotry... .

No, it is not. What utter nonsense.

 

[paddymurphy]

Agree or Disagree? Rebuttals?

How did marriage start? It began when God created Eve to be Adam's wife. God is the creator of the marriage relationship ... Genesis 2:18 - "Then the Lord God said, “It is not good for the man to be alone. I will make a helper who is just right for him.” And so he created Eve, a woman, to be a companion for Adam.
These scriptures make it clear that God designed marriage to be heterosexual. A man and a woman.

Homosexuality is not God's pattern for marriage and family relationships. The Bible makes that clear.
"Do not practice homosexuality, having sex with another man as with a woman. It is a detestable sin." (Leviticus 18:22)

Homosexual relationships are unnatural. They cause diseases. And worst of all, they dishonor God.

Religious mumbo jumbo causes diseases. Look at the Plague in medevel Europe. Thinking black cats were familars of the Devil, religious people slaughtered them en masse' when the cats were the only thing keeping the rats infested with plague-carrying fleas in check spreading the plague even faster.

By definition, anything other animals do is 'natural.'

Natural?

It's amazing how much the Left struggles with proper context. Just because something is natural, doesn't make it viable...

The Left claims that homosexual behavior is found in nature, therefore it is 'natural'.

Ya know what else is natural?

Syphillis is natural. The HIV... is natural.

Both are commonly found infecting homo- and bi-sexuals.

"Syphilis has returned with a vengeance to the gay community, U.S. health officials reported Friday.
Syphilis Cases Climbing Among Gay Men CDC WebMD


Cases of the sexually transmitted disease, once almost eliminated in the United States, have more than doubled among gay and bisexual men since the year 2000, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention."

"Gay and bisexual men are more severely affected by HIV than any other group in the United States.

Among all gay and bisexual men, black/African American gay and bisexual men bear a disproportionate burden of HIV.

From 2008 to 2010, HIV infections among young black/African American gay and bisexual men increased 20%."
CDC Fact Sheet - Gay and Bisexual Men Gender Risk HIV AIDS

Now those are the facts... and there's nothing viable about deadly, life altering disease that correlates with one's 'sexual choices'. Which means that if one's sexual choices.. results in the contraction of deadly disease, one's sexual choices are NOT VIABLE.

Well, with all this promiscuity among gays, we better demand that they become monogamous, in committed, lifelong relationships with legally binding responsibilities. What do they call that relationship? Oh, yeah, marriage. Great to see you support marriage equality as a means of fighting promiscuity. By the way, since gay women have less incidence of sexually transmitted disease than straight people, does that mean that being a lesbian is nature's preferred state?

 

[Delta4Embassy]

Agree or Disagree? Rebuttals?

How did marriage start? It began when God created Eve to be Adam's wife. God is the creator of the marriage relationship ... Genesis 2:18 - "Then the Lord God said, “It is not good for the man to be alone. I will make a helper who is just right for him.” And so he created Eve, a woman, to be a companion for Adam.
These scriptures make it clear that God designed marriage to be heterosexual. A man and a woman.

Homosexuality is not God's pattern for marriage and family relationships. The Bible makes that clear.
"Do not practice homosexuality, having sex with another man as with a woman. It is a detestable sin." (Leviticus 18:22)

Homosexual relationships are unnatural. They cause diseases. And worst of all, they dishonor God.

Religious mumbo jumbo causes diseases. Look at the Plague in medevel Europe. Thinking black cats were familars of the Devil, religious people slaughtered them en masse' when the cats were the only thing keeping the rats infested with plague-carrying fleas in check spreading the plague even faster.

By definition, anything other animals do is 'natural.'

Natural?

It's amazing how much the Left struggles with proper context. Just because something is natural, doesn't make it viable...

The Left claims that homosexual behavior is found in nature, therefore it is 'natural'.

Ya know what else is natural?

Syphillis is natural. The HIV... is natural.

Both are commonly found infecting homo- and bi-sexuals.

"Syphilis has returned with a vengeance to the gay community, U.S. health officials reported Friday.
Syphilis Cases Climbing Among Gay Men CDC WebMD


Cases of the sexually transmitted disease, once almost eliminated in the United States, have more than doubled among gay and bisexual men since the year 2000, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention."

"Gay and bisexual men are more severely affected by HIV than any other group in the United States.

Among all gay and bisexual men, black/African American gay and bisexual men bear a disproportionate burden of HIV.

From 2008 to 2010, HIV infections among young black/African American gay and bisexual men increased 20%."
CDC Fact Sheet - Gay and Bisexual Men Gender Risk HIV AIDS

Now those are the facts... and there's nothing viable about deadly, life altering disease that correlates with one's 'sexual choices'. Which means that if one's sexual choices.. results in the contraction of deadly disease, one's sexual choices are NOT VIABLE.

Well, with all this promiscuity among gays, we better demand that they become monogamous, in committed, lifelong relationships with legally binding responsibilities. What do they call that relationship? Oh, yeah, marriage. Great to see you support marriage equality as a means of fighting promiscuity. By the way, since gay women have less incidence of sexually transmitted disease than straight people, does that mean that being a lesbian is nature's preferred state?

Marriage in and of itself doesn't imply monogamy as swinging and wife-swapping attests.

 

[paddymurphy]

Agree or Disagree? Rebuttals?

How did marriage start? It began when God created Eve to be Adam's wife. God is the creator of the marriage relationship ... Genesis 2:18 - "Then the Lord God said, “It is not good for the man to be alone. I will make a helper who is just right for him.” And so he created Eve, a woman, to be a companion for Adam.
These scriptures make it clear that God designed marriage to be heterosexual. A man and a woman.

Homosexuality is not God's pattern for marriage and family relationships. The Bible makes that clear.
"Do not practice homosexuality, having sex with another man as with a woman. It is a detestable sin." (Leviticus 18:22)

Homosexual relationships are unnatural. They cause diseases. And worst of all, they dishonor God.

Religious mumbo jumbo causes diseases. Look at the Plague in medevel Europe. Thinking black cats were familars of the Devil, religious people slaughtered them en masse' when the cats were the only thing keeping the rats infested with plague-carrying fleas in check spreading the plague even faster.

