Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
US military dominance was never disputed.Preach on Good Doctor.
'If Syria really had sarin and other chemical weapons factories, does it make sense for the US to bomb the buildings and risk killing thousands by widely disbursing the poisons? Does it make sense to risk killing Syrian civilians with chemical weapons in retaliation for allegations that the Syrian government killed civilians with chemical weapons? No, it seems more like the phony “mobile WMD labs” we were told that Saddam Hussein had constructed'...
Trump’s Disastrous Syria Attack
I haven't seen this noted in the calculation as to whether this bombing of Syria was a net positive for Trump, but consider this from the Syrian side:
After all the promises by Putin and Russia, after all the defenses and troops sold and sent to the Middle East, which can be boiled down to "we'll protect you,"......
....Trump just proved to all of Russia's client-states, that they couldn't protect them from an angered United States.
Preach on Good Doctor.
'If Syria really had sarin and other chemical weapons factories, does it make sense for the US to bomb the buildings and risk killing thousands by widely disbursing the poisons? Does it make sense to risk killing Syrian civilians with chemical weapons in retaliation for allegations that the Syrian government killed civilians with chemical weapons? No, it seems more like the phony “mobile WMD labs” we were told that Saddam Hussein had constructed'...
Trump’s Disastrous Syria Attack
I haven't seen this noted in the calculation as to whether this bombing of Syria was a net positive for Trump, but consider this from the Syrian side:
After all the promises by Putin and Russia, after all the defenses and troops sold and sent to the Middle East, which can be boiled down to "we'll protect you,"......
....Trump just proved to all of Russia's client-states, that they couldn't protect them from an angered United States.
Syria never attacked the US. It isn't a threat to the US at all. The Regime Change policy is illegal, and needs to be ended. We have no right dictating to all nations who their leaders will be. It represents awful Empire arrogance. It's exactly what our Founding Fathers warned against. They knew very well that all Empires fall. They themselves defeated one to create our nation.
Preach on Good Doctor.
'If Syria really had sarin and other chemical weapons factories, does it make sense for the US to bomb the buildings and risk killing thousands by widely disbursing the poisons? Does it make sense to risk killing Syrian civilians with chemical weapons in retaliation for allegations that the Syrian government killed civilians with chemical weapons? No, it seems more like the phony “mobile WMD labs” we were told that Saddam Hussein had constructed'...
Trump’s Disastrous Syria Attack
I haven't seen this noted in the calculation as to whether this bombing of Syria was a net positive for Trump, but consider this from the Syrian side:
After all the promises by Putin and Russia, after all the defenses and troops sold and sent to the Middle East, which can be boiled down to "we'll protect you,"......
....Trump just proved to all of Russia's client-states, that they couldn't protect them from an angered United States.
Syria never attacked the US. It isn't a threat to the US at all. The Regime Change policy is illegal, and needs to be ended. We have no right dictating to all nations who their leaders will be. It represents awful Empire arrogance. It's exactly what our Founding Fathers warned against. They knew very well that all Empires fall. They themselves defeated one to create our nation.
It is a gross error on your part to restrict your view to Syria alone.
Hussein Obama made two abysmal errors
a. in leaving the field to Russia
b. in being the number one funder of the psychotics who run Iran
The slap at Syria is felt by both Russia and Iran.
It is a forceful and well designed foreign policy by an administration that needs to solve the errors of the previous administration.
Preach on Good Doctor.
'If Syria really had sarin and other chemical weapons factories, does it make sense for the US to bomb the buildings and risk killing thousands by widely disbursing the poisons? Does it make sense to risk killing Syrian civilians with chemical weapons in retaliation for allegations that the Syrian government killed civilians with chemical weapons? No, it seems more like the phony “mobile WMD labs” we were told that Saddam Hussein had constructed'...
Trump’s Disastrous Syria Attack
I haven't seen this noted in the calculation as to whether this bombing of Syria was a net positive for Trump, but consider this from the Syrian side:
After all the promises by Putin and Russia, after all the defenses and troops sold and sent to the Middle East, which can be boiled down to "we'll protect you,"......
....Trump just proved to all of Russia's client-states, that they couldn't protect them from an angered United States.
Syria never attacked the US. It isn't a threat to the US at all. The Regime Change policy is illegal, and needs to be ended. We have no right dictating to all nations who their leaders will be. It represents awful Empire arrogance. It's exactly what our Founding Fathers warned against. They knew very well that all Empires fall. They themselves defeated one to create our nation.
