Ruh roh! Hillary is in trouble now. Russia Is Set To Release Clinton's Intercepted Emails

[SmokeALib]

How will Hillary deny that she took money for favors as Secretary of State after the Russians release her so-called "private emails?"

Russia Is Reportedly Set To Release Clinton's Intercepted Emails

Reliable intelligence sources in the West have indicated that warnings had been received that the Russian Government could in the near future release the text of email messages intercepted from U.S. Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s private e-mail server from the time she was U.S. Secretary of State. The release would, the messaging indicated, prove that Secretary Clinton had, in fact, laid open U.S. secrets to foreign interception by putting highly-classified Government reports onto a private server in violation of U.S. law, and that, as suspected, the server had been targeted and hacked by foreign intelligence services.

The reports indicated that the decision as to whether to reveal the intercepts would be made by Russian Federation President Vladimir Putin, and it was possible that the release would, if made, be through a third party, such as Wikileaks. The apparent message from Moscow, through the intelligence community, seemed to indicate frustration with the pace of the official U.S. Department of Justice investigation into the so-called server scandal, which seemed to offer prima facie evidence that U.S. law had been violated by Mrs Clinton’s decision to use a private server through which to conduct official and often highly-secret communications during her time as Secretary of State. U.S. sources indicated that the extensive Deptartment of Justice probe was more focused on the possibility that the private server was used to protect messaging in which Secretary Clinton allegedly discussed quid pro quo transactions with private donors to the Clinton Foundation in exchange for influence on U.S. policy.​

bra hahahahahahahaha you are one dumb shit

comey concluded on Hillarys case on July 5, 2016 ... if your article is correct which it isn't, then comey would have some sort of charge for her ... the russians didn't get one email off her server... your article was written June 13 2016 ... 20 days before the FBI released their statement ... if the russians had anything they would have given them to Comey ... they didn't do that ... they didn't give Comey any part of youre made up story case closed ...
Russia Is Reportedly Set To Release Clinton's Intercepted Emails
By Defense and Foreign Affairs - Jun 13, 2016, 2:37 PM CDT

Comey is bought and paid for.

 

[owebo]

We have systems in place to prevent this....it's important to know what the enemy is doing to circumvent these systems.....

blah, blah blah, blah blah, blah blah, blah blah, blah blah, blah blah, blah

Exactly.....

blah, blah blah, blah blah, blah blah, blah blah, blah blah, blah blah, blah

Yes, yes.....exactly....

blah, blah blah, blah blah, blah blah, blah blah, blah blah, blah blah, blah

Yep....exactly....

 

[G.T.]

This is stupidity on so many levels, especially wanting for it to happen.

And since when is spying/hacking ok to just openly admit? That's cool with anybody? Proud of that? Who are you guys?

You missed the point.

It is very likely her private server was hacked and not only by Russia. In a recent radio interview, former defense secretary Robert M. Gates said that the Pentagon “acknowledges they get attacked about 100,000 times a day.”
FBI: No evidence Clinton’s email was hacked by foreign powers, but it could have been

Do you want a 'careless' POTUS?

The FBI's failure to prosecute her when she clearly broke the law and lied about it several times, is the point.

Now if Russia exposes thousands of her emails, will it mean anything to you?

Yes, it will mean that a competitor Nation freely admits to spying as well as breaking and entering.

 

[billyerock1991]

How will Hillary deny that she took money for favors as Secretary of State after the Russians release her so-called "private emails?"

Russia Is Reportedly Set To Release Clinton's Intercepted Emails

Reliable intelligence sources in the West have indicated that warnings had been received that the Russian Government could in the near future release the text of email messages intercepted from U.S. Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s private e-mail server from the time she was U.S. Secretary of State. The release would, the messaging indicated, prove that Secretary Clinton had, in fact, laid open U.S. secrets to foreign interception by putting highly-classified Government reports onto a private server in violation of U.S. law, and that, as suspected, the server had been targeted and hacked by foreign intelligence services.

