Right Wing Creationist Home School Curriculum Highly Inaccurate And "Really Dumb"

[JakeStarkey]

Oh'shit,

No wonder conservatives don't believe anything coming out of real scientific societies.

What a bunch of morons.

Jake, please stop posting as Matthew

Report me if you think I am a sock, son.

 

[chikenwing]

Oh'shit,

No wonder conservatives don't believe anything coming out of real scientific societies.

What a bunch of morons.

The only moron here is you,painting conservatives with false ideals. Its the peak of ignorance.

It would be no different than if I post all Liberals are pantywaist limp wrist-ed cowards.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Anyone,such as yourself,that would look down on someone because of their faith is hardly a professional. Their opinion would be useless.

Once again, a deliberate misconstruction of my point.

One can be a Christian and teach evolution in a biology class.

One can be a creationist and should never be allowed to teach evolution in a biology class.

Why? you just presented an example of how both can exist at the same time,but once again ,people like yourself choose a narrow point of view and call it gospel,pun intended.

False criteria by you, because you don't understand.

A Christian creationist who believes in biblical creationism has chosen an extremely narrow point of view.

A Christian who knows that biblical creationism is (1) a faith heresy and (2) a scientific impossibility and has majored in biology can teach evolution. A creationist can't.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Believe in reactionary Christian creationism all you want, edge, and you will get the lack of respect you deserve from the larger world.

Only a small minority of Christians believe in heretical reactionary evangelical and fundamentalist creationism.

Only a small amount?? where do you get this crap from?

One can not be a "christian "when one rejects god

The use of heretical,and evangelical as the same descriptor....is well wrong.

What is a reactionary evangelical anyways??

Most Christians do reject evangelical and fundamentalist Biblical literalism as heresy.

A Christian certainly does not reject God by rejecting Biblical literalism.

 

[chikenwing]

Believe in reactionary Christian creationism all you want, edge, and you will get the lack of respect you deserve from the larger world.

Only a small minority of Christians believe in heretical reactionary evangelical and fundamentalist creationism.

Only a small amount?? where do you get this crap from?

One can not be a "christian "when one rejects god

The use of heretical,and evangelical as the same descriptor....is well wrong.

What is a reactionary evangelical anyways??

Most Christians do reject evangelical and fundamentalist Biblical literalism as heresy.

A Christian certainly does not reject God by rejectionary Biblical literalism.

making up your own terms and false definitions.won't convince anyone but yourself.

There are many people of all faiths that cherry pick,it human nature,still doesn't make it right,and you fall right in the middle of the pack.


What is a reactionary evangelical?

This should be good.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Only a small amount?? where do you get this crap from?

One can not be a "christian "when one rejects god

The use of heretical,and evangelical as the same descriptor....is well wrong.

What is a reactionary evangelical anyways??

Most Christians do reject evangelical and fundamentalist Biblical literalism as heresy.

A Christian certainly does not reject God by rejectionary Biblical literalism.

making up your own terms and false definitions.won't convince anyone but yourself. There are many people of all faiths that cherry pick,it human nature,still doesn't make it right,and you fall right in the middle of the pack. What is a reactionary evangelical? This should be good.

The bolded above is exactly what you are doing. You folks have always been guilty of bad theology.

 

[boilermaker55]

Just like public education that many others like to bash, having only one side of the story is not a fair assessment. So use what you will to bash a system. There are very well educated home school students just as their are well educated public/private students
Mostly what a child/student has to live with in the confines of their home is a direct relationship to what their study and learning habits are.

Not that this is to anyone's surprise,..

A popular curriculum used by home-schooled students has drawn criticism for inaccurate, misleading information and an over-reliance on rote memorization, but those aspects may not be the worst things about it.

A lot of the material that children are exposed to in the Accelerated Christian Education is just astonishingly stupid, according to a former Christian fundamentalist.

Blogger Jonny Scarmanga shared some of the multiple-choice questions he found in some ACE packets used by British home-school students Monday on the blog, Leaving Fundamentalism.

