Rudy Giuliani hands over a hard drive to Delaware State police because of child pornography

[hadit]

I'm not getting any sensible replies here. The topic here and the posts have been about HUNTER BIDEN'S supposed sexual activity. As far as I can tell, that--specifically Hunter's sex life -- has nothing to do with either Joe Biden or his ability as President.

Well now, that depends. Did Joe have any knowledge of child abuse being committed by his son? Did he use his office to set up circumstances whereby his son could do this?

 

[OldLady]

BREAKING: Giuliani Gives Hunter Biden's Hard Drive to Delaware State Police Over Photos of Underage Girls, Inappropriate Texts | The Gateway Pundit | by Cassandra MacDonald

Rudy Giuliani has announced that he has turned over Hunter Biden’s hard drive to Delaware State Police due to pornographic photos of underage girls and inappropriate text messages.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

But the FBI has had the laptop since 2019 and have done nothing to act upon the evidence.. deep state is
Real

The FBI is comprised of useless, tax sucking hacks.

Why do you hate the police?

Hey Corn Hole, I told you last night this shit was about to get very real. You denied it of course, trying to put on a brave face. Hmmm...wonder have things will unfold now?

Hold your breath until it "gets real"... I dare you.

You ready to say President Trump for four more years?

I think he still wins if he holds on to PA.
We'll see what happens.

Are you okay with Joe's 50 year old son being a child rapist? I'm just curious.

Are you okay spreading bullshit lies? If not, you should stop.

Multiple media reports are indicating Biden has child pornography and sexual acts with minors on his computer. That by legal definition is child rape because children cannot legally consent. My question is are you okay with that?

Indeed, the information is mounting up against the Biden Crime Family. Info Wars has staff working on it. The American People have a right to this information as they go to the polls to judge Biden worthy or unworthy of the Presidency. The fact that the Ultra Partisan Lame Stream Media doesn't want to talk about it is irrelevant.

Giuliani Gives Hunter Biden’s Hard Drive to Delaware State Police Over Photos of Underage Girls, Disturbing Texts

Alarming text messages to his father Joe Biden is supported by numerous pictures of underage girls" on hard drive

www.infowars.com

Infowars....

For a second there, I was worried.

Not about your post, that you may stop your comedy routine. You should tour with this material.

Wait a minute, Joe Biden has been accused of being inappropriate with kids and now we see his son was confessing similar behavior to him. Why was Hunter so comfortable communicating that to his father?
Is it possible Hunter was molested and this is just a long continuation of this family’s culture?

Hunter wasn't "confessing" anything in that email. He was denying accusations made by a mom whose 14 year old daughter --when pressed 'said nothing like that.' I did Child Protective for enough years to have heard lots of stuff like this during custodial battles that would curl your hair. Therapists have a duty to report child abuse, and whenever this happened, it would have been looked into.

Whether there's anything to it, it sure isn't about raping Chinese girls. That came straight from 4chan according to Politifact.

The Accusations against the Biden Crime Family are devastating. I think everyone can agree on that.

The curious thing for me is why haven't Sleepy Joe and his son gone on TV and addressed the issues? All they are saying is that the hard drive "isn't admissible" .


Well, maybe. I'm not a lawyer.

But if its TRUE, the people have a right to know.

Did Joe say that or his lawyers? I think it's a mistake not to address it directly, but he's taking the advice of his lawyers. Hunter was apparently a mess back then. Maybe stirring the pot would just make the shit stink worse.

Worse back than? He was found in a parking lot with a crack pipe during the Democrat debates

Link? Was he arrested for it? I hadn't heard that, but relapse is part of the disease, so I wouldn't be shocked over it either. If it's true he's still struggling, it's a shame. He just had a baby girl in March.

 

[Redcurtain]

Joe did you know your son was raping Chinese children?

 

[OldLady]

I have it on good sources that there are videos of him and very young girls, some of whom, he physically savages as he rapes them!

What does this have to do with Joe being president?

I agree. It has nothing to do with Joe. Im more worried about Hunter getting paid for his dads influence. We already know Joe lied about meeting people. We already know the people were willing to pay big bucks for influence.

If true, of course you're right. I don't think we "know" it yet though. As I said before, there are records of these transactions somewhere. I'll believe it when I see them.

We know they were willing to pay for it. We know Joe met with them, therefore, we know Joe lied about it. We have emails, pictures and video of Joe saying such.

I'll wait for the evidence. We don't 'know' he met with them to transact bribery.

 

[TNHarley]

I have it on good sources that there are videos of him and very young girls, some of whom, he physically savages as he rapes them!

What does this have to do with Joe being president?

I agree. It has nothing to do with Joe. Im more worried about Hunter getting paid for his dads influence. We already know Joe lied about meeting people. We already know the people were willing to pay big bucks for influence.

If true, of course you're right. I don't think we "know" it yet though. As I said before, there are records of these transactions somewhere. I'll believe it when I see them.

You don’t believe DNA Radcliffe?

He said Intelligence hasn't investigated it. Yeah, I believe that. But where he then gets the information to say it wasn't Russian disinformation, I don't know, since they haven't looked at it. He said it's the FBI'S baby. Ratcliffe was taking exception to Russia Nut Schiff and correcting the record. It's mostly an opinion piece.

The pics are real. Joe saying he didnt meet them are real. People in the email chain has said they are real.

 

[TNHarley]

I have it on good sources that there are videos of him and very young girls, some of whom, he physically savages as he rapes them!

What does this have to do with Joe being president?

I agree. It has nothing to do with Joe. Im more worried about Hunter getting paid for his dads influence. We already know Joe lied about meeting people. We already know the people were willing to pay big bucks for influence.

If true, of course you're right. I don't think we "know" it yet though. As I said before, there are records of these transactions somewhere. I'll believe it when I see them.

We know they were willing to pay for it. We know Joe met with them, therefore, we know Joe lied about it. We have emails, pictures and video of Joe saying such.

I'll wait for the evidence. We don't 'know' he met with them to transact bribery.

I know but he did lie about meeting them. And we know they were willing to pay for it. Thats all i was saying.

 

[OldLady]

Joe did you know your son was raping Chinese children?

Where's the evidence he was raping Chinese children? I gave you the item Rudy found 'concerning,' and it had nothing in it about Chinese children. Rudy has been alleging a lot of stuff without supplying the goods. If this weren't being done to discredit the Biden campaign, he wouldn't be running to Fox to announce it. Normally you don't broadcast such, because you don't want the perp--or supplier-- to start destroying evidence.

 

[Redcurtain]

Joe did you know your son was raping Chinese children?

Where's the evidence he was raping Chinese children? I gave you the item Rudy found 'concerning,' and it had nothing in it about Chinese children. Rudy has been alleging a lot of stuff without supplying the goods. If this weren't being done to discredit the Biden campaign, he wouldn't be running to Fox to announce it. Normally you don't broadcast such, because you don't want the perp--or supplier-- to start destroying evidence.

It’s on the hard drive Rudy Giuliani had to turn it over to Lauren Forssman because he would’ve been holding child pornography. Why won’t Joe Biden come out and answer the questions? Because the media is working on his behalf?

 

[hadit]

Joe did you know your son was raping Chinese children?

Where's the evidence he was raping Chinese children? I gave you the item Rudy found 'concerning,' and it had nothing in it about Chinese children. Rudy has been alleging a lot of stuff without supplying the goods. If this weren't being done to discredit the Biden campaign, he wouldn't be running to Fox to announce it. Normally you don't broadcast such, because you don't want the perp--or supplier-- to start destroying evidence.

You would if you had the evidence in hand.

There are two very large things in play here.

1. Politics. Rudy is definitely a political creature, and destroying Quid Pro Joe's campaign at the last minute would appeal to him. Thus, the evidence is crucial if it exists.
2. Child abuse is a serious issue, and if the VP's office is enabling it in any way, there's a big problem.

Quid Pro Joe has been in Washington for nearly 50 years and has become extremely wealthy (and powerful) as a result. Along with the perks of office comes enormous responsibility. If the average citizen is expected to alert the authorities should they discover their adult child is involved with child abuse, the VPOTUS is CERTAINLY expected to do so, at the very least to distance himself from it. AFAIK, there are no pictures of Joe abusing children on this laptop, so no one is claiming that he did. There is, though, apparently an email that would indicate that Joe was at the least aware that this was going on, and therein lies his political vulnerability. If Hunter WAS abusing children and Joe knew about it but covered it up, he should be in serious electoral jeopardy. I'm not commenting on any legal ramifications, and this whole thing hinges on the legitimacy of the evidence. The timing is certainly political.

I would also say that Joe's response is political. If I knew my son was innocent of such charges and that the "evidence" was faked, I would be front and center proclaiming it. Ducking back into his basement bunker, however, just makes it look like he knows there's a big problem and is consulting with his lawyers to figure out his best path forward with the least amount of legal exposure.

 

[OldLady]

he did lie about meeting them.

Joe said he never got involved in his son's overseas business. If the informal meeting wasn't about Burisma business on Joe's part, he's not lying. Look at how the Russians manipulated Don Jr. to put in their 2 cents worth on that sanction in the Trump Tower meeting. Don says they didn't play, and you believe that, but not that Biden just shined this guy on?

If it's all true and Biden was on the take somehow, I'll be extremely disappointed. I'm not closing my ears to the possibility, but it's gonna take more than I've seen so far. People are connecting dots that are speculation to start with.

 

[Redcurtain]

he did lie about meeting them.