The reports indicated that the decision as to whether to reveal the intercepts would be made by Russian Federation President Vladimir Putin, and it was possible that the release would, if made, be through a third party, such as Wikileaks. The apparent message from Moscow, through the intelligence community, seemed to indicate frustration with the pace of the official U.S. Department of Justice investigation into the so-called server scandal, which seemed to offer prima facie evidence that U.S. law had been violated by Mrs Clinton’s decision to use a private server through which to conduct official and often highly-secret communications during her time as Secretary of State. U.S. sources indicated that the extensive Deptartment of Justice probe was more focused on the possibility that the private server was used to protect messaging in which Secretary Clinton allegedly discussed quid pro quo transactions with private donors to the Clinton Foundation in exchange for influence on U.S. policy.​

bra hahahahahahahaha you are one dumb shit

comey concluded on Hillarys case on July 5, 2016 ... if your article is correct which it isn't, then comey would have some sort of charge for her ... the russians didn't get one email off her server... your article was written June 13 2016 ... 20 days before the FBI released their statement ... if the russians had anything they would have given them to Comey ... they didn't do that ... they didn't give Comey any part of youre made up story case closed ...
Russia Is Reportedly Set To Release Clinton's Intercepted Emails
By Defense and Foreign Affairs - Jun 13, 2016, 2:37 PM CDT

Comey is bought and paid for.

you are so full of it... first of all he's a republican He was the United States Deputy Attorney General, serving in President George W. Bush's administration. As Deputy Attorney General, he was appointed by Bush

 

[SmokeALib]

How will Hillary deny that she took money for favors as Secretary of State after the Russians release her so-called "private emails?"

Russia Is Reportedly Set To Release Clinton's Intercepted Emails

Reliable intelligence sources in the West have indicated that warnings had been received that the Russian Government could in the near future release the text of email messages intercepted from U.S. Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s private e-mail server from the time she was U.S. Secretary of State. The release would, the messaging indicated, prove that Secretary Clinton had, in fact, laid open U.S. secrets to foreign interception by putting highly-classified Government reports onto a private server in violation of U.S. law, and that, as suspected, the server had been targeted and hacked by foreign intelligence services.

The reports indicated that the decision as to whether to reveal the intercepts would be made by Russian Federation President Vladimir Putin, and it was possible that the release would, if made, be through a third party, such as Wikileaks. The apparent message from Moscow, through the intelligence community, seemed to indicate frustration with the pace of the official U.S. Department of Justice investigation into the so-called server scandal, which seemed to offer prima facie evidence that U.S. law had been violated by Mrs Clinton’s decision to use a private server through which to conduct official and often highly-secret communications during her time as Secretary of State. U.S. sources indicated that the extensive Deptartment of Justice probe was more focused on the possibility that the private server was used to protect messaging in which Secretary Clinton allegedly discussed quid pro quo transactions with private donors to the Clinton Foundation in exchange for influence on U.S. policy.​

bra hahahahahahahaha you are one dumb shit

comey concluded on Hillarys case on July 5, 2016 ... if your article is correct which it isn't, then comey would have some sort of charge for her ... the russians didn't get one email off her server... your article was written June 13 2016 ... 20 days before the FBI released their statement ... if the russians had anything they would have given them to Comey ... they didn't do that ... they didn't give Comey any part of youre made up story case closed ...
Russia Is Reportedly Set To Release Clinton's Intercepted Emails
By Defense and Foreign Affairs - Jun 13, 2016, 2:37 PM CDT

Comey is bought and paid for.

you are so full of it... first of all he's a republican He was the United States Deputy Attorney General, serving in President George W. Bush's administration. As Depue ty Attorney General, he was appointed by Bush

He left the republican party moron.

