No idea what youāre trying to say there.They were chosen because they were lighter, the ammo was lighter, and likely the bribes they paid to the government officials were higher.........
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No idea what youāre trying to say there.They were chosen because they were lighter, the ammo was lighter, and likely the bribes they paid to the government officials were higher.........
Holy shit. Were you born yesterday , or just come out of a coma? Let's start with Trump colluded with Russia. Or , nobody spied on Trump. Or hunters laptop is Russian disinformation.Name the lies.
None of that has any basis in objective fact.Holy shit. Were you born yesterday , or just come out of a coma? Let's start with Trump colluded with Russia. Or , nobody spied on Trump. Or hunters laptop is Russian disinformation.
Apparently, they are lying about wanting to ban and confiscate guns.Name the lies.
What confiscations?Apparently, they are lying about wanting to ban and confiscate guns.
Why do they lie about this?
Read for comprehension:What confiscations?
I read very well.Read for comprehension:
Apparently, they are lying about wanting to ban and confiscate guns.
Thank you
Now then...
Why do they lie about this?
Then you understand why your question is irrelevant.I read very well.
Nothing irrelevant art all. What confiscations are the Democrats lying about.Then you understand why your question is irrelevant.
So, I ask again:
Why do the Democrats about their desire to ban and confiscate guns?
Did you think that wasn't already happening?Kamala Harris is going to take your guns
Better hide them
"Military grade" = big, black and scary. Put a carved walnut stock on it and viola, not "military grade" anymore.Not the average guy useful ones just the military grade weaponry and that;s a good thing.
Let me dissuade you from your current argumental course...If an AR15-type weapon is sold in a standard gun store, it is not military grade..
Now, the AR-15 creator's family has spoken out about mass shootings, and how their late father viewed the weapon.
Eugene Stoner invented the AR-15 in 1959. The assault rifle was created as a military weapon ā not meant for sport or defense. In an anonymous interview with MSNBC, Stoner's family spoke out:
āOur father, Eugene Stoner, designed the AR-15 and subsequent M-16 as a military weapon to give our soldiers an advantage over the AK-47. He died long before any mass shootings occurred. But, we do think he would have been horrified and sickened as anyone, if not more by these events.ā
Since the AR-15 was created solely for military purposes, it was never intended for civilians or civilian use outside a context of war.
The ArmaLite 15 is a classic assault rifle. You might know it better as an M-16, the U.S. Military's version of the weapon. Today, we are going to take you through the history of this iconic American weapon, from its inception in 1959 to the present day.
The first AR-15 weapons were sold by Colt to the Federation of Malaya (modern day Malaysia).
With the AR-15 in the hands of the Air Force, a standard model of the rifle is born. They dub it the M-16, the most famous service weapon of the United States Military.
General Curtis LeMay saw a demonstration of the AR-15 in 1960. Impressed by the prowess of this new firearm, when General LeMay became the Air Force Chief of Staff in the Summer of 1961, he placed 80,000 AR-15's on order for the U.S. Air Force.
In 1961, ten AR-15's were sent to South Vietnam, as the United States continued to penetrate into the jungles of Indochina.
Despite a great deal of success, US Army wasn't enthusiastic about adopting the new rifle.
I will, as soon as you point to the post where I said there were any confiscations.Nothing irrelevant art all. What confiscations are the Democrats lying about.=
Specifically - answer that question.
Let me dissuade you from your current argumental course...
The Creator Of The AR-15 Rifle Only Invented The Gun For One Purpose
Funny post. I always refer to them as "The Litmus Test": if someone who opposes your position on guns tries "The Litmus Test" that person's answers have to show a true expertise on guns or YOU (the gun thugs) will say that if you're not an expert, you cannot comment on any issue to with guns or the second amendment.
In other words, you cannot demonstrate the difference between the hunting rifles and sniper rifles presented to you..Funny post. I always refer to them as "The Litmus Test":
Let me dissuade you from your current argumental course...
The Creator Of The AR-15 Rifle Only Invented The Gun For One Purpose
The Complete History of the AR-15 Rifle | Small Wars Journal
I can trot out as many articles just like that, that show how wrong you are about the AR15.
So I challenge you to prove those points wrong.
I will answer no further replies to you on the AR15 until you prove all that information to be absolutely wrong.
Youāve been debunked.In other words, you cannot demonstrate the difference between the hunting rifles and sniper rifles presented to you..
Thank you
Pro tip:
When you do not know anything about a subject, you cannot have an intelligent conversation with regard to same..
Uh no. Youāve been educated on the AR15 and its offspring the M16.You are a moron...
The FOIA request itself was prompted from a Nov. 2017 article in The Atlantic in which the magazine, unsurprisingly to anyone familiar with its anti-gun bent, attempted to bolster a claim that āthese rifles were meant for the military, not civilians.ā
āColt sent a pilot model rifle (serial no. GX4968) to the BATF for civilian sale approval on Oct. 23, 1963. It was approved on Dec. 10, 1963, and sales of the āModel R6000 Colt AR-15 SP1 Sporter Rifleā began on Jan 2, 1964,ā one critic of the article contended. āThe M16 wasnāt issued to infantry units until 1965 (as the XM16E1), wasnāt standardized as the M16A1 until 1967, and didnāt officially replace the M14 until 1969.ā
![]()
Original ATF AR-15 Classification Refutes Claim that Rifle āNot Meantā for Civilians
[T]he magazine, unsurprisingly to anyone familiar with its anti-gun bent, attempted to bolster a claim that āthese rifles were meant for the military, not civilians.āwww.ammoland.com