I can't imagine Mitt pushing through any major legislation without strong Congressional support and without the approval of the people.
I can't imagine him doing anything to disrupt the corporatist 'horse-trade' at the core of PPACA. He made the same "deal" with the insurance lobby in his home state. He clearly sees nothing wrong with that kind of governance.
I suppose you've just decided that Romney is a little better than Obama and that justifies making excuses for him. I can't do it.
I have a feeling you wouldn't make any excuses for Romney, but still will give a pass to a proven failure. I just don't understand your logic, or lack there of.
Not clear what you mean. Care to elaborate?