S.C. school brat told friends before cop encounter: "Get yall phones out". She did it purposely.

[Conservative65]

Not based on this thug girl's actions. If her mother had raised her properly, she wouldn't have planned to resist and would have done what she was told, when she was told, by someone that had the authority to tell her. When she planned it, based on what this thread indicates, I would say her mother is the cause of why she acts that way.

Mom being recently dead might have something to do with that. And you don't get to throw a child across the floor just because they won't obey you.

So that gives her a right to refuse to obey someone of authority?

You get to deal with someone resisting arrest in a manner they deserve.

She wasn't under arrest and kids don't always obey. It was his job to protect her, not throw her.

She was under arrest. She broke state law and the officer was there to arrest her for breaking the law. He tried to do it the nice way and she refused.

She was not under arrest. That's total nonsense. And it doesn't matter what he tried, it only matters what he did, which got him fired and that is a good thing.

That's the reason the officer was there. She broke state law and he was the only one that could arrest her for it. When she had her phone out, the reason for the request by the teacher to go to the discipline office, she had only broken policy. When she refused to go and continued to refuse to go, she broke state law 17-16-420. It's called disturbing school and enforcement of that is up to a police officer.

Is it a good thing that the black girl disobeyed multiple people of authority rightfully telling her what to do?

 

[Conservative65]

Reading this thread exposes some of the most racist and fascist members of USMB.

You mean those who expect someone told by multiple authorities to do what they have the authority to tell her to do it?

 

[Conservative65]

I hope she's going to get in trouble too or is she now the victim?

In this case she is, and she has the injuries to prove it apparently.

I mean being charged and suspended. She resisted arrest and there was a reason they called a cop. Being roughed up when being arrested isn't the punishment for the crime you committed

There is no evidence to indicate Officer Slam was there to make an arrest or that the student knew she was being arrested. In her mind Officer Slam was just doing the bidding of the teacher and administrator. Neither the administrator nor Officer Slam informed her that the situation was transitioning from an administrative to a legal situation.

Actually, there is . It doesn't matter what she thought. I matters what he was there to do and that was to arrest her under SC Code of Laws 17-16-420. It's called disturbing school.

You say there is no evidence to indicate she was being arrested but you've determined she wasn't informed of the situation transitioning. The sad thing is that you make that claim, get this, without evidence.

 

[LoneLaugher]

Hmmmmmm. And if the cop had not gone postal and did his job well, he'd still have a job. It was his fault for losing control of himself. Period.

The cop did not go postal, you lying sack of shit. No one was shot, which is a shame.

That little thug is going to cause a lot of people greif before she gets planted for worm food.

Oooooh! You talk so tough! You are so rugged! It's a shame nobody got shot. Yes.....that's rugged!

 

[Conservative65]

Girl arrested during Spring Valley incident says she told classmates to film

Some people can't see a ******* setup coming. This *****....before the cop even spoke to her....told her friends "Get yall phones out because something is about to happen".

SHE PLANNED IT. She knew damn well that she was going to resist and become a ghetto YouTube superstar. She knew NOTHING the cop did was she going to cooperate with.

She knew "something is gonna happen" because she was determined to MAKE SOMETHING HAPPEN. Had she followed directions....NOTHING would happen.

Do we call this "premeditated oppression"?? Planning your own victimhood!!!

Hey, you dumbassed POS, Kenny was NOT the girl the pig attacked. She was a witness to the pig's assault.

Lies like this OP are why the Right are the scum of the Earth!!!

She was a witness to the little ***** planning on defying the law.

The "planning" is nothing but another lie from the worthless lying scum on the Right.

The excuses are nothing more than yet another black refusing to do what she's told because the person rightfully doing the telling is white.

 

[Camp]

Girl arrested during Spring Valley incident says she told classmates to film

Some people can't see a ******* setup coming. This *****....before the cop even spoke to her....told her friends "Get yall phones out because something is about to happen".

SHE PLANNED IT. She knew damn well that she was going to resist and become a ghetto YouTube superstar. She knew NOTHING the cop did was she going to cooperate with.

She knew "something is gonna happen" because she was determined to MAKE SOMETHING HAPPEN. Had she followed directions....NOTHING would happen.

Do we call this "premeditated oppression"?? Planning your own victimhood!!!

