Riddle me this Democrats

They can vote for any candidate they like.
Doesn't mean their candidate is guaranteed to win.
Sure. And since republicans make sure they’re perpetual minorities in every district, it ensures their candidate will never win.

That’s the Republican goal. To make their voices irrelevant.
 
You know what the Republicans are doing. They’re trying to gerrymander black voters to prevent them from having a majority anywhere.

It’s unconstitutional but SCOTUS allows it.
Why are you so devisive. Are you trying to say Americans are defined by skin color? Again, your racism is rearing it ugly head.
 
Last edited:
And you believe that white reps and senators do not represent black people? Then by that same logic, black reps and senators do not represent white people. How very RACIST of you.
How well did the white representatives reflect black people before Congress passed the civil rights act?
 
Why are you so decisive. Are you trying to say Americans are defined by skin color? Again, your racism is rearing it ugly head.
If skin color wasn’t relevant, Republicans wouldn’t be trying to dilute black voters to keep them in the minority.
 
Really. Again. Even after an R controlled SC decided to once again allow R controlled southern states to draw racially discriminatory congressional maps.

Stop beating that dead horse.
What the Supreme Court decided was to follow the law...which makes redistricting based on race...ILLEGAL! Combining black districts with ones that are not black, is not racial discrimination.
 
To give black people a chance to have representation in Congress.
Interesting, so the district in Tennessee that was predominantly black and represented by a white Jewish guy will most likely end up being represented by a black guy. How is that racist again?
 
What the Supreme Court decided was to follow the law...which makes redistricting based on race...ILLEGAL! Combining black districts with ones that are not black, is not racial discrimination.
Republicans DEFINITELY are making districts based on race. They are very intentionally diluting black voters to make sure the districts are majority white.
 
If skin color wasn’t relevant, Republicans wouldn’t be trying to dilute black voters to keep them in the minority.
So you're lumping all black people into the democrat party, eh? That is patently false. There is no mention of color in the drawing of any district---but there is a party affiliation aspect which clearly shows that you are disingenuous in your allegations of diluting the color vote--it is about your desire to divide and demolish this country in your quest of globalism.
 
Sure. And since republicans make sure they’re perpetual minorities in every district, it ensures their candidate will never win.

That’s the Republican goal. To make their voices irrelevant.

They're 13% of the population, why wouldn't they be the minority in most districts?

That’s the Republican goal. To make their voices irrelevant.

They can vote for white democrats, black democrats, hispanic democrats, asian democrats, white republicans, black republicans, hispanic republicans, asian republicans or anyone else they want.

Sounds like their voices are just as relevant as any voter's voice.
 
Republicans DEFINITELY are making districts based on race. They are very intentionally diluting black voters to make sure the districts are majority white.
Ah, so what mix of blacks and whites are allowed by law, Marener? Carving out a small black district in a predominantly white State violates the law. You can't base a district on skin color. If you don't like that...then change the law.
 
How well did the white representatives reflect black people before Congress passed the civil rights act?
By that idiotic logic, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 would never have passed. Indeed, if democrat Senator Robert Byrd would have had his way, it wouldn't have as he mounted the longest filibuster on record against it.
 
15th post
So you're lumping all black people into the democrat party, eh? That is patently false. There is no mention of color in the drawing of any district---but there is a party affiliation aspect which clearly shows that you are disingenuous in your allegations of diluting the color vote--it is about your desire to divide and demolish this country in your quest of globalism.
Actually republicans do explicitly mention race in the redistricting, but SCOTUS said they’re mentioning race only because they’re usually Democrats. So it’s republicans and SCOTUS who lumping the two together.

This logic has been in numerous decisions this last year.

You really don’t know what you’re talking about.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom