The problem with trusting robots became more obvious during another round of experiments in which the guide robot led people not to an exit, but to a dark room blocked off by furniture. Two participants squeezed past the couch partially blocking the door and walked into the dark room. Two just stood there with the robot until the researchers came to get them. Two turned and left through the emergency exit.
If one of the leading politicians was in truth anatomically mechanical would anyone notice? At no time can we be too credulously subservient if we really care about our democratic heritage. In this way, individual contentment is more fruitfully bolstered when the society's populants question everything. We can't be passive spectators, we need be able to promote virtuously magnetized character and all the while recognize intellectual attainment. So why the divide between intermutual neighborly compassion and pure scholarly triumph at the highest dominion?? Oppenheimer was of the most celebrated intellectuals from his era, but he is seldom deferred to for having realized eternal sainthood. Bonhoeffer had been covertly engaged in an insurgent religious movement which sought to have the fascist backers violently dislodged. Both of these men had faith based lives, but the latter instance evidently was set upon rendering service in a theologically consistent way that may have saved many lives — over the destructive proclivity of the former example.
Added thoughts: Robotified organisms in the technical denotation are for the most part mimicry specialists. If ever effectually fulfilled they'd still be distorted imitations that crudely pales with our human vitality. Not only this, but they reflect interests of the mastermind programmer hiding behind the not seen furtive curtain. Along these lines, the looming potential rife for undetected manipulation by any industry supplier is of a great risk.
See link: http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2016/03/robots-dont-need-to-be-evil-just-stupid-to-lead-us-to-our-doom/