Joe said he never got involved in his son's overseas business. If the informal meeting wasn't about Burisma business on Joe's part, he's not lying. Look at how the Russians manipulated Don Jr. to put in their 2 cents worth on that sanction in the Trump Tower meeting. Don says they didn't play, and you believe that, but not that Biden just shined this guy on?

If it's all true and Biden was on the take somehow, I'll be extremely disappointed. I'm not closing my ears to the possibility, but it's gonna take more than I've seen so far. People are connecting dots that are speculation to start with.

According to the emails he we’re supposed to do a favor and get rid of the investigator.. ohh look what happen?

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

The FBI is comprised of useless, tax sucking hacks.

The FBI, State Dept., Justice Department, Pentagon....go in there with a fumigator and drive out the rats.

 

[OldLady]

Joe did you know your son was raping Chinese children?

Where's the evidence he was raping Chinese children? I gave you the item Rudy found 'concerning,' and it had nothing in it about Chinese children. Rudy has been alleging a lot of stuff without supplying the goods. If this weren't being done to discredit the Biden campaign, he wouldn't be running to Fox to announce it. Normally you don't broadcast such, because you don't want the perp--or supplier-- to start destroying evidence.

You would if you had the evidence in hand.

There are two very large things in play here.

1. Politics. Rudy is definitely a political creature, and destroying Quid Pro Joe's campaign at the last minute would appeal to him. Thus, the evidence is crucial if it exists.
2. Child abuse is a serious issue, and if the VP's office is enabling it in any way, there's a big problem.

Quid Pro Joe has been in Washington for nearly 50 years and has become extremely wealthy (and powerful) as a result. Along with the perks of office comes enormous responsibility. If the average citizen is expected to alert the authorities should they discover their adult child is involved with child abuse, the VPOTUS is CERTAINLY expected to do so, at the very least to distance himself from it. AFAIK, there are no pictures of Joe abusing children on this laptop, so no one is claiming that he did. There is, though, apparently an email that would indicate that Joe was at the least aware that this was going on, and therein lies his political vulnerability. If Hunter WAS abusing children and Joe knew about it but covered it up, he should be in serious electoral jeopardy. I'm not commenting on any legal ramifications, and this whole thing hinges on the legitimacy of the evidence. The timing is certainly political.

I would also say that Joe's response is political. If I knew my son was innocent of such charges and that the "evidence" was faked, I would be front and center proclaiming it. Ducking back into his basement bunker, however, just makes it look like he knows there's a big problem and is consulting with his lawyers to figure out his best path forward with the least amount of legal exposure.

That's grasping at straws. The alleged abuse had already been reported to a therapist, who is a mandated reporter. All Joe got was a she said, he said in what sounds like a dispute between Hunter and this woman, whoever she was.

 

[hadit]

Joe did you know your son was raping Chinese children?

Where's the evidence he was raping Chinese children? I gave you the item Rudy found 'concerning,' and it had nothing in it about Chinese children. Rudy has been alleging a lot of stuff without supplying the goods. If this weren't being done to discredit the Biden campaign, he wouldn't be running to Fox to announce it. Normally you don't broadcast such, because you don't want the perp--or supplier-- to start destroying evidence.

You would if you had the evidence in hand.

There are two very large things in play here.

1. Politics. Rudy is definitely a political creature, and destroying Quid Pro Joe's campaign at the last minute would appeal to him. Thus, the evidence is crucial if it exists.
2. Child abuse is a serious issue, and if the VP's office is enabling it in any way, there's a big problem.

Quid Pro Joe has been in Washington for nearly 50 years and has become extremely wealthy (and powerful) as a result. Along with the perks of office comes enormous responsibility. If the average citizen is expected to alert the authorities should they discover their adult child is involved with child abuse, the VPOTUS is CERTAINLY expected to do so, at the very least to distance himself from it. AFAIK, there are no pictures of Joe abusing children on this laptop, so no one is claiming that he did. There is, though, apparently an email that would indicate that Joe was at the least aware that this was going on, and therein lies his political vulnerability. If Hunter WAS abusing children and Joe knew about it but covered it up, he should be in serious electoral jeopardy. I'm not commenting on any legal ramifications, and this whole thing hinges on the legitimacy of the evidence. The timing is certainly political.

I would also say that Joe's response is political. If I knew my son was innocent of such charges and that the "evidence" was faked, I would be front and center proclaiming it. Ducking back into his basement bunker, however, just makes it look like he knows there's a big problem and is consulting with his lawyers to figure out his best path forward with the least amount of legal exposure.

That's grasping at straws. The alleged abuse had already been reported to a therapist, who is a mandated reporter. All Joe got was a she said, he said in what sounds like a dispute between Hunter and this woman, whoever she was.

