Rittenhouse trial witness says prosecution tried to make him change his statement

marvin martian

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2020
Messages
44,724
Reaction score
66,238
Points
3,488
Location
Texas Hill Country
These prosecutors are garbage humans. They should be in prison.


While questioning DeBruin on the stand Tuesday, Kraus said, “We had you read over your statement, right?”

DeBruin responded, “Correct.”

Kraus followed, “And we asked if you knew anything beyond that statement.”

DeBruin said, “Correct.”

Kraus then said, “We didn’t ask you to change it.”

DeBruin answered, “Yes, you did.”
 
These prosecutors are garbage humans. They should be in prison.


While questioning DeBruin on the stand Tuesday, Kraus said, “We had you read over your statement, right?”

DeBruin responded, “Correct.”

Kraus followed, “And we asked if you knew anything beyond that statement.”

DeBruin said, “Correct.”

Kraus then said, “We didn’t ask you to change it.”

DeBruin answered, “Yes, you did.”
Can you blame them for trying?

They have THE SHITTIEST case imaginable and tons of outside commie pressure to get a wrongful conviction.
 
Wow! I'm thinking the kid is going to walk. The prosecution realizes that it's such a weak case that
they have to pull out all the stops, IMO.

I agree. The prosecution's star witness just admitted he pointed a gun at Rittenhouse before the kid shot him.
 
Fuck off, troll.
I can tell you have nothing. yet can you show us the marks from where they twisted his arm to get him to change his story? If not then it's he said-she said accusations. Since when did you start playing the bitch-boy perspective?
 
I can tell you have nothing. yet can you show us the marks from where they twisted his arm to get him to change his story? If not then it's he said-she said accusations. Since when did you start playing the bitch-boy perspective?

He didn't change it. He refused to commit the crime the prosecutors were asking him to commit.

Now fuck off, troll.
 
I am sure you would like to believe that since you were a fly on the wall.

So your position is that this witness lied under oath about it, despite having NOTHING to gain from that? Interesting how far you're willing to go to take the side of the pedo who got capped.
 
So your position is that this witness lied under oath about it, despite having NOTHING to gain from that? Interesting how far you're willing to go to take the side of the pedo who got capped.
I am not taking any sides I am saying that people have and do lie under oath.
 
If it is true that a guy had a gun pointed to his face and was shot by this kid, then this is a clear example of self-defense and I'm no lawyer. I've never understood how a 17 year old can walk around with a rifle, but those are your laws not ours.

Even in Canada, you might (I say might), be cleared of killing someone who was going to kill you first, if they pointed a gun at your face before hand. If they did so with a knife, a bomb, a chainsaw, a speargun etc. you probably aren't cleared of defending your life from the hands of another because we are told "hey dare bye call da cops eh dats dare job". It's as if the Security Industrial Complex doesn't want citizens stepping onto their turf and defending themselves...

As for trying to have a witness change his story, that can't be good for the prosecution.
 
Last edited:

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom