Rudy Giuliani may now be in Robert Mueller’s crosshairs: “The lawyers are going to need lawyers”

[Fort Fun Indiana]

About what, specifically?

That remains to be seen, doesn't it? I wouldn't have to know this specifically, in order to surmise that they are informing on bigger fish. Stop being silly.

 

[Denizen]

Donald Trump doesn't have any associates who are moral, decent, and honest.

look who he wants to buddy up with on the world stage? leaders of countries that have had an alliance with us - going all the way back to the revolutionary war? ....

no he wants to be accepted by the likes of the saudis, the NK piglet, & duterte. he's also got a special kind of friendship with pootey poot. i'm surprised donny can still bend over & grab his ankles with that fat orange pumpkin of a gut he has.

Donald Trump thinks his duty as head of state is to give head.

 

[OKTexas]

Yep, it's just been ignorant people flapping their gums, all meaningless.

No, it has a colloquial meaning. And we already know it's a fact about members of the Trump campaign. So not meaningless on that level, either.

Blah, blah, blah, no laws were broken.

.

 

[bripat9643]

Yep, it's just been ignorant people flapping their gums, all meaningless.

No, it has a colloquial meaning. And we already know it's a fact about members of the Trump campaign. So not meaningless on that level, either.

"Colloquial meanings" are irrelevant in a court of law, moron.

 

[bripat9643]

About what, specifically?

That remains to be seen, doesn't it? I wouldn't have to know this specifically, in order to surmise that they are informing on bigger fish. Stop being silly.

In other words, you got nothing.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

no laws were broken.

You, of course, could not possibly know the truth of this. You just hope it is true.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

About what, specifically?

That remains to be seen, doesn't it? I wouldn't have to know this specifically, in order to surmise that they are informing on bigger fish. Stop being silly.

In other words, you got nothing.

Except knowing they are informing on bigger fish. I wonder who that could be?

 

[OKTexas]

About what, specifically?

That remains to be seen, doesn't it? I wouldn't have to know this specifically, in order to surmise that they are informing on bigger fish. Stop being silly.

Silly, I'm not the one assuming crap and making claims with no basis in fact. Not only is that silly, it disregards the very basis of our justice system.

.

 

[OKTexas]

no laws were broken.

You, of course, could not possibly know the truth of this. You just hope it is true.

Name the law that was violated?

.

 

[bripat9643]

About what, specifically?

That remains to be seen, doesn't it? I wouldn't have to know this specifically, in order to surmise that they are informing on bigger fish. Stop being silly.

In other words, you got nothing.

Except knowing they are informing on bigger fish. I wonder who that could be?

You don't know, so who do you imagine you are fooling?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Silly, I'm not the one assuming crap and making claims with no basis in fact.

Of course you are . You declared that no crime has been committed, which is based on nothing but your wishful thinking.

On the contrary, i said they are informing on bigger fish, which is evidenced by their cooperation and lenient sentences.

So literally the opposite of what you just said is true.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You don't know

Of course i do, everyone does. They weren't state's evidence to inform on smaller fish. Don't be ridiculous.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Name the law that was violated?

Uh, I would not have to say I know they broke a law in order to say you don't know that they didn't. Come on man, get a grasp of basic logic.

 

[bripat9643]

You don't know

Of course i do, everyone does. They weren't state's evidence to inform on smaller fish. Don't be ridiculous.

Post the evidence, dumbass.

 

[bripat9643]

Name the law that was violated?

Uh, I would not have to say I know they broke a law in order to say you don't know that they didn't. Come on man, get a grasp of basic logic.

We don't know that you aren't a child molester.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Post the evidence,

That they are cooperating and receiving leniency to inform on bigger fish instead of smaller fish? It is its own evidence.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

We don't know that you aren't a child molester.

But we do know you bring that topic up a lot.

 

[bripat9643]

Post the evidence,

That they are cooperating and receiving leniency to inform on bigger fish instead of smaller fish? It is its own evidence.

In other words, no evidence.

 

[bripat9643]

We don't know that you aren't a child molester.

But we do know you bring that topic up a lot.

Actually, no I don't.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Post the evidence,

That they are cooperating and receiving leniency to inform on bigger fish instead of smaller fish? It is its own evidence.

In other words, no evidence.

Of course, it is self evident.