Russians may have Trump dirt too....

[usmbguest5318]

Intel chiefs presented Trump with claims of Russian efforts to compromise him

The allegations were presented in a two-page synopsis that was appended to a report on Russian interference in the 2016 election. The allegations came, in part, from memos compiled by a former British intelligence operative, whose past work US intelligence officials consider credible. The FBI is investigating the credibility and accuracy of these allegations, which are based primarily on information from Russian sources, but has not confirmed many essential details in the memos about Mr. Trump.

The classified briefings last week were presented by four of the senior-most US intelligence chiefs -- Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, FBI Director James Comey, CIA Director John Brennan, and NSA Director Admiral Mike Rogers.

One reason the nation's intelligence chiefs took the extraordinary step of including the synopsis in the briefing documents was to make the President-elect aware that such allegations involving him are circulating among intelligence agencies, senior members of Congress and other government officials in Washington, multiple sources tell CNN.

The two-page synopsis also included allegations that there was a continuing exchange of information during the campaign between Trump surrogates and intermediaries for the Russian government, according to two national security officials.​

It is worth noting that the allegations did not originate with U.S. sources, but rather with agents in MI6.


This is exactly what I intimated this past weekend.

From the declassified report on Russian efforts to influence the 2016 election outcome, we know that "Russia collected on some Republican-affiliated targets but did not conduct a comparable disclosure campaign."

Now I know what I'd do were I to have hacked both Democrats and Republicans. I'd look over the information I obtained and I'd do one of the following:

• Identify the candidate/party I liked least and aim to ruin them and use the information I got on the other candidate/party as a "bully stick" to keep them in line on threat of releasing the information.
• Determine which one has the least opprobrious information and leak the info on the other one so that I keep the biggest "bully stick" in my pocket for future use if/when I need to.

How will we the American people know whether that's what Russia did? Well, just wait and see what Trump does that doesn't make sense. Currently, Trump's steadfast efforts to maintain an air of doubt about the Russian's role seems to me a starting point for what constitutes that sort of thing.

 

[Pogo]

No doubt they have plenty, which is why they wanted him to take the office.

Wonder if they have his tax returns....

 

[Snouter]

There was no Russian interference in the US election. The Podesta and DNC emails Wikileaks posted were not from Russia. So this falls in the logical fallacy area in that a conclusion or prediction was based on a falsehood to begin with.

 

[nat4900]

Intel chiefs presented Trump with claims of Russian efforts to compromise him

The allegations were presented in a two-page synopsis that was appended to a report on Russian interference in the 2016 election. The allegations came, in part, from memos compiled by a former British intelligence operative, whose past work US intelligence officials consider credible. The FBI is investigating the credibility and accuracy of these allegations, which are based primarily on information from Russian sources, but has not confirmed many essential details in the memos about Mr. Trump.

The classified briefings last week were presented by four of the senior-most US intelligence chiefs -- Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, FBI Director James Comey, CIA Director John Brennan, and NSA Director Admiral Mike Rogers.

One reason the nation's intelligence chiefs took the extraordinary step of including the synopsis in the briefing documents was to make the President-elect aware that such allegations involving him are circulating among intelligence agencies, senior members of Congress and other government officials in Washington, multiple sources tell CNN.

The two-page synopsis also included allegations that there was a continuing exchange of information during the campaign between Trump surrogates and intermediaries for the Russian government, according to two national security officials.​

It is worth noting that the allegations did not originate with U.S. sources, but rather with agents in MI6.


This is exactly what I intimated this past weekend.

From the declassified report on Russian efforts to influence the 2016 election outcome, we know that "Russia collected on some Republican-affiliated targets but did not conduct a comparable disclosure campaign."

Now I know what I'd do were I to have hacked both Democrats and Republicans. I'd look over the information I obtained and I'd do one of the following:

• Identify the candidate/party I liked least and aim to ruin them and use the information I got on the other candidate/party as a "bully stick" to keep them in line on threat of releasing the information.
• Determine which one has the least opprobrious information and leak the info on the other one so that I keep the biggest "bully stick" in my pocket for future use if/when I need to.

How will we the American people know whether that's what Russia did? Well, just wait and see what Trump does that doesn't make sense. Currently, Trump's steadfast efforts to maintain an air of doubt about the Russian's role seems to me a starting point for what constitutes that sort of thing.

Thank you, and please bear in mind that the Brits have MUCH BETTER intelligence sources in Russia than we do.

 

[peabody]

Intel chiefs presented Trump with claims of Russian efforts to compromise him

The allegations were presented in a two-page synopsis that was appended to a report on Russian interference in the 2016 election. The allegations came, in part, from memos compiled by a former British intelligence operative, whose past work US intelligence officials consider credible. The FBI is investigating the credibility and accuracy of these allegations, which are based primarily on information from Russian sources, but has not confirmed many essential details in the memos about Mr. Trump.

The classified briefings last week were presented by four of the senior-most US intelligence chiefs -- Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, FBI Director James Comey, CIA Director John Brennan, and NSA Director Admiral Mike Rogers.

One reason the nation's intelligence chiefs took the extraordinary step of including the synopsis in the briefing documents was to make the President-elect aware that such allegations involving him are circulating among intelligence agencies, senior members of Congress and other government officials in Washington, multiple sources tell CNN.

The two-page synopsis also included allegations that there was a continuing exchange of information during the campaign between Trump surrogates and intermediaries for the Russian government, according to two national security officials.​

It is worth noting that the allegations did not originate with U.S. sources, but rather with agents in MI6.


This is exactly what I intimated this past weekend.

From the declassified report on Russian efforts to influence the 2016 election outcome, we know that "Russia collected on some Republican-affiliated targets but did not conduct a comparable disclosure campaign."

Now I know what I'd do were I to have hacked both Democrats and Republicans. I'd look over the information I obtained and I'd do one of the following:

• Identify the candidate/party I liked least and aim to ruin them and use the information I got on the other candidate/party as a "bully stick" to keep them in line on threat of releasing the information.
• Determine which one has the least opprobrious information and leak the info on the other one so that I keep the biggest "bully stick" in my pocket for future use if/when I need to.

How will we the American people know whether that's what Russia did? Well, just wait and see what Trump does that doesn't make sense. Currently, Trump's steadfast efforts to maintain an air of doubt about the Russian's role seems to me a starting point for what constitutes that sort of thing.

It's the piss video that the Russians have. Trump likes to get peed on and he likes to drink HOT PISS

Doc Claiming Russia Has Dirt on Trump Says Kremlin Has Video of Trump Golden Shower Orgy

 

[nat4900]

There was no Russian interference in the US election. The Podesta and DNC emails Wikileaks posted were not from Russia. So this falls in the logical fallacy area in that a conclusion or prediction was based on a falsehood to begin with.

Reading comprehension issues???

 

[NYcarbineer]

They've got something on Trump that's bad. Probably some sort of sexual perversion. That fits the Trump pattern.

 

[The VOR]

Intel chiefs presented Trump with claims of Russian efforts to compromise him

The allegations were presented in a two-page synopsis that was appended to a report on Russian interference in the 2016 election. The allegations came, in part, from memos compiled by a former British intelligence operative, whose past work US intelligence officials consider credible. The FBI is investigating the credibility and accuracy of these allegations, which are based primarily on information from Russian sources, but has not confirmed many essential details in the memos about Mr. Trump.

The classified briefings last week were presented by four of the senior-most US intelligence chiefs -- Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, FBI Director James Comey, CIA Director John Brennan, and NSA Director Admiral Mike Rogers.

One reason the nation's intelligence chiefs took the extraordinary step of including the synopsis in the briefing documents was to make the President-elect aware that such allegations involving him are circulating among intelligence agencies, senior members of Congress and other government officials in Washington, multiple sources tell CNN.

The two-page synopsis also included allegations that there was a continuing exchange of information during the campaign between Trump surrogates and intermediaries for the Russian government, according to two national security officials.​

It is worth noting that the allegations did not originate with U.S. sources, but rather with agents in MI6.


