Zincwarrior
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #41
Everything is, but thats not relevant. Scientific papers in journals are how science advances.And still subject to corruption.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Everything is, but thats not relevant. Scientific papers in journals are how science advances.And still subject to corruption.
I realize that the "scientific journals" have become exclusive cartels captured by corporate interests, that have been caught faking results and excluding contradicting evidence, to help stoke profits of their benefactors.You realize scientific journals are the backbone of transmitting current science and medical information advancements right, so that they may be peer reviewed and experiments made to see if the experiments hold up.
My boy was defending papers as a Freshman.
So you're not a scientist, doctor, and engineer. OK. You are as qualified as JFK!I realize that the "scientific journals" have become exclusive cartels captured by corporate interests, that have been caught faking results and excluding contradicting evidence, to help stoke profits of their benefactors.
I'm not an airline Captain either, but know what happens when you depressurize the cabin.So you're not a scientist, doctor, and engineer. OK. You are as qualified as JFK!
I'm not an airline Captain either, but know what happens when you depressurize the cabin.
I'm also someone who can read and digest common knowledge.
Appeals to authority/credentials isn't even a quality 3rd grade debate tactic.
The signators of the Barrington Declaration would like to have a word with you.Thats a nonsequitor. Scientific studies and experiments are published in papers that are then tested to see if the experiment and underlying theory is efficacious. How else do you propose they do that?
Didn't seem to work. Probably should have published it.The signators of the Barrington Declaration would like to have a word with you.
Dismissed.
They weren't published for exactly the crony corporate relationship and dynamic that was pointed out in #42.Didn't seem to work. Probably should have published it.![]()
So they didn't try. Interesting.They weren't published for exactly the crony corporate relationship and dynamic that was pointed out in #42.
Anyone with the intellectual horsepower of the aforementioned 3rd grader, which obviously excludes you, can figure that out.
Now how are we going to disseminate and replicate a cancer treatment experiment?So they didn't try. Interesting.
Yup...Far below that of a 3rd grader.So they didn't try. Interesting.
Help me out, whats a better alternative?Another red letter day.
We've found a leftist willing to argue in favor of corporate merger/capture.
View attachment 1116771
Which way did you come in?...That'll be a good way back out.Help me out, whats a better alternative?
Answer the question. How do you disseminate new studies for review or therapy outside of a scientific journal?Which way did you come in?...That'll be a good way back out.
Don't trust anyone but yourself. Don't trust government, don't trust corporations, and certainly don't trust billionaire funded foundations with an agenda.Help me out, whats a better alternative?
"Believe Nothing Trust No One"Don't trust anyone but yourself. Don't trust government, don't trust corporations, and certainly don't trust billionaire funded foundations with an agenda.