Rittenhouse jury just went to deliberate

What will the verdict be?

  • Guilty on all charges

    Votes: 2 2.7%
  • Not guilty on all charges

    Votes: 53 72.6%
  • Some yes and some no

    Votes: 18 24.7%

  • Total voters
    73
Again, has there ever been a vigilante the right wing hasn't idolized?

Again, at what point did you get the idea that YOU could shame people for not behaving the way you want them to? I've stepped on wads of gum on the sidewalk whose moral judgement held more weight with me.
 
So you think to be an active shooter one must be in the process of committing murder? That’s idiotic.

Well, the DHS seems to think so. Perhaps you should go give them the benefit of your "superior knowledge" in that department. I'm sure they'll be eager for your guidance.
 
You guys have let your emotions guide your view. You are so angry at the rioters that your judgement has been sucked from your brain.

"Never mind what law enforcement says. I know better. But YOU GUYS are the ones who are using your emotions instead of logic!!!"

The only one who's angry here is you, at Kyle, for nothing more than being someone the media has told you to be angry at. The more you talk, the more grateful I am to be nothing that the likes of you would consider "rational".
 
If one is actively shooting a firearm they an active shooter.

Jeebus, what’s the problem here?
That is not what active shooter means you sensational moron.

That has been explained to you and your literal word games is a lost cause proving you are a fool.
 
Not Rosenbaum.

The other two? Yes.
Vigilantes? Yes, it would seem so. What lesson did they and those like them learn? Bring rifles. That's the message of the last 18 months of protests from left and right, and our reaction to them.
 
Vigilantes? Yes, it would seem so. What lesson did they and those like them learn? Bring rifles. That's the message of the last 18 months of protests from left and right, and our reaction to them.
As far as I know, Rosenbaum was just another one of the knuckhead mob who was out protesting/burning shit. That doesn't make him a vigilante. The other two..one attacked pop and fresh with a skateboard and the other pointed a pistol at him....both in the name of law enforcement. That wasn't their job. KR was/is a jerk looking for trouble, created it, and is being (hopefully) prosecuted for it. But he still has rights.
 
Again, has there ever been a vigilante the right wing hasn't idolized?

Vigilantes are cool!

a3EWXvr_700b.webp
 
So the FBI says that an active shooter is only someone who is shooting at random people intending to commit murder?

The FBI is possibly one of the most corrupt and incompetently run agencies of Government today.

DHS says that, too.
 
Because they are always right. If they say someone actively shooting a firearm is not active shooter, they are obviously wrong.

Now, there are different types of active shooters. I gues dumb-asses can’t figure that out.

So your idea of rational, unemotional thinking is, "If all the experts disagree with me, that means THEY are all wrong and I know better from my vast law enforcement experience of wanting to be right!"

Tell us more about how you're qualified to call anyone else a dumbass. I'm sure I'm not the only one enjoying your clown show.
 
I suspect that definition is not new. But yes, the fbi has been doing a shit job for a while now.


Burt this time, they have it right. An "Active shooter" is NOT just anyone doing any shooting.


If Rittenhouse was an "Active Shooter" he would not have held his fire when bicep man first held up his hands.

The FBI has been doing its job badly, but not because they don't know how to define words.
 
No, he won't. That's not how it works.
But he can declare a mistrial for other reasons - including prosecutorial misconduct. The prosecutor insinuated that the defendant‘s use of his right to remain silent signaled guilt, for one, and for another, the prosecutor did not share the clear video of Kyle running away from his would-be murderer.

If they are hung 11 normals to 1 leftist, the judge can also consider how impossible it will be to get a conviction in this case and to not waste more of the state’s money going after a white teen who defended himself against BLM terrorists within seconds of killing him.
 
But he can declare a mistrial for other reasons - including prosecutorial misconduct. The prosecutor insinuated that the defendant‘s use of his right to remain silent signaled guilt, for one, and for another, the prosecutor did not share the clear video of Kyle running away from his would-be murderer.

If they are hung 11 normals to 1 leftist, the judge can also consider how impossible it will be to get a conviction in this case and to not waste more of the state’s money going after a white teen who defended himself against BLM terrorists within seconds of killing him.

Oh, he can definitely declare a mistrial. And I frankly think he should at this point, as well as file an ethics complaint with the Bar Association, given the various shenanigans of the prosecution. I've seen attorneys disbarred for far less.

But he can't replace jurors because the jury is hung (assuming it is).
 
That is not what active shooter means you sensational moron.

That has been explained to you and your literal word games is a lost cause proving you are a fool.

He knows what he is saying but that's a democrat and liberal way of thinking. Twist meanings to support you so you feel you're always right.

We all know what "active shooter" really means, so does he but he will lie to himself and us to be right. He knows what it means, but he is applying the same definition as if I am driving down the road I am a active driver on the sense of regardless of what he is doing with the gun even shooting at targets he is in the process of shooting.
 
Back
Top Bottom