Again, it is still MATH.
You don't have to understand it. You just have to know it is real.
That's the problem with you liberals, you don't understand it. You just repeat what you were brainwashed into repeating. You can't give reasons because there are none and you weren't programmed to give any.
On the contrary, I think they understand it very well.
As long there is no ID law, there is a room for voter fraud which is hard to expose, and even then, it's too late do do anything about it. That's why they're resisting those laws that will make it harder for them to cheat, and will bring punishment for something they could get away with today easily.
Voter Fraud, is a Statistical Rarity. Epic Fail.
If it happens it suppose to be eliminated. What's wrong about that?
As my Late Mother used to say, "
What if a bear was to come?"
You are asking a question about something, that as a verifiable event occurs less than .000000001% of the time.
Voter Fraud is a Statistical Anomaly. You cannot eliminate something that as a rule does not occur, especially when the only means by which you attempting trying to make that elimination is by denying U.S. Citizens their Constitutionally Protected Right to Vote.
Especially when the Citizens being targeted for restrictive I.D. Laws are Minorities that have historically been denied their Constitutionally Protected Right to Vote. Vote I.D. Laws are NOT applied fairly and equally throughout the Population as a whole, but targeted against demographic groups who historically vote Democratic.
You cannot deny a Person or Persons their Constitutionally Protected Right to Vote because you do not like the Political Party they vote for, nor can that Right be denied based on Race, Religion, Ethnic Background, Gender, Gender Identity or Country of Origin. Please consult the United States Constitution, the 14th. Amendment, the Equal Protection Clause if you do not understand that.
There is no verifiable proof of you claim. There is Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth, Ninth, and Tenth Hearsay which provides only conjecture, contention and the vaguest of vague, remotest of the remote isolated possibility of something that might, maybe happen.
You do not offer subjective proof. You have none. There is no proof whatsoever of Millions of Undocumented Workers flooding this country to vote in November...no proof just words that have no basis in reality.