In one question aimed at 9- or 10-year-old fourth-graders, students are given this example: “Children played happily in the water spout.” They are then asked to define a water spout from three examples: “a stream of water,” “two dry ducks” or “playground.”




Creationist home school curriculum isn?t just inaccurate ? it?s really, really dumb | The Raw Story

 

[chikenwing]

A Christian creationist who believes in biblical creationism has chosen an extremely narrow point of view.

This is good,biblical creationism is really the foundation that Christianity is built,God the creator,anything else is just cold mashed potatoes.

Man you need some knowledge building exercises.

 

[chikenwing]

Most Christians do reject evangelical and fundamentalist Biblical literalism as heresy.

A Christian certainly does not reject God by rejectionary Biblical literalism.

making up your own terms and false definitions.won't convince anyone but yourself. There are many people of all faiths that cherry pick,it human nature,still doesn't make it right,and you fall right in the middle of the pack. What is a reactionary evangelical? This should be good.

The bolded above is exactly what you are doing. You folks have always been guilty of bad theology.

LOL if you say so,typical . bad theology? just stating this doesn't make it so,once again typical of a liberal. Say it enough,you convince yourself.

You can't be a Christian if you reject creationism its that simple.

 

[Edgetho]

making up your own terms and false definitions.won't convince anyone but yourself. There are many people of all faiths that cherry pick,it human nature,still doesn't make it right,and you fall right in the middle of the pack. What is a reactionary evangelical? This should be good.

The bolded above is exactly what you are doing. You folks have always been guilty of bad theology.

LOL if you say so,typical . bad theology? just stating this doesn't make it so,once again typical of a liberal. Say it enough,you convince yourself.

You can't be a Christian if you reject creationism its that simple.

Whoever wrote the books 3,000 or so years ago knew their audience.

Imagine going back 3,000 or more years with the job of explaining a microwave oven to the people of those years. You wouldn't even make it to 'magnetron' before they tied you to a stake and set you on fire.

Shit, they couldn't even count past 40, which is why Noah's Flood was caused by 40 days and 40 nights of rain.

Even the Romans had trouble counting past 10,000. And the integer 0 (zero) had yet to be invented.

Try dividing MMMMCMXCIX by LXXXIX

Good luck.

Whoever was trying to teach those people undoubtedly used parables and made some stuff up along the way, but the messages were still pretty good.... Like --

Don't kill your neighbor so you can pork his OL. Very uncool.

Try taking a bath every once in a while.

Stealing isn't very nice

etc, etc.

That these basic guides to living were couched in some mysticism shouldn't surprise anyone with an IQ...... And if you dimocraps get confused, I'm sure a Conservative will be glad to help you along.

So if the people trying to tell these others about Creation used numbers like, "The Earth was created 6 Billion years and the Universe was created 8 Billion years before that......"

They wouldn't have gotten very far. So I can forgive them for using 'days' instead of 'Billions of years'

IOW, they had to dumb it down. Just like when I'm trying to make a point to a dimocrap. You gotta talk real slow and pronounce your words very clearly.... And try not to use ideas they're incapable of grasping with their tiny little brains.

Just like the writers of the Old Testament. You gotta know your audience..

P.S.
It's not worth the trouble making a point to a dimocrap. They'll just forget it their next trip around the fish bowl.

I just call them names and move on.

 

[Unkotare]

Oh'shit,

No wonder conservatives don't believe anything coming out of real scientific societies.

What a bunch of morons.

The only moron here is you,painting conservatives with false ideals. Its the peak of ignorance.

It would be no different than if I post all Liberals are pantywaist limp wrist-ed cowards.

That would make matthew a liberal.

 

[ScienceRocks]

This is also why these people don't respect PHd's within major scientific fields. If it goes against their belief of greed at every turn then jesus Christ o'sallly I sure as fuck aint going to listen to that piker.

Got to go to watts up with that to get my daily quotes.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

What's the point of this article? To focus in on one or two poorly worded questions in some OBSCURE British home-schooling packet (that parents may or may not choose to use) in a dishonest effort to make the entire lot of (a) Christians and (b) people who homeschool their kids look like idiots?