 

[billyerock1991]

blah, blah blah, blah blah, blah blah, blah blah, blah blah, blah blah, blah

Exactly.....

blah, blah blah, blah blah, blah blah, blah blah, blah blah, blah blah, blah

Yes, yes.....exactly....

blah, blah blah, blah blah, blah blah, blah blah, blah blah, blah blah, blah

Yep....exactly....

blah, blah blah, blah blah, blah blah, blah blah, blah blah, blah blah, blah

 

[Vastator]

This is stupidity on so many levels, especially wanting for it to happen.

And since when is spying/hacking ok to just openly admit? That's cool with anybody? Proud of that? Who are you guys?

Point the blame, and guilt trip at Hillary; not the patriotic, law-abiding, Americans who want the truth out in the open...

 

[owebo]

Exactly.....

blah, blah blah, blah blah, blah blah, blah blah, blah blah, blah blah, blah

Yes, yes.....exactly....

blah, blah blah, blah blah, blah blah, blah blah, blah blah, blah blah, blah

Yep....exactly....

blah, blah blah, blah blah, blah blah, blah blah, blah blah, blah blah, blah

Uh huh.....exactly....

 

[owebo]

This is stupidity on so many levels, especially wanting for it to happen.

And since when is spying/hacking ok to just openly admit? That's cool with anybody? Proud of that? Who are you guys?

Point the blame, and guilt trip at Hillary; not the patriotic, law-abiding, Americans who want the truth out in the open...

The liberals know she's rotten to the core.....and they know Putin will expose her....

 

[gipper]

This is stupidity on so many levels, especially wanting for it to happen.

And since when is spying/hacking ok to just openly admit? That's cool with anybody? Proud of that? Who are you guys?

You missed the point.

It is very likely her private server was hacked and not only by Russia. In a recent radio interview, former defense secretary Robert M. Gates said that the Pentagon “acknowledges they get attacked about 100,000 times a day.”
FBI: No evidence Clinton’s email was hacked by foreign powers, but it could have been

Do you want a 'careless' POTUS?

The FBI's failure to prosecute her when she clearly broke the law and lied about it several times, is the point.

Now if Russia exposes thousands of her emails, will it mean anything to you?

Yes, it will mean that a competitor Nation freely admits to spying as well as breaking and entering.

Yeah....and the USA would NEVER do that.

 

[G.T.]

This is stupidity on so many levels, especially wanting for it to happen.

And since when is spying/hacking ok to just openly admit? That's cool with anybody? Proud of that? Who are you guys?

Point the blame, and guilt trip at Hillary; not the patriotic, law-abiding, Americans who want the truth out in the open...

There's blame there, for sure - about as much as youd blame a home owner for leaving their door unlocked when they get robbed.

Seems that this thread skips the fact of the robber being scrutinized for their act because Hillary carelessly left her house un-locked. The priorities, then, become an apparent manifestation of partisan politics as opposed to actually resolving the issue of being robbed.

 

[easyt65]

The moment the 1st e-mail is released is the moment the LIE that Hillary's e-mail was never hacked and that she never jeopardized our national security will die amidst the screaming, wailing, and gnashing of teeth of Liberals still in denial.

 

[NoNukes]

How will Hillary deny that she took money for favors as Secretary of State after the Russians release her so-called "private emails?"

Russia Is Reportedly Set To Release Clinton's Intercepted Emails

Reliable intelligence sources in the West have indicated that warnings had been received that the Russian Government could in the near future release the text of email messages intercepted from U.S. Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s private e-mail server from the time she was U.S. Secretary of State. The release would, the messaging indicated, prove that Secretary Clinton had, in fact, laid open U.S. secrets to foreign interception by putting highly-classified Government reports onto a private server in violation of U.S. law, and that, as suspected, the server had been targeted and hacked by foreign intelligence services.