By definition, anything other animals do is 'natural.'

Natural?

It's amazing how much the Left struggles with proper context. Just because something is natural, doesn't make it viable...

The Left claims that homosexual behavior is found in nature, therefore it is 'natural'.

Ya know what else is natural?

Syphillis is natural. The HIV... is natural.

Both are commonly found infecting homo- and bi-sexuals.

"Syphilis has returned with a vengeance to the gay community, U.S. health officials reported Friday.
Syphilis Cases Climbing Among Gay Men CDC WebMD


Cases of the sexually transmitted disease, once almost eliminated in the United States, have more than doubled among gay and bisexual men since the year 2000, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention."

"Gay and bisexual men are more severely affected by HIV than any other group in the United States.

Among all gay and bisexual men, black/African American gay and bisexual men bear a disproportionate burden of HIV.

From 2008 to 2010, HIV infections among young black/African American gay and bisexual men increased 20%."
CDC Fact Sheet - Gay and Bisexual Men Gender Risk HIV AIDS

Now those are the facts... and there's nothing viable about deadly, life altering disease that correlates with one's 'sexual choices'. Which means that if one's sexual choices.. results in the contraction of deadly disease, one's sexual choices are NOT VIABLE.

Well, with all this promiscuity among gays, we better demand that they become monogamous, in committed, lifelong relationships with legally binding responsibilities. What do they call that relationship? Oh, yeah, marriage. Great to see you support marriage equality as a means of fighting promiscuity. By the way, since gay women have less incidence of sexually transmitted disease than straight people, does that mean that being a lesbian is nature's preferred state?

Marriage in and of itself doesn't imply monogamy as swinging and wife-swapping attests.

Actually, it does. That some folks violate the vows they took, does not change the fact that marriage involves monogamy.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Agree or Disagree? Rebuttals?

How did marriage start? It began when God created Eve to be Adam's wife. God is the creator of the marriage relationship ... Genesis 2:18 - "Then the Lord God said, “It is not good for the man to be alone. I will make a helper who is just right for him.” And so he created Eve, a woman, to be a companion for Adam.
These scriptures make it clear that God designed marriage to be heterosexual. A man and a woman.

Homosexuality is not God's pattern for marriage and family relationships. The Bible makes that clear.
"Do not practice homosexuality, having sex with another man as with a woman. It is a detestable sin." (Leviticus 18:22)

Homosexual relationships are unnatural. They cause diseases. And worst of all, they dishonor God.

Religious mumbo jumbo causes diseases. Look at the Plague in medevel Europe. Thinking black cats were familars of the Devil, religious people slaughtered them en masse' when the cats were the only thing keeping the rats infested with plague-carrying fleas in check spreading the plague even faster.

By definition, anything other animals do is 'natural.'

Natural?

It's amazing how much the Left struggles with proper context. Just because something is natural, doesn't make it viable...

The Left claims that homosexual behavior is found in nature, therefore it is 'natural'.

Ya know what else is natural?

Syphillis is natural. The HIV... is natural.

Both are commonly found infecting homo- and bi-sexuals.

"Syphilis has returned with a vengeance to the gay community, U.S. health officials reported Friday.
Syphilis Cases Climbing Among Gay Men CDC WebMD


Cases of the sexually transmitted disease, once almost eliminated in the United States, have more than doubled among gay and bisexual men since the year 2000, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention."

"Gay and bisexual men are more severely affected by HIV than any other group in the United States.

Among all gay and bisexual men, black/African American gay and bisexual men bear a disproportionate burden of HIV.

From 2008 to 2010, HIV infections among young black/African American gay and bisexual men increased 20%."
CDC Fact Sheet - Gay and Bisexual Men Gender Risk HIV AIDS

Now those are the facts... and there's nothing viable about deadly, life altering disease that correlates with one's 'sexual choices'. Which means that if one's sexual choices.. results in the contraction of deadly disease, one's sexual choices are NOT VIABLE.

Well, with all this promiscuity among gays, we better demand that they become monogamous, in committed, lifelong relationships with legally binding responsibilities. What do they call that relationship? Oh, yeah, marriage. Great to see you support marriage equality as a means of fighting promiscuity. By the way, since gay women have less incidence of sexually transmitted disease than straight people, does that mean that being a lesbian is nature's preferred state?

Promiscuity is intrinsic to homosexuality... .

Understand that what we're discussing here is sexual deviancy. The notion that a sexual deviant; which is to say one whose sexual cravings deviate from the human sexual standard, is limited to say Craving sexual gratification through sexual interaction with the person of the same gender, is fairly short cited.

This is because, in terms of the scope of deviating from the human sexual standard, homosexuality deviates as far from that standard as is possible, where the subjects at issue remain exclusively human.

Thus the subject: homosexual deviancy, spans the ENTIRE FIELD of possible ways to deviate from the human sexual standard... . therefore all bets with regard to any lines that they may draw, are off, as they've drown no line... and could't give a red rats ass about any lines. All they are concerned with is their own subjective needs and getting those would-be itches, scratched.

 

[paddymurphy]

Agree or Disagree? Rebuttals?

How did marriage start? It began when God created Eve to be Adam's wife. God is the creator of the marriage relationship ... Genesis 2:18 - "Then the Lord God said, “It is not good for the man to be alone. I will make a helper who is just right for him.” And so he created Eve, a woman, to be a companion for Adam.
These scriptures make it clear that God designed marriage to be heterosexual. A man and a woman.

Homosexuality is not God's pattern for marriage and family relationships. The Bible makes that clear.
"Do not practice homosexuality, having sex with another man as with a woman. It is a detestable sin." (Leviticus 18:22)

Homosexual relationships are unnatural. They cause diseases. And worst of all, they dishonor God.

Religious mumbo jumbo causes diseases. Look at the Plague in medevel Europe. Thinking black cats were familars of the Devil, religious people slaughtered them en masse' when the cats were the only thing keeping the rats infested with plague-carrying fleas in check spreading the plague even faster.

By definition, anything other animals do is 'natural.'

Natural?

It's amazing how much the Left struggles with proper context. Just because something is natural, doesn't make it viable...

The Left claims that homosexual behavior is found in nature, therefore it is 'natural'.

Ya know what else is natural?

Syphillis is natural. The HIV... is natural.

Both are commonly found infecting homo- and bi-sexuals.

"Syphilis has returned with a vengeance to the gay community, U.S. health officials reported Friday.
Syphilis Cases Climbing Among Gay Men CDC WebMD


Cases of the sexually transmitted disease, once almost eliminated in the United States, have more than doubled among gay and bisexual men since the year 2000, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention."

"Gay and bisexual men are more severely affected by HIV than any other group in the United States.

Among all gay and bisexual men, black/African American gay and bisexual men bear a disproportionate burden of HIV.

From 2008 to 2010, HIV infections among young black/African American gay and bisexual men increased 20%."
CDC Fact Sheet - Gay and Bisexual Men Gender Risk HIV AIDS

Now those are the facts... and there's nothing viable about deadly, life altering disease that correlates with one's 'sexual choices'. Which means that if one's sexual choices.. results in the contraction of deadly disease, one's sexual choices are NOT VIABLE.

Well, with all this promiscuity among gays, we better demand that they become monogamous, in committed, lifelong relationships with legally binding responsibilities. What do they call that relationship? Oh, yeah, marriage. Great to see you support marriage equality as a means of fighting promiscuity. By the way, since gay women have less incidence of sexually transmitted disease than straight people, does that mean that being a lesbian is nature's preferred state?

Promiscuity is intrinsic to homosexuality... .

Understand that what we're discussing here is sexual deviancy. The notion that a sexual deviant; which is to say one whose sexual cravings deviate from the human sexual standard, is limited to say Craving sexual gratification through sexual interaction with the person of the same gender, is fairly short cited.

This is because, in terms of the scope of deviating from the human sexual standard, homosexuality deviates as far from that standard as is possible, where the subjects at issue remain exclusively human.

Thus the subject: homosexual deviancy, spans the ENTIRE FIELD of possible ways to deviate from the human sexual standard... . therefore all bets with regard to any lines that they may draw, are off, as they've drown no line... and could't give a red rats ass about any lines. All they are concerned with is their own subjective needs and getting those would-be itches, scratched.

I have more of a problem with intellectual deviancy. It is something that afflicts you and those who think like you. You guys keep passing it back and forth like some nasty virus. Your obsession with the sex lives of others is really weird.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

God hates those who do not abide by his every word, because he really is concerned for us, and our being heterosexual is going to make a huge difference on what happens in the universe. If someone is gay, they will turn the universe upside down and Lucifer may actually take over. ...

Ahh... sarcasm. Such requires great care, or the next thing ya know, it trips over an unexpected truth.

In point of fact, where you point out Lucifer, AKA: The Lord of Darkness... the destroyer, the purveyor of chaos, calamity and catastrophe; and with regard to its taking over... I'd point out that in the wake of every single point in human history where sexual deviancy found public normality... a darkness had in fact 'taken over' and toward proof of that... we can find not a single example of a culture which came to that point, which survived it.

Now you're free to correct me... I'd love to see examples of historical cultures that embraced the normalization of sexual deviancy that from that point rose to prosperity, sustained viability and success.

Please, take a moment and enlighten the board as to your knowledge of how degeneracy, debauchery and perversion have produced the consequences otherwise common to virtuous behavior.

 

[paddymurphy]

God hates those who do not abide by his every word, because he really is concerned for us, and our being heterosexual is going to make a huge difference on what happens in the universe. If someone is gay, they will turn the universe upside down and Lucifer may actually take over. ...

Ahh... sarcasm. Such requires great care, or the next thing ya know, it trips over an unexpected truth.

In point of fact, where you point out Lucifer, AKA: The Lord of Darkness... the destroyer, the purveyor of chaos, calamity and catastrophe; and with regard to its taking over... I'd point out that in the wake of every single point in human history where sexual deviancy found public normality... a darkness had in fact 'taken over' and toward proof of that... we can find not a single example of a culture which came to that point, which survived it.

Now you're free to correct me... I'd love to see examples of historical cultures that embraced the normalization of sexual deviancy that from that point rose to prosperity, sustained viability and success.

Please, take a moment and enlighten the board as to your knowledge of how degeneracy, debauchery and perversion have produced the consequences otherwise common to virtuous behavior.

I am pretty sure blow jobs, which you would clearly consider deviant since they are not natural in that they use a part of the body for other than its biological purpose, have been rather popular and fairly normal in most cultures of the last century or two. Don't think polishing the knob has brought down any cultures (though one did nearly bring down a President).

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

I have more of a problem with intellectual deviancy. It is something that afflicts you and those who think like you. You guys keep passing it back and forth like some nasty virus. Your obsession with the sex lives of others is really weird.

Does it now?

Well let's test that... shall we?

Intellectual deviancy?

First we should define the terms so that we can both agree on the subject at hand and not get sidetracked in misunderstanding of the elements that comprise the scope of the discussion.

Intellect: the faculty of reasoning and understanding objectively, especially with regard to abstract or academic matters; a term used in studies of the human mind, and refers to the ability of the mind to come to correct conclusions about what is true or real, and about how to solve problems.

Deviancy: the fact or state of departing from usual or accepted standards, especially in social or sexual behavior.

Thus the Intellectual Deviant is one who would use their mind toward deflection, obscuring the distinction between what is real and true.

Now my position is that Promiscuity is intrinsic to homosexuality... .

Understand that what we're discussing here is sexual deviancy. The notion that a sexual deviant; which is to say one whose sexual cravings deviate from the human sexual standard, to the point that they... say, crave sexual gratification through sexual interaction with the person of the same gender, would be limited to such, is fairly short cited.

This is because, in terms of the scope of deviating from the human sexual standard, homosexuality deviates as far from that standard as is possible, where the subjects at issue remain exclusively human.

Thus the subject: homo-sexual deviancy, spans the ENTIRE FIELD of possible deviations from the human sexual standard... . Therefore all bets with regard to any lines that they may draw, are off, as they've drawn no line between normality and the antithesis of such... ergo; they could't give a red rats ass about any lines. All they are concerned with is their own subjective needs and getting those would-be itches, scratched.

Now you have come to declare that position as evidence of Intellectual Deviancy.

So the terms central to the argument are defined... Now please show the board where you feel that the argument deviates from the pursuit of that which is real, OKA: Reality... thus that which is true.

For your edification:

• Homosexuality is sexuality that deviates from the Human physiological standard.
• Homosexuality represent sexuality that ranges as far from the Human physiological standard as can be produced, where the subjects at issue remain Exclusively human.
• Thus the entire scope of deviant sexual behavior; with regard to sexual behavior limited exclusively to human beings, sits between the human physiological standard (normality) and Homosexuality.
• Ergo, it is not reasonable to expect that the homosexual will respect any sexual boundary which rests between normality and that which they have chosen to define themselves the farthest point possible, from sexual normality.

GO!

 

[paddymurphy]

Religious mumbo jumbo causes diseases. Look at the Plague in medevel Europe. Thinking black cats were familars of the Devil, religious people slaughtered them en masse' when the cats were the only thing keeping the rats infested with plague-carrying fleas in check spreading the plague even faster.

By definition, anything other animals do is 'natural.'

Natural?

It's amazing how much the Left struggles with proper context. Just because something is natural, doesn't make it viable...

The Left claims that homosexual behavior is found in nature, therefore it is 'natural'.

Ya know what else is natural?

Syphillis is natural. The HIV... is natural.

Both are commonly found infecting homo- and bi-sexuals.

"Syphilis has returned with a vengeance to the gay community, U.S. health officials reported Friday.
Syphilis Cases Climbing Among Gay Men CDC WebMD


Cases of the sexually transmitted disease, once almost eliminated in the United States, have more than doubled among gay and bisexual men since the year 2000, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention."

"Gay and bisexual men are more severely affected by HIV than any other group in the United States.

Among all gay and bisexual men, black/African American gay and bisexual men bear a disproportionate burden of HIV.

From 2008 to 2010, HIV infections among young black/African American gay and bisexual men increased 20%."
CDC Fact Sheet - Gay and Bisexual Men Gender Risk HIV AIDS

Now those are the facts... and there's nothing viable about deadly, life altering disease that correlates with one's 'sexual choices'. Which means that if one's sexual choices.. results in the contraction of deadly disease, one's sexual choices are NOT VIABLE.

Well, with all this promiscuity among gays, we better demand that they become monogamous, in committed, lifelong relationships with legally binding responsibilities. What do they call that relationship? Oh, yeah, marriage. Great to see you support marriage equality as a means of fighting promiscuity. By the way, since gay women have less incidence of sexually transmitted disease than straight people, does that mean that being a lesbian is nature's preferred state?

Promiscuity is intrinsic to homosexuality... .

Understand that what we're discussing here is sexual deviancy. The notion that a sexual deviant; which is to say one whose sexual cravings deviate from the human sexual standard, is limited to say Craving sexual gratification through sexual interaction with the person of the same gender, is fairly short cited.

This is because, in terms of the scope of deviating from the human sexual standard, homosexuality deviates as far from that standard as is possible, where the subjects at issue remain exclusively human.

Thus the subject: homosexual deviancy, spans the ENTIRE FIELD of possible ways to deviate from the human sexual standard... . therefore all bets with regard to any lines that they may draw, are off, as they've drown no line... and could't give a red rats ass about any lines. All they are concerned with is their own subjective needs and getting those would-be itches, scratched.

I have more of a problem with intellectual deviancy. It is something that afflicts you and those who think like you. You guys keep passing it back and forth like some nasty virus. Your obsession with the sex lives of others is really weird.

Does it now?

Well let's test that... shall we?

Intellectual deviancy?

First we should define the terms so that we can both agree on the subject at hand and not get sidetracked in misunderstanding of the elements that comprise the scope of the discussion.

Intellect: the faculty of reasoning and understanding objectively, especially with regard to abstract or academic matters; a term used in studies of the human mind, and refers to the ability of the mind to come to correct conclusions about what is true or real, and about how to solve problems.

Deviancy: the fact or state of departing from usual or accepted standards, especially in social or sexual behavior.

Thus the Intellectual Deviant is one who would use their mind toward deflection, obscuring the distinction between what is real and true.

Now my position is that Promiscuity is intrinsic to homosexuality... .

Understand that what we're discussing here is sexual deviancy. The notion that a sexual deviant; which is to say one whose sexual cravings deviate from the human sexual standard, is limited to say Craving sexual gratification through sexual interaction with the person of the same gender, is fairly short cited.

This is because, in terms of the scope of deviating from the human sexual standard, homosexuality deviates as far from that standard as is possible, where the subjects at issue remain exclusively human.

Thus the subject: homosexual deviancy, spans the ENTIRE FIELD of possible ways to deviate from the human sexual standard... . therefore all bets with regard to any lines that they may draw, are off, as they've drown no line... and could't give a red rats ass about any lines. All they are concerned with is their own subjective needs and getting those would-be itches, scratched.

Now you have come to declare that position as evidence of Intellectual Deviancy.

So the terms central to the argument are defined... Now please show the board where you feel that the argument deviates from the pursuit of that which is real, OKA: Reality... thus that which is true.

For your edification:

• Homosexuality is sexuality that deviates from the Human physiological standard.
• Homosexuality represent sexuality that ranges as far from the Human physiological standard as can be produced, where the subjects at issue remain Exclusively human.
• Thus the entire scope of deviant sexual behavior; with regard to sexual behavior limited exclusively to human beings, sits between the human physiological standard (normality) and Homosexuality.
• Ergo, it is not reasonable to expect that the homosexual will respect any sexual boundary which rests between normality and that which they have chosen to define themselves the farther point possible from sexual normality.

GO!/QUOTE]

So, you have no problem with two of the same gender doing all of the things married straight couple do, as long as they don't ****? They can live together, raise kids together, share their property and income, support each other emotionally, and that is fine with you. You just want to make sure that when they are in the privacy of their own home they only obtain sexual gratification in the manner you think is acceptable? Does this apply to straight couples as well? No mor bjs? No more hand jobs? You what is truly sexually deviant? Your obsession with the sex acts of other adults.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Natural?