It is a gross error on your part to restrict your view to Syria alone.
Hussein Obama made two abysmal errors
a. in leaving the field to Russia
b. in being the number one funder of the psychotics who run Iran
The slap at Syria is felt by both Russia and Iran.
It is a forceful and well designed foreign policy by an administration that needs to solve the errors of the previous administration.
Preach on Good Doctor.
'If Syria really had sarin and other chemical weapons factories, does it make sense for the US to bomb the buildings and risk killing thousands by widely disbursing the poisons? Does it make sense to risk killing Syrian civilians with chemical weapons in retaliation for allegations that the Syrian government killed civilians with chemical weapons? No, it seems more like the phony “mobile WMD labs” we were told that Saddam Hussein had constructed'...
Trump’s Disastrous Syria Attack
I haven't seen this noted in the calculation as to whether this bombing of Syria was a net positive for Trump, but consider this from the Syrian side:
After all the promises by Putin and Russia, after all the defenses and troops sold and sent to the Middle East, which can be boiled down to "we'll protect you,"......
....Trump just proved to all of Russia's client-states, that they couldn't protect them from an angered United States.
Syria never attacked the US. It isn't a threat to the US at all. The Regime Change policy is illegal, and needs to be ended. We have no right dictating to all nations who their leaders will be. It represents awful Empire arrogance. It's exactly what our Founding Fathers warned against. They knew very well that all Empires fall. They themselves defeated one to create our nation.
It is a gross error on your part to restrict your view to Syria alone.
Hussein Obama made two abysmal errors
a. in leaving the field to Russia
b. in being the number one funder of the psychotics who run Iran
The slap at Syria is felt by both Russia and Iran.
It is a forceful and well designed foreign policy by an administration that needs to solve the errors of the previous administration.
We need to move on past 'Regime Change.' We just don't have the right to make such a demand. We have no business being in Syria. We own just about the entire Middle East. We have Puppets installed all over the region. So Russia and Iran have one country? That represents no threat to the US whatsoever. The US/West rules the Middle East. Syria represents US Empire greed at its worst. We never belonged there.
Preach on Good Doctor.
'If Syria really had sarin and other chemical weapons factories, does it make sense for the US to bomb the buildings and risk killing thousands by widely disbursing the poisons? Does it make sense to risk killing Syrian civilians with chemical weapons in retaliation for allegations that the Syrian government killed civilians with chemical weapons? No, it seems more like the phony “mobile WMD labs” we were told that Saddam Hussein had constructed'...
Trump’s Disastrous Syria Attack
I haven't seen this noted in the calculation as to whether this bombing of Syria was a net positive for Trump, but consider this from the Syrian side:
After all the promises by Putin and Russia, after all the defenses and troops sold and sent to the Middle East, which can be boiled down to "we'll protect you,"......
....Trump just proved to all of Russia's client-states, that they couldn't protect them from an angered United States.
Syria never attacked the US. It isn't a threat to the US at all. The Regime Change policy is illegal, and needs to be ended. We have no right dictating to all nations who their leaders will be. It represents awful Empire arrogance. It's exactly what our Founding Fathers warned against. They knew very well that all Empires fall. They themselves defeated one to create our nation.
It is a gross error on your part to restrict your view to Syria alone.
Hussein Obama made two abysmal errors
a. in leaving the field to Russia
b. in being the number one funder of the psychotics who run Iran
The slap at Syria is felt by both Russia and Iran.
It is a forceful and well designed foreign policy by an administration that needs to solve the errors of the previous administration.
When George W Bushh took out Sasdam, he did Iran the biggest favor of all. Instead of Iran spending money fighting Iraq, its enemy for over 30 years, it now could spend money elsewhere.
Not to mention how the Cheney led Halliburton was in Iran helping them produce oil.
So keep up with your lies about Obama you stupid shit.
Preach on Good Doctor.
'If Syria really had sarin and other chemical weapons factories, does it make sense for the US to bomb the buildings and risk killing thousands by widely disbursing the poisons? Does it make sense to risk killing Syrian civilians with chemical weapons in retaliation for allegations that the Syrian government killed civilians with chemical weapons? No, it seems more like the phony “mobile WMD labs” we were told that Saddam Hussein had constructed'...
