Rittenhouse jury just went to deliberate

What will the verdict be?

  • Guilty on all charges

    Votes: 2 2.7%
  • Not guilty on all charges

    Votes: 53 72.6%
  • Some yes and some no

    Votes: 18 24.7%

  • Total voters
    73
Where’s the dummy who offered over and over that Kyle showing up armed meant that he was lawfully guilty of trying to “start something” and that since judged (by whom?) of starting something he cannot offer self defense (nor by fact connection be lawfully permitted to defend himself)
 
No one goes into a lions den with raw meat
The merit of going to this conflict is legitimately debatable.
Carrying something with you to potentially defend yourself is not provocative nor indicative of mal intent. Far more likely it’s legitimate and legally permitted protection in case something goes awry. Again, the merits of being there is the first place has legitimate debatability. Being armed when doing is wise snd indicative of zero preplanning of violence and far more likely properly indicative of potentially protecting yourself.
The solution is to not enter the lion’s den.
 
You mean you have purposely not seen what I'm talking about. I mean, if you dont see it, it didnt happen, right?
No. I haven't....


....you mean like you have purposely NOT seen all the mountains of evidence in this case that should be completely exculpatory because you want to hang a kid for the sole reason that he dared to protect himself against your communist ilk?

See how you sound?

FYI it's all over the internet. I challenge you to right now stop what you're doing and look up those pictures I am referring to.
Fine. Why don't you do the same?

And, why does it matter? I have NEVER claimed that no one used poles as deadly weapons on Jan 6. You are making up bullshit arguments for me and blowing them over like strawmen. You know....the "strawman" fallacy?
 
I’ve seen several constitutionalist type attorney’s agree that displaying a rifle while engaged in a violent riot can legitimately be portrayed as a provocative act.
The I’ve seen …..shit is for childten
We are adults.
go away
 
No. I haven't....


....you mean like you have purposely NOT seen all the mountains of evidence in this case that should be completely exculpatory because you want to hang a kid for the sole reason that he dared to protect himself against your communist ilk?

See how you sound?


Fine. Why don't you do the same?

And, why does it matter? I have NEVER claimed that no one used poles as deadly weapons on Jan 6. You are making up bullshit arguments for me and blowing them over like strawmen. You know....the "strawman" fallacy?
I"ve said all along Kyle will probably be found innocent. For the 5th time. I even said the prosecutor should probably be fired and was clownish. You must be slow.
 
That’s the type of response which discredits conservatives and supporters of our second amendment rights.
Did you happen to see his comment?

And this is why I think your kind are a bunch of uncivilized animals.
He is a passive-aggressive **** who is begging for hostility. He is angry as **** that Rittenhouse will walk.
 
I"ve said all along Kyle will probably be found innocent. For the 5th time. I even said the prosecutor should probably be fired and was clownish. You must be slow.
I didn’t watch the entire trial like some, but what I did see was a completely unprepared and incompetent prosecutor.

I won’t predict the outcome because a jury often does the unexpected.
 
I"ve said all along Kyle will probably be found innocent. For the 5th time. I even said the prosecutor should probably be fired and was clownish. You must be slow.
And you completely missed the point of my responding in that fashion, didn't you?

:rolleyes:

You accused me of purposefully not looking at some random photographs on the internet JUST so I could deny that it happened, EVEN WHEN I HAVE NEVER DENIED IT IN THE FIRST PLACE.

:bang3:
 
15th post
Did you happen to see his comment?


He is a passive-aggressive **** who is begging for hostility. He is angry as **** that Rittenhouse will
No. I saw yours.
You can get a couple lawyers to agree with anything. The law is clear on this the simple act of open carry is NOT a provocation in Wisconsin
The law doesn’t say they.

Open carry doesn’t necessarily mean openly carrying a rifle in any situation is never a provocative act.
 
So you think people carrying rifles in a grocery store should be an every day occurrence from what you are saying. That is your version of a civilized society.

This is where we disagree. And this is why I think your kind are a bunch of uncivilized animals.

And the rest of the world would disagree with you. But before you tell me to move to another country, consider the possibility you might actually be wrong.
Your position is far easier to identify than your mischaracterization above
You want no one to have guns. Period.
They scare you and you are unfamiliar with them
Since they frighten you then no one else should have them and then, you offer, you will feel secure.
You will Never feel secure! You don’t know how to, and it’s not up to all of us to make that “right” for you.
 
I didn’t watch the entire trial like some, but what I did see was a completely unprepared and incompetent prosecutor.

I won’t predict the outcome because a jury often does the unexpected.
Similar to you, I've seen very little. But I completely agree with your assessment of the prosecutor. It was amateur hour. And you are correct on juries. In fact I think the longer this takes, the greater the chance Kyle will be found guilty of something. My prediction was 70% chance he's found innocent, 30% chance he is found guilty on reduced charge(s).
 
Back
Top Bottom