Hey, you dumbassed POS, Kenny was NOT the girl the pig attacked. She was a witness to the pig's assault.

Lies like this OP are why the Right are the scum of the Earth!!!

She was a witness to the little ***** planning on defying the law.

The "planning" is nothing but another lie from the worthless lying scum on the Right.

The SUPREME COURT has ruled that taking video of police is a constitutional right. The girl had a constitutional right to tell other students to video Officer Slam and to video him herself.

 

[Conservative65]

Girl arrested during Spring Valley incident says she told classmates to film

Some people can't see a ******* setup coming. This *****....before the cop even spoke to her....told her friends "Get yall phones out because something is about to happen".

SHE PLANNED IT. She knew damn well that she was going to resist and become a ghetto YouTube superstar. She knew NOTHING the cop did was she going to cooperate with.

She knew "something is gonna happen" because she was determined to MAKE SOMETHING HAPPEN. Had she followed directions....NOTHING would happen.

Do we call this "premeditated oppression"?? Planning your own victimhood!!!

Hey, you dumbassed POS, Kenny was NOT the girl the pig attacked. She was a witness to the pig's assault.

Lies like this OP are why the Right are the scum of the Earth!!!

She was a witness to the little ***** planning on defying the law.

The "planning" is nothing but another lie from the worthless lying scum on the Right.

The SUPREME COURT has ruled that taking video of police is a constitutional right. The girl had a constitutional right to tell other students to video Officer Slam and to video him herself.

Did she have a right to refuse the rightful order of a police officer? Seems many on here believe she did.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Girl arrested during Spring Valley incident says she told classmates to film

Some people can't see a ******* setup coming. This *****....before the cop even spoke to her....told her friends "Get yall phones out because something is about to happen".

Nope. You didn't read your source article. The girl you're quoting is Niya Kenny. She was *also* arrested at the scene. But she wasn't the girl who the officer went off on.

From your own article:

When school resource officer Ben Fields entered the classroom at Spring Valley High School on Monday morning, student Niya Kenny says she knew something was going to happen.

“Initially, when they said an SRO was coming, we have two — so I didn’t know which one was coming,” Kenny said. “It could have been the other one. When I saw deputy Fields, that’s when I started . . . that’s when I told them to get the cameras out, because we know his reputation — well, I know his reputation.”

Read more here: Girl arrested during Spring Valley incident says she told classmates to film

'Get the cameras out' was Niya Kenny. Per your own source.

And Ninya Kenny was a witness to the incident. She wasn't the victim of it. Niya Kenny was arrested *after* the girl had already been dragged from the room.

After Fields forcibly removed a girl who the teacher said was disrupting class by refusing to put her phone away, the deputy arrested Kenny as well. The first girl was released to her parents, but Kenny was transported to the Alvin S. Glenn Detention Center, according to the Richland County Sheriff’s Department.

Read more here: Girl arrested during Spring Valley incident says she told classmates to film

Again, this is your own source. See? Two different people. And it explicitly contradicts your entire ignorant 'she planned it' narrative.

it still seems SORTA PLANNED-------in the sense of a level of collusion.
Planning a little shitty prank like that does not take months and
an elaborate written proposal. It takes a wink and a nod

^this^

With 'this' being baseless speculation backed by nothing......after the LAST bullshit narrative the OP fed us was proven to be ignorant nonsense?

well, it melds together to give that impression. In court it could be very valuable data, the girls behavior and the girl giving out the message about the recording. Yeah, it fits together like a hand in a glove.

Only to idiots who are uninformed and can't read.

 

[Camp]

I hope she's going to get in trouble too or is she now the victim?

In this case she is, and she has the injuries to prove it apparently.

I mean being charged and suspended. She resisted arrest and there was a reason they called a cop. Being roughed up when being arrested isn't the punishment for the crime you committed

There is no evidence to indicate Officer Slam was there to make an arrest or that the student knew she was being arrested. In her mind Officer Slam was just doing the bidding of the teacher and administrator. Neither the administrator nor Officer Slam informed her that the situation was transitioning from an administrative to a legal situation.

Actually, there is . It doesn't matter what she thought. I matters what he was there to do and that was to arrest her under SC Code of Laws 17-16-420. It's called disturbing school.

You say there is no evidence to indicate she was being arrested but you've determined she wasn't informed of the situation transitioning. The sad thing is that you make that claim, get this, without evidence.

There is no evidence or even claim that the officer was there to make an arrest. The decision to charge the students with a crime was made after the incident. The evidence to this is the video and again, the fact that the claim of a warning of an arrest was not claimed.

 

[LoneLaugher]

Let me deflect.

Cliven Bundy. Nutter hero.

That is all.

 

[Conservative65]

I hope she's going to get in trouble too or is she now the victim?

In this case she is, and she has the injuries to prove it apparently.

I mean being charged and suspended. She resisted arrest and there was a reason they called a cop. Being roughed up when being arrested isn't the punishment for the crime you committed

There is no evidence to indicate Officer Slam was there to make an arrest or that the student knew she was being arrested. In her mind Officer Slam was just doing the bidding of the teacher and administrator. Neither the administrator nor Officer Slam informed her that the situation was transitioning from an administrative to a legal situation.

Actually, there is . It doesn't matter what she thought. I matters what he was there to do and that was to arrest her under SC Code of Laws 17-16-420. It's called disturbing school.

You say there is no evidence to indicate she was being arrested but you've determined she wasn't informed of the situation transitioning. The sad thing is that you make that claim, get this, without evidence.

There is no evidence or even claim that the officer was there to make an arrest. The decision to charge the students with a crime was made after the incident. The evidence to this is the video and again, the fact that the claim of a warning of an arrest was not claimed.

There is no evidence of your claim they didn't inform her. You're saying they didn't do something you can't prove they didn't do.

 

[Conservative65]

Let me deflect.

Cliven Bundy. Nutter hero.

That is all.

Let me deflect. Spring Valley HS N*gger Girl. Left wing hero.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Let me deflect.

Cliven Bundy. Nutter hero.

That is all.

Let me deflect. Spring Valley HS N*gger Girl. Left wing hero.

Nope, just another black victim of white police brutality.

 

[LoneLaugher]

Let me deflect.

Cliven Bundy. Nutter hero.

That is all.

Let me deflect. Spring Valley HS N*gger Girl. Left wing hero.

Looks like you are upset.

This girl in the chair is not being lauded as a hero by anyone, nutbag. She acted the fool in class. No hero. You can now make up some more shit that makes you feel better about yourself.

You......yes YOU.....supported Cliven Bundy and those who drew arms against the police at and near his ranch. You openly applauded people who did not obey the orders of police.

**** off, loser.

 

[Conservative65]

Let me deflect.

Cliven Bundy. Nutter hero.

That is all.

Let me deflect. Spring Valley HS N*gger Girl. Left wing hero.

Looks like you are upset.

This girl in the chair is not being lauded as a hero by anyone, nutbag. She acted the fool in class. No hero. You can now make up some more shit that makes you feel better about yourself.

You......yes YOU.....supported Cliven Bundy and those who drew arms against the police at and near his ranch. You openly applauded people who did not obey the orders of police.

**** off, loser.

I supported Cliven Bundy? Proof please. Seems you're making up things.

When you can enforce your demand, do so son. You won't like the failed results of trying.

 

[Camp]

Girl arrested during Spring Valley incident says she told classmates to film

Some people can't see a ******* setup coming. This *****....before the cop even spoke to her....told her friends "Get yall phones out because something is about to happen".

SHE PLANNED IT. She knew damn well that she was going to resist and become a ghetto YouTube superstar. She knew NOTHING the cop did was she going to cooperate with.

She knew "something is gonna happen" because she was determined to MAKE SOMETHING HAPPEN. Had she followed directions....NOTHING would happen.

Do we call this "premeditated oppression"?? Planning your own victimhood!!!

Hey, you dumbassed POS, Kenny was NOT the girl the pig attacked. She was a witness to the pig's assault.

Lies like this OP are why the Right are the scum of the Earth!!!

She was a witness to the little ***** planning on defying the law.

The "planning" is nothing but another lie from the worthless lying scum on the Right.

The SUPREME COURT has ruled that taking video of police is a constitutional right. The girl had a constitutional right to tell other students to video Officer Slam and to video him herself.

Did she have a right to refuse the rightful order of a police officer? Seems many on here believe she did.

All of us have a right to question what appears to us to be an unlawful order from a police officer. That is why a specific protocol and procedure is used when making an arrest. Failure to follow those procedures and protocol and specified in numerous SCOTUS rulings can, and do leading to invalidating an arrest.

In this case she is, and she has the injuries to prove it apparently.

I mean being charged and suspended. She resisted arrest and there was a reason they called a cop. Being roughed up when being arrested isn't the punishment for the crime you committed

There is no evidence to indicate Officer Slam was there to make an arrest or that the student knew she was being arrested. In her mind Officer Slam was just doing the bidding of the teacher and administrator. Neither the administrator nor Officer Slam informed her that the situation was transitioning from an administrative to a legal situation.

Actually, there is . It doesn't matter what she thought. I matters what he was there to do and that was to arrest her under SC Code of Laws 17-16-420. It's called disturbing school.

You say there is no evidence to indicate she was being arrested but you've determined she wasn't informed of the situation transitioning. The sad thing is that you make that claim, get this, without evidence.

There is no evidence or even claim that the officer was there to make an arrest. The decision to charge the students with a crime was made after the incident. The evidence to this is the video and again, the fact that the claim of a warning of an arrest was not claimed.

There is no evidence of your claim they didn't inform her. You're saying they didn't do something you can't prove they didn't do.

You are claiming the student disregarded Officer Slam and is thus, guilty of a crime. In America even racist people like you have to live with a simple American constitutional right that demands a person, even a black teenager, is innocent until proven guilty. She nor anyone else has to prove her innocence, you and the other racist attacking her have to prove her guilt. So far no legal authority is even attempting to make the claims you are attempting to make.

 

[AvgGuyIA]

If the cop is that easy to bait, he deserves what he gets.

Amazing how many asshole Leftists think that career law enforcement officials need to lose their job. A decent person is not so flippant about somebody's hard invested means of living, but no Leftist is decent.

It's amazing all the asshole leftist we have here on the USMB board. There isn't a decent one among them and none of them show an ounce of integrity.

A little help for ya, you don't get to be a cop and throw a teenage girl across the floor, period, ever...

The girl caused the disturbance and had to be pulled out of her chair.

Yep, and nope. The cop lost it, and his job now as is appropriate.

Are you prepared to say the girl must be expelled too?

 

[Conservative65]

Hey, you dumbassed POS, Kenny was NOT the girl the pig attacked. She was a witness to the pig's assault.

Lies like this OP are why the Right are the scum of the Earth!!!

She was a witness to the little ***** planning on defying the law.

The "planning" is nothing but another lie from the worthless lying scum on the Right.

The SUPREME COURT has ruled that taking video of police is a constitutional right. The girl had a constitutional right to tell other students to video Officer Slam and to video him herself.

Did she have a right to refuse the rightful order of a police officer? Seems many on here believe she did.

All of us have a right to question what appears to us to be an unlawful order from a police officer. That is why a specific protocol and procedure is used when making an arrest. Failure to follow those procedures and protocol and specified in numerous SCOTUS rulings can, and do leading to invalidating an arrest.

I mean being charged and suspended. She resisted arrest and there was a reason they called a cop. Being roughed up when being arrested isn't the punishment for the crime you committed

There is no evidence to indicate Officer Slam was there to make an arrest or that the student knew she was being arrested. In her mind Officer Slam was just doing the bidding of the teacher and administrator. Neither the administrator nor Officer Slam informed her that the situation was transitioning from an administrative to a legal situation.

Actually, there is . It doesn't matter what she thought. I matters what he was there to do and that was to arrest her under SC Code of Laws 17-16-420. It's called disturbing school.

You say there is no evidence to indicate she was being arrested but you've determined she wasn't informed of the situation transitioning. The sad thing is that you make that claim, get this, without evidence.

There is no evidence or even claim that the officer was there to make an arrest. The decision to charge the students with a crime was made after the incident. The evidence to this is the video and again, the fact that the claim of a warning of an arrest was not claimed.

There is no evidence of your claim they didn't inform her. You're saying they didn't do something you can't prove they didn't do.

You are claiming the student disregarded Officer Slam and is thus, guilty of a crime. In America even racist people like you have to live with a simple American constitutional right that demands a person, even a black teenager, is innocent until proven guilty. She nor anyone else has to prove her innocence, you and the other racist attacking her have to prove her guilt. So far no legal authority is even attempting to make the claims you are attempting to make.

While she may be innocent until proven guilty, she doesn't have a right to refuse a lawful request by a police officer. He wouldn't have been there other than to make an arrest. That's how the law works under these situations.

 

[AvgGuyIA]

Hey, you dumbassed POS, Kenny was NOT the girl the pig attacked. She was a witness to the pig's assault.

Lies like this OP are why the Right are the scum of the Earth!!!

She was a witness to the little ***** planning on defying the law.

The "planning" is nothing but another lie from the worthless lying scum on the Right.

The SUPREME COURT has ruled that taking video of police is a constitutional right. The girl had a constitutional right to tell other students to video Officer Slam and to video him herself.

Did she have a right to refuse the rightful order of a police officer? Seems many on here believe she did.

All of us have a right to question what appears to us to be an unlawful order from a police officer. That is why a specific protocol and procedure is used when making an arrest. Failure to follow those procedures and protocol and specified in numerous SCOTUS rulings can, and do leading to invalidating an arrest.

I mean being charged and suspended. She resisted arrest and there was a reason they called a cop. Being roughed up when being arrested isn't the punishment for the crime you committed

There is no evidence to indicate Officer Slam was there to make an arrest or that the student knew she was being arrested. In her mind Officer Slam was just doing the bidding of the teacher and administrator. Neither the administrator nor Officer Slam informed her that the situation was transitioning from an administrative to a legal situation.

Actually, there is . It doesn't matter what she thought. I matters what he was there to do and that was to arrest her under SC Code of Laws 17-16-420. It's called disturbing school.

You say there is no evidence to indicate she was being arrested but you've determined she wasn't informed of the situation transitioning. The sad thing is that you make that claim, get this, without evidence.

There is no evidence or even claim that the officer was there to make an arrest. The decision to charge the students with a crime was made after the incident. The evidence to this is the video and again, the fact that the claim of a warning of an arrest was not claimed.

There is no evidence of your claim they didn't inform her. You're saying they didn't do something you can't prove they didn't do.

You are claiming the student disregarded Officer Slam and is thus, guilty of a crime. In America even racist people like you have to live with a simple American constitutional right that demands a person, even a black teenager, is innocent until proven guilty. She nor anyone else has to prove her innocence, you and the other racist attacking her have to prove her guilt. So far no legal authority is even attempting to make the claims you are attempting to make.

Pull the Race card ..and you lose the argument. If the girl was white, our opinion would be no different.

 

[Conservative65]

She was a witness to the little ***** planning on defying the law.

The "planning" is nothing but another lie from the worthless lying scum on the Right.

The SUPREME COURT has ruled that taking video of police is a constitutional right. The girl had a constitutional right to tell other students to video Officer Slam and to video him herself.

Did she have a right to refuse the rightful order of a police officer? Seems many on here believe she did.

All of us have a right to question what appears to us to be an unlawful order from a police officer. That is why a specific protocol and procedure is used when making an arrest. Failure to follow those procedures and protocol and specified in numerous SCOTUS rulings can, and do leading to invalidating an arrest.

There is no evidence to indicate Officer Slam was there to make an arrest or that the student knew she was being arrested. In her mind Officer Slam was just doing the bidding of the teacher and administrator. Neither the administrator nor Officer Slam informed her that the situation was transitioning from an administrative to a legal situation.

Actually, there is . It doesn't matter what she thought. I matters what he was there to do and that was to arrest her under SC Code of Laws 17-16-420. It's called disturbing school.

You say there is no evidence to indicate she was being arrested but you've determined she wasn't informed of the situation transitioning. The sad thing is that you make that claim, get this, without evidence.

There is no evidence or even claim that the officer was there to make an arrest. The decision to charge the students with a crime was made after the incident. The evidence to this is the video and again, the fact that the claim of a warning of an arrest was not claimed.

There is no evidence of your claim they didn't inform her. You're saying they didn't do something you can't prove they didn't do.

You are claiming the student disregarded Officer Slam and is thus, guilty of a crime. In America even racist people like you have to live with a simple American constitutional right that demands a person, even a black teenager, is innocent until proven guilty. She nor anyone else has to prove her innocence, you and the other racist attacking her have to prove her guilt. So far no legal authority is even attempting to make the claims you are attempting to make.

Pull the Race card ..and you lose the argument. If the girl was white, our opinion would be no different.

The term I would use would be white trash instead.