It's amazing how much the Left struggles with proper context. Just because something is natural, doesn't make it viable...

The Left claims that homosexual behavior is found in nature, therefore it is 'natural'.

Ya know what else is natural?

Syphillis is natural. The HIV... is natural.

Both are commonly found infecting homo- and bi-sexuals.

"Syphilis has returned with a vengeance to the gay community, U.S. health officials reported Friday.
Syphilis Cases Climbing Among Gay Men CDC WebMD


Cases of the sexually transmitted disease, once almost eliminated in the United States, have more than doubled among gay and bisexual men since the year 2000, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention."

"Gay and bisexual men are more severely affected by HIV than any other group in the United States.

Among all gay and bisexual men, black/African American gay and bisexual men bear a disproportionate burden of HIV.

From 2008 to 2010, HIV infections among young black/African American gay and bisexual men increased 20%."
CDC Fact Sheet - Gay and Bisexual Men Gender Risk HIV AIDS

Now those are the facts... and there's nothing viable about deadly, life altering disease that correlates with one's 'sexual choices'. Which means that if one's sexual choices.. results in the contraction of deadly disease, one's sexual choices are NOT VIABLE.

Well, with all this promiscuity among gays, we better demand that they become monogamous, in committed, lifelong relationships with legally binding responsibilities. What do they call that relationship? Oh, yeah, marriage. Great to see you support marriage equality as a means of fighting promiscuity. By the way, since gay women have less incidence of sexually transmitted disease than straight people, does that mean that being a lesbian is nature's preferred state?

Promiscuity is intrinsic to homosexuality... .

Understand that what we're discussing here is sexual deviancy. The notion that a sexual deviant; which is to say one whose sexual cravings deviate from the human sexual standard, is limited to say Craving sexual gratification through sexual interaction with the person of the same gender, is fairly short cited.

This is because, in terms of the scope of deviating from the human sexual standard, homosexuality deviates as far from that standard as is possible, where the subjects at issue remain exclusively human.

Thus the subject: homosexual deviancy, spans the ENTIRE FIELD of possible ways to deviate from the human sexual standard... . therefore all bets with regard to any lines that they may draw, are off, as they've drown no line... and could't give a red rats ass about any lines. All they are concerned with is their own subjective needs and getting those would-be itches, scratched.

I have more of a problem with intellectual deviancy. It is something that afflicts you and those who think like you. You guys keep passing it back and forth like some nasty virus. Your obsession with the sex lives of others is really weird.

Does it now?

Well let's test that... shall we?

Intellectual deviancy?

First we should define the terms so that we can both agree on the subject at hand and not get sidetracked in misunderstanding of the elements that comprise the scope of the discussion.

Intellect: the faculty of reasoning and understanding objectively, especially with regard to abstract or academic matters; a term used in studies of the human mind, and refers to the ability of the mind to come to correct conclusions about what is true or real, and about how to solve problems.

Deviancy: the fact or state of departing from usual or accepted standards, especially in social or sexual behavior.

Thus the Intellectual Deviant is one who would use their mind toward deflection, obscuring the distinction between what is real and true.

Now my position is that Promiscuity is intrinsic to homosexuality... .

Understand that what we're discussing here is sexual deviancy. The notion that a sexual deviant; which is to say one whose sexual cravings deviate from the human sexual standard, is limited to say Craving sexual gratification through sexual interaction with the person of the same gender, is fairly short cited.

This is because, in terms of the scope of deviating from the human sexual standard, homosexuality deviates as far from that standard as is possible, where the subjects at issue remain exclusively human.

Thus the subject: homosexual deviancy, spans the ENTIRE FIELD of possible ways to deviate from the human sexual standard... . therefore all bets with regard to any lines that they may draw, are off, as they've drown no line... and could't give a red rats ass about any lines. All they are concerned with is their own subjective needs and getting those would-be itches, scratched.

Now you have come to declare that position as evidence of Intellectual Deviancy.

So the terms central to the argument are defined... Now please show the board where you feel that the argument deviates from the pursuit of that which is real, OKA: Reality... thus that which is true.

For your edification:

• Homosexuality is sexuality that deviates from the Human physiological standard.
• Homosexuality represent sexuality that ranges as far from the Human physiological standard as can be produced, where the subjects at issue remain Exclusively human.
• Thus the entire scope of deviant sexual behavior; with regard to sexual behavior limited exclusively to human beings, sits between the human physiological standard (normality) and Homosexuality.
• Ergo, it is not reasonable to expect that the homosexual will respect any sexual boundary which rests between normality and that which they have chosen to define themselves the farthest point possible, from sexual normality.

GO!

So, you have no problem with two of the same gender doing all of the things married straight couple do, as long as they don't ****? They can live together, raise kids together, share their property and income, support each other emotionally, and that is fine with you. You just want to make sure that when they are in the privacy of their own home they only obtain sexual gratification in the manner you think is acceptable? Does this apply to straight couples as well? No mor bjs? No more hand jobs? You what is truly sexually deviant? Your obsession with the sex acts of other adults.

How... or from what it was that you used to come to such a conclusion, is known only to you.

And given that there is absolutely NOTHING in the position to which you are responding, which could have possibly lead any reasonably objective person to such a conclusion, such informs the Reader that your position is the one which falls well short of 'objective', which the foundational evidence demonstrated is a key element of the standard establishing intellectual normalcy.

Thus... Your position; at least to this point, demonstrates that it deviates from the standard of intellectual normalcy.

Ergo, given that you are the author of such; thus it was your intellect that created such, it becomes apparent that it is YOU who are the intellectual deviant.

Huh... Go figure.

Now, I ask ya... WHO coulda seen that comin'?

 

[paddymurphy]

God hates those who do not abide by his every word, because he really is concerned for us, and our being heterosexual is going to make a huge difference on what happens in the universe. If someone is gay, they will turn the universe upside down and Lucifer may actually take over. ...

Ahh... sarcasm. Such requires great care, or the next thing ya know, it trips over an unexpected truth.

In point of fact, where you point out Lucifer, AKA: The Lord of Darkness... the destroyer, the purveyor of chaos, calamity and catastrophe; and with regard to its taking over... I'd point out that in the wake of every single point in human history where sexual deviancy found public normality... a darkness had in fact 'taken over' and toward proof of that... we can find not a single example of a culture which came to that point, which survived it.

Now you're free to correct me... I'd love to see examples of historical cultures that embraced the normalization of sexual deviancy that from that point rose to prosperity, sustained viability and success.

Please, take a moment and enlighten the board as to your knowledge of how degeneracy, debauchery and perversion have produced the consequences otherwise common to virtuous behavior.

I am pretty sure blow jobs, which you would clearly consider deviant since they are not natural in that they use a part of the body for other than its biological purpose, have been rather popular and fairly normal in most cultures of the last century or two. Don't think polishing the knob has brought down any cultures (though one did nearly bring down a President).

Huh...

So you feel that there's some relevance with regard to a given sexual action... which somehow overrides the context of with whom the would-be action is being engaged?

Interesting...

Now the question becomes, does your position serve the intrinsic pursuit common to intellectual normalcy, the status required to avoid the oh so unenviable st

Well, with all this promiscuity among gays, we better demand that they become monogamous, in committed, lifelong relationships with legally binding responsibilities. What do they call that relationship? Oh, yeah, marriage. Great to see you support marriage equality as a means of fighting promiscuity. By the way, since gay women have less incidence of sexually transmitted disease than straight people, does that mean that being a lesbian is nature's preferred state?

Promiscuity is intrinsic to homosexuality... .

Understand that what we're discussing here is sexual deviancy. The notion that a sexual deviant; which is to say one whose sexual cravings deviate from the human sexual standard, is limited to say Craving sexual gratification through sexual interaction with the person of the same gender, is fairly short cited.

This is because, in terms of the scope of deviating from the human sexual standard, homosexuality deviates as far from that standard as is possible, where the subjects at issue remain exclusively human.

Thus the subject: homosexual deviancy, spans the ENTIRE FIELD of possible ways to deviate from the human sexual standard... . therefore all bets with regard to any lines that they may draw, are off, as they've drown no line... and could't give a red rats ass about any lines. All they are concerned with is their own subjective needs and getting those would-be itches, scratched.

I have more of a problem with intellectual deviancy. It is something that afflicts you and those who think like you. You guys keep passing it back and forth like some nasty virus. Your obsession with the sex lives of others is really weird.

Does it now?

Well let's test that... shall we?

Intellectual deviancy?

First we should define the terms so that we can both agree on the subject at hand and not get sidetracked in misunderstanding of the elements that comprise the scope of the discussion.

Intellect: the faculty of reasoning and understanding objectively, especially with regard to abstract or academic matters; a term used in studies of the human mind, and refers to the ability of the mind to come to correct conclusions about what is true or real, and about how to solve problems.

Deviancy: the fact or state of departing from usual or accepted standards, especially in social or sexual behavior.

Thus the Intellectual Deviant is one who would use their mind toward deflection, obscuring the distinction between what is real and true.

Now my position is that Promiscuity is intrinsic to homosexuality... .

Understand that what we're discussing here is sexual deviancy. The notion that a sexual deviant; which is to say one whose sexual cravings deviate from the human sexual standard, is limited to say Craving sexual gratification through sexual interaction with the person of the same gender, is fairly short cited.

This is because, in terms of the scope of deviating from the human sexual standard, homosexuality deviates as far from that standard as is possible, where the subjects at issue remain exclusively human.

Thus the subject: homosexual deviancy, spans the ENTIRE FIELD of possible ways to deviate from the human sexual standard... . therefore all bets with regard to any lines that they may draw, are off, as they've drown no line... and could't give a red rats ass about any lines. All they are concerned with is their own subjective needs and getting those would-be itches, scratched.

Now you have come to declare that position as evidence of Intellectual Deviancy.

So the terms central to the argument are defined... Now please show the board where you feel that the argument deviates from the pursuit of that which is real, OKA: Reality... thus that which is true.

For your edification:

• Homosexuality is sexuality that deviates from the Human physiological standard.
• Homosexuality represent sexuality that ranges as far from the Human physiological standard as can be produced, where the subjects at issue remain Exclusively human.
• Thus the entire scope of deviant sexual behavior; with regard to sexual behavior limited exclusively to human beings, sits between the human physiological standard (normality) and Homosexuality.
• Ergo, it is not reasonable to expect that the homosexual will respect any sexual boundary which rests between normality and that which they have chosen to define themselves the farther point possible from sexual normality.

GO!

So, you have no problem with two of the same gender doing all of the things married straight couple do, as long as they don't ****? They can live together, raise kids together, share their property and income, support each other emotionally, and that is fine with you. You just want to make sure that when they are in the privacy of their own home they only obtain sexual gratification in the manner you think is acceptable? Does this apply to straight couples as well? No mor bjs? No more hand jobs? You what is truly sexually deviant? Your obsession with the sex acts of other adults.

From where you came to such a conclusion is known only to you.

And given that there is absolutely NOTHING in the position to which you are responding, which could possibly lead any reasonably objective person to such a conclusion, informs the Reader that your position is one which falls well short of 'objective'.

A key element of the standard establishing intellectual normalcy.

Thus... Your position; at least to this point, demonstrates that it deviates from the standard of intellectual normalcy.

Ergo, given that you are the author of such; thus it was your intellect that created such, it becomes apparent that it is YOU who are the intellectual deviant.

Huh... Go figure.

Now, I ask ya... WHO coulda seen that comin'?

[/QUOTE]
Did you have a stroke while typing that nonsense?

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Natural?

It's amazing how much the Left struggles with proper context. Just because something is natural, doesn't make it viable...

The Left claims that homosexual behavior is found in nature, therefore it is 'natural'.

Ya know what else is natural?

Syphillis is natural. The HIV... is natural.

Both are commonly found infecting homo- and bi-sexuals.

"Syphilis has returned with a vengeance to the gay community, U.S. health officials reported Friday.
Syphilis Cases Climbing Among Gay Men CDC WebMD


Cases of the sexually transmitted disease, once almost eliminated in the United States, have more than doubled among gay and bisexual men since the year 2000, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention."

"Gay and bisexual men are more severely affected by HIV than any other group in the United States.

Among all gay and bisexual men, black/African American gay and bisexual men bear a disproportionate burden of HIV.

From 2008 to 2010, HIV infections among young black/African American gay and bisexual men increased 20%."
CDC Fact Sheet - Gay and Bisexual Men Gender Risk HIV AIDS

Now those are the facts... and there's nothing viable about deadly, life altering disease that correlates with one's 'sexual choices'. Which means that if one's sexual choices.. results in the contraction of deadly disease, one's sexual choices are NOT VIABLE.

Well, with all this promiscuity among gays, we better demand that they become monogamous, in committed, lifelong relationships with legally binding responsibilities. What do they call that relationship? Oh, yeah, marriage. Great to see you support marriage equality as a means of fighting promiscuity. By the way, since gay women have less incidence of sexually transmitted disease than straight people, does that mean that being a lesbian is nature's preferred state?

Promiscuity is intrinsic to homosexuality... .

Understand that what we're discussing here is sexual deviancy. The notion that a sexual deviant; which is to say one whose sexual cravings deviate from the human sexual standard, is limited to say Craving sexual gratification through sexual interaction with the person of the same gender, is fairly short cited.

This is because, in terms of the scope of deviating from the human sexual standard, homosexuality deviates as far from that standard as is possible, where the subjects at issue remain exclusively human.

Thus the subject: homosexual deviancy, spans the ENTIRE FIELD of possible ways to deviate from the human sexual standard... . therefore all bets with regard to any lines that they may draw, are off, as they've drown no line... and could't give a red rats ass about any lines. All they are concerned with is their own subjective needs and getting those would-be itches, scratched.

I have more of a problem with intellectual deviancy. It is something that afflicts you and those who think like you. You guys keep passing it back and forth like some nasty virus. Your obsession with the sex lives of others is really weird.

Does it now?

Well let's test that... shall we?

Intellectual deviancy?

First we should define the terms so that we can both agree on the subject at hand and not get sidetracked in misunderstanding of the elements that comprise the scope of the discussion.

Intellect: the faculty of reasoning and understanding objectively, especially with regard to abstract or academic matters; a term used in studies of the human mind, and refers to the ability of the mind to come to correct conclusions about what is true or real, and about how to solve problems.

Deviancy: the fact or state of departing from usual or accepted standards, especially in social or sexual behavior.

Thus the Intellectual Deviant is one who would use their mind toward deflection, obscuring the distinction between what is real and true.

Now my position is that Promiscuity is intrinsic to homosexuality... .

Understand that what we're discussing here is sexual deviancy. The notion that a sexual deviant; which is to say one whose sexual cravings deviate from the human sexual standard, is limited to say Craving sexual gratification through sexual interaction with the person of the same gender, is fairly short cited.

This is because, in terms of the scope of deviating from the human sexual standard, homosexuality deviates as far from that standard as is possible, where the subjects at issue remain exclusively human.

Thus the subject: homosexual deviancy, spans the ENTIRE FIELD of possible ways to deviate from the human sexual standard... . therefore all bets with regard to any lines that they may draw, are off, as they've drown no line... and could't give a red rats ass about any lines. All they are concerned with is their own subjective needs and getting those would-be itches, scratched.

Now you have come to declare that position as evidence of Intellectual Deviancy.

So the terms central to the argument are defined... Now please show the board where you feel that the argument deviates from the pursuit of that which is real, OKA: Reality... thus that which is true.

For your edification:

• Homosexuality is sexuality that deviates from the Human physiological standard.
• Homosexuality represent sexuality that ranges as far from the Human physiological standard as can be produced, where the subjects at issue remain Exclusively human.
• Thus the entire scope of deviant sexual behavior; with regard to sexual behavior limited exclusively to human beings, sits between the human physiological standard (normality) and Homosexuality.
• Ergo, it is not reasonable to expect that the homosexual will respect any sexual boundary which rests between normality and that which they have chosen to define themselves the farthest point possible, from sexual normality.

GO!

So, you have no problem with two of the same gender doing all of the things married straight couple do, as long as they don't ****? They can live together, raise kids together, share their property and income, support each other emotionally, and that is fine with you. You just want to make sure that when they are in the privacy of their own home they only obtain sexual gratification in the manner you think is acceptable? Does this apply to straight couples as well? No mor bjs? No more hand jobs? You what is truly sexually deviant? Your obsession with the sex acts of other adults.

How... or from what it was that you used to come to such a conclusion, is known only to you.

And given that there is absolutely NOTHING in the position to which you are responding, which could have possibly lead any reasonably objective person to such a conclusion, such informs the Reader that your position is the one which falls well short of 'objective', which the foundational evidence demonstrated is a key element of the standard establishing intellectual normalcy.

Thus... Your position; at least to this point, demonstrates that it deviates from the standard of intellectual normalcy.

Ergo, given that you are the author of such; thus it was your intellect that created such, it becomes apparent that it is YOU who are the intellectual deviant.

Huh... Go figure.

Now, I ask ya... WHO coulda seen that comin'?

Did you have a stroke while typing that nonsense?

AH!

That is all we needed to wrap this up. And I want you to know, that as for me, it's clear that you're doin' the very best you can. And despite knowing in my heart that it is very unlikely, given your demonstrated means and all... I hope that you can use this to help you find the objectivity necessary to drag yourself from intellectual deviancy, in which you are presently mired.

With that said:

Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.

 

[paddymurphy]

Natural?

It's amazing how much the Left struggles with proper context. Just because something is natural, doesn't make it viable...

The Left claims that homosexual behavior is found in nature, therefore it is 'natural'.

Ya know what else is natural?

Syphillis is natural. The HIV... is natural.

Both are commonly found infecting homo- and bi-sexuals.

"Syphilis has returned with a vengeance to the gay community, U.S. health officials reported Friday.
Syphilis Cases Climbing Among Gay Men CDC WebMD


Cases of the sexually transmitted disease, once almost eliminated in the United States, have more than doubled among gay and bisexual men since the year 2000, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention."

