Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 125,892
- 90,770
- 3,635
Yes it's their private propertyPrivate "street." That street is not that home owner's property.The protesters were not on their property.ON THEIR OWN PROPERTY? *laughs*They may have committed a 4th degree assault...Negative... They threatened lethal force. They did not USE lethal force. They were trespassing. They are allowed to threaten anything they want. Get off their property.They kind of did. Pointing a gun right at someone is application of deadly force, which is why they might be in trouble.Considering THEY DIDN'T USE LETHAL FORCE.
565.056 said:565.056 said:1. A person commits the offense of assault in the fourth degree if: (3) The person purposely places another person in apprehension of immediate physical injury;
Oh wait... Are you talking about the "protesters" ... That makes sense.
View attachment 362146
From your link ... Andes Walker: "I think..."
the lawyer at the end of the video said the individuals withing the gate owned the property
St. Louis law
That lawyer is Andes Walker ... the one I quoted.
he also said they (the protesters) were on private property
Missouri Castle Doctrine
Missouri's law is more extensive than those of other states because it allows you to use deadly force to attack an intruder to protect any private property that you own, in addition to yourself or another individual.Oct 10, 2018
From your link...
However, case law suggests it does not go so far as permitting the use of deadly force to merely protect property. In 2016, the Missouri Court of Appeals for the Eastern District held in State v. Whipple that deadly force under the castle doctrine can only be used when you reasonably believe such force is necessary to protect yourself or someone else from "the use or imminent use of unlawful force."
Missouri is a Castle Doctrine state
Look up Missouri's Castle Doctrine law
GAME SET AND MATCH
You lose
LOL
Dumbfuck, I quoted YOUR source.
Dear dumbfuck Stand your ground no obligation to retreat That is what the castle Doctrine is
Meaning in Missouri you have the right to defend your property and any other place you are at.
LOLOL
Dumbfuck, stand your ground beyond your property requires one to be facing an imminent threat of "death, serious physical injury, or any forcible felony." Not only wasn't that mob threatening them until they themselves were threatened -- you can't be the initial aggressor and then claim a stand your ground defense. Mark McCloskey was the initial aggressor when he brandished an AR-15 at a crowd of people before they threatened him.
A person may, subject to the provisions of subsection 2 of this section, use physical force upon another person when and to the extent he or she reasonably believes such force to be necessary to defend himself or herself or a third person from what he or she reasonably believes to be the use or imminent use of unlawful force by such other person, unless:(1) The actor was the initial aggressor; except that in such case his or her use of force is nevertheless justifiable provided:
Every time you post, you say something stupid.
There was an imminent threat the rioters who were trespassing you dumbfuck
Trespassing is a misdemeanor and not an imminent threat of death or serious physical injury. Even worse for you retards -- Mark McCloskey confessed he pulled his gun before he even felt threatened.
Hogwash.
LOLOL
Idiot.