Trump’s Disastrous Syria Attack
I haven't seen this noted in the calculation as to whether this bombing of Syria was a net positive for Trump, but consider this from the Syrian side:
After all the promises by Putin and Russia, after all the defenses and troops sold and sent to the Middle East, which can be boiled down to "we'll protect you,"......
....Trump just proved to all of Russia's client-states, that they couldn't protect them from an angered United States.
Syria never attacked the US. It isn't a threat to the US at all. The Regime Change policy is illegal, and needs to be ended. We have no right dictating to all nations who their leaders will be. It represents awful Empire arrogance. It's exactly what our Founding Fathers warned against. They knew very well that all Empires fall. They themselves defeated one to create our nation.
It is a gross error on your part to restrict your view to Syria alone.
Hussein Obama made two abysmal errors
a. in leaving the field to Russia
b. in being the number one funder of the psychotics who run Iran
The slap at Syria is felt by both Russia and Iran.
It is a forceful and well designed foreign policy by an administration that needs to solve the errors of the previous administration.
When George W Bushh took out Sasdam, he did Iran the biggest favor of all. Instead of Iran spending money fighting Iraq, its enemy for over 30 years, it now could spend money elsewhere.
Not to mention how the Cheney led Halliburton was in Iran helping them produce oil.
So keep up with your lies about Obama you stupid shit.
"When George W Bushh (sic) took out Sasdam (sic), blah blah blah...."
I believe these few words illustrate the deficit you have been battling your entire life.
If we could convert your collective IQs into electricity, you might be able to lightly toast a slice of bread. Maybe.
'President Trump will come to regret the day he let the neocons take over his foreign policy. Their track record is abysmal. His attack on Syria was clearly illegal and should his party lose the House in November he may find his new fair-weather friends in the Democratic Party quickly turning foul.'
Trump’s Disastrous Syria Attack
I can't type. OMG OMG OMG OMG OMGPreach on Good Doctor.
'If Syria really had sarin and other chemical weapons factories, does it make sense for the US to bomb the buildings and risk killing thousands by widely disbursing the poisons? Does it make sense to risk killing Syrian civilians with chemical weapons in retaliation for allegations that the Syrian government killed civilians with chemical weapons? No, it seems more like the phony “mobile WMD labs” we were told that Saddam Hussein had constructed'...
Trump’s Disastrous Syria Attack
I haven't seen this noted in the calculation as to whether this bombing of Syria was a net positive for Trump, but consider this from the Syrian side:
After all the promises by Putin and Russia, after all the defenses and troops sold and sent to the Middle East, which can be boiled down to "we'll protect you,"......
....Trump just proved to all of Russia's client-states, that they couldn't protect them from an angered United States.
Syria never attacked the US. It isn't a threat to the US at all. The Regime Change policy is illegal, and needs to be ended. We have no right dictating to all nations who their leaders will be. It represents awful Empire arrogance. It's exactly what our Founding Fathers warned against. They knew very well that all Empires fall. They themselves defeated one to create our nation.
It is a gross error on your part to restrict your view to Syria alone.
Hussein Obama made two abysmal errors
a. in leaving the field to Russia
b. in being the number one funder of the psychotics who run Iran
The slap at Syria is felt by both Russia and Iran.
It is a forceful and well designed foreign policy by an administration that needs to solve the errors of the previous administration.
When George W Bushh took out Sasdam, he did Iran the biggest favor of all. Instead of Iran spending money fighting Iraq, its enemy for over 30 years, it now could spend money elsewhere.
Not to mention how the Cheney led Halliburton was in Iran helping them produce oil.
So keep up with your lies about Obama you stupid shit.
"When George W Bushh (sic) took out Sasdam (sic), blah blah blah...."
I believe these few words illustrate the deficit you have been battling your entire life.
If we could convert your collective IQs into electricity, you might be able to lightly toast a slice of bread. Maybe.
Yeah, that’s why they are having shots fired preventing them once again from getting in.I heard this morning Russia will not allow international inspectors in there.
OPCW is in Syria and gearing up to begin inspections on Wednesday. Some of the media are lying.
I can't type. OMG OMG OMG OMG OMGI haven't seen this noted in the calculation as to whether this bombing of Syria was a net positive for Trump, but consider this from the Syrian side:
After all the promises by Putin and Russia, after all the defenses and troops sold and sent to the Middle East, which can be boiled down to "we'll protect you,"......
....Trump just proved to all of Russia's client-states, that they couldn't protect them from an angered United States.
Syria never attacked the US. It isn't a threat to the US at all. The Regime Change policy is illegal, and needs to be ended. We have no right dictating to all nations who their leaders will be. It represents awful Empire arrogance. It's exactly what our Founding Fathers warned against. They knew very well that all Empires fall. They themselves defeated one to create our nation.
It is a gross error on your part to restrict your view to Syria alone.
Hussein Obama made two abysmal errors
a. in leaving the field to Russia
b. in being the number one funder of the psychotics who run Iran
The slap at Syria is felt by both Russia and Iran.
It is a forceful and well designed foreign policy by an administration that needs to solve the errors of the previous administration.
When George W Bushh took out Sasdam, he did Iran the biggest favor of all. Instead of Iran spending money fighting Iraq, its enemy for over 30 years, it now could spend money elsewhere.
Not to mention how the Cheney led Halliburton was in Iran helping them produce oil.
So keep up with your lies about Obama you stupid shit.
"When George W Bushh (sic) took out Sasdam (sic), blah blah blah...."
I believe these few words illustrate the deficit you have been battling your entire life.
If we could convert your collective IQs into electricity, you might be able to lightly toast a slice of bread. Maybe.
Preach on Good Doctor.
'If Syria really had sarin and other chemical weapons factories, does it make sense for the US to bomb the buildings and risk killing thousands by widely disbursing the poisons? Does it make sense to risk killing Syrian civilians with chemical weapons in retaliation for allegations that the Syrian government killed civilians with chemical weapons? No, it seems more like the phony “mobile WMD labs” we were told that Saddam Hussein had constructed'...
Trump’s Disastrous Syria Attack
I haven't seen this noted in the calculation as to whether this bombing of Syria was a net positive for Trump, but consider this from the Syrian side:
After all the promises by Putin and Russia, after all the defenses and troops sold and sent to the Middle East, which can be boiled down to "we'll protect you,"......
....Trump just proved to all of Russia's client-states, that they couldn't protect them from an angered United States.
Syria never attacked the US. It isn't a threat to the US at all. The Regime Change policy is illegal, and needs to be ended. We have no right dictating to all nations who their leaders will be. It represents awful Empire arrogance. It's exactly what our Founding Fathers warned against. They knew very well that all Empires fall. They themselves defeated one to create our nation.
It is a gross error on your part to restrict your view to Syria alone.
Hussein Obama made two abysmal errors
a. in leaving the field to Russia
b. in being the number one funder of the psychotics who run Iran
The slap at Syria is felt by both Russia and Iran.
It is a forceful and well designed foreign policy by an administration that needs to solve the errors of the previous administration.
Preach on Good Doctor.
'If Syria really had sarin and other chemical weapons factories, does it make sense for the US to bomb the buildings and risk killing thousands by widely disbursing the poisons? Does it make sense to risk killing Syrian civilians with chemical weapons in retaliation for allegations that the Syrian government killed civilians with chemical weapons? No, it seems more like the phony “mobile WMD labs” we were told that Saddam Hussein had constructed'...
Trump’s Disastrous Syria Attack
I haven't seen this noted in the calculation as to whether this bombing of Syria was a net positive for Trump, but consider this from the Syrian side:
After all the promises by Putin and Russia, after all the defenses and troops sold and sent to the Middle East, which can be boiled down to "we'll protect you,"......
....Trump just proved to all of Russia's client-states, that they couldn't protect them from an angered United States.
Syria never attacked the US. It isn't a threat to the US at all. The Regime Change policy is illegal, and needs to be ended. We have no right dictating to all nations who their leaders will be. It represents awful Empire arrogance. It's exactly what our Founding Fathers warned against. They knew very well that all Empires fall. They themselves defeated one to create our nation.
It is a gross error on your part to restrict your view to Syria alone.
Hussein Obama made two abysmal errors
a. in leaving the field to Russia
b. in being the number one funder of the psychotics who run Iran
The slap at Syria is felt by both Russia and Iran.
It is a forceful and well designed foreign policy by an administration that needs to solve the errors of the previous administration.
I rarely disagree with you PC but on Syria I will. Obama left jack shit to the Russians. And this Syria strike was based on a false flag operation.
Timelines are everything. After Obama diddled and fiddled around pretending he was fighting ISIS Russia had no choice to become involved in this bloody mess called the Arab Spring which was nothing other than handing the keys of ME to the Muslim Brotherhood and creating multiple Salafist states. Obama's CIA was working with Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Turkey to overthrow Assad from the very beginning.
Where do I start? First off there never was a civil war. You don't have Sunni jihadists from over 80 countries pouring into Syria and financed by the Gulf States and call them rebels. You call it an invasion.
Russia did stay out of the conflict for many a year only becoming involved in September of 2015.
Motive for Putin? Sunni jihadists from Chechnya were the key players in ISIS in Syria. Chechen terrorists also pledged their allegiance to ISIS. Then a second warning from the UN that ISIS was taking over mega territory in Afghanistan and putting ISIS in Putin's back yard so to speak, left Russia no choice but to jump in and fight ISIS in Syria rather than at home.
Bottom line. We in the west had no freaking business trying to overthrow Assad and subject the Syrians to Salafism and Sharia. It boggles the mind that our governments would EVER want to subject anyone to the MB and Sharia.
On the other hand, Russia had a very valid reason to kill off ISIS and al Nusra in Syria rather than on home turf.
These strikes were based on bullshit. The Syrian Army had won Douma back from the terror group Jaish al Islam. Negotiations for a cease fire were already underway.
Assad is no fool. Risk the worlds wrath after winning back the city? Pffffffffffft. He didn't do it.
Preach on Good Doctor.
'If Syria really had sarin and other chemical weapons factories, does it make sense for the US to bomb the buildings and risk killing thousands by widely disbursing the poisons? Does it make sense to risk killing Syrian civilians with chemical weapons in retaliation for allegations that the Syrian government killed civilians with chemical weapons? No, it seems more like the phony “mobile WMD labs” we were told that Saddam Hussein had constructed'...
Trump’s Disastrous Syria Attack
I haven't seen this noted in the calculation as to whether this bombing of Syria was a net positive for Trump, but consider this from the Syrian side:
After all the promises by Putin and Russia, after all the defenses and troops sold and sent to the Middle East, which can be boiled down to "we'll protect you,"......
....Trump just proved to all of Russia's client-states, that they couldn't protect them from an angered United States.
Syria never attacked the US. It isn't a threat to the US at all. The Regime Change policy is illegal, and needs to be ended. We have no right dictating to all nations who their leaders will be. It represents awful Empire arrogance. It's exactly what our Founding Fathers warned against. They knew very well that all Empires fall. They themselves defeated one to create our nation.
It is a gross error on your part to restrict your view to Syria alone.
Hussein Obama made two abysmal errors
a. in leaving the field to Russia
b. in being the number one funder of the psychotics who run Iran
The slap at Syria is felt by both Russia and Iran.
It is a forceful and well designed foreign policy by an administration that needs to solve the errors of the previous administration.
I rarely disagree with you PC but on Syria I will. Obama left jack shit to the Russians. And this Syria strike was based on a false flag operation.
Timelines are everything. After Obama diddled and fiddled around pretending he was fighting ISIS Russia had no choice to become involved in this bloody mess called the Arab Spring which was nothing other than handing the keys of ME to the Muslim Brotherhood and creating multiple Salafist states. Obama's CIA was working with Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Turkey to overthrow Assad from the very beginning.
Where do I start? First off there never was a civil war. You don't have Sunni jihadists from over 80 countries pouring into Syria and financed by the Gulf States and call them rebels. You call it an invasion.
Russia did stay out of the conflict for many a year only becoming involved in September of 2015.
Motive for Putin? Sunni jihadists from Chechnya were the key players in ISIS in Syria. Chechen terrorists also pledged their allegiance to ISIS. Then a second warning from the UN that ISIS was taking over mega territory in Afghanistan and putting ISIS in Putin's back yard so to speak, left Russia no choice but to jump in and fight ISIS in Syria rather than at home.
Bottom line. We in the west had no freaking business trying to overthrow Assad and subject the Syrians to Salafism and Sharia. It boggles the mind that our governments would EVER want to subject anyone to the MB and Sharia.
On the other hand, Russia had a very valid reason to kill off ISIS and al Nusra in Syria rather than on home turf.
These strikes were based on bullshit. The Syrian Army had won Douma back from the terror group Jaish al Islam. Negotiations for a cease fire were already underway.
Assad is no fool. Risk the worlds wrath after winning back the city? Pffffffffffft. He didn't do it.
