Rittenhouse jury just went to deliberate

[JohnDB]

It’s obvious that Rittenhouse armed himself and went to that riot with the intent of shooting someone. The kid has a hero complex.

There's absolutely no evidence of that. In fact everything about him demonstrated the exact opposite.

 

[tahuyaman]

See post #1451.

So you think to be an active shooter one must be in the process of committing murder? That’s idiotic.

 

[tahuyaman]

Gonna just ignore the fact you are wrong?

How am I wrong?

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

This situation has made formerly rational people lose their mind.

What is that supposed to mean?

They attacked a guy who was fleeing. PERIOD.

 

[Correll]

He inserted himself into this riot with the intent of engaging someone with the firearm he acquired illegally. Period.

Umm, that is not supported by his actions. He did not "engage" when given the chance. He ran. He ran until he heard shooting behind him.

 

[progressive hunter]

So you think to be an active shooter one must be in the process of committing murder? That’s idiotic.

Active shooter - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[RetiredGySgt]

So you think to be an active shooter one must be in the process of committing murder? That’s idiotic.

That is the LEGAL definition as submitted by the FBI.

 

[M14 Shooter]

So you think to be an active shooter one must be in the process of committing murder? That’s idiotic.

You disagree with the FBI DHS and USDOJ.
You choose to be wrong.

 

[tahuyaman]

There's absolutely no evidence of that. In fact everything about him demonstrated the exact opposite.

You guys have let your emotions guide your view. You are so angry at the rioters that your judgement has been sucked from your brain.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

How am I wrong?

Do you read the thread? 2 legal definitions of active shooter were provided and linked.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

He inserted himself into this riot

Irrelevant to his self-defense privilege.

with the intent of engaging someone

No evidence presented of his intent. In fact, THE EXACT OPPOSITE was presented, where he gave his body armor to another person because "I won't need it." That shows NO INTENT

with the firearm he acquired illegally. Period.

WRONG

He was LEGALLY in possession of a firearm. It was not a short-barrel rifle. That charge should not have been brought.

PERIOD

 

[Correll]

You guys have let your emotions guide your view. You are so angry at the rioters that your judgement has been sucked from your brain.

If your usages of the term is the correct one, how would ANYONE ever be able to legally defend themselves?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

It’s obvious that Rittenhouse armed himself and went to that riot with the intent of shooting someone.

Why do you feel that?

 

[progressive hunter]

You guys have let your emotions guide your view. You are so angry at the rioters that your judgement has been sucked from your brain.

are you stomping your feet when youre saying that??

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

How am I wrong?

You seem to be focusing on the fact that he was at the "mostly peaceful protest" and that act alone makes him guilty of everything.

 

[tahuyaman]

That is the LEGAL definition as submitted by the FBI.

So the FBI says that an active shooter is only someone who is shooting at random people intending to commit murder?

The FBI is possibly one of the most corrupt and incompetently run agencies of Government today.

 

[tahuyaman]

are you stomping your feet when youre saying that??

No. I’m shaking my head.

 

[JohnDB]

You guys have let your emotions guide your view. You are so angry at the rioters that your judgement has been sucked from your brain.

No...
Not even.
I simply don't hold a "gun man bad" ideology.

I don't care about the rioters...they were a result of caloussness of left wing politics with encouragement by foreign interests in social media.

Those who rioted are nothing more than tools used by others. I hold animosity towards their puppet masters...but the rioters themselves I have no feelings about whatsoever.

 

[john doe 101]

And doing so is a declaration of war, so be prepared for the consequences.

Actually it's not a declaration of war, dumbass. A crime, yes. And yet another thinly veiled threat from you. You're just itching to shoot a lefty, arent you?

 

[progressive hunter]

So the FBI says that an active shooter is only someone who is shooting at random people intending to commit murder?

The FBI is possibly one of the most corrupt and incompetently run agencies of Government today.

its more accurate than you calling a deer hunter an active shooter,,