Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is this one something like the AMA (who comprise fewer than 1/3 of all MDs) endorsing socialized medicine?![]()
Well, Annie, from what I have read, we will see definate indications within the next five years that we passed the tipping point already.
There, see, I made a definate prediction that you can call me on. We will see the arctic ice pack go down to less than half the present volume in that time. We will see a major increase in the CH4 emissions, both from permafrost and yedoma, and from the arctic ocean clathrates.
Now Annie, I have made definate predictions. Since you believe them to be bunkem, why don't you tell me what you expect to happen. A real test of whose view of reality most conforms to reality.
Hey dipshit,
what the fuck does "definate" mean?
Is this one something like the AMA (who comprise fewer than 1/3 of all MDs) endorsing socialized medicine?![]()
No, it is something like Dooodeee...... never bothers to research anything before posting his ignorance for all the world to see.
97% of climatologists say global warming is occurring and caused by humans
*The authors contacted 10,200 scientists listed in the 2007 edition of the American Geological Institute's Directory of Geoscience Departments and received 3,146 responses to their two questions: "have mean global temperatures risen compared to pre-1800s levels?" and "Has human activity been a significant factor in changing mean global temperatures?"
Well, Annie, from what I have read, we will see definate indications within the next five years that we passed the tipping point already.
There, see, I made a definate prediction that you can call me on. We will see the arctic ice pack go down to less than half the present volume in that time. We will see a major increase in the CH4 emissions, both from permafrost and yedoma, and from the arctic ocean clathrates.
Now Annie, I have made definate predictions. Since you believe them to be bunkem, why don't you tell me what you expect to happen. A real test of whose view of reality most conforms to reality.
Hey dipshit,
what the fuck does "definate" mean?
Well, stupid ass, read the whole post. That is, if you are capable of understanding more than one sentence at a time. Doubtful.
Is this one something like the AMA (who comprise fewer than 1/3 of all MDs) endorsing socialized medicine?![]()
No, it is something like Dooodeee...... never bothers to research anything before posting his ignorance for all the world to see.
97% of climatologists say global warming is occurring and caused by humans
*The authors contacted 10,200 scientists listed in the 2007 edition of the American Geological Institute's Directory of Geoscience Departments and received 3,146 responses to their two questions: "have mean global temperatures risen compared to pre-1800s levels?" and "Has human activity been a significant factor in changing mean global temperatures?"
please post something from one of those environut blogs again.
Just as I guessed....A voluntarily skewed result.OldRocksinthehead said:The authors contacted 10,200 scientists listed in the 2007 edition of the American Geological Institute's Directory of Geoscience Departments and received 3,146 responses to their two questions:
Well, I suppose that I could stay on this board all night trading meaningless insults with willfull ignoramouses like Doooodeee... and ol' pervert Elvis.
But I have a job, and have to get up early in the morning, unlike some of the trolls here.![]()
No, it is something like Dooodeee...... never bothers to research anything before posting his ignorance for all the world to see.
97% of climatologists say global warming is occurring and caused by humans
*The authors contacted 10,200 scientists listed in the 2007 edition of the American Geological Institute's Directory of Geoscience Departments and received 3,146 responses to their two questions: "have mean global temperatures risen compared to pre-1800s levels?" and "Has human activity been a significant factor in changing mean global temperatures?"
please post something from one of those environut blogs again.
This was the source for the article. But an ignoramous like you wouldn't be expected to understand sourcing an article.
American Geological Institute - Serving the Geosciences Since 1948
ABOUT AGI -- The American Geological Institute is a nonprofit federation of 46 geoscientific and professional associations that represents more than 120,000 geologists, geophysicists, and other earth scientists. Founded in 1948, AGI provides information services to geoscientists, serves as a voice of shared interests in our profession, plays a major role in strengthening geoscience education, and strives to increase public awareness of the vital role the geosciences play in society's use of resources, resilience to natural hazards, and the health of the environment
Just as I guessed....A voluntarily skewed result.OldRocksinthehead said:The authors contacted 10,200 scientists listed in the 2007 edition of the American Geological Institute's Directory of Geoscience Departments and received 3,146 responses to their two questions:
Now, tell us all that one about how the Sun revolves around the Earf, Pope Prattlus!![]()
Just as I guessed....A voluntarily skewed result.OldRocksinthehead said:The authors contacted 10,200 scientists listed in the 2007 edition of the American Geological Institute's Directory of Geoscience Departments and received 3,146 responses to their two questions:
Now, tell us all that one about how the Sun revolves around the Earf, Pope Prattlus!![]()
AH - a bit of truth in numbers to that "poll".
I note a much more angry and aggressive tone to Old Rocks of late.
Watching one's faith be exposed as lies is not a difficult thing...
Just as I guessed....A voluntarily skewed result.OldRocksinthehead said:The authors contacted 10,200 scientists listed in the 2007 edition of the American Geological Institute's Directory of Geoscience Departments and received 3,146 responses to their two questions:
Now, tell us all that one about how the Sun revolves around the Earf, Pope Prattlus!![]()
AH - a bit of truth in numbers to that "poll".
I note a much more angry and aggressive tone to Old Rocks of late.
Watching one's faith be exposed as lies is a difficult thing...
Just as I guessed....A voluntarily skewed result.
Now, tell us all that one about how the Sun revolves around the Earf, Pope Prattlus!![]()
AH - a bit of truth in numbers to that "poll".
I note a much more angry and aggressive tone to Old Rocks of late.
Watching one's faith be exposed as lies is not a difficult thing...
he's not going to get his social medicine either.
AH - a bit of truth in numbers to that "poll".
I note a much more angry and aggressive tone to Old Rocks of late.
Watching one's faith be exposed as lies is not a difficult thing...
he's not going to get his social medicine either.
If he continues at this rate he is going to need meds just to calm the blood pressure...
He gets up early...They'll want hash browns with their egg McMuffin.Well, I suppose that I could stay on this board all night trading meaningless insults with willfull ignoramouses like Doooodeee... and ol' pervert Elvis.
But I have a job, and have to get up early in the morning, unlike some of the trolls here.![]()
Don't forget to ask them if they want fries with their Big Mac.
he's not going to get his social medicine either.
If he continues at this rate he is going to need meds just to calm the blood pressure...
that's what he has Chris for.
The integrity of the scientific community has been tainted already.And who modified the Japanese data sets, the American data sets, the Chinese data sets, the Canadian data sets ......... and so on. They all show the same thing. A rapid warming since 1850, with major effects in the Arctic in the last decade.
Debunking Misinformation About Stolen Climate Emails « Climate Progress
This is reposted from the Union of Concerned Scientists Global Warming Blog. Another good, detailed debunking can be found at the Pew Center for Global Climate Change.
The manufactured controversy over emails stolen from the University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit has generated a lot more heat than light over the past two weeks. Experts at the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) have concluded that while the emails “do raise some valid concerns about scientific integrity, they do not indicate that climate data and research have been compromised.”
UCSÂ’s analysis of the emails and the debate surrounding them aims to correct popular misconceptions about what the emails say, put them in scientific context and explain the importance of scientific integrity.
Certainly, they are not dimwits. They went to extraordinary computer wizardry to fool the entire world...for a while.Center for American Progress and Union of Concerned Scientists....Good thing that they're completely non-partisan and have funding sources are beyond reproach, huh?![]()
They are scientists and not dimbulbs like you.
Polls mean diddly. For a while, most Americans believed Obama was worth his salt. Here lately, the truth has come out and a lot of people are really surprised at their own duping.As compared to the majority of scientists? No, of those you listed, only Spencer has any standing in the scientific community.
97% of climatologists say global warming is occurring and caused by humans
97% of climatologists say global warming is occurring and caused by humans
mongabay.com
January 22, 2009
A new poll among 3,146 earth scientists found that 90 percent believe global warming is real, while 82 percent agree that human activity been a significant factor in changing mean global temperatures.
The survey, conducted among researchers listed in the American Geological Institute's Directory of Geoscience Departments*, "found that climatologists who are active in research showed the strongest consensus on the causes of global warming, with 97 percent agreeing humans play a role". The biggest doubters were petroleum geologists (47 percent) and meteorologists (64 percent). A recent poll suggests that 58 percent of Americans believe that human activity contributes to climate change.
Still the pathological liar, I see.So are Roy Spencer, Steve McIntyre, Ross McKitrick and a slew of other skeptics.Center for American Progress and Union of Concerned Scientists....Good thing that they're completely non-partisan and have funding sources are beyond reproach, huh?![]()
They are scientists.....
But since political hack sites like Center for American Progress don't pimp them out, they don't count, huh?![]()