???
Dear
JoeB131 I don't have to have a family member raped to care that other people don't get raped. I don't have to know someone personally who got injured by a drunk driver in order to want that reckless endangerment to be stopped.
False equivalency. Competing in an unfair competition is hardly rape..
What a ridiculous statement. It's ok for men to compete against women as long as there aren't many spectators. Wow.
Wow... who cares? The fact is, you guys didn't give a crap about women's track until a few trannies started showing up....
I didn't say it was equivalent
JoeB131.
That's NOT a requirement (for wrongs to be "identically the same")
in order to police against abuses.
Robbing someone is a crime, is unlawful but can be repaired
compared with rape or murder.
Since these are not equivalent does that mean
we should not stop rape, robbery and murder?
They are all unlawful actions against the consent and rights of a person.
As long as you are DEPRIVING someone of rights, liberty and equal protections
WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW, then that is VIOLATING someone's equal
rights and protections.
Do all crimes have to be equal in degree in order to police and prevent them?
What are you saying
JoeB131
Where did you get this requirement that people have to care
sincerely in order to enforce laws protecting others against violations of one kind or
another, where did you get that all violations have to be the same in order to count???
Sorry
JoeB131 but I don't have to care at all for athletes
or men or women of any profession in order to care that
the laws be fair and represent everyone affected.
It's called CONSENT OF THE GOVERNED
and it applies whether I know the person or care about what they do professionally.
If people didn't pay attention to wrongs until it involved LGBT issues,
that doesn't affect the fact that abuses of power or laws are right or wrong.
What makes them right or wrong is whether they violate
the consent, due process and equal rights and representation of people.
If LGBT can argue for rights to representation, so can everyone else.
I don't have to agree or care about those people's professions to
care that the laws be applied and enforced consistently.
Whatever point you are trying to make
JoeB131 please
stick to it and don't go off on tangents that aren't even logical.
That merely detracts and derails whatever point you were trying to make
that I am left guessing at.
Did I guess correctly? Because your approach lost me in illogic
and wasn't clear at all. Please clarify your real point, let me know if I understood
what you were really trying to say here!