Rittenhouse jury just went to deliberate

What will the verdict be?

  • Guilty on all charges

    Votes: 2 2.7%
  • Not guilty on all charges

    Votes: 53 72.6%
  • Some yes and some no

    Votes: 18 24.7%

  • Total voters
    73
then why did he wait until he was attacked and then stopped once the attacks stopped??
I don’t get why supposed rational Adults think it was OK for a teenager to arm himself and become engaged in a violent riot. I think these people are motivated by something they don’t want to expose
 
It’s obvious that Rittenhouse armed himself and went to that riot with the intent of shooting someone. The kid has a hero complex.
Then why did he run before shooting anyone? Why did he try to run EVERY SINGLE TIME before he shot anyone?
 
I don’t get why supposed rational Adults think it was OK for a teenager to arm himself and become engaged in a violent riot. I think these people are motivated by something they don’t want to expose
I dont understand why you would be more angry at a kid with a gun defending himself, than you are at the adult rioter with a gun who is attacking him.
 
They were watching video. The prosecutor was to the right of the judge. So what?
No, that is the defense attorney seated on the right.
JEEEsus ... His name is Mark Richards - Dude on the right in both these shots. :rolleyes-41:

merlin_195855645_511e46db-f61a-4878-8019-e5ef18d73107-articleLarge.jpg


6181836623745d001824b336
 
If someone is in act of shooting a firearm, they are an active shooter. Does this confuse you?
So, running down the street, looking for the cops is NOT shooting, right?

Is that confusing?

When I was a soldier firing my rifle in a combat situation, I was an active shooter. When I was on the range qualifying, I was an active shooter.
But, when you were on patrol, with your firearm slung, you were NOT an active shooter.

What exactly are you trying to argue here?

He was not an active shooter when the 3 amigos attacked him.

:dunno:
 
So, running down the street, looking for the cops is NOT shooting, right?

Is that confusing?


But, when you were on patrol, with your firearm slung, you were NOT an active shooter.
This situation has made formerly rational people lose their mind.
 
So an active shooter is not someone who is actively shooting a firearm? How can that be possible?
According to the ten debunked lies, calling Rittenhouse an active shooter is one of them.
 
It’s obvious that Rittenhouse armed himself and went to that riot with the intent of shooting someone. The kid has a hero complex.


He ran first. not until he heard shots behind him, did he turn and defend himself.


Then he ran again. And then again.


Again and again, he ran first and only shot when under immediate threat.


His actual ACTIONS conflict with what you think his intent was.


Even IF you were right about his INTENT, his actual ACTIONS, when shit got real, was NOT that.


And to be clear, I think his intent was, that a group of armed citizens standing between the rioters and their targets, would DETER violence.

And, his actual actions, FITS with that.
 
If one is actively shooting a firearm they an active shooter.
So, at the time one of the rioters "craniumed" Kyle with a rock while Kyle was running to the police, Kyle was NOT actively shooting, and was therefore NOT an active shooter, so they cannot claim they were after an "active shooter" when Rock guy hit him in the head and knocked him to the ground. Jump-Kick man cannot claim he was an active shooter. He only became an active shooter WHEN ATTACKED.

RIGHT?
 
I don’t get why supposed rational Adults think it was OK for a teenager to arm himself and become engaged in a violent riot. I think these people are motivated by something they don’t want to expose
when the elected officials, cops and the adults refuse its left for the children to do,,
 
He ran first. not until he heard shots behind him, did he turn and defend himself.


Then he ran again. And then again.


Again and again, he ran first and only shot when under immediate threat.


His actual ACTIONS conflict with what you think his intent was.


Even IF you were right about his INTENT, his actual ACTIONS, when shit got real, was NOT that.


And to be clear, I think his intent was, that a group of armed citizens standing between the rioters and their targets, would DETER violence.

And, his actual actions, FITS with that.
He inserted himself into this riot with the intent of engaging someone with the firearm he acquired illegally. Period.
 
15th post

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom