I like to keep a somewhat open mind but I honestly believe after the way this incident and the girl have been repeatedly characterized ,that it is no more than fury over the idea that a white officer lost his job over a black girl. Maybe I'm wrong but I haven't seen anything that would make me think otherwise. Add in the way a white rapist is defended in another thread and it becomes even more apparent.
That's all it is. If they were all about law and order they wouldn't defend the rapist AND defend the students who defied school rules and walked out.
Of course they will never say it directly. I used this example before where they fit the definition but hate that they fit the very definition of racism. No way they find class disruption more offensive than child rape.
So they'll call her and others a ni**er, monkey etc. But they'll also say it not racist to do so. Even the OP flat out lied and keeps pushing the lie for "no reason"
So they'll say for example:
That thing has leaves and roots. But when you say "Tree" they say "I didnt say that" like they are fooling someone. But it's plain to see.