Rittenhouse jury just went to deliberate

[Lisa558]

No one said it was ok for him to be attacked. That said, he needlessly placed himself in harms way and Provoked a deadly altercation.

What if I was stupidly walking in a bad section of town at night, where I didn’t need to be, and a bunch of lowlife scums attacked me? I provoked it?

 

[Mr Natural]

What if I was stupidly walking in a bad section of town at night, where I didn’t need to be, and a bunch of lowlife scums attacked me? I provoked it?

But that wasn't the case. He knew exactly where he was going.

 

[Lisa558]

As far as I know, Rosenbaum was just another one of the knuckhead mob who was out protesting/burning shit. That doesn't make him a vigilante. The other two..one attacked pop and fresh with a skateboard and the other pointed a pistol at him....both in the name of law enforcement. That wasn't their job. KR was/is a jerk looking for trouble, created it, and is being (hopefully) prosecuted for it. But he still has rights.

The BLM rioters were much worse - that night, and all the nights over three months while they destroyed property, burned down buildings, set cars aflame, and murdered dozens of people. Why aren‘t their trials being televised? Or are there even any trials for them at all? Where’s the trial for the thug looter who killed the police captain? Seems these days, all you see are trials of white boys.

 

[Cecilie1200]

We n

once again for the very last time. One loses ability to claim self defense when they provoke an altercation. This is backed by the law.

Once again, for the very last time. One regains the right to claim self-defense when one withdraws from the confrontation and is then followed. This is backed by the law.

Also, one is not "provoking a confrontation" simply by opposing leftists, no matter HOW much you may feel that your personal desires are the equivalent of holy writ.

 

[Cecilie1200]

It’s embarrassing and troubling that so many so called conservatives have elevated this troubled teen to hero status.

People in the media like Hannity nearly worshiping this kid is embarrassing.

It's embarrassing and troubling that so many leftists continue to think their approval is important.

Get over yourself.

 

[Lisa558]

But that wasn't the case. He knew exactly where he was going.

So what? He was young and naive, but well-intentioned. You can’t say the same for the throngs of lowlife felons intentionally out to destroy property. What about that lowlife that drop-kicked Kyle? When is his trial for attempted murder going on TV?

Lots of rage for a white teen who wanted to fight back against the violence and terror of BLM rioters, and got himself into more than he could handle. (Well, actually, he proved he COULD handle it….defended himself effectively.)

At the crux, this is about liberals taking a firm stance against people who object to the BLM terror group and their violent supporters.

 

[Cecilie1200]

You can help that bu not asking the same dumb question over and over again.

The distorted view is the one which elevated a disturbed teenager acting as a vigilante to Icon status

No, the distorted view continues to be, "It's a horrible crime to oppose what we want."

 

[Lisa558]

Oh, he can definitely declare a mistrial. And I frankly think he should at this point, as well as file an ethics complaint with the Bar Association, given the various shenanigans of the prosecution. I've seen attorneys disbarred for far less.

But he can't replace jurors because the jury is hung (assuming it is).

Agree. He can’t replace jurors. I suspect we will hear a dismissal with prejudice within days.

 

[Lisa558]

Just think. If that lowlife scumbag Blake just followed police direction, rather than go for a weapon in his car, there would have been no Kenosha riot at all.

This is all due to yet another criminal black man ignoring police and going for a weapon. But shhhhh…..

 

[Cecilie1200]

Running for your life and then defending yourself, is not being a vigilante.

It's pretty clear that we need to deal with the left's mindless parroting of the word "vigilante". As with virtually everything spewing from their headholes, they have no idea what it means.

A vigilante is someone who tries to usurp the powers of law enforcement authorities for himself, but that pre-supposes there are authorities prepared to enforce the laws. In the case of Kenosha, those authorities abdicated their responsibilities. To put it another way, "vigilante" is a term describing behavior under a functioning social order. To try to apply it to a situation where there is no functioning social order is ridiculous.

As much as leftists hate it and try their best to change it, Americans are not serfs. We are not subjects. We're citizens. Those in authority do not rule by divine right, obligating us to simply accept whatever they choose to do and however they decide the world is going to be at the moment. They are servants, employees who work for us and wield authority granted to them by us. When they abandon their responsibilities and refuse to do their jobs, that authority does not remain with them. It devolves back where it came from, to the people themselves.

 

[Cecilie1200]

While in the act of shooting a firearm one is an active shooter. As I dated earlier, there are various types of active shooters.

I just heard, "Fuck the legal definitions. I have declared this, and that makes it TRUE!!!"

 

[Cecilie1200]

So what? He was young and naive, but well-intentioned. You can’t say the same for the throngs of lowlife felons intentionally out to destroy property. What about that lowlife that drop-kicked Kyle? When is his trial for attempted murder going on TV?

Lots of rage for a white teen who wanted to fight back against the violence and terror of BLM rioters, and got himself into more than he could handle. (Well, actually, he proved he COULD handle it….defended himself effectively.)

At the crux, this is about liberals taking a firm stance against people who object to the BLM terror group and their violent supporters.

More than that. This is about leftists taking a firm stance against people having rights and being anything other than slaves to the elite.

 

[Correll]

It's pretty clear that we need to deal with the left's mindless parroting of the word "vigilante". As with virtually everything spewing from their headholes, they have no idea what it means.

A vigilante is someone who tries to usurp the powers of law enforcement authorities for himself, but that pre-supposes there are authorities prepared to enforce the laws. In the case of Kenosha, those authorities abdicated their responsibilities. To put it another way, "vigilante" is a term describing behavior under a functioning social order. To try to apply it to a situation where there is no functioning social order is ridiculous.

As much as leftists hate it and try their best to change it, Americans are not serfs. We are not subjects. We're citizens. Those in authority do not rule by divine right, obligating us to simply accept whatever they choose to do and however they decide the world is going to be at the moment. They are servants, employees who work for us and wield authority granted to them by us. When they abandon their responsibilities and refuse to do their jobs, that authority does not remain with them. It devolves back where it came from, to the people themselves.

Very well said. That is an example of using a definition to clarify an issue.


The exact opposite of what lefties do.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Agree. He can’t replace jurors. I suspect we will hear a dismissal with prejudice within days.

It seems like the judge is intending to wait to rule on the requests for a mistrial after the jury ends its deliberations.

 

[Cecilie1200]

you were given legal definitions that prove you wrong,,

so unless you have a link that proves youre claim right we can only assume youre lying and desperate for attention,,

Like all leftists, this fool believes that reality is defined by his/her wishing really hard and making REALLY definitive statements of what everyone has to believe.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Being where you needn’t be with a loaded gun is.

"Where you needn't be" defined by whom? Leftist animals who want to riot and destroy?

 

[Lisa558]

More than that. This is about leftists taking a firm stance against people having rights and being anything other than slaves to the elite.

Yes, it’s the cancel culture taken to the next extreme. First, they silence you. Next, they sic the FBI on you. Next, they try to lock you up for life.

Leftists bring a new and chilling meaning to “my way or the highway.”

This Is no longer America. We have to make sure the left doesn’t cheat its way to a win in November 2022, so we can sweep Congress (both chambers) and block more of the Communist transformation. Hope the damage isn’t beyond repair by then, as the left sees the writing on the wall and is now doubling down on their destruction.

 

[Cecilie1200]

So I’m hit limited mind, one is a “gun hating leftist”’because he thinks Rittenhouse was wrong to insert himself into a riot.

Not a true mind numbed moron would assume yet

Yes, basically, you're a gun-hating leftist because you think it's a bad idea to interfere with riots you're cheering on.

 

[Lisa558]

"Where you needn't be" defined by whom? Leftist animals who want to riot and destroy?

Yeah….isn’t THAT calling the kettle black? Leftist savages supporting the Summer of Love, rampaging city after city for months on end, are now deciding that People Who Disagree needn’t be at riots.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Or stay home where you belong.

It's really fascinating to watch leftist garbage attempt to enslave and oppress an entire nation in real time. I used to try to picture what it was like to be in East Berlin after the wall went up, and people went overnight from being free citizens with the right to go anywhere they wanted whenever they wanted to being prisoners who needed a tyrant's permission simply to live their lives. I don't have to imagine it any more, because now I get to watch the left try to duplicate it.