Rumor: Mueller will end investigation, will not submit report, has nothing, going nowhere...

[WTP]

There were no top secret emails. There was no "fake dossier". There were no crimes or conspirators. How do we know? Because none of those prople are locked up, and Trump's people are. That makes you a big fat liar.

Even COMEY admitted in his testimony AND statement, that Hillary DID send and receive top secret emails, and that the dossier was a fake. Change the intensity and brand of your leftist coolaid propaganda.

NO, he DID NOT! sheesh....

They were emails from Syd Blumenthal, it is why they did not KNOW they were classified and it is WHY they were not MARKED with the classified information.... and it is why THEY COULD NOT CHARGE HER and win in court.

AND NO Comey did not say the dossier was FAKE.

You are either ignorant or totally delusional, or both, which makes for a great Hillary supporter.

If anyone ever wanted to prove just how dumb you are, when you posted this video, up against the opposing argument, this is that time. The opposing argument was as follows; They were emails from Syd Blumenthal, it is why they did not KNOW they were classified and it is WHY they were not MARKED with the classified information.... and it is why THEY COULD NOT CHARGE HER and win in court. Seems easy enough to understand right? Nope, not with this idiot.

As quoted in your video by Comey that there were classified emails, now quote the part where the opposition argument said there were no classified emails? The opposition argument is stating that they were not marked, not that they weren't there.

How friggin stupid do you have to be to think someone is that stupid, that they can't see your dishonesty? Answer, pretty damn stupid. Wow, what a dumb ass.

Huh?! Try making sense will ya? Comey did not reveal WHO the TOP SECRET emails were sent to and received from, nor is there any information as to their content. But, one thing is for sure, Syd Blumenthal the gossip specialist nobody with "connections" would NOT be a point of contact for TOP SECRET or classified emails, you delusional moron.

Pay attention nit wit; Even COMEY admitted in his testimony AND statement, that Hillary DID send and receive top secret emails,. That is what you said. Then you posted Comey on video saying Clinton sent classified emails. The problem was, the classified emails had the wrong labels. That is why she will never be prosecuted. I've been saying this for over two years now. And I have been proven right.

In the meantime, all you do is try and gum up the message by adding more to what no one is arguing about. No one is disputing Comey did not reveal WHO the TOP SECRET emails were sent to and received from, nor is there any information as to their content. And? What about it? If that's an argument dumb ass, you just made it with yourself. Lol!

You lack the intellectual honesty and the objectivity to be able to admit that Hillary DID send and receive top secret classified emails, those emails ended up on a pedophile pervert future Democrat ""star" Anthony Weiner's laptop, and had there not been a conspiracy at the highest levels to give Hilllary a pass no matter WHAT, Hillary would be in federal prison serving 25 years just forr those two treasonous crimes.

The emails were sent with the wrong labels. That is why she will never be prosecuted. And Hillary Clinton has nothing to do with Anthony Weiner being a pedophile.

There is no intellectual dishonesty. There are just facts. And I proved those facts to be true, because Clinton was never prosecuted. There never was a crime.

 

[Claudette]

If true it should be very interesting.

 

[WTP]

If true it should be very interesting.

If what is true?

 

[Roudy]

Even COMEY admitted in his testimony AND statement, that Hillary DID send and receive top secret emails, and that the dossier was a fake. Change the intensity and brand of your leftist coolaid propaganda.

NO, he DID NOT! sheesh....

They were emails from Syd Blumenthal, it is why they did not KNOW they were classified and it is WHY they were not MARKED with the classified information.... and it is why THEY COULD NOT CHARGE HER and win in court.

AND NO Comey did not say the dossier was FAKE.

You are either ignorant or totally delusional, or both, which makes for a great Hillary supporter.

If anyone ever wanted to prove just how dumb you are, when you posted this video, up against the opposing argument, this is that time. The opposing argument was as follows; They were emails from Syd Blumenthal, it is why they did not KNOW they were classified and it is WHY they were not MARKED with the classified information.... and it is why THEY COULD NOT CHARGE HER and win in court. Seems easy enough to understand right? Nope, not with this idiot.

As quoted in your video by Comey that there were classified emails, now quote the part where the opposition argument said there were no classified emails? The opposition argument is stating that they were not marked, not that they weren't there.

How friggin stupid do you have to be to think someone is that stupid, that they can't see your dishonesty? Answer, pretty damn stupid. Wow, what a dumb ass.

Huh?! Try making sense will ya? Comey did not reveal WHO the TOP SECRET emails were sent to and received from, nor is there any information as to their content. But, one thing is for sure, Syd Blumenthal the gossip specialist nobody with "connections" would NOT be a point of contact for TOP SECRET or classified emails, you delusional moron.

Pay attention nit wit; Even COMEY admitted in his testimony AND statement, that Hillary DID send and receive top secret emails,. That is what you said. Then you posted Comey on video saying Clinton sent classified emails. The problem was, the classified emails had the wrong labels. That is why she will never be prosecuted. I've been saying this for over two years now. And I have been proven right.

In the meantime, all you do is try and gum up the message by adding more to what no one is arguing about. No one is disputing Comey did not reveal WHO the TOP SECRET emails were sent to and received from, nor is there any information as to their content. And? What about it? If that's an argument dumb ass, you just made it with yourself. Lol!

You lack the intellectual honesty and the objectivity to be able to admit that Hillary DID send and receive top secret classified emails, those emails ended up on a pedophile pervert future Democrat ""star" Anthony Weiner's laptop, and had there not been a conspiracy at the highest levels to give Hilllary a pass no matter WHAT, Hillary would be in federal prison serving 25 years just forr those two treasonous crimes.

The emails were sent with the wrong labels. That is why she will never be prosecuted. And Hillary Clinton has nothing to do with Anthony Weiner being a pedophile.

There is no intellectual dishonesty. There are just facts. And I proved those facts to be true, because Clinton was never prosecuted. There never was a crime.

Really? "The emails had the wrong labels", ha ha ha what a bunch of fake news and baloney! Amazing, the amount of lying and fabrication to justify the fact that Hillary clearly broke the law, several times, then lied about it, and obstructed justice by destroying the evidence. All confirmed by FBI at several intervals.

Like I said, you are a committed Leftwing HACK, who obviously lacks the intellectual honesty to simply hold Hillary to the same standards that you hold Trump to. If you did, you'd be screaming off the top of your lungs to put that treasonous criminal behind bars, where she belongs.

 

[Godboy]

And when this is proven to be false…will you stop regarding what you hear on Fox News as truthful?

Of course not.

Apparently you weren't paying attention. FOX didnt say anything; some guests did. If those people are proven to be unreliable, that would be on them, not the network they spoke on.

 

[Care4all]

NO, he DID NOT! sheesh....

They were emails from Syd Blumenthal, it is why they did not KNOW they were classified and it is WHY they were not MARKED with the classified information.... and it is why THEY COULD NOT CHARGE HER and win in court.

AND NO Comey did not say the dossier was FAKE.

You are either ignorant or totally delusional, or both, which makes for a great Hillary supporter.

If anyone ever wanted to prove just how dumb you are, when you posted this video, up against the opposing argument, this is that time. The opposing argument was as follows; They were emails from Syd Blumenthal, it is why they did not KNOW they were classified and it is WHY they were not MARKED with the classified information.... and it is why THEY COULD NOT CHARGE HER and win in court. Seems easy enough to understand right? Nope, not with this idiot.

As quoted in your video by Comey that there were classified emails, now quote the part where the opposition argument said there were no classified emails? The opposition argument is stating that they were not marked, not that they weren't there.

How friggin stupid do you have to be to think someone is that stupid, that they can't see your dishonesty? Answer, pretty damn stupid. Wow, what a dumb ass.

Huh?! Try making sense will ya? Comey did not reveal WHO the TOP SECRET emails were sent to and received from, nor is there any information as to their content. But, one thing is for sure, Syd Blumenthal the gossip specialist nobody with "connections" would NOT be a point of contact for TOP SECRET or classified emails, you delusional moron.

Pay attention nit wit; Even COMEY admitted in his testimony AND statement, that Hillary DID send and receive top secret emails,. That is what you said. Then you posted Comey on video saying Clinton sent classified emails. The problem was, the classified emails had the wrong labels. That is why she will never be prosecuted. I've been saying this for over two years now. And I have been proven right.

In the meantime, all you do is try and gum up the message by adding more to what no one is arguing about. No one is disputing Comey did not reveal WHO the TOP SECRET emails were sent to and received from, nor is there any information as to their content. And? What about it? If that's an argument dumb ass, you just made it with yourself. Lol!

You lack the intellectual honesty and the objectivity to be able to admit that Hillary DID send and receive top secret classified emails, those emails ended up on a pedophile pervert future Democrat ""star" Anthony Weiner's laptop, and had there not been a conspiracy at the highest levels to give Hilllary a pass no matter WHAT, Hillary would be in federal prison serving 25 years just forr those two treasonous crimes.

The emails were sent with the wrong labels. That is why she will never be prosecuted. And Hillary Clinton has nothing to do with Anthony Weiner being a pedophile.

There is no intellectual dishonesty. There are just facts. And I proved those facts to be true, because Clinton was never prosecuted. There never was a crime.

Really? "The emails had the wrong labels", ha ha ha what a bunch of fake news and baloney! Amazing, the amount of lying and fabrication to justify the fact that Hillary clearly broke the law, several times, then lied about it, and obstructed justice by destroying the evidence. All confirmed by FBI at several intervals.

Like I said, you are a committed Leftwing HACK, who obviously lacks the intellectual honesty to simply hold Hillary to the same standards that you hold Trump to. If you did, you'd be screaming off the top of your lungs to put that treasonous criminal behind bars, where she belongs.

Nothing that was claimed to be top secret had any markings indicating such, which shows her staff did not know the content of the emails was top secret...

Most of the information they were discussing in emails came from Syd Blumenthal, and THAT is why they were not marked top secret classified, with the agency that classified it, and the agent who classified it, and the date the top secret info becomes Declassified.

ALL government top secret classified documents are stored in a server that has no internet access, and are MARKED, with the information listed above...

the 3 emails that Comey mentioned that were PARTIALLY marked classified, were not appropriately marked by the scheduling secretary who sent them to her....

She put a (C) in the content of the email. With no MARKINGS at the top. And these 3 emails, partially marked were simply for scheduling an appointment with a Diplomat/Ambassador...

It was NOT classified information with intelligence.

 

[WTP]

You are either ignorant or totally delusional, or both, which makes for a great Hillary supporter.

If anyone ever wanted to prove just how dumb you are, when you posted this video, up against the opposing argument, this is that time. The opposing argument was as follows; They were emails from Syd Blumenthal, it is why they did not KNOW they were classified and it is WHY they were not MARKED with the classified information.... and it is why THEY COULD NOT CHARGE HER and win in court. Seems easy enough to understand right? Nope, not with this idiot.

As quoted in your video by Comey that there were classified emails, now quote the part where the opposition argument said there were no classified emails? The opposition argument is stating that they were not marked, not that they weren't there.

How friggin stupid do you have to be to think someone is that stupid, that they can't see your dishonesty? Answer, pretty damn stupid. Wow, what a dumb ass.

Huh?! Try making sense will ya? Comey did not reveal WHO the TOP SECRET emails were sent to and received from, nor is there any information as to their content. But, one thing is for sure, Syd Blumenthal the gossip specialist nobody with "connections" would NOT be a point of contact for TOP SECRET or classified emails, you delusional moron.

Pay attention nit wit; Even COMEY admitted in his testimony AND statement, that Hillary DID send and receive top secret emails,. That is what you said. Then you posted Comey on video saying Clinton sent classified emails. The problem was, the classified emails had the wrong labels. That is why she will never be prosecuted. I've been saying this for over two years now. And I have been proven right.

In the meantime, all you do is try and gum up the message by adding more to what no one is arguing about. No one is disputing Comey did not reveal WHO the TOP SECRET emails were sent to and received from, nor is there any information as to their content. And? What about it? If that's an argument dumb ass, you just made it with yourself. Lol!

You lack the intellectual honesty and the objectivity to be able to admit that Hillary DID send and receive top secret classified emails, those emails ended up on a pedophile pervert future Democrat ""star" Anthony Weiner's laptop, and had there not been a conspiracy at the highest levels to give Hilllary a pass no matter WHAT, Hillary would be in federal prison serving 25 years just forr those two treasonous crimes.

The emails were sent with the wrong labels. That is why she will never be prosecuted. And Hillary Clinton has nothing to do with Anthony Weiner being a pedophile.

There is no intellectual dishonesty. There are just facts. And I proved those facts to be true, because Clinton was never prosecuted. There never was a crime.