The reports indicated that the decision as to whether to reveal the intercepts would be made by Russian Federation President Vladimir Putin, and it was possible that the release would, if made, be through a third party, such as Wikileaks. The apparent message from Moscow, through the intelligence community, seemed to indicate frustration with the pace of the official U.S. Department of Justice investigation into the so-called server scandal, which seemed to offer prima facie evidence that U.S. law had been violated by Mrs Clinton’s decision to use a private server through which to conduct official and often highly-secret communications during her time as Secretary of State. U.S. sources indicated that the extensive Deptartment of Justice probe was more focused on the possibility that the private server was used to protect messaging in which Secretary Clinton allegedly discussed quid pro quo transactions with private donors to the Clinton Foundation in exchange for influence on U.S. policy.​

Russia is obviously afraid off Hillary and wants Trump to win. And many of you will still not wise up.

 

[Freewill]

How will Hillary deny that she took money for favors as Secretary of State after the Russians release her so-called "private emails?"

Russia Is Reportedly Set To Release Clinton's Intercepted Emails

Reliable intelligence sources in the West have indicated that warnings had been received that the Russian Government could in the near future release the text of email messages intercepted from U.S. Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s private e-mail server from the time she was U.S. Secretary of State. The release would, the messaging indicated, prove that Secretary Clinton had, in fact, laid open U.S. secrets to foreign interception by putting highly-classified Government reports onto a private server in violation of U.S. law, and that, as suspected, the server had been targeted and hacked by foreign intelligence services.

The reports indicated that the decision as to whether to reveal the intercepts would be made by Russian Federation President Vladimir Putin, and it was possible that the release would, if made, be through a third party, such as Wikileaks. The apparent message from Moscow, through the intelligence community, seemed to indicate frustration with the pace of the official U.S. Department of Justice investigation into the so-called server scandal, which seemed to offer prima facie evidence that U.S. law had been violated by Mrs Clinton’s decision to use a private server through which to conduct official and often highly-secret communications during her time as Secretary of State. U.S. sources indicated that the extensive Deptartment of Justice probe was more focused on the possibility that the private server was used to protect messaging in which Secretary Clinton allegedly discussed quid pro quo transactions with private donors to the Clinton Foundation in exchange for influence on U.S. policy.​

bra hahahahahahahaha you are one dumb shit

comey concluded on Hillarys case on July 5, 2016 ... if your article is correct which it isn't, then comey would have some sort of charge for her ... the russians didn't get one email off her server... your article was written June 13 2016 ... 20 days before the FBI released their statement ... if the russians had anything they would have given them to Comey ... they didn't do that ... they didn't give Comey any part of youre made up story case closed ...
Russia Is Reportedly Set To Release Clinton's Intercepted Emails
By Defense and Foreign Affairs - Jun 13, 2016, 2:37 PM CDT

Amazing how the liberal left thinks that Comey exonerated Mrs. clinton. Comey would never let the information out that Russia hacked into her server. But he did all but say someone did. He told Congresman Hurd that she put CIA lives in danger. That alone caused an uproar with Phalme affair, but nothing with Mrs. Tuzla.

 

[easyt65]

There's blame there, for sure - about as much as youd blame a home owner for leaving their door unlocked when they get robbed.

In your scenario the homeowners did not break the law by leaving their door unlocked. The criminal was the one who broke in / entered illegally.

With Hillary, she had an un-authorized / illegal, un-encrypted server and multiple personal devices (which she lied about) on which she did all of her State Department business, in violation of policy, regulations, and laws. She refused to turn over State Department-related documents in direct violation of the FOIA and the Federal Records Act - Yes, she broke the law. She gave access to Top Secret compartmentalized information to people who never had the security clearance to handle / store such information - like Huma, her IT Tech, the small company who stored and maintained her illegal server from the bathroom of their office, and her lawyer who illegally carried around this information on memory stick. She attempted to destroy classified info (and failed to do so) NOT in accordance to government directives / law specifically outlining / dictating how this had to be done.

