Ron Paul worried trump tariffs will return 1930's decimation to GOP

JimH52

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2007
Messages
49,596
Reaction score
28,399
Points
2,645
Location
US

Republican Senator Rand Paul has warned his party that tariffs have “decimated politics” after he voted against President Donald Trump’s duties on Canadian imports yesterday.

Sen. Paul of Kentucky told Fox News that tariffs have historically brought down his party.

“When McKinley put tariffs on in 1890, they lost 50 percent of their seats… When Smoot-Hawley put their tariffs In the early 1930s, we lost the House and Senate for 60 years,” Sen. Paul said.

For once I agree with Paul. But trump thinks he is so smart, his trade war will not cause his party to lose congress. Poor dumb Donnie. But if Paul is correct....GO FOR IT DONNIE!
 

Republican Senator Rand Paul has warned his party that tariffs have “decimated politics” after he voted against President Donald Trump’s duties on Canadian imports yesterday.

Sen. Paul of Kentucky told Fox News that tariffs have historically brought down his party.


“When McKinley put tariffs on in 1890, they lost 50 percent of their seats… When Smoot-Hawley put their tariffs In the early 1930s, we lost the House and Senate for 60 years,” Sen. Paul said.

For once I agree with Paul. But trump thinks he is so smart, his trade war will not cause his party to lose congress. Poor dumb Donnie. But if Paul is correct....GO FOR IT DONNIE!
The war began decades ago, we have just not been fighting it.
 

Republican Senator Rand Paul has warned his party that tariffs have “decimated politics” after he voted against President Donald Trump’s duties on Canadian imports yesterday.

Sen. Paul of Kentucky told Fox News that tariffs have historically brought down his party.


“When McKinley put tariffs on in 1890, they lost 50 percent of their seats… When Smoot-Hawley put their tariffs In the early 1930s, we lost the House and Senate for 60 years,” Sen. Paul said.

For once I agree with Paul. But trump thinks he is so smart, his trade war will not cause his party to lose congress. Poor dumb Donnie. But if Paul is correct....GO FOR IT DONNIE!
So if we don’t keep letting other countries fuck us with tariffs then the other party is going to take over and let other countries fuck us over with tariffs.

Good plan.
 
So if we don’t keep letting other countries fuck us with tariffs then the other party is going to take over and let other countries fuck us over with tariffs.

Good plan.
I have to say I'm enjoying all the MAGAts applauding a huge tax hike on US consumers.

It nearly makes it all worth it.

Nearly.
 
I think Rand is right.

And he's not the only one saying that the way he went about it is unconstitutional.

A couple articles:


 
I have to say I'm enjoying all the MAGAts applauding a huge tax hike on US consumers.

It nearly makes it all worth it.

Nearly.
What tax? You can save 25% on a new vehicle if it’s made here and US workers were paid to make it. Or you can be a democrat and pay the extra 25% to make sure the Mexicans get paid to make it.
 
I think Rand is right.

And he's not the only one saying that the way he went about it is unconstitutional.

A couple articles:


Before the income tax all of our wealth came from tariffs. Can you explain how that happened?
 
What is the greatest thing Ron Paul has done for me or you. Ron Paul was silent while democrats destroyed our country. Ron Paul is an idiot.

The only reason I know of Ron Paul is cause he is an idiot.
 
What is the greatest thing Ron Paul has done for me or you. Ron Paul was silent while democrats destroyed our country. Ron Paul is an idiot.

The only reason I know of Ron Paul is cause he is an idiot.

^ One of the dumbest things I've ever read on USMB. And that's saying a lot!
 
I thought FDR and his "New" Deal solved all that in the 1930s?

Oh, right, it made things worse, as did the tight-fisted Federal Reserve.
 
I thought FDR and his "New" Deal solved all that in the 1930s?

Oh, right, it made things worse, as did the tight-fisted Federal Reserve.
Absolutely wrong
 
Absolutely wrong


Nope, absolute facts.

Only massive factory orders for defense goods c.1940 got the economy going.

The Fed was tight money policy throughout the 1930s.


Yes, many economists believe that the tight monetary policy pursued by the Federal Reserve in the 1930s, particularly after the 1929 stock market crash, exacerbated the Great Depression by allowing the money supply to shrink and failing to act as a lender of last resort.



Here's a more detailed explanation:
  • Initial Tightening:
    In the wake of the 1929 stock market crash, the Fed, instead of injecting liquidity into the system, allowed the money supply to decline, which led to a contraction of the economy.
  • Failure to Act as Lender of Last Resort:
    The Fed's charter mandates it to be a lender of last resort, meaning it should provide liquidity to banks facing distress. However, during the Great Depression, the Fed failed to fulfill this role, leading to a collapse of the banking system and a further contraction of the money supply.

  • Consequences of Tight Money:
    The tight monetary policy led to a sharp drop in prices, output, and a rise in unemployment, further deepening the economic crisis.

  • Milton Friedman and Anna J. Schwartz's Argument:
    Economists Friedman and Schwartz argued that monetary factors were a major cause of the Great Depression, pointing to the Fed's policy mistakes as a key factor in the
downturn.​


 
Back
Top Bottom