Russia Continues Advance Toward The Dnieper

Why do you always imagine that war will be one-sided?
Because we'll attack first. And first of all we'll attack your capability to attack us.

Why do you think Russian cities are any more fireproof than American ones?
Because they are more fireproof. Russia is a cold place, and we don't build houses from twigs and papers. What is even more important our firefighters are fighting fire, they don't commit some freaking LGBT+ performances, don't protect little fish and don't play political games. Russian EMERCOM is a military structure, not a bunch of civilians and week-end soldiers like this National Guard of yours
 
Tanks get destroyed in battle, but there have been hundreds of Russian tanks destroyed for every Abrams, Leopard and Challanger. Hell Bradley’s have been killing T-80s and 90s with their 25mm cannon.
Most of Abrams, Leopards and Challengers have been destroyed before their first fire contacts with Russian tanks. Missile strikes, artillery, UAVs, mines, ambushes with ATGMs, etc...
 
Because we'll attack first. And first of all we'll attack your capability to attack us.


Because they are more fireproof. Russia is a cold place, and we don't build houses from twigs and papers. What is even more important our firefighters are fighting fire, they don't commit some freaking LGBT+ performances, don't protect little fish and don't play political games. Russian EMERCOM is a military structure, not a bunch of civilians and week-end soldiers like this National Guard of yours
Remember YOUR military is the one where officers sell their troop's food on the black market, sell their weapons, conspire to replace the reactive armor explosive blocks with wood, shall I go on about the corruption in YOUR armed forces? Having faith in THOSE TYPES of officers is flat out stupid.
 
Remember YOUR military is the one where officers sell their troop's food on the black market, sell their weapons, conspire to replace the reactive armor explosive blocks with wood, shall I go on about the corruption in YOUR armed forces? Having faith in THOSE TYPES of officers is flat out stupid.
As I said - we'll see. Highly likely, we'll see pretty soon. We don't need to be immaculate. For the victory we need to make only one fatal mistake lesser than you. And I don't think it's that difficult.
 
As I said - we'll see. Highly likely, we'll see pretty soon. We don't need to be immaculate. For the victory we need to make only one fatal mistake lesser than you. And I don't think it's that difficult.
You haven't made a single correct decision since you invaded Ukraine three years ago. You've squandered all your modern armor and artillery, lost your Black Sea fleet, lost hundreds of thousands of soldiers and are reduced to fielding thirty-year-old tanks, WWII artillery and foreign troops from North Korea as cannon fodder. Russia used to be considered a third world country with a first world military, now everyone knows it's a third world country with a third world military. Russia is toast and will never recover economically from Putin's war.
 
Last edited:
You haven't made a single correct decision since you invaded Ukraine three years ago.
Actually, even according modern Ukrainian mythology and canon of CNN-verse Russia "invaded Ukraine" back in 2014.

You've squandered all your modern armor and artillery, lost your Black Sea fleet, lost hundreds of thousands of soldiers and are reduced to fielding thirty-year-old tanks, WWII artillery and foreign troops from North Korea as cannon fodder. Russia used to be considered a third world country with a first world military, now everyone knows it's a third world country with a third world military. Russia is toast and will never recover economically from Putin's war.
As I told earler - you are totally out of touch with reality. And reality matters. Russia is just warming up.
 
Actually, even according modern Ukrainian mythology and canon of CNN-verse Russia "invaded Ukraine" back in 2014.


As I told earler - you are totally out of touch with reality. And reality matters. Russia is just warming up.
Warming up? You are on the edge of Niagara Falls in a rowboat without any oars. Every day your economic situation gets worse, you are already spending a full third of your GDP on the war and your GDP is falling by the day, the last time Russia was in this situation, the Revolution happened and the communists took over in a bloodbath.
 
Actually, even according modern Ukrainian mythology and canon of CNN-verse Russia "invaded Ukraine" back in 2014.


As I told earler - you are totally out of touch with reality. And reality matters. Russia is just warming up.
Russia DID invade Ukraine in 2014 and conquered Crimea, that’s when Ukraine got serious about defense and raised and equipped a modern, western style army rather than the Russian style conscript army that failed it in 2014.
 
The Russians are fighting NATO and their proxy Ukrainian idiots, when we see NATO missiles hitting Russia then it's a NATO war, only thing that surprises me is that Russia has been so restrained, they should have sent a message by hitting a NATO asset as a reality check for those warmongers.