It's fallacious to claim that this is ALL the communication Joe got. Think about it. You're the VPOTUS and you get this email. Do you ignore it, or do you pick up the phone and start asking questions to make SURE there's nothing that can blow back on you? Do you pick up the phone and make sure your son is okay? Do you ask if he's depressed, needs help? Do you send some lawyers over to protect your family's and your own interests? IOW, do not be so naive as to think this was the only information Joe got.

It the abuse did not happen, the natural response would be an immediate denial because you know whatever "evidence" they might have is faked. If it did happen and was properly reported and dealt with, the natural response would be to state that it was and refuse to dignify it further. The candidate ducking back into his bunker and suspending his campaign mere weeks before election day is a natural reaction if he's afraid more will come out that will reflect badly on him. Let's be real here, it's not fatal for a candidate to have embarrassing family members. Heck, even Jimmy Carter had Billy. What is damaging, however, is how the candidate deals with them, and Joe has a lot to deal with, especially if his son was using Joe's office to facilitate what he is alleged to have done. That's where Joe is vulnerable.

 

[TNHarley]

he did lie about meeting them.

Joe said he never got involved in his son's overseas business. If the informal meeting wasn't about Burisma business on Joe's part, he's not lying. Look at how the Russians manipulated Don Jr. to put in their 2 cents worth on that sanction in the Trump Tower meeting. Don says they didn't play, and you believe that, but not that Biden just shined this guy on?

If it's all true and Biden was on the take somehow, I'll be extremely disappointed. I'm not closing my ears to the possibility, but it's gonna take more than I've seen so far. People are connecting dots that are speculation to start with.

You are incorrect. He said he never met them. Again, he lied and we KNOW this.

Joe Biden's campaign DENIES he met Hunter's Ukrainian business partner

Ukrainian gas executive Vadym Pozharskyi thanked Hunter Biden for 'an opportunity to meet your father' in an email sent in 2015, according to a stash of emails.

www.dailymail.co.uk

 

[OldLady]

I think you already said that and I already responded, so no sense in repeating it.

 

[22lcidw]

he did lie about meeting them.

Joe said he never got involved in his son's overseas business. If the informal meeting wasn't about Burisma business on Joe's part, he's not lying. Look at how the Russians manipulated Don Jr. to put in their 2 cents worth on that sanction in the Trump Tower meeting. Don says they didn't play, and you believe that, but not that Biden just shined this guy on?

If it's all true and Biden was on the take somehow, I'll be extremely disappointed. I'm not closing my ears to the possibility, but it's gonna take more than I've seen so far. People are connecting dots that are speculation to start with.

Agendas a lot of times come in second to the personality and what clings to the candidate. Until recent years a lot of Americans paid attention to this more then agendas. Obama broke that. He pushed the power of the Presidency into the outer reaches in different things. And he had extremist judges there to define anything Prog as plausible. Now we know the Prog agendas. And we know Trump's agendas. Prog agendas are revolutionary.

 

[iceberg]

he did lie about meeting them.

Joe said he never got involved in his son's overseas business. If the informal meeting wasn't about Burisma business on Joe's part, he's not lying. Look at how the Russians manipulated Don Jr. to put in their 2 cents worth on that sanction in the Trump Tower meeting. Don says they didn't play, and you believe that, but not that Biden just shined this guy on?

If it's all true and Biden was on the take somehow, I'll be extremely disappointed. I'm not closing my ears to the possibility, but it's gonna take more than I've seen so far. People are connecting dots that are speculation to start with.

the problem is people connect the dots and run with what they want to be true.

it's done all the time to trump and we're at around 160 media mistakes about trump so far.

someone walking by and hearing trump talk on the phone became grounds for impeachment. what he said could NEVER be clarified, it was worst possible scenario PERIOD and he must go.

i'm all for the sense of fair play and accuracy, but that must apply to all or you get where we are today. selective beliefs and enforcement based off emotional validation, not truth.

 

[iceberg]

Joe did you know your son was raping Chinese children?

Where's the evidence he was raping Chinese children? I gave you the item Rudy found 'concerning,' and it had nothing in it about Chinese children. Rudy has been alleging a lot of stuff without supplying the goods. If this weren't being done to discredit the Biden campaign, he wouldn't be running to Fox to announce it. Normally you don't broadcast such, because you don't want the perp--or supplier-- to start destroying evidence.

if they have his hard drive, they have the evidence.

in my mind, this is why hillary bleachbit her drives - to remove evidence. she was told "we want to see your mail" and then destroyed it, turning over paper copies that were meaningless in this type of research.

maybe all this is more BS. i'll wait for the entire story to come out because i do believe it's the right thing to do IF your interest is in knowing the truth. if your interest is in attacks, no one waits for the truth to come out, they create it.

 

[TNHarley]

I think you already said that and I already responded, so no sense in repeating it.

You said that he said "he never got involved in his son's overseas business"
Which is not what i was referring to.