Rittenhouse ordered to stand trial

[Mac-7]

Obama set up the Taskforce for 20th Century Policing to restore respect and confidence in Law Enforcement.

And he failed miserably

obama contributed to low esteem of the FBI and black distrust of the police

 

[Leo123]

That’s why he joined in the riot. Looking for a fight.

More babble from the babbling troll.

 

[Leo123]

Easily proven wrong.
Rittenhouse was the only one with rifle, so not only does that prove a rifle was not needed for protection, but the only harm to anyone was caused by that rifle.
And anyone should easily anticipate that carrying a rifle would be provocative and deliberately intimidating.
Which is why Rittenhouse deliberately brought the rifle, not for protection.
For protection one would being a concealed pistol, which would be easier to bring to bear and not provoke someone to try to take away.

There were 5 wounds to one person alone, so then we have proof Rittenhouse did not just "fire a few shots in self defense".
After the first incident, he kept at it, continually provoking in an escalating pattern of deliberate violence.

Rosenbaums past is irrelevant.
There is no indication Rittenhouse ever tried to simply go to the safety of the police, that he gave any warning or fired any warning shots, and in fact at that close range, could easily have chosen a limb shot if his intent was not deadly.

So what? There were rioters with handguns, Molotov cocktails, bricks, etc. Are they less a threat? Carrying a rifle is not provocative. Rosenbaum was armed with a 3 foot chain as was about to beat Rittenhouse with it. 5 shots IS a few. Only about half a typical, legal, 10 round cartridge. Rittenhouse was running toward the police. Honestly, you do not have all the facts, you have a media-spun narrative.

You apparently do not believe one is innocent unless proven guilty. You are part of the problem today. You set yourself up as witness, judge and jury and proclaim guilt because you need to uphold your political views.

 

[tahuyaman]

More babble from the babbling troll.

Lol.

 

[tahuyaman]

So what, there were rioters with handguns. Are they less a threat? Carrying a rifle is not provocative. Yeah Rosenbaum had a 3 foot chain as was about to beat Rittenhouse with it. 5 shots IS a few. Only about half a typical, legal, 10 round cartridge. Rittenhouse was running toward the police. Honestly, you do not have all the facts, you have a media-spun narrative.

Rittenhouse should not have made the decision to arm himself and participate in a violent riot. No smart or responsible person would do that. Tempting fate is generally not a good idea.

 

[Leo123]

Rittenhouse should not have made the decision to arm himself and participate in a violent riot. No smart or responsible person would do that. Tempting fate is generally not a good idea.

No one cares what you think, that's not the point here. All you have is emotional diatribes based on a fantasy story you made up in your head because you have already convicted a presumed to be innocent man. In order to do that you made several false statements which I proved false. The shit you make up in your head does not constitute facts.

 

[Canon Shooter]

There are places in California where you can take one step and cross a state line

I'm gonna' go out on a limb and guess that such places exist in all of the lower 48...

 

[Leo123]

I'm gonna' go out on a limb and guess that such places exist in all of the lower 48...

There used to be a Casino on the CA/NV line that was named: 'CalNeva" the state line ran right down the middle of the Casino. Don't know if it still exists though.

 

[Rigby5]

Hey, spin it any way you want. Zimmerman didn't break any laws...

We know Zimmerman was following someone at night, and then ran around in front of them to cut them off.
That is very intimidating.
But we don't know for sure what happened then.
We don't know who started the brawl, and we do not know if Zimmerman is lying when he said Trayvon was trying to get the gun.
We do know Zimmerman bears the responsibility for it since he made it happen even after police said not to.
But we can't tell is it amounted to murder because we only have Zimmerman's side of the story.

 

[Rigby5]

He basically drove from one suburb to another. In the process he crosses a state line. There are a lot of places like that. There are places in California where you can take one step and cross a state line and I believe there is a building where half is in California and the other half is in Nevada.

Driving any distance means he had no business there.
He was not defending home or business.
He should not have been there.
He was a counter demonstrator over abuse by police, which then makes him totally wrong morally and legally.
The demonstration had the moral and legal high ground.

 

[Rigby5]

Kyle is a political prisoner.

Just sayin'.

His crime was political and not for profit, but it was still a horrendously evil crime.

 

[Leo123]

Driving any distance means he had no business there.
He was not defending home or business.
He should not have been there.
He was a counter demonstrator over abuse by police, which then makes him totally wrong morally and legally.
The demonstration had the moral and legal high ground.

All made up in your head. No facts, no objective thinking, just a bunch of leftist crap talking points.

 

[Meathead]

Driving any distance means he had no business there.
He was not defending home or business.
He should not have been there.
He was a counter demonstrator over abuse by police, which then makes him totally wrong morally and legally.
The demonstration had the moral and legal high ground.

A moral pedophile. FFS, what's wrong with you people?

 

[tahuyaman]

No one cares what you think, that's not the point here. All you have is emotional diatribes based on a fantasy story you made up in your head because you have already convicted a presumed to be innocent man.

This is a discussion forum. I don’t need your approval. I calmly and rationally expressed my view on this. You’ve done nothing but toss out insults.

 

[Leo123]

His crime was political and not for profit, but it was still a horrendously evil crime.

Rittenhouse is not convicted of any crime yet, here you are, witness, judge and jury making a summary conviction on nothing but your fantasy story.

 

[boedicca]

His crime was political and not for profit, but it was still a horrendously evil crime.

He didn't commit a crime. He performed self-defense.

 

[Rigby5]

All made up in your head. No facts, no objective thinking, just a bunch of leftist crap talking points.

Are you saying the police should continue to kill Blacks who are no threat, have no weapon, and should not have been arrested?
If police do not change drastically, then it is police who need to be elminated.
We did a lot better 120 years ago when essentially police did not exist.

 

[Leo123]

This is a discussion forum. I don’t need your approval. I calmly and rationally expressed my view on this. You’ve done nothing but toss out insults.

You made up false facts, I pointed them out, and provided links. I didn't ask your your approval, I just proved you to be wrong and a person that does not believe in American law. Innocent unless proven guilty. You are not rational at all you know.

 

[Rigby5]

He didn't commit a crime. He performed self-defense.

You can't claim self defense when you cause the danger by deliberately provocative actions.

 

[boedicca]

Are you saying the police should continue to kill Blacks who are no threat, have no weapon, and should not have been arrested?
If police do not change drastically, then it is police who need to be elminated.
We did a lot better 120 years ago when essentially police did not exist.

Reading for comprehension and thinking logically aren't in your wheelhouse, bub.