RetiredGySgt
Diamond Member
Keep prove just how abjectly STUPID you are. I just linked again to an article about it from case law.You MORON I most assuredly did and you disagreed with it cause you didn't check the link probably.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Keep prove just how abjectly STUPID you are. I just linked again to an article about it from case law.You MORON I most assuredly did and you disagreed with it cause you didn't check the link probably.
Is this the part where you start threatening to kill people like you have done before?Cool.
Now, **** off. I don't give a rat **** what you think about us. Stay away or go live with your commie ilk.
![]()
The solution is to not enter the lion’s den.No one goes into a lions den with raw meat
The merit of going to this conflict is legitimately debatable.
Carrying something with you to potentially defend yourself is not provocative nor indicative of mal intent. Far more likely it’s legitimate and legally permitted protection in case something goes awry. Again, the merits of being there is the first place has legitimate debatability. Being armed when doing is wise snd indicative of zero preplanning of violence and far more likely properly indicative of potentially protecting yourself.
No. I haven't....You mean you have purposely not seen what I'm talking about. I mean, if you dont see it, it didnt happen, right?
Fine. Why don't you do the same?FYI it's all over the internet. I challenge you to right now stop what you're doing and look up those pictures I am referring to.
And this is where you molest babies and **** dogs.Is this the part where you start threatening to kill people like you have done before?
The I’ve seen …..shit is for childtenI’ve seen several constitutionalist type attorney’s agree that displaying a rifle while engaged in a violent riot can legitimately be portrayed as a provocative act.
Ture, but entering the lion's den is not a criminal act.The solution is to not enter the lion’s den.
That’s the type of response which discredits conservatives and supporters of our second amendment rights.Cool.
Now, **** off. I don't give a rat **** what you think about us. Stay away or go live with your commie ilk.
![]()
I"ve said all along Kyle will probably be found innocent. For the 5th time. I even said the prosecutor should probably be fired and was clownish. You must be slow.No. I haven't....
....you mean like you have purposely NOT seen all the mountains of evidence in this case that should be completely exculpatory because you want to hang a kid for the sole reason that he dared to protect himself against your communist ilk?
See how you sound?
Fine. Why don't you do the same?
And, why does it matter? I have NEVER claimed that no one used poles as deadly weapons on Jan 6. You are making up bullshit arguments for me and blowing them over like strawmen. You know....the "strawman" fallacy?
It’s called having a discussion dumb-ass.The I’ve seen …..shit is for childten
We are adults.
go away
Did you happen to see his comment?That’s the type of response which discredits conservatives and supporters of our second amendment rights.
He is a passive-aggressive **** who is begging for hostility. He is angry as **** that Rittenhouse will walk.And this is why I think your kind are a bunch of uncivilized animals.
I didn’t watch the entire trial like some, but what I did see was a completely unprepared and incompetent prosecutor.I"ve said all along Kyle will probably be found innocent. For the 5th time. I even said the prosecutor should probably be fired and was clownish. You must be slow.
You can get a couple lawyers to agree with anything. The law is clear on this the simple act of open carry is NOT a provocation in WisconsinIt’s called having a discussion dumb-ass.
But I have the receipts. You dont.And this is where you molest babies and **** dogs.
See how ridiculous you sound.
And you completely missed the point of my responding in that fashion, didn't you?I"ve said all along Kyle will probably be found innocent. For the 5th time. I even said the prosecutor should probably be fired and was clownish. You must be slow.

No. I saw yours.Did you happen to see his comment?
He is a passive-aggressive **** who is begging for hostility. He is angry as **** that Rittenhouse will
The law doesn’t say they.You can get a couple lawyers to agree with anything. The law is clear on this the simple act of open carry is NOT a provocation in Wisconsin
Your position is far easier to identify than your mischaracterization aboveSo you think people carrying rifles in a grocery store should be an every day occurrence from what you are saying. That is your version of a civilized society.
This is where we disagree. And this is why I think your kind are a bunch of uncivilized animals.
And the rest of the world would disagree with you. But before you tell me to move to another country, consider the possibility you might actually be wrong.
Similar to you, I've seen very little. But I completely agree with your assessment of the prosecutor. It was amateur hour. And you are correct on juries. In fact I think the longer this takes, the greater the chance Kyle will be found guilty of something. My prediction was 70% chance he's found innocent, 30% chance he is found guilty on reduced charge(s).I didn’t watch the entire trial like some, but what I did see was a completely unprepared and incompetent prosecutor.
I won’t predict the outcome because a jury often does the unexpected.