By comparison to your 1st story, Hillary opened up the front door of SOMEONE ELSE'S house, invited the bad guys in, and let - it seems - bad guys walk in and walk out with things that did not belong to them.

Hillary didn't just jeopardize 'HER HOUSE', she jeopardized all of our houses - our national security.

Fit to be President? Hardly. Forget all of her crimes, scandals, incompetence, and lies for a minute (I know, it's almost impossible to do)...

HER OWN STAFF DESCRIBED HER AS 'OFTEN CONFUSED' AND 'TECHNOLOGY CHALLENGED'.

COMEY, HEAD OF THE FBI, DECLARED HILLARY WAS / IS TO 'UN-SOPHISTICATED TO UNDERSTAND THE CONCEPT OF 'CLASSIFIED MATERIAL'...WHICH IS A POLITE WAY OF SAYING HILLARY WAS / IS TOO STUPID TO UNDERSTAND THE CONCEPT OF 'CLASSIFIED' INFORMAITON AND HOW TO PROPERLY HANDLE AND PROTECT SUCH INFORMATION.


And Hillary is literally the BEST candidate the Democratic Party has to offer the American people?! That's just SAD!

 

[easyt65]

Russia is obviously afraid off Hillary and wants Trump to win. And many of you will still not wise up.

Yeah, Putin is as afraid of Hillary as he is of Barry.

Putin already bought Hillary's ass long ago when he gave her enough money to buy 15th of the US' supply of uranium. Now he has e-mails with which to blackmail Hillary, but it is obvious that he finds embarrassing the United States by exposing its 'leaders' corruption and incompetence to the world more satisfying.

 

[Old Rocks]

Are we going to hear about the e-mails as long as we heard about Benghazi? And with the same results? Why don't you guys come up with some policies that aid the working stiff, instead of a bunch of accusations that go nowhere against people that you perceive as the enemy? Thus far, all I have seen in this campaign from you fellows is that you are going to deport a bunch of people, you are going to end access to health care for a bunch of Americans, and that you want to prosecute a bunch of scientists for publishing what they see happening in the world. Easy to sell to the rightwingnuts, not going to fly in the general.

 

[owebo]

Are we going to hear about the e-mails as long as we heard about Benghazi? And with the same results? Why don't you guys come up with some policies that aid the working stiff, instead of a bunch of accusations that go nowhere against people that you perceive as the enemy? Thus far, all I have seen in this campaign from you fellows is that you are going to deport a bunch of people, you are going to end access to health care for a bunch of Americans, and that you want to prosecute a bunch of scientists for publishing what they see happening in the world. Easy to sell to the rightwingnuts, not going to fly in the general.

That's your flat earth party of the democrat kkk....

 

[G.T.]

There's blame there, for sure - about as much as youd blame a home owner for leaving their door unlocked when they get robbed.

In your scenario the homeowners did not break the law by leaving their door unlocked. The criminal was the one who broke in / entered illegally.

With Hillary, she had an un-authorized / illegal, un-encrypted server and multiple personal devices (which she lied about) on which she did all of her State Department business, in violation of policy, regulations, and laws. She refused to turn over State Department-related documents in direct violation of the FOIA and the Federal Records Act - Yes, she broke the law. She gave access to Top Secret compartmentalized information to people who never had the security clearance to handle / store such information - like Huma, her IT Tech, the small company who stored and maintained her illegal server from the bathroom of their office, and her lawyer who illegally carried around this information on memory stick. She attempted to destroy classified info (and failed to do so) NOT in accordance to government directives / law specifically outlining / dictating how this had to be done.

By comparison to your 1st story, Hillary opened up the front door of SOMEONE ELSE'S house, invited the bad guys in, and let - it seems - bad guys walk in and walk out with things that did not belong to them.

Hillary didn't just jeopardize 'HER HOUSE', she jeopardized all of our houses - our national security.

Fit to be President? Hardly. Forget all of her crimes, scandals, incompetence, and lies for a minute (I know, it's almost impossible to do)...