Good observation. Assad had absolutely nothing to gain by using chemical weapons. It didn't happen. If they were used, they were used by Assad's enemies. The area in question has been controlled by US/Western-backed Jihadis for years. They wouldn't have any problem using chemical weapons on civilians.
Preach on Good Doctor.
'If Syria really had sarin and other chemical weapons factories, does it make sense for the US to bomb the buildings and risk killing thousands by widely disbursing the poisons? Does it make sense to risk killing Syrian civilians with chemical weapons in retaliation for allegations that the Syrian government killed civilians with chemical weapons? No, it seems more like the phony “mobile WMD labs” we were told that Saddam Hussein had constructed'...
Trump’s Disastrous Syria Attack
I haven't seen this noted in the calculation as to whether this bombing of Syria was a net positive for Trump, but consider this from the Syrian side:
After all the promises by Putin and Russia, after all the defenses and troops sold and sent to the Middle East, which can be boiled down to "we'll protect you,"......
....Trump just proved to all of Russia's client-states, that they couldn't protect them from an angered United States.
Syria never attacked the US. It isn't a threat to the US at all. The Regime Change policy is illegal, and needs to be ended. We have no right dictating to all nations who their leaders will be. It represents awful Empire arrogance. It's exactly what our Founding Fathers warned against. They knew very well that all Empires fall. They themselves defeated one to create our nation.
It is a gross error on your part to restrict your view to Syria alone.
Hussein Obama made two abysmal errors
a. in leaving the field to Russia
b. in being the number one funder of the psychotics who run Iran
The slap at Syria is felt by both Russia and Iran.
It is a forceful and well designed foreign policy by an administration that needs to solve the errors of the previous administration.
I rarely disagree with you PC but on Syria I will. Obama left jack shit to the Russians. And this Syria strike was based on a false flag operation.
Timelines are everything. After Obama diddled and fiddled around pretending he was fighting ISIS Russia had no choice to become involved in this bloody mess called the Arab Spring which was nothing other than handing the keys of ME to the Muslim Brotherhood and creating multiple Salafist states. Obama's CIA was working with Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Turkey to overthrow Assad from the very beginning.
Where do I start? First off there never was a civil war. You don't have Sunni jihadists from over 80 countries pouring into Syria and financed by the Gulf States and call them rebels. You call it an invasion.
Russia did stay out of the conflict for many a year only becoming involved in September of 2015.
Motive for Putin? Sunni jihadists from Chechnya were the key players in ISIS in Syria. Chechen terrorists also pledged their allegiance to ISIS. Then a second warning from the UN that ISIS was taking over mega territory in Afghanistan and putting ISIS in Putin's back yard so to speak, left Russia no choice but to jump in and fight ISIS in Syria rather than at home.
Bottom line. We in the west had no freaking business trying to overthrow Assad and subject the Syrians to Salafism and Sharia. It boggles the mind that our governments would EVER want to subject anyone to the MB and Sharia.
On the other hand, Russia had a very valid reason to kill off ISIS and al Nusra in Syria rather than on home turf.
These strikes were based on bullshit. The Syrian Army had won Douma back from the terror group Jaish al Islam. Negotiations for a cease fire were already underway.
Assad is no fool. Risk the worlds wrath after winning back the city? Pffffffffffft. He didn't do it.
ISIS opens a new front on Europe's doorstep: Chechan jihadi group with 'up to 15,000' fighters pledge allegiance to terror horde
- Leader of terror group known as Caucuses Emirate declared loyalty to ISIS
- 'We need to unite... so we can cut off the heads of the infidels,' he has said
- Group operates in Russian republics of Chechnya, Daghestan, Ingushetia
- It has killed hundreds in deadly terror attacks on Russian soil since 2007
- Eight million already live in ISIS territory across MIddle East, north Africa
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3134206/ISIS-opens-new-Europe-s-doorstep-Chechan-jihadi-group-15-000-fighters-pledge-allegiance-terror-horde.html#ixzz5D2fmMAQQ
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
Preach on Good Doctor.
'If Syria really had sarin and other chemical weapons factories, does it make sense for the US to bomb the buildings and risk killing thousands by widely disbursing the poisons? Does it make sense to risk killing Syrian civilians with chemical weapons in retaliation for allegations that the Syrian government killed civilians with chemical weapons? No, it seems more like the phony “mobile WMD labs” we were told that Saddam Hussein had constructed'...
Trump’s Disastrous Syria Attack
I haven't seen this noted in the calculation as to whether this bombing of Syria was a net positive for Trump, but consider this from the Syrian side:
After all the promises by Putin and Russia, after all the defenses and troops sold and sent to the Middle East, which can be boiled down to "we'll protect you,"......
....Trump just proved to all of Russia's client-states, that they couldn't protect them from an angered United States.
Syria never attacked the US. It isn't a threat to the US at all. The Regime Change policy is illegal, and needs to be ended. We have no right dictating to all nations who their leaders will be. It represents awful Empire arrogance. It's exactly what our Founding Fathers warned against. They knew very well that all Empires fall. They themselves defeated one to create our nation.
It is a gross error on your part to restrict your view to Syria alone.
Hussein Obama made two abysmal errors
a. in leaving the field to Russia
b. in being the number one funder of the psychotics who run Iran
The slap at Syria is felt by both Russia and Iran.
It is a forceful and well designed foreign policy by an administration that needs to solve the errors of the previous administration.
I rarely disagree with you PC but on Syria I will. Obama left jack shit to the Russians. And this Syria strike was based on a false flag operation.
Timelines are everything. After Obama diddled and fiddled around pretending he was fighting ISIS Russia had no choice to become involved in this bloody mess called the Arab Spring which was nothing other than handing the keys of ME to the Muslim Brotherhood and creating multiple Salafist states. Obama's CIA was working with Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Turkey to overthrow Assad from the very beginning.
Where do I start? First off there never was a civil war. You don't have Sunni jihadists from over 80 countries pouring into Syria and financed by the Gulf States and call them rebels. You call it an invasion.
Russia did stay out of the conflict for many a year only becoming involved in September of 2015.
Motive for Putin? Sunni jihadists from Chechnya were the key players in ISIS in Syria. Chechen terrorists also pledged their allegiance to ISIS. Then a second warning from the UN that ISIS was taking over mega territory in Afghanistan and putting ISIS in Putin's back yard so to speak, left Russia no choice but to jump in and fight ISIS in Syria rather than at home.
Bottom line. We in the west had no freaking business trying to overthrow Assad and subject the Syrians to Salafism and Sharia. It boggles the mind that our governments would EVER want to subject anyone to the MB and Sharia.
On the other hand, Russia had a very valid reason to kill off ISIS and al Nusra in Syria rather than on home turf.
These strikes were based on bullshit. The Syrian Army had won Douma back from the terror group Jaish al Islam. Negotiations for a cease fire were already underway.
Assad is no fool. Risk the worlds wrath after winning back the city? Pffffffffffft. He didn't do it.
ISIS opens a new front on Europe's doorstep: Chechan jihadi group with 'up to 15,000' fighters pledge allegiance to terror horde
- Leader of terror group known as Caucuses Emirate declared loyalty to ISIS
- 'We need to unite... so we can cut off the heads of the infidels,' he has said
- Group operates in Russian republics of Chechnya, Daghestan, Ingushetia
- It has killed hundreds in deadly terror attacks on Russian soil since 2007
- Eight million already live in ISIS territory across MIddle East, north Africa
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3134206/ISIS-opens-new-Europe-s-doorstep-Chechan-jihadi-group-15-000-fighters-pledge-allegiance-terror-horde.html#ixzz5D2fmMAQQ
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
Actually, Obama did cede the field to the Russians.
"US and Russia Reach Agreement on Plan to Rid Syria of Chemical Weapons"
US and Russia Reach Deal on Syria Chemical Weapons
Russia didn't, and Obama didn't care.
His verification of the plan was as his verification of Iran's ending their nuclear program.
These are two errors that Trump needs to reverse, and the Syria attack was a warning to all parties concerned.
Hussein apologists are always saying that crap, yet they never back it up. Do you have any evidence to back up your bizarre claims?You Saddam Hussein apologists are always making these bizarre unsupported claims.I remember that disinformation all over the media.You are brainwashed fool experiencing false memories. Lay off the kool-aid, jackass.
Nah, it's a real memory. Go back and check it out yourself.
You not only drank the kool-aid, you are propagating crude, defamatory anti-USA disinformation.
Iraq never attacked the US. It was never a threat to the US. Bush did lie to get support for that horrific quagmire. It is what it is.
You idiots never provide evidence to support your blather.
Don't give a shite about Saddam Hussein. I'm not defending him. I'm concerned with my Government. And Bush did lie us into that bloodbath. Iraq was absolutely no threat to the US.
