Dagosa
Gold Member
- Oct 22, 2012
- 22,594
- 6,158
- 198
That’s was 1865…..you’re off nearly 100 years.Yeah and in 1935 the Democrats were the party of segregation and still are in a lot of ways.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That’s was 1865…..you’re off nearly 100 years.Yeah and in 1935 the Democrats were the party of segregation and still are in a lot of ways.
Nope, I believe everyone should have some skin in the game.That’s because you‘re math illiterate.
Boy, that sounds very familiar.Did you have fun posting several paragraphs of made up shit ?
Afraid to answer the question still.Faun, I'm a big proponent for a flat tax. I doubt it will ever happen
with our government.
The poor who pay payroll tax don’t have skin in the game ?Nope, I believe everyone should have some skin in the game.
Don't like the idea of buying votes....I'm sure you do with your government philosophy.
We were talking payroll tax? I thought we were talking about the fed income tax.The poor who pay payroll tax don’t have skin in the game ?
Not afraid, but I think this is one of those gotchya questions.Afraid to answer the question still.
Everyone with the brain of a mature cucumber knows that recessions redistribute wealth.
Faun, I'm a big proponent for a flat tax. I doubt it will ever happen
with our government.
My issue is that you can buy votes, if not everyone has some kind of skin in the game.Still, that rate, assuming no deductions allowed, would be about 30% just to maintain current spending.
For a person making $1,000,000 a year, they would still have about $700K to live off of.
But a person making minimum wage (in Florida) would have about $7K of their $23,000 taken out in taxes. How does anyone live off of $16K a year? Your plan would hurl millions into the poverty level overnight.
My issue is that you can buy votes, if not everyone has some kind of skin in the game.
Welfare breeds welfare, child support breeds child support, it's a career for many.
They keep voting for those who just keep giving the tax dollars to them.
I don't know what the answer is, but just keep saying tax the rich does not cut it.
The rich are taxed and do pay the lions share of the income taxes.
What have you got, Faun?
You birds of a feather.Boy, that sounds very familiar.![]()
When the 2007 recession started people started losing their jobs. By the time it reached 8.8 million mid wage jobs, the middle class began feeling the effects. More then 60% were middle class who lost their wealth, their homes, their healthcare and their dignity. When the recovery offcially ended, only 27% recovered the to work at the wage they were before. The middle class lost their wealth.Most recessions are not long lived, and the redistribution has a variance to it.
As long as republicans promote recessions, it will get worse. Always has. We have to print money to climb out of recessions. The gop doesn’t give a fk. They have their Cayman Island accounts to hide behind."They"? Something is going to have to give, cutting or raising the age
requirement, it can't remain as it is now and be solvent
"eliminating it altogether if they could"? There goes your imagination again,
I warned you about that already.![]()
And the republicans are the party of idiots.Yeah and in 1935 the Democrats were the party of segregation and still are in a lot of ways.
LameAnd not the republicans are the party of idiots.
And you have issue in making the poor pay for the rich’s vacations.I'm not arguing that. You have an issue with the rich adhering to the tax code.![]()
Gotcha question ? It is is only if you still cling to the idea that trickle down works. It’s a stupid philosophy proven false over and over. Only you numb shits fall for it.Not afraid, but I think this is one of those gotchya questions.
What does that have to do with the meat and potatoes of this thread?
Most recessions are not long lived, and the redistribution has a variance to it.
Boy, you are naive. The payroll tax for SS goes into the trust fund for pay outs. Over the decades, the trust fund has accumulated 2.9 TRILLION DOLLARS surplus which is used to purchase treasury notes . Question. Where is that money ? Hint. The same place the federal income tax monies go.We were talking payroll tax? I thought we were talking about the fed income tax.
Was the flat tax income tax or payroll tax?
I get so confused when trying to have a discussion with you.
You keep moving the goal posts.![]()
Sure sparky, sure.Boy, you are naive. The payroll tax for SS goes into the trust fund for pay outs. Over the decades, the trust fund has accumulated 2.9 TRILLION DOLLARS surplus which is used to purchase treasury notes . Question. Where is that money ? Hint. The same place the federal income tax monies go.
So dumb ass, all workers hav3 sk8n in the game.
Yes sparky dullard.Not afraid, but I think this is one of those gotchya questions.
What does that have to do with the meat and potatoes of this thread?
Most recessions are not long lived, and the redistribution has a variance to it.