"Gay and bisexual men are more severely affected by HIV than any other group in the United States.

Among all gay and bisexual men, black/African American gay and bisexual men bear a disproportionate burden of HIV.

From 2008 to 2010, HIV infections among young black/African American gay and bisexual men increased 20%."
CDC Fact Sheet - Gay and Bisexual Men Gender Risk HIV AIDS

Now those are the facts... and there's nothing viable about deadly, life altering disease that correlates with one's 'sexual choices'. Which means that if one's sexual choices.. results in the contraction of deadly disease, one's sexual choices are NOT VIABLE.

Well, with all this promiscuity among gays, we better demand that they become monogamous, in committed, lifelong relationships with legally binding responsibilities. What do they call that relationship? Oh, yeah, marriage. Great to see you support marriage equality as a means of fighting promiscuity. By the way, since gay women have less incidence of sexually transmitted disease than straight people, does that mean that being a lesbian is nature's preferred state?

Promiscuity is intrinsic to homosexuality... .

Understand that what we're discussing here is sexual deviancy. The notion that a sexual deviant; which is to say one whose sexual cravings deviate from the human sexual standard, is limited to say Craving sexual gratification through sexual interaction with the person of the same gender, is fairly short cited.

This is because, in terms of the scope of deviating from the human sexual standard, homosexuality deviates as far from that standard as is possible, where the subjects at issue remain exclusively human.

Thus the subject: homosexual deviancy, spans the ENTIRE FIELD of possible ways to deviate from the human sexual standard... . therefore all bets with regard to any lines that they may draw, are off, as they've drown no line... and could't give a red rats ass about any lines. All they are concerned with is their own subjective needs and getting those would-be itches, scratched.

I have more of a problem with intellectual deviancy. It is something that afflicts you and those who think like you. You guys keep passing it back and forth like some nasty virus. Your obsession with the sex lives of others is really weird.

Does it now?

Well let's test that... shall we?

Intellectual deviancy?

First we should define the terms so that we can both agree on the subject at hand and not get sidetracked in misunderstanding of the elements that comprise the scope of the discussion.

Intellect: the faculty of reasoning and understanding objectively, especially with regard to abstract or academic matters; a term used in studies of the human mind, and refers to the ability of the mind to come to correct conclusions about what is true or real, and about how to solve problems.

Deviancy: the fact or state of departing from usual or accepted standards, especially in social or sexual behavior.

Thus the Intellectual Deviant is one who would use their mind toward deflection, obscuring the distinction between what is real and true.

Now my position is that Promiscuity is intrinsic to homosexuality... .

Understand that what we're discussing here is sexual deviancy. The notion that a sexual deviant; which is to say one whose sexual cravings deviate from the human sexual standard, is limited to say Craving sexual gratification through sexual interaction with the person of the same gender, is fairly short cited.

This is because, in terms of the scope of deviating from the human sexual standard, homosexuality deviates as far from that standard as is possible, where the subjects at issue remain exclusively human.

Thus the subject: homosexual deviancy, spans the ENTIRE FIELD of possible ways to deviate from the human sexual standard... . therefore all bets with regard to any lines that they may draw, are off, as they've drown no line... and could't give a red rats ass about any lines. All they are concerned with is their own subjective needs and getting those would-be itches, scratched.

Now you have come to declare that position as evidence of Intellectual Deviancy.

So the terms central to the argument are defined... Now please show the board where you feel that the argument deviates from the pursuit of that which is real, OKA: Reality... thus that which is true.

For your edification:

• Homosexuality is sexuality that deviates from the Human physiological standard.
• Homosexuality represent sexuality that ranges as far from the Human physiological standard as can be produced, where the subjects at issue remain Exclusively human.
• Thus the entire scope of deviant sexual behavior; with regard to sexual behavior limited exclusively to human beings, sits between the human physiological standard (normality) and Homosexuality.
• Ergo, it is not reasonable to expect that the homosexual will respect any sexual boundary which rests between normality and that which they have chosen to define themselves the farthest point possible, from sexual normality.

GO!

So, you have no problem with two of the same gender doing all of the things married straight couple do, as long as they don't ****? They can live together, raise kids together, share their property and income, support each other emotionally, and that is fine with you. You just want to make sure that when they are in the privacy of their own home they only obtain sexual gratification in the manner you think is acceptable? Does this apply to straight couples as well? No mor bjs? No more hand jobs? You what is truly sexually deviant? Your obsession with the sex acts of other adults.

How... or from what it was that you used to come to such a conclusion, is known only to you.

And given that there is absolutely NOTHING in the position to which you are responding, which could have possibly lead any reasonably objective person to such a conclusion, such informs the Reader that your position is the one which falls well short of 'objective', which the foundational evidence demonstrated is a key element of the standard establishing intellectual normalcy.

Thus... Your position; at least to this point, demonstrates that it deviates from the standard of intellectual normalcy.

Ergo, given that you are the author of such; thus it was your intellect that created such, it becomes apparent that it is YOU who are the intellectual deviant.

Huh... Go figure.

Now, I ask ya... WHO coulda seen that comin'?

Did you have a stroke while typing that nonsense?

AH!

That is all we needed to wrap this up. And I want you to know, that as for me, it's clear that you're doin' the very best you can. And despite knowing in my heart that it is very unlikely, given your demonstrated means and all... I hope that you can use this to help you find the objectivity necessary to drag yourself from intellectual deviancy, in which you are presently mired.

With that said:

Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.

I concede that you are very good at concealing your intellectual shortcomings through the use of a good thesaurus. The only thing you have talked about in support of your hatred of gay people is that the sexual acts they engage in are, in your opinion, outside the standard means of obtaining sexual gratification which I guess, to your wife's unending disappointment, is,to quote that great American philosopher, George Carlin, the "man on top, get it over with quick" method. That is your only objection to Gay people. How they have sex. Now, you have not responded to my inquiry as to whether you similarly condemn sex acts between straight folks that are outside the standard means of sex, which, to you, means sex with those parts of the body specifically designed for the biological purpose of sex, reproduction.