HER OWN STAFF DESCRIBED HER AS 'OFTEN CONFUSED' AND 'TECHNOLOGY CHALLENGED'.

COMEY, HEAD OF THE FBI, DECLARED HILLARY WAS / IS TO 'UN-SOPHISTICATED TO UNDERSTAND THE CONCEPT OF 'CLASSIFIED MATERIAL'...WHICH IS A POLITE WAY OF SAYING HILLARY WAS / IS TOO STUPID TO UNDERSTAND THE CONCEPT OF 'CLASSIFIED' INFORMAITON AND HOW TO PROPERLY HANDLE AND PROTECT SUCH INFORMATION.


And Hillary is literally the BEST candidate the Democratic Party has to offer the American people?! That's just SAD!

Yea that's a more astute view regarding the break in - please don't mistake me for supporting Hillary Clinton - my point was, we have a pretty big grievance with Russia here which I'm thinking is the entire reason one needs to shut and lock doors in the first place.

 

[Care4all]

How will Hillary deny that she took money for favors as Secretary of State after the Russians release her so-called "private emails?"

Russia Is Reportedly Set To Release Clinton's Intercepted Emails

Reliable intelligence sources in the West have indicated that warnings had been received that the Russian Government could in the near future release the text of email messages intercepted from U.S. Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s private e-mail server from the time she was U.S. Secretary of State. The release would, the messaging indicated, prove that Secretary Clinton had, in fact, laid open U.S. secrets to foreign interception by putting highly-classified Government reports onto a private server in violation of U.S. law, and that, as suspected, the server had been targeted and hacked by foreign intelligence services.

The reports indicated that the decision as to whether to reveal the intercepts would be made by Russian Federation President Vladimir Putin, and it was possible that the release would, if made, be through a third party, such as Wikileaks. The apparent message from Moscow, through the intelligence community, seemed to indicate frustration with the pace of the official U.S. Department of Justice investigation into the so-called server scandal, which seemed to offer prima facie evidence that U.S. law had been violated by Mrs Clinton’s decision to use a private server through which to conduct official and often highly-secret communications during her time as Secretary of State. U.S. sources indicated that the extensive Deptartment of Justice probe was more focused on the possibility that the private server was used to protect messaging in which Secretary Clinton allegedly discussed quid pro quo transactions with private donors to the Clinton Foundation in exchange for influence on U.S. policy.​

bra hahahahahahahaha you are one dumb shit

comey concluded on Hillarys case on July 5, 2016 ... if your article is correct which it isn't, then comey would have some sort of charge for her ... the russians didn't get one email off her server... your article was written June 13 2016 ... 20 days before the FBI released their statement ... if the russians had anything they would have given them to Comey ... they didn't do that ... they didn't give Comey any part of youre made up story case closed ...
Russia Is Reportedly Set To Release Clinton's Intercepted Emails
By Defense and Foreign Affairs - Jun 13, 2016, 2:37 PM CDT

Comey is bought and paid for.

you are so full of it... first of all he's a republican He was the United States Deputy Attorney General, serving in President George W. Bush's administration. As Depue ty Attorney General, he was appointed by Bush

He left the republican party moron.

no he didn't, he simply did not register as a Republican.... he's been a Republican his entire life...

And he dicked Hillary from here to high heaven...

She did not reach the level of Criminal, in her actions....he should have simply stated that....

INSTEAD he tried to have his cake and eat it too....

he KNEW she could not be prosecuted for any crime, but he was judge jury and executioner in his speech.... he made certain she was convicted in the court of public opinion, starting with his....

If Govt investigators found that a citizen they were investigating did not commit criminal actions and the investigator of the case came out and smeared and demeaned this citizen on tv the way Comey did Hillary, he would be sued for defamation.

Comey is a scumbag... lost all credibility and impartiality that he is suppose to maintain as the Head of the FBI.