Rousey v Holm

Well, I hope she recovers and gets back in the ring soon. Everyone is going to lose sometimes.

Not everyone. Some of us know our limitations sufficiently to choose not to play when the chance of losing is too great.
 
A brawler v a boxer,a rather good boxer,Rhonda couldn't bum rush her like all her other matches,totally out played at every move.She may learn from this or not.If Holms tunes up her ground skills,she will be hard to beat.
 
Not sure I agree. she was in the Olympics at 17 in 2004, and she did win gold at the World Juniors that year.
And she medalled in 2008, although I don't understand how you give two bronzes out for the same competition.

She won Juniors in 2004 then placed 8th (I believe) in the Olympics. She was so distraught that she left the Olympics and came home 24 hours after being eliminated. Placing 3rd in 2008 was such a great success in her mind that she left the arena, gorged herself in the athlete's cafetetia then was found the next day curled up in her dorm room in the Olympic village. Doesn't sound to me like she really felt good about either rssult.

Yes, she became over hyped, and yes, I know people can't stand her for that and other reasons, that doesn't change the facf that she won a ton of stuff, and then ran into a fighter that negated her strengths.

Winning a lot of stuff becomes immaterial to some people once they lose. For totally different reasons than Ms. Rousey, I understand that mentality. Even at 42 years old....

My right hand is in a cast right now due to a team I support losing a game they had no chance to win, 8 days ago. I almost made it a matching pair Saturday night then again yesterday.
 
Last edited:
Those two can probably make a few dollars doing a rematch. Do ya think?
 
Those two can probably make a few dollars doing a rematch. Do ya think?

Yes, but are BOTH of them interested? Even before Saturday, Rousey said she's not interestef in ANY other fight before next July. With the loss, I get the feeling she may take her movie money and walk away.
 
yea they can make assloads.... Ronda cant win though. Holly outclasses her by too many leaps and bounds.

Then no rematch will ever occur. Ronda won't agree to take a second beating. Only if Ronda thinks she can convincingly win would there ever be a rematch.
 
Yea anyone watching that fight can see plain as day that Holly's skills are on a different dimension of existence.

In which case we've seen the end of Ronda Rousey in the UFC, as I stated in my first post in this thread.
 
if we havent - we should have. Her allure was her apparent immortality that they promoted the **** out of. Now shes mortal, even worse - shes very amateur next to Holly. Holly is a real gladiator, she deserves all of this. I hope she fights Cyborg at a 140lb catch weight. Itll never happen though.

Holm has no allure for me. The UFC without an undefeated Ronda Rousey has no allure for me. Dana White just lost not only his best marketibg tool but any chance of getting future money or interest from me. Not thst he gives a shit.
 
what dont ya like about holly

She's a boxer and kickboxer. I have great respect for those arts/sports but if that's what I wanted to watch, that's what Id watch. If I'm watching MMA I want to see brawl, not a chess match. In fact if I were Dana White I'd have a rule that says if neither fighter has landed a blow in any 15 second period if time, the match is a DQ for both fighters. I'd also get rid of the points system. Fight until you have a KO/TKO or the fight is a draw after 3 rounds.
 
15th post
I don't see the point of her fighting anymore. She's gonna make millions in movies as an action star. It's a lot safer....and other MMA Champs went that route. She should walk away while she's still pretty.

Ronda has a short window before she becomes yesterday's news since she's no longer the champ.
Tell that to Chuck Norris

And not if she's as good at acting as she's shown.

She being considered as a female Captain Marvel.
 
Yes, but you typed 1994 and 1998.

Which has now been corrected. Thank you for noticing the errors so they could be fixed.

Regardless of the dates, the events show s very thi. Skinned and less than resilient mentailty to losing, which I understand very well from my own competitiveness issues.

Not sure I agree. she was in the Olympics at 17 in 2004, and she did win gold at the World Juniors that year.
And she medalled in 2008, although I don't understand how you give two bronzes out for the same competition.

Yes, she became over hyped, and yes, I know people can't stand her for that and other reasons, that doesn't change the facf that she won a ton of stuff, and then ran into a fighter that negated her strengths.
MMA Champions usually have short reigns:

Since the birth of the Ultimate Fighting Championship in 1993, 11 different men have held the light heavyweight championship. The duration of their reigns ranges from Randy Couture’s 127 days to Tito Ortiz’s 1,260 days. Amazingly, only one of those 11 champions has successfully defended the title at least five times and five of them failed to retain it even once, making it one of the more volatile divisions from a historical standpoint.​

Sherdog.com has compiled an infographic which chronicles the journey of the UFC light heavyweight championship, beginning with Frank Shamrock in December 1997 -- it was then recognized as the middleweight crown -- and running through current titleholder Jon Jones.

A Linear History: UFC Light Heavyweight Championship
So much of the so-called hype
 
The brawls mostly happen with the strikers. Thats all boxing and kickboxing is, is striking and defense.

My combat background is pistol shooting, medieval combat and lower level Krav Maga. Three styles where you don't stand around and make nice with the other guy (or the targets). You aggressively seek out and destroy you enemy. The amount of juking snd jiving in most MMA/UFC fight bores me to death.
 
Back
Top Bottom