Why would it surprise you? If Russia ended up in a direct war against NATO, Russia would have been defeated a long, long time ago.
 
Russia DID invade Ukraine in 2014 and conquered Crimea, that’s when Ukraine got serious about defense and raised and equipped a modern, western style army rather than the Russian style conscript army that failed it in 2014.
You can't "invade" a place if you are already there. And no, it was NATO, who started expansion eastward.
 
Warming up? You are on the edge of Niagara Falls in a rowboat without any oars.
Really? I don't think so.

Every day your economic situation gets worse, you are already spending a full third of your GDP on the war and your GDP is falling by the day, the last time Russia was in this situation, the Revolution happened and the communists took over in a bloodbath.
Oh, man, it's not even close to a revolutionary situation. And even if it were, believe me, export of revolution is one of the things Russia can do.
 
Of course, no. Russia will win, and it will be the end of NATO and it's members.

NATO exists for a reason, and the more powerful Russia and China are, the more need those countries will have for NATO. So I disagree totally.

The only way NATO could really end, is if these countries stop being democracies.
 
NATO exists for a reason, and the more powerful Russia and China are, the more need those countries will have for NATO. So I disagree totally.
But, in the case of WWIII, neutral countries will survive (occupied or not) and NATO members will be annihilated. That's from the point of the minor members. From the American point of view, European members add nothing for the safety of the USA, but decrease it by increasing the probability of the large-scale war with Russia. NATO is no good neither for the USA nor for those minor European members, if we are talking about war. It's good only in peace time and not for the people, but for corrupted politicians. Just another way to steal some money.

The only way NATO could really end, is if these countries stop being democracies.
Most of them are not democraties and never have been. And no, there will be no NATO after its defeat in a nuclear war.
 
But, in the case of WWIII, neutral countries will survive (occupied or not) and NATO members will be annihilated. That's from the point of the minor members. From the American point of view, European members add nothing for the safety of the USA, but decrease it by increasing the probability of the large-scale war with Russia. NATO is no good neither for the USA nor for those minor European members, if we are talking about war. It's good only in peace time and not for the people, but for corrupted politicians. Just another way to steal some money.


Most of them are not democraties and never have been. And no, there will be no NATO after its defeat in a nuclear war.

If there were a WW3, then it'd be difficult for countries to remain neutral.

Look at the Cold War, who was neutral there? Not many.

1737027215566.webp


Of the neutral countries, China wasn't, it participated in the Korean War on the Soviet's side, though it didn't particularly like the Russians, so didn't get involved in much of the later stuff, mostly because it was too poor, like India.

In fact every country that didn't participate was probably because their poverty wasn't an asset for the US or USSR.
 
15th post
If there were a WW3, then it'd be difficult for countries to remain neutral.

Look at the Cold War, who was neutral there? Not many.

View attachment 1066147

Of the neutral countries, China wasn't, it participated in the Korean War on the Soviet's side, though it didn't particularly like the Russians, so didn't get involved in much of the later stuff, mostly because it was too poor, like India.

In fact every country that didn't participate was probably because their poverty wasn't an asset for the US or USSR.
Sweden was neutral during both WWI and WWII. Actually, that's why they survived.
And had the chance to survive even in WWIII, if they continued their neutrality. And if WWIII is mostly "missile war", then the small countries are not very interesting for Great Powers.
 
NATO exists for a reason, and the more powerful Russia and China are, the more need those countries will have for NATO. So I disagree totally.

The only way NATO could really end, is if these countries stop being democracies.
Nato is no more than a foreign Legion for US Imperialism and a money making pyramid selling scam for the industrial military complex, don't know why you have not caught on yet, those recent NATO Countries those great democracies did anyone actually ask the people if they wanted to be in NATO with a referendum?
 
Russia DID invade Ukraine in 2014 and conquered Crimea, that’s when Ukraine got serious about defense and raised and equipped a modern, western style army rather than the Russian style conscript army that failed it in 2014.
Still lying about Russia invading Ukraine in 2014, they should have invaded in 2014 if they had many people would be alive now who are dead, Russia tried for years to settle things diplomatically with Minsk etc, they didn't even recognize the DPR and LPR for years, in 2014 it was a civil war Kiev started by attacking the people in Donbass who at the time were their own citizens, they were shelling civilians in Donetsk every day, would you still want to live under a Regime who did that?
 
Back
Top Bottom