RFK Jr Plans To Run 3rd Party - Biden Is Finished - But Why Is This Guy Upset?

[there4eyeM]

Blessings on anyone who can organize a campaign other than with the duopoly.

 

[westwall]

Blessings on anyone who can organize a campaign other than with the duopoly.

There is no duopoly. There is the political class, and they are at war with the middle class.

If you truly want to fight against them, then vote for Trump.

The only person that they fear.

 

[sparky]

There is no duopoly. There is the political class, and they are at war with the middle class.

the up/down in America right now is hiding behind the right/left

jmho ww

~S~

 

[Mac-7]

Joe Biden faces disastrous defeat if RFK Jr runs as third party candidate

Joe Biden could lose up to a third of his vote if Robert F. Kennedy Jr. runs as an independent in 2024, according to a new poll.

www.newsweek.com

"A third of Democratic voters would likely vote for Robert F. Kennedy Jr. if he runs as an independent in the 2024 presidential election, according to a new survey, potentially handing victory to Donald Trump. The Rasmussen Reports poll found 57 percent of likely Democratic voters plan to support Biden in the Democratic primaries, as opposed to 25 percent for Kennedy, three percent for Marianne Williamson and seven percent for any other candidate."

This is true.....RFK Jr. is a Democrat, he has realistically about 55% support among registered Democrats....if he runs as a Libertarian, Trump will win the White House by at least 45 pts.....this is why Biden and the Dems will most likely try to assassinate RFK Jr. just like he did his father many years ago.






But what is odd to me is why are the same folks who were fanboying for RFK Jr just weeks ago; are now changing their tune once he decides to run 3rd party? Like uncomfortably shaped head Charlie Kirk....he and RFK Jr were like best buds not long ago...he was really playing RFK up (as long as RFK ran as a Democrat) --- but now, he is literally saying that RFK Jr. is a Democrat Psy-Op to hurt Trump? WTF? Just because Libertarians have historically sucked away votes from the Republican candidate in the past doesn't mean it will happen this time? RFK Jr. is wildly popular with many Democrats, which is why he is running 3rd party; because of how popular he is with Democratic voters....so why is Charlie so triggered?

But what is odd to me is why are the same folks who were fanboying for RFK Jr just weeks ago; are now changing their tune once he decides to run 3rd party?

The next time I see Charlie Kirk I will ask him that question for you because I have no idea

Personally I dont care if RFK jr runs as a democrat or an independent

Here’s a thought

Suppose corrupt washington swamp rats prevent both trump and kennedy from being nominated

Wouldnt they make an awesome 3rd party team?

 

[Mac-7]

If that were true, we'd be watching him debate Biden.

Biden would never dare debate RFKjr

He may be senile but he’s not that far gone around the bend

 

[westwall]

Biden would never dare debate RFKjr

He may be senile but he’s not that far gone around the bend

As they say, he's crazy, but not stupid.

 

[sparky]

Wouldnt they make an awesome 3rd party team?

good one Mac!

~S~

 

[Kondor3]

There is no duopoly. There is the political class, and they are at war with the middle class.

If you truly want to fight against them, then vote for Trump.

The only person that they fear.

You convince everybody that Trump will govern properly and stand-down when his time is over and you might have a shot.

Four years of unthinking idiot-tweets and January 6, 2021, stand as a deafening counterpoint to any such effort at convincing.

 

[westwall]

You convince everybody that Trump will govern properly and stand-down when his time is over and you might have a shot.

Four years of unthinking idiot-tweets and January 6, 2021, stand as a deafening counterpoint to any such effort at convincing.

Trump stood down when he knew the election was stolen.

 

[Kondor3]

Trump stood down when he knew the election was stolen.

(1) The election of November 2020 was not stolen. You failed to prove otherwise in 62 separate court challenges. That's a lie.

(2) Trump only gave up when the Chair of the Joint Chiefs publicly warned that DoD would not follow any unlawful order.

Your boy snuck out of Washington DC like a thief in the night and left it to his VP to do what was right and publicly transfer power.

Like the egoistic arrogant narcissistic petulant man-baby that he is.