Really? "The emails had the wrong labels", ha ha ha what a bunch of fake news and baloney! Amazing, the amount of lying and fabrication to justify the fact that Hillary clearly broke the law, several times, then lied about it, and obstructed justice by destroying the evidence. All confirmed by FBI at several intervals.

Like I said, you are a committed Leftwing HACK, who obviously lacks the intellectual honesty to simply hold Hillary to the same standards that you hold Trump to. If you did, you'd be screaming off the top of your lungs to put that treasonous criminal behind bars, where she belongs.

Nothing that was claimed to be top secret had any markings indicating such, which shows her staff did not know the content of the emails was top secret...

Most of the information they were discussing in emails came from Syd Blumenthal, and THAT is why they were not marked top secret classified, with the agency that classified it, and the agent who classified it, and the date the top secret info becomes Declassified.

ALL government top secret classified documents are stored in a server that has no internet access, and are MARKED, with the information listed above...

the 3 emails that Comey mentioned that were PARTIALLY marked classified, were not appropriately marked by the scheduling secretary who sent them to her....

She put a (C) in the content of the email. With no MARKINGS at the top. And these 3 emails, partially marked were simply for scheduling an appointment with a Diplomat/Ambassador...

It was NOT classified information with intelligence.

Isn't it amazing how much garbage the Right threw into that scandal, which literally amounted to nothing. And still is.

 

[rightwinger]

NO, he DID NOT! sheesh....

They were emails from Syd Blumenthal, it is why they did not KNOW they were classified and it is WHY they were not MARKED with the classified information.... and it is why THEY COULD NOT CHARGE HER and win in court.

AND NO Comey did not say the dossier was FAKE.

You are either ignorant or totally delusional, or both, which makes for a great Hillary supporter.

If anyone ever wanted to prove just how dumb you are, when you posted this video, up against the opposing argument, this is that time. The opposing argument was as follows; They were emails from Syd Blumenthal, it is why they did not KNOW they were classified and it is WHY they were not MARKED with the classified information.... and it is why THEY COULD NOT CHARGE HER and win in court. Seems easy enough to understand right? Nope, not with this idiot.

As quoted in your video by Comey that there were classified emails, now quote the part where the opposition argument said there were no classified emails? The opposition argument is stating that they were not marked, not that they weren't there.

How friggin stupid do you have to be to think someone is that stupid, that they can't see your dishonesty? Answer, pretty damn stupid. Wow, what a dumb ass.

Huh?! Try making sense will ya? Comey did not reveal WHO the TOP SECRET emails were sent to and received from, nor is there any information as to their content. But, one thing is for sure, Syd Blumenthal the gossip specialist nobody with "connections" would NOT be a point of contact for TOP SECRET or classified emails, you delusional moron.

Pay attention nit wit; Even COMEY admitted in his testimony AND statement, that Hillary DID send and receive top secret emails,. That is what you said. Then you posted Comey on video saying Clinton sent classified emails. The problem was, the classified emails had the wrong labels. That is why she will never be prosecuted. I've been saying this for over two years now. And I have been proven right.

In the meantime, all you do is try and gum up the message by adding more to what no one is arguing about. No one is disputing Comey did not reveal WHO the TOP SECRET emails were sent to and received from, nor is there any information as to their content. And? What about it? If that's an argument dumb ass, you just made it with yourself. Lol!

You lack the intellectual honesty and the objectivity to be able to admit that Hillary DID send and receive top secret classified emails, those emails ended up on a pedophile pervert future Democrat ""star" Anthony Weiner's laptop, and had there not been a conspiracy at the highest levels to give Hilllary a pass no matter WHAT, Hillary would be in federal prison serving 25 years just forr those two treasonous crimes.

The emails were sent with the wrong labels. That is why she will never be prosecuted. And Hillary Clinton has nothing to do with Anthony Weiner being a pedophile.

There is no intellectual dishonesty. There are just facts. And I proved those facts to be true, because Clinton was never prosecuted. There never was a crime.

Really? "The emails had the wrong labels", ha ha ha what a bunch of fake news and baloney! Amazing, the amount of lying and fabrication to justify the fact that Hillary clearly broke the law, several times, then lied about it, and obstructed justice by destroying the evidence. All confirmed by FBI at several intervals.

Like I said, you are a committed Leftwing HACK, who obviously lacks the intellectual honesty to simply hold Hillary to the same standards that you hold Trump to. If you did, you'd be screaming off the top of your lungs to put that treasonous criminal behind bars, where she belongs.

None of the emails had appropriate classification markings

 

[WTP]

NO, he DID NOT! sheesh....

They were emails from Syd Blumenthal, it is why they did not KNOW they were classified and it is WHY they were not MARKED with the classified information.... and it is why THEY COULD NOT CHARGE HER and win in court.

AND NO Comey did not say the dossier was FAKE.

You are either ignorant or totally delusional, or both, which makes for a great Hillary supporter.

If anyone ever wanted to prove just how dumb you are, when you posted this video, up against the opposing argument, this is that time. The opposing argument was as follows; They were emails from Syd Blumenthal, it is why they did not KNOW they were classified and it is WHY they were not MARKED with the classified information.... and it is why THEY COULD NOT CHARGE HER and win in court. Seems easy enough to understand right? Nope, not with this idiot.

As quoted in your video by Comey that there were classified emails, now quote the part where the opposition argument said there were no classified emails? The opposition argument is stating that they were not marked, not that they weren't there.

How friggin stupid do you have to be to think someone is that stupid, that they can't see your dishonesty? Answer, pretty damn stupid. Wow, what a dumb ass.

Huh?! Try making sense will ya? Comey did not reveal WHO the TOP SECRET emails were sent to and received from, nor is there any information as to their content. But, one thing is for sure, Syd Blumenthal the gossip specialist nobody with "connections" would NOT be a point of contact for TOP SECRET or classified emails, you delusional moron.

Pay attention nit wit; Even COMEY admitted in his testimony AND statement, that Hillary DID send and receive top secret emails,. That is what you said. Then you posted Comey on video saying Clinton sent classified emails. The problem was, the classified emails had the wrong labels. That is why she will never be prosecuted. I've been saying this for over two years now. And I have been proven right.

In the meantime, all you do is try and gum up the message by adding more to what no one is arguing about. No one is disputing Comey did not reveal WHO the TOP SECRET emails were sent to and received from, nor is there any information as to their content. And? What about it? If that's an argument dumb ass, you just made it with yourself. Lol!

You lack the intellectual honesty and the objectivity to be able to admit that Hillary DID send and receive top secret classified emails, those emails ended up on a pedophile pervert future Democrat ""star" Anthony Weiner's laptop, and had there not been a conspiracy at the highest levels to give Hilllary a pass no matter WHAT, Hillary would be in federal prison serving 25 years just forr those two treasonous crimes.

The emails were sent with the wrong labels. That is why she will never be prosecuted. And Hillary Clinton has nothing to do with Anthony Weiner being a pedophile.

There is no intellectual dishonesty. There are just facts. And I proved those facts to be true, because Clinton was never prosecuted. There never was a crime.

Really? "The emails had the wrong labels", ha ha ha what a bunch of fake news and baloney! Amazing, the amount of lying and fabrication to justify the fact that Hillary clearly broke the law, several times, then lied about it, and obstructed justice by destroying the evidence. All confirmed by FBI at several intervals.

Like I said, you are a committed Leftwing HACK, who obviously lacks the intellectual honesty to simply hold Hillary to the same standards that you hold Trump to. If you did, you'd be screaming off the top of your lungs to put that treasonous criminal behind bars, where she belongs.

The reason no one knows what you are talking about, is because you don't. There is no lying about the wrong labeling. If there was, it would have already been verified by law enforcement. It wasn't, and you are a liar.

There is no evidence also, that Hillary lied about all this. And the FBI never confirmed that. Show us the link liar, where the FBI said Clinton was lying. That's yet another lie.

The only intellectual honesty lacking is you. You haven't even linked the proof that the "dossier is fake", because you are a liar.

Let's see, didn't prove "the dossier was fake", haven't proven "Clinton lied to the FBI", and no proof anyone "lied about the wrong labeling". You're as bad as Trump you liar. But ha, keep them coming. At least the rest of us will see up close and personal what a piece of shit liar you are. Keep them coming.

 

[WTP]

You are either ignorant or totally delusional, or both, which makes for a great Hillary supporter.

If anyone ever wanted to prove just how dumb you are, when you posted this video, up against the opposing argument, this is that time. The opposing argument was as follows; They were emails from Syd Blumenthal, it is why they did not KNOW they were classified and it is WHY they were not MARKED with the classified information.... and it is why THEY COULD NOT CHARGE HER and win in court. Seems easy enough to understand right? Nope, not with this idiot.

As quoted in your video by Comey that there were classified emails, now quote the part where the opposition argument said there were no classified emails? The opposition argument is stating that they were not marked, not that they weren't there.

How friggin stupid do you have to be to think someone is that stupid, that they can't see your dishonesty? Answer, pretty damn stupid. Wow, what a dumb ass.

Huh?! Try making sense will ya? Comey did not reveal WHO the TOP SECRET emails were sent to and received from, nor is there any information as to their content. But, one thing is for sure, Syd Blumenthal the gossip specialist nobody with "connections" would NOT be a point of contact for TOP SECRET or classified emails, you delusional moron.

Pay attention nit wit; Even COMEY admitted in his testimony AND statement, that Hillary DID send and receive top secret emails,. That is what you said. Then you posted Comey on video saying Clinton sent classified emails. The problem was, the classified emails had the wrong labels. That is why she will never be prosecuted. I've been saying this for over two years now. And I have been proven right.

In the meantime, all you do is try and gum up the message by adding more to what no one is arguing about. No one is disputing Comey did not reveal WHO the TOP SECRET emails were sent to and received from, nor is there any information as to their content. And? What about it? If that's an argument dumb ass, you just made it with yourself. Lol!

You lack the intellectual honesty and the objectivity to be able to admit that Hillary DID send and receive top secret classified emails, those emails ended up on a pedophile pervert future Democrat ""star" Anthony Weiner's laptop, and had there not been a conspiracy at the highest levels to give Hilllary a pass no matter WHAT, Hillary would be in federal prison serving 25 years just forr those two treasonous crimes.

The emails were sent with the wrong labels. That is why she will never be prosecuted. And Hillary Clinton has nothing to do with Anthony Weiner being a pedophile.

There is no intellectual dishonesty. There are just facts. And I proved those facts to be true, because Clinton was never prosecuted. There never was a crime.

Really? "The emails had the wrong labels", ha ha ha what a bunch of fake news and baloney! Amazing, the amount of lying and fabrication to justify the fact that Hillary clearly broke the law, several times, then lied about it, and obstructed justice by destroying the evidence. All confirmed by FBI at several intervals.

Like I said, you are a committed Leftwing HACK, who obviously lacks the intellectual honesty to simply hold Hillary to the same standards that you hold Trump to. If you did, you'd be screaming off the top of your lungs to put that treasonous criminal behind bars, where she belongs.

None of the emails had appropriate classification markings

You are either ignorant or totally delusional, or both, which makes for a great Hillary supporter.

If anyone ever wanted to prove just how dumb you are, when you posted this video, up against the opposing argument, this is that time. The opposing argument was as follows; They were emails from Syd Blumenthal, it is why they did not KNOW they were classified and it is WHY they were not MARKED with the classified information.... and it is why THEY COULD NOT CHARGE HER and win in court. Seems easy enough to understand right? Nope, not with this idiot.

As quoted in your video by Comey that there were classified emails, now quote the part where the opposition argument said there were no classified emails? The opposition argument is stating that they were not marked, not that they weren't there.

How friggin stupid do you have to be to think someone is that stupid, that they can't see your dishonesty? Answer, pretty damn stupid. Wow, what a dumb ass.

Huh?! Try making sense will ya? Comey did not reveal WHO the TOP SECRET emails were sent to and received from, nor is there any information as to their content. But, one thing is for sure, Syd Blumenthal the gossip specialist nobody with "connections" would NOT be a point of contact for TOP SECRET or classified emails, you delusional moron.

Pay attention nit wit; Even COMEY admitted in his testimony AND statement, that Hillary DID send and receive top secret emails,. That is what you said. Then you posted Comey on video saying Clinton sent classified emails. The problem was, the classified emails had the wrong labels. That is why she will never be prosecuted. I've been saying this for over two years now. And I have been proven right.

In the meantime, all you do is try and gum up the message by adding more to what no one is arguing about. No one is disputing Comey did not reveal WHO the TOP SECRET emails were sent to and received from, nor is there any information as to their content. And? What about it? If that's an argument dumb ass, you just made it with yourself. Lol!

You lack the intellectual honesty and the objectivity to be able to admit that Hillary DID send and receive top secret classified emails, those emails ended up on a pedophile pervert future Democrat ""star" Anthony Weiner's laptop, and had there not been a conspiracy at the highest levels to give Hilllary a pass no matter WHAT, Hillary would be in federal prison serving 25 years just forr those two treasonous crimes.

The emails were sent with the wrong labels. That is why she will never be prosecuted. And Hillary Clinton has nothing to do with Anthony Weiner being a pedophile.

There is no intellectual dishonesty. There are just facts. And I proved those facts to be true, because Clinton was never prosecuted. There never was a crime.

Really? "The emails had the wrong labels", ha ha ha what a bunch of fake news and baloney! Amazing, the amount of lying and fabrication to justify the fact that Hillary clearly broke the law, several times, then lied about it, and obstructed justice by destroying the evidence. All confirmed by FBI at several intervals.

Like I said, you are a committed Leftwing HACK, who obviously lacks the intellectual honesty to simply hold Hillary to the same standards that you hold Trump to. If you did, you'd be screaming off the top of your lungs to put that treasonous criminal behind bars, where she belongs.

None of the emails had appropriate classification markings

Probably not!

 

[Care4all]

You are either ignorant or totally delusional, or both, which makes for a great Hillary supporter.

If anyone ever wanted to prove just how dumb you are, when you posted this video, up against the opposing argument, this is that time. The opposing argument was as follows; They were emails from Syd Blumenthal, it is why they did not KNOW they were classified and it is WHY they were not MARKED with the classified information.... and it is why THEY COULD NOT CHARGE HER and win in court. Seems easy enough to understand right? Nope, not with this idiot.

As quoted in your video by Comey that there were classified emails, now quote the part where the opposition argument said there were no classified emails? The opposition argument is stating that they were not marked, not that they weren't there.

How friggin stupid do you have to be to think someone is that stupid, that they can't see your dishonesty? Answer, pretty damn stupid. Wow, what a dumb ass.

Huh?! Try making sense will ya? Comey did not reveal WHO the TOP SECRET emails were sent to and received from, nor is there any information as to their content. But, one thing is for sure, Syd Blumenthal the gossip specialist nobody with "connections" would NOT be a point of contact for TOP SECRET or classified emails, you delusional moron.

Pay attention nit wit; Even COMEY admitted in his testimony AND statement, that Hillary DID send and receive top secret emails,. That is what you said. Then you posted Comey on video saying Clinton sent classified emails. The problem was, the classified emails had the wrong labels. That is why she will never be prosecuted. I've been saying this for over two years now. And I have been proven right.

In the meantime, all you do is try and gum up the message by adding more to what no one is arguing about. No one is disputing Comey did not reveal WHO the TOP SECRET emails were sent to and received from, nor is there any information as to their content. And? What about it? If that's an argument dumb ass, you just made it with yourself. Lol!

You lack the intellectual honesty and the objectivity to be able to admit that Hillary DID send and receive top secret classified emails, those emails ended up on a pedophile pervert future Democrat ""star" Anthony Weiner's laptop, and had there not been a conspiracy at the highest levels to give Hilllary a pass no matter WHAT, Hillary would be in federal prison serving 25 years just forr those two treasonous crimes.

The emails were sent with the wrong labels. That is why she will never be prosecuted. And Hillary Clinton has nothing to do with Anthony Weiner being a pedophile.

There is no intellectual dishonesty. There are just facts. And I proved those facts to be true, because Clinton was never prosecuted. There never was a crime.

Really? "The emails had the wrong labels", ha ha ha what a bunch of fake news and baloney! Amazing, the amount of lying and fabrication to justify the fact that Hillary clearly broke the law, several times, then lied about it, and obstructed justice by destroying the evidence. All confirmed by FBI at several intervals.

Like I said, you are a committed Leftwing HACK, who obviously lacks the intellectual honesty to simply hold Hillary to the same standards that you hold Trump to. If you did, you'd be screaming off the top of your lungs to put that treasonous criminal behind bars, where she belongs.

None of the emails had appropriate classification markings

Also this...

On July 5, FBI Director James Comey announced that he was not going to recommend the filing of criminal charges against Hillary Clinton over her use of a private email server. Comey said there was insufficient evidence to show Clinton had malicious intent. Comey reasoned:


All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information, or vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct, or indications of disloyalty to the United States… We do not see those things here.


Many commentators have criticized Comey’s decision, arguing the statute Clinton was accused of violating, 18 U.S.C. § 793(f), requires only “gross negligence,” not intent. Former federal prosecutor Andy McCarthy has gone so far as to say that replacing the words “gross negligence” with “intent” rewrites that statute to serve political ends.


McCarthy and others are mistaken. The issue of mens rea, or intent, is not as simple as it seems on the surface, and intent is the correct standard. Comey was right not to recommend filing charges and to base his decision on the absence of evidence that Clinton had the necessary intent.


Section 793(f) makes it a felony for any person “entrusted with… information relating to the national defense” to allow that information to be “removed from its proper place of custody” through “gross negligence.” On its face, the law does not appear to require intent, but it turns out the key phrase in 793(f) is not “gross negligence.” The key phrase is “related to the national defense.” (And ''removed from its proper place of custody'')

read more
Why Intent, Not Gross Negligence, is the Standard in Clinton Case

 

[Correll]

If anyone ever wanted to prove just how dumb you are, when you posted this video, up against the opposing argument, this is that time. The opposing argument was as follows; They were emails from Syd Blumenthal, it is why they did not KNOW they were classified and it is WHY they were not MARKED with the classified information.... and it is why THEY COULD NOT CHARGE HER and win in court. Seems easy enough to understand right? Nope, not with this idiot.

As quoted in your video by Comey that there were classified emails, now quote the part where the opposition argument said there were no classified emails? The opposition argument is stating that they were not marked, not that they weren't there.

How friggin stupid do you have to be to think someone is that stupid, that they can't see your dishonesty? Answer, pretty damn stupid. Wow, what a dumb ass.

Huh?! Try making sense will ya? Comey did not reveal WHO the TOP SECRET emails were sent to and received from, nor is there any information as to their content. But, one thing is for sure, Syd Blumenthal the gossip specialist nobody with "connections" would NOT be a point of contact for TOP SECRET or classified emails, you delusional moron.

Pay attention nit wit; Even COMEY admitted in his testimony AND statement, that Hillary DID send and receive top secret emails,. That is what you said. Then you posted Comey on video saying Clinton sent classified emails. The problem was, the classified emails had the wrong labels. That is why she will never be prosecuted. I've been saying this for over two years now. And I have been proven right.

In the meantime, all you do is try and gum up the message by adding more to what no one is arguing about. No one is disputing Comey did not reveal WHO the TOP SECRET emails were sent to and received from, nor is there any information as to their content. And? What about it? If that's an argument dumb ass, you just made it with yourself. Lol!

You lack the intellectual honesty and the objectivity to be able to admit that Hillary DID send and receive top secret classified emails, those emails ended up on a pedophile pervert future Democrat ""star" Anthony Weiner's laptop, and had there not been a conspiracy at the highest levels to give Hilllary a pass no matter WHAT, Hillary would be in federal prison serving 25 years just forr those two treasonous crimes.

The emails were sent with the wrong labels. That is why she will never be prosecuted. And Hillary Clinton has nothing to do with Anthony Weiner being a pedophile.

There is no intellectual dishonesty. There are just facts. And I proved those facts to be true, because Clinton was never prosecuted. There never was a crime.

Really? "The emails had the wrong labels", ha ha ha what a bunch of fake news and baloney! Amazing, the amount of lying and fabrication to justify the fact that Hillary clearly broke the law, several times, then lied about it, and obstructed justice by destroying the evidence. All confirmed by FBI at several intervals.

Like I said, you are a committed Leftwing HACK, who obviously lacks the intellectual honesty to simply hold Hillary to the same standards that you hold Trump to. If you did, you'd be screaming off the top of your lungs to put that treasonous criminal behind bars, where she belongs.

None of the emails had appropriate classification markings

Also this...

On July 5, FBI Director James Comey announced that he was not going to recommend the filing of criminal charges against Hillary Clinton over her use of a private email server. Comey said there was insufficient evidence to show Clinton had malicious intent. Comey reasoned:


All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information, or vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct, or indications of disloyalty to the United States… We do not see those things here.


Many commentators have criticized Comey’s decision, arguing the statute Clinton was accused of violating, 18 U.S.C. § 793(f), requires only “gross negligence,” not intent. Former federal prosecutor Andy McCarthy has gone so far as to say that replacing the words “gross negligence” with “intent” rewrites that statute to serve political ends.


McCarthy and others are mistaken. The issue of mens rea, or intent, is not as simple as it seems on the surface, and intent is the correct standard. Comey was right not to recommend filing charges and to base his decision on the absence of evidence that Clinton had the necessary intent.


Section 793(f) makes it a felony for any person “entrusted with… information relating to the national defense” to allow that information to be “removed from its proper place of custody” through “gross negligence.” On its face, the law does not appear to require intent, but it turns out the key phrase in 793(f) is not “gross negligence.” The key phrase is “related to the national defense.” (And ''removed from its proper place of custody'')

read more
Why Intent, Not Gross Negligence, is the Standard in Clinton Case

Nothing in your post supports your conclusion, that McCarthy is wrong about "intent".

 

[WTP]

Huh?! Try making sense will ya? Comey did not reveal WHO the TOP SECRET emails were sent to and received from, nor is there any information as to their content. But, one thing is for sure, Syd Blumenthal the gossip specialist nobody with "connections" would NOT be a point of contact for TOP SECRET or classified emails, you delusional moron.

Pay attention nit wit; Even COMEY admitted in his testimony AND statement, that Hillary DID send and receive top secret emails,. That is what you said. Then you posted Comey on video saying Clinton sent classified emails. The problem was, the classified emails had the wrong labels. That is why she will never be prosecuted. I've been saying this for over two years now. And I have been proven right.

In the meantime, all you do is try and gum up the message by adding more to what no one is arguing about. No one is disputing Comey did not reveal WHO the TOP SECRET emails were sent to and received from, nor is there any information as to their content. And? What about it? If that's an argument dumb ass, you just made it with yourself. Lol!

You lack the intellectual honesty and the objectivity to be able to admit that Hillary DID send and receive top secret classified emails, those emails ended up on a pedophile pervert future Democrat ""star" Anthony Weiner's laptop, and had there not been a conspiracy at the highest levels to give Hilllary a pass no matter WHAT, Hillary would be in federal prison serving 25 years just forr those two treasonous crimes.

The emails were sent with the wrong labels. That is why she will never be prosecuted. And Hillary Clinton has nothing to do with Anthony Weiner being a pedophile.

There is no intellectual dishonesty. There are just facts. And I proved those facts to be true, because Clinton was never prosecuted. There never was a crime.

Really? "The emails had the wrong labels", ha ha ha what a bunch of fake news and baloney! Amazing, the amount of lying and fabrication to justify the fact that Hillary clearly broke the law, several times, then lied about it, and obstructed justice by destroying the evidence. All confirmed by FBI at several intervals.

Like I said, you are a committed Leftwing HACK, who obviously lacks the intellectual honesty to simply hold Hillary to the same standards that you hold Trump to. If you did, you'd be screaming off the top of your lungs to put that treasonous criminal behind bars, where she belongs.

None of the emails had appropriate classification markings

Also this...

On July 5, FBI Director James Comey announced that he was not going to recommend the filing of criminal charges against Hillary Clinton over her use of a private email server. Comey said there was insufficient evidence to show Clinton had malicious intent. Comey reasoned:


All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information, or vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct, or indications of disloyalty to the United States… We do not see those things here.


Many commentators have criticized Comey’s decision, arguing the statute Clinton was accused of violating, 18 U.S.C. § 793(f), requires only “gross negligence,” not intent. Former federal prosecutor Andy McCarthy has gone so far as to say that replacing the words “gross negligence” with “intent” rewrites that statute to serve political ends.


McCarthy and others are mistaken. The issue of mens rea, or intent, is not as simple as it seems on the surface, and intent is the correct standard. Comey was right not to recommend filing charges and to base his decision on the absence of evidence that Clinton had the necessary intent.


Section 793(f) makes it a felony for any person “entrusted with… information relating to the national defense” to allow that information to be “removed from its proper place of custody” through “gross negligence.” On its face, the law does not appear to require intent, but it turns out the key phrase in 793(f) is not “gross negligence.” The key phrase is “related to the national defense.” (And ''removed from its proper place of custody'')

read more
Why Intent, Not Gross Negligence, is the Standard in Clinton Case

Nothing in your post supports your conclusion, that McCarthy is wrong about "intent".

In other news related to the thread, lol, because of this investigation, Flynn is going to jail along with Manafort, while Republicans themselves are pointing out all the lies by Trump over the weekend related to the investigation; blob:https://www.msnbc.com/1c4e93b3-7c73-4342-80da-796a75a2f3


Deadline: White House on MSNBC

 

[Correll]

Pay attention nit wit; Even COMEY admitted in his testimony AND statement, that Hillary DID send and receive top secret emails,. That is what you said. Then you posted Comey on video saying Clinton sent classified emails. The problem was, the classified emails had the wrong labels. That is why she will never be prosecuted. I've been saying this for over two years now. And I have been proven right.

In the meantime, all you do is try and gum up the message by adding more to what no one is arguing about. No one is disputing Comey did not reveal WHO the TOP SECRET emails were sent to and received from, nor is there any information as to their content. And? What about it? If that's an argument dumb ass, you just made it with yourself. Lol!

The emails were sent with the wrong labels. That is why she will never be prosecuted. And Hillary Clinton has nothing to do with Anthony Weiner being a pedophile.

There is no intellectual dishonesty. There are just facts. And I proved those facts to be true, because Clinton was never prosecuted. There never was a crime.

Really? "The emails had the wrong labels", ha ha ha what a bunch of fake news and baloney! Amazing, the amount of lying and fabrication to justify the fact that Hillary clearly broke the law, several times, then lied about it, and obstructed justice by destroying the evidence. All confirmed by FBI at several intervals.

Like I said, you are a committed Leftwing HACK, who obviously lacks the intellectual honesty to simply hold Hillary to the same standards that you hold Trump to. If you did, you'd be screaming off the top of your lungs to put that treasonous criminal behind bars, where she belongs.

None of the emails had appropriate classification markings

Also this...

On July 5, FBI Director James Comey announced that he was not going to recommend the filing of criminal charges against Hillary Clinton over her use of a private email server. Comey said there was insufficient evidence to show Clinton had malicious intent. Comey reasoned:


All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information, or vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct, or indications of disloyalty to the United States… We do not see those things here.


Many commentators have criticized Comey’s decision, arguing the statute Clinton was accused of violating, 18 U.S.C. § 793(f), requires only “gross negligence,” not intent. Former federal prosecutor Andy McCarthy has gone so far as to say that replacing the words “gross negligence” with “intent” rewrites that statute to serve political ends.


McCarthy and others are mistaken. The issue of mens rea, or intent, is not as simple as it seems on the surface, and intent is the correct standard. Comey was right not to recommend filing charges and to base his decision on the absence of evidence that Clinton had the necessary intent.


Section 793(f) makes it a felony for any person “entrusted with… information relating to the national defense” to allow that information to be “removed from its proper place of custody” through “gross negligence.” On its face, the law does not appear to require intent, but it turns out the key phrase in 793(f) is not “gross negligence.” The key phrase is “related to the national defense.” (And ''removed from its proper place of custody'')

read more
Why Intent, Not Gross Negligence, is the Standard in Clinton Case

Nothing in your post supports your conclusion, that McCarthy is wrong about "intent".

In other news related to the thread, lol, because of this investigation, Flynn is going to jail along with Manafort, while Republicans themselves are pointing out all the lies by Trump over the weekend related to the investigation; blob:https://www.msnbc.com/1c4e93b3-7c73-4342-80da-796a75a2f3

https://media1.s-nbcnews.com/j/MSNB...ine_flynn_180917_1920x1080.760;380;7;70;5.jpg

Hillary got a pass by the FBI. THe FBI lied about the law when they justified that.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Rumor: Iran sucks and the prior administration gave them tons of $$$.

Oh shoot that actually happened.

 

[WTP]

Really? "The emails had the wrong labels", ha ha ha what a bunch of fake news and baloney! Amazing, the amount of lying and fabrication to justify the fact that Hillary clearly broke the law, several times, then lied about it, and obstructed justice by destroying the evidence. All confirmed by FBI at several intervals.

Like I said, you are a committed Leftwing HACK, who obviously lacks the intellectual honesty to simply hold Hillary to the same standards that you hold Trump to. If you did, you'd be screaming off the top of your lungs to put that treasonous criminal behind bars, where she belongs.

None of the emails had appropriate classification markings

Also this...

On July 5, FBI Director James Comey announced that he was not going to recommend the filing of criminal charges against Hillary Clinton over her use of a private email server. Comey said there was insufficient evidence to show Clinton had malicious intent. Comey reasoned:


All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information, or vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct, or indications of disloyalty to the United States… We do not see those things here.


Many commentators have criticized Comey’s decision, arguing the statute Clinton was accused of violating, 18 U.S.C. § 793(f), requires only “gross negligence,” not intent. Former federal prosecutor Andy McCarthy has gone so far as to say that replacing the words “gross negligence” with “intent” rewrites that statute to serve political ends.


McCarthy and others are mistaken. The issue of mens rea, or intent, is not as simple as it seems on the surface, and intent is the correct standard. Comey was right not to recommend filing charges and to base his decision on the absence of evidence that Clinton had the necessary intent.


Section 793(f) makes it a felony for any person “entrusted with… information relating to the national defense” to allow that information to be “removed from its proper place of custody” through “gross negligence.” On its face, the law does not appear to require intent, but it turns out the key phrase in 793(f) is not “gross negligence.” The key phrase is “related to the national defense.” (And ''removed from its proper place of custody'')

read more
Why Intent, Not Gross Negligence, is the Standard in Clinton Case

Nothing in your post supports your conclusion, that McCarthy is wrong about "intent".

In other news related to the thread, lol, because of this investigation, Flynn is going to jail along with Manafort, while Republicans themselves are pointing out all the lies by Trump over the weekend related to the investigation; blob:https://www.msnbc.com/1c4e93b3-7c73-4342-80da-796a75a2f3

https://media1.s-nbcnews.com/j/MSNB...ine_flynn_180917_1920x1080.760;380;7;70;5.jpg

Hillary got a pass by the FBI. THe FBI lied about the law when they justified that.

Proof it was a lie, while Mueller sends Flynn and Manafort to jail?

 

[Correll]

None of the emails had appropriate classification markings

Also this...

On July 5, FBI Director James Comey announced that he was not going to recommend the filing of criminal charges against Hillary Clinton over her use of a private email server. Comey said there was insufficient evidence to show Clinton had malicious intent. Comey reasoned:


All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information, or vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct, or indications of disloyalty to the United States… We do not see those things here.