This is clear propaganda, as the only purpose is to harm the reputation of a certain group by unfairly blowing out of proportion some random obscure question that is in some random obscure British guide.

Total crap, guys. You need to use your head.

The curriculum isn't British. It's headquartered in Tennessee. The same curriculum says the existence of the Loch Ness monster is fact, and disproves evolution. They state that solar fusion is a myth. Up until 1998 this passage appeared in their Social Studies curriculum.

Although apartheid appears to allow the unfair treatment of blacks, the system has worked well in South Africa .... Although white businessmen and developers are guilty of some unfair treatment of blacks, they turned South Africa into a modern industrialized nation, which the poor, uneducated blacks couldn't have accomplished in several more decades. If more blacks were suddenly given control of the nation, its economy and business, as Mandela wished, they could have destroyed what they have waited and worked so hard for.

I really hate to be a party pooper hear, but the only stuff posted from the alleged curriculum comes from a guy that claims it is there. There isn't a single document to prove that the curriculum, as described, actually exists.

On the other hand, I can provide you with pages and pages of actual, government approved, curriculum that are full of stupid errors and math problems that are unsolvable. Why don't you prove how smart you are and actually post the material to prove how stupid everyone who uses it is, while I do the same. Want to bet on who will end up making the other side look dumber?

 

[Quantum Windbag]

And Biblical literalism, the heart pin of evangelical and fundamentalist heresy, dooms the creationist-based home school program as out of touch with the world in which the home-schooled child must operate.

So does the typical public school curriculum, what's your point?

 

[Quantum Windbag]

Believe in reactionary Christian creationism all you want, edge, and you will get the lack of respect you deserve from the larger world.

Only a small minority of Christians believe in heretical reactionary evangelical and fundamentalist creationism.

Newsflash Jake, the fact that you have never heard of Robert Bakker does not mean he is not respected among his peers.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

I may disagree with you on a lot of things, but I always considered you a rational poster. PLEASE don't drift off to Crazyland, Frank.

Seems that a number of pleisosaurs did not get the "Hey, we're all extinct!" memo

It actually does seem that way, if you are a cryptozoologist.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

Once again, a deliberate misconstruction of my point.

One can be a Christian and teach evolution in a biology class.

One can be a creationist and should never be allowed to teach evolution in a biology class.

Why? you just presented an example of how both can exist at the same time,but once again ,people like yourself choose a narrow point of view and call it gospel,pun intended.

False criteria by you, because you don't understand.

A Christian creationist who believes in biblical creationism has chosen an extremely narrow point of view.

A Christian who knows that biblical creationism is (1) a faith heresy and (2) a scientific impossibility and has majored in biology can teach evolution. A creationist can't.

I have two words for you, theistic evolution.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

Only a small amount?? where do you get this crap from?

One can not be a "christian "when one rejects god

The use of heretical,and evangelical as the same descriptor....is well wrong.

What is a reactionary evangelical anyways??

Most Christians do reject evangelical and fundamentalist Biblical literalism as heresy.

A Christian certainly does not reject God by rejectionary Biblical literalism.

making up your own terms and false definitions.won't convince anyone but yourself.

There are many people of all faiths that cherry pick,it human nature,still doesn't make it right,and you fall right in the middle of the pack.


What is a reactionary evangelical?

This should be good.

I actually got a copy of the Dictionary of Starkeyism, a reactionary evangelical is anyone who preaches to Jake.

 

[ScienceRocks]

A Christian creationist who believes in biblical creationism has chosen an extremely narrow point of view.

This is good,biblical creationism is really the foundation that Christianity is built,God the creator,anything else is just cold mashed potatoes.

Man you need some knowledge building exercises.

That's what modern day islam also believes. Fuck science and let's all go back to the caves

 

[CrusaderFrank]

A Christian creationist who believes in biblical creationism has chosen an extremely narrow point of view.

This is good,biblical creationism is really the foundation that Christianity is built,God the creator,anything else is just cold mashed potatoes.

Man you need some knowledge building exercises.

That's what modern day islam also believes. Fuck science and let's all go back to the caves

That sounds exactly like what the AGWCult believes too and for the same reasons, Jake