This is exactly what I intimated this past weekend.

From the declassified report on Russian efforts to influence the 2016 election outcome, we know that "Russia collected on some Republican-affiliated targets but did not conduct a comparable disclosure campaign."

Now I know what I'd do were I to have hacked both Democrats and Republicans. I'd look over the information I obtained and I'd do one of the following:

• Identify the candidate/party I liked least and aim to ruin them and use the information I got on the other candidate/party as a "bully stick" to keep them in line on threat of releasing the information.
• Determine which one has the least opprobrious information and leak the info on the other one so that I keep the biggest "bully stick" in my pocket for future use if/when I need to.

How will we the American people know whether that's what Russia did? Well, just wait and see what Trump does that doesn't make sense. Currently, Trump's steadfast efforts to maintain an air of doubt about the Russian's role seems to me a starting point for what constitutes that sort of thing.

It's the piss video that the Russians have. Trump likes to get peed on and he likes to drink HOT PISS

Doc Claiming Russia Has Dirt on Trump Says Kremlin Has Video of Trump Golden Shower Orgy

You're one sick motherfucker, and I think I'd like to subscribe to your newsletter.

 

[nat4900]

Of special note from the above citation.....

These senior intelligence officials also included the synopsis to demonstrate that Russia had compiled information potentially harmful to both political parties, but only released information damaging to Hillary Clinton and Democrats.

 

[Pogo]

They've got something on Trump that's bad. Probably some sort of sexual perversion. That fits the Trump pattern.

Hey I bet they have the next series of shots after this one...

 

[AnCap'n_Murica]

The Russians, Chinese, Israelis, NorKs and just about every other player in the world has opposition research on just about every Murican politician. So what of it?

 

[whitehall]

An unverified memo from an unidentified alleged former Brit secret agent? Promise us lefties that this is the last fantasy y'all will entertain before you admit that Hillary lost the election.

 

[peabody]

The Russians, Chinese, Israelis, NorKs and just about every other player in the world has opposition research on just about every Murican politician. So what of it?

Yeah but come on, a president with a fetish for golden showers?

 

[Dr Grump]

There was no Russian interference in the US election. The Podesta and DNC emails Wikileaks posted were not from Russia. So this falls in the logical fallacy area in that a conclusion or prediction was based on a falsehood to begin with.

What intelligence service do you work for again?

 

[LadyGunSlinger]

**************************************SnowFlake Meltdown Thread******************************

Enter with play-doh and coloring books in hand.

 

[Pogo]

**************************************SnowFlake Meltdown Thread******************************

Enter with play-doh and coloring books in hand.

Ask and ye shall receive.

"NEW - Specially formulated for floods!"​

 

[usmbguest5318]

The Russians, Chinese, Israelis, NorKs and just about every other player in the world has opposition research on just about every Murican politician. So what of it?

• Alleged Certainty
  
• Appeal to Common Practice
  
• Composition

 

[AnCap'n_Murica]

The Russians, Chinese, Israelis, NorKs and just about every other player in the world has opposition research on just about every Murican politician. So what of it?

• Alleged Certainty
  
• Appeal to Common Practice
  
• Composition

None of that refutes the fact that it is common practice for foreign governments to gather intel on politicians.

What of it?

 

[Care4all]

They've got something on Trump that's bad. Probably some sort of sexual perversion. That fits the Trump pattern.

I don't think it is something sexual....they can see that even if it was sexual, he's like Teflon....those kind of accusations mean nothing....America has accepted him as a whore-dog for decades...

I think that the communications between his surrogates like Roger Stone or Paul Manafort and the Russians on the stolen DNC emails and wikileaks dump, is more likely....it's more threatening to DJT's presidency....

or maybe illegal business doings with the Russian mob, that none of us know about...?

But sex, and his compulsive adultery is truly not something that would be surprising imo.

 

[nat4900]

or maybe illegal business doings with the Russian mob, that none of us know about...?

Speculation has it that the Russian mob has bailed out Trump from many bad deals just before declaring bankruptcy. We will see, relatively soon.