Many commentators have criticized Comey’s decision, arguing the statute Clinton was accused of violating, 18 U.S.C. § 793(f), requires only “gross negligence,” not intent. Former federal prosecutor Andy McCarthy has gone so far as to say that replacing the words “gross negligence” with “intent” rewrites that statute to serve political ends.


McCarthy and others are mistaken. The issue of mens rea, or intent, is not as simple as it seems on the surface, and intent is the correct standard. Comey was right not to recommend filing charges and to base his decision on the absence of evidence that Clinton had the necessary intent.


Section 793(f) makes it a felony for any person “entrusted with… information relating to the national defense” to allow that information to be “removed from its proper place of custody” through “gross negligence.” On its face, the law does not appear to require intent, but it turns out the key phrase in 793(f) is not “gross negligence.” The key phrase is “related to the national defense.” (And ''removed from its proper place of custody'')

read more
Why Intent, Not Gross Negligence, is the Standard in Clinton Case

Nothing in your post supports your conclusion, that McCarthy is wrong about "intent".

In other news related to the thread, lol, because of this investigation, Flynn is going to jail along with Manafort, while Republicans themselves are pointing out all the lies by Trump over the weekend related to the investigation; blob:https://www.msnbc.com/1c4e93b3-7c73-4342-80da-796a75a2f3

https://media1.s-nbcnews.com/j/MSNB...ine_flynn_180917_1920x1080.760;380;7;70;5.jpg

Hillary got a pass by the FBI. THe FBI lied about the law when they justified that.

Proof it was a lie, while Mueller sends Flynn and Manafort to jail?

THe lie is clearly spelled out in the excerpt above.

 

[Care4all]

Hillary got a pass by the FBI. THe FBI lied about the law when they justified that.

That is simply NOT TRUE, and right wing mumbo jumbo, that you chose to believe Correll!

Here is the Espionage Act below.... she and her staff DID NOT commit section a, b, c, d or e.

18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information

(a)
Whoever, for the purpose of obtaining information respecting the national defense with intent or reason to believe that the information is to be used to the injury of the United States, or to the advantage of any foreign nation, goes upon, enters, flies over, or otherwise obtains information concerning any vessel, aircraft, work of defense, navy yard, naval station, submarine base, fueling station, fort, battery, torpedo station, dockyard, canal, railroad, arsenal, camp, factory, mine, telegraph, telephone, wireless, or signal station, building, office, research laboratory or station or other place connected with the national defense owned or constructed, or in progress of construction by the United States or under the control of the United States, or of any of its officers, departments, or agencies, or within the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States, or any place in which any vessel, aircraft, arms, munitions, or other materials or instruments for use in time of war are being made, prepared, repaired, stored, or are the subject of research or development, under any contract or agreement with the United States, or any department or agency thereof, or with any person on behalf of the United States, or otherwise on behalf of the United States, or any prohibited place so designated by the President by proclamation in time of war or in case of national emergency in which anything for the use of the Army, Navy, or Air Force is being prepared or constructed or stored, information as to which prohibited place the President has determined would be prejudicial to the national defense; or


(b)
Whoever, for the purpose aforesaid, and with like intent or reason to believe, copies, takes, makes, or obtains, or attempts to copy, take, make, or obtain, any sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, document, writing, or note of anything connected with the national defense; or


(c)
Whoever, for the purpose aforesaid, receives or obtains or agrees or attempts to receive or obtain from any person, or from any source whatever, any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note, of anything connected with the national defense, knowing or having reason to believe, at the time he receives or obtains, or agrees or attempts to receive or obtain it, that it has been or will be obtained, taken, made, or disposed of by any person contrary to the provisions of this chapter; or


(d)
Whoever, lawfully having possession of, access to, control over, or being entrusted with any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it on demand to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it; or


(e)
Whoever having unauthorized possession of, access to, or control over any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted, or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it; or





In f, the gross negligence section of the law:
-she did not do part 1.
-she did not do part 2.

NOTHING was removed from its proper place....
NO Knowledge of anything being removed illegally



(f)
Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—

18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information

 

[Correll]

Hillary got a pass by the FBI. THe FBI lied about the law when they justified that.

That is simply NOT TRUE, and right wing mumbo jumbo, that you chose to believe Correll!

Here is the Espionage Act below.... she and her staff DID NOT commit section a, b, c, d or e.

18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information

(a)
Whoever, for the purpose of obtaining information respecting the national defense with intent or reason to believe that the information is to be used to the injury of the United States, or to the advantage of any foreign nation, goes upon, enters, flies over, or otherwise obtains information concerning any vessel, aircraft, work of defense, navy yard, naval station, submarine base, fueling station, fort, battery, torpedo station, dockyard, canal, railroad, arsenal, camp, factory, mine, telegraph, telephone, wireless, or signal station, building, office, research laboratory or station or other place connected with the national defense owned or constructed, or in progress of construction by the United States or under the control of the United States, or of any of its officers, departments, or agencies, or within the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States, or any place in which any vessel, aircraft, arms, munitions, or other materials or instruments for use in time of war are being made, prepared, repaired, stored, or are the subject of research or development, under any contract or agreement with the United States, or any department or agency thereof, or with any person on behalf of the United States, or otherwise on behalf of the United States, or any prohibited place so designated by the President by proclamation in time of war or in case of national emergency in which anything for the use of the Army, Navy, or Air Force is being prepared or constructed or stored, information as to which prohibited place the President has determined would be prejudicial to the national defense; or


(b)
Whoever, for the purpose aforesaid, and with like intent or reason to believe, copies, takes, makes, or obtains, or attempts to copy, take, make, or obtain, any sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, document, writing, or note of anything connected with the national defense; or


(c)
Whoever, for the purpose aforesaid, receives or obtains or agrees or attempts to receive or obtain from any person, or from any source whatever, any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note, of anything connected with the national defense, knowing or having reason to believe, at the time he receives or obtains, or agrees or attempts to receive or obtain it, that it has been or will be obtained, taken, made, or disposed of by any person contrary to the provisions of this chapter; or


(d)
Whoever, lawfully having possession of, access to, control over, or being entrusted with any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it on demand to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it; or


(e)
Whoever having unauthorized possession of, access to, or control over any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted, or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it; or





In f, the gross negligence section of the law:
-she did not do part 1.
-she did not do part 2.

NOTHING was removed from its proper place....
NO Knowledge of anything being removed illegally



(f)
Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—

18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information

She was grossly negligence by using her private email for classified material..

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

Her last name was the only thing keeping her out of prison