He promises you things that you want so badly that you're willing to look the other way when it comes to his profound character flaws.

I now understand 1933 Germany much better than I did prior to 2016.

 

[westwall]

(1) The election of November 2020 was not stolen. You failed to prove otherwise in 62 separate court challenges. That's a lie.

(2) Trump only gave up when the Chair of the Joint Chiefs publicly warned that DoD would not follow any unlawful order.

Your boy snuck out of Washington DC like a thief in the night and left it to his VP to do what was right and publicly transfer power.

Like the egoistic arrogant narcissistic petulant man-baby that he is.

He promises you things that you want so badly that you're willing to look the other way when it comes to his profound character flaws.

I now understand 1933 Germany much better than I did prior to 2016.

It was stolen. The Courts refused to hear evidence. As the cases have worked their way through other Courts we now KNOW that AZ is corrupt, as is Wisconsin, and Georgia.

This is now proven beyond doubt.

The whole world knows how bad Pennsylvania is. The standard assumption is that democrat corruption counts for 5 to 6 percent of the "vote" there.

This has been known for years and years.

 

[citygator]

Trump stood down when he knew the election was stolen.

News flash. No one thinks the election was stolen anymore. Even on here. MagaMorons.

 

[Kondor3]

It was stolen. The Courts refused to hear evidence. A

Refused to hear evidence, or...

(1) found that the complainant(s) had no standing, in some instances, and...

(2) found that the so-called 'evidence' was insubstantial and conjectural in others...

Many of those 62 cases were heard in front of Republican (and even Trump-appointed) judges.

Your boy lost.

Then he lied to assuage his colossal ego.

And you rubes fell for it and continue to play the role of Useful Idiots in your modern-day version of "The Reich was stabbed in the back."

as the cases have worked their way through other Courts we now KNOW that AZ is corrupt, as is Wisconsin, and Georgia.

Standard fare for those desperate to explain-away their loss.

This is now proven beyond doubt.

Incorrect... there is VAST room for 'doubt' over your so-called corruption allegations..

The whole world knows how bad Pennsylvania is. The standard assumption is that democrat corruption counts for 5 to 6 percent of the "vote" there.

This has been known for years and years.

If you can't make it happen in a court of law then it is irrelevant.

 

[westwall]

Refused to hear evidence, or...

(1) found that the complainant(s) had no standing, in some instances, and...

(2) found that the so-called 'evidence' was insubstantial and conjectural in others...

Many of those 62 cases were heard in front of Republican (and even Trump-appointed) judges.

Your boy lost.

Then he lied to assuage his colossal ego.

And you rubes fell for it and continue to play the role of Useful Idiots in your modern-day version of "The Reich was stabbed in the back."

Standard fare for those desperate to explain-away their loss.

Incorrect... there is VAST room for 'doubt' over your so-called corruption allegations..

If you can't make it happen in a court of law then it is irrelevant.

No, they flat out refused to hear any evidence.

 

[Lisa558]

No, they flat out refused to hear any evidence.

They were afraid that once it became known that we did not have a true election, all semblance of a constitutional republic would die - and the country would be in tatters. They didn’t predict just how anti-American Biden is, how corrupt, how manipulated by Obama.

Now we are paying the price.

 

[Kondor3]

No, they flat out refused to hear any evidence.

In all sixty-two cases?

 

[westwall]

In all sixty-two cases?

Yes. NO ONE wanted to open that pandoras box. So it was a long, slow slog to get cases into the Courts.

And 3 states are now KNOWN to have been stolen.

 

[Kondor3]

Yes. NO ONE wanted to open that pandoras box. So it was a long, slow slog to get cases into the Courts.

Then you have information about the motives of Republican judges that no one else does. Time to reveal it.

And 3 states are now KNOWN to have been stolen.

"Known"? By whose definition?

----------------

And... in the final analysis... ya'll are in desperate need of a way to stop dwelling on the past.

Your perception of the past is inaccurate.

But even if it was not inaccurate (and it is)...

Dwelling on the past gets you nowhere...

The Republic requires people who are thinking in terms of the future, not the past.

This fixation on the past is a direct result of a manifestation of bruised ego on the part of your Dear Leader.