RFK Jr. is no JFK

I do not wish to be unkind.

But maybe the sound of the gentleman's voice is turning off some potential voters.
 
1712198275950.png
 
He can't beat the machines of both parties. But this is a year of turmoil and change. The machines may break.
 
RFKJr is a nutter, yes, but far superior t Mr. Trump and behind President Biden.,
 
JFK was a fan of technocracy, where the 'elites' decide what is best for the elites and piss on the proles. Big IS Better, and let the banks and oligarchs rule the country and the planet to their liking. He was a big fan of Kenneth Galbraith.

Don't know anything about RFK except he will take votes away from the criminal syndicate Biden runs so I'm fine with his running. Electing a lamp post would be better than another Biden term.
 
RFK Jr., is no JFK.

For starters, because unlike his Uncle, Bobby Jr. is into his senior years. He's 70 years old, whereas his Uncle was 42 years old when he campaigned for President. Bobby has none of the Kennedy campaign people or even Kennedy family people behind his campaign. He reminds me of those people with the Kennedy name, who were no relation to the storied Kennedy political machine, who would appear on ballots , many times being paid to take votes away from another candidate.
No shit JFK would not be a democrat today.
 
No shit JFK would not be a democrat today.
Of course he would. He was a loud, proud Liberal, which are persona non grata in the GOP.
:auiqs.jpg:

if by a "Liberal," they mean someone who looks ahead and not behind, someone who welcomes new ideas without rigid reactions, someone who cares about the welfare of the people - their health, their housing, their schools, their jobs, their civil rights, and their civil liberties - someone who believes that we can break through the stalemate and suspicions that grip us in our policies abroad, if that is what they mean by a "Liberal," then I'm proud to say that I'm a "Liberal." [Applause.]


But first, I would like to say what I understand the word, "Liberal," to mean and explain in the process why I consider myself to be a "Liberal," and what it means in the presidential election of 1960.


In short, having set forth my views - I hope for all time - 2 nights ago in Houston, on the proper relationship between church and state, I want to take this opportunity to set forth my views on the proper relationship between the state and the citizen. This is my political credo:


I believe in human dignity as the source of national purpose, in human liberty as the source of national action, and the human heart as the source of national compassion, and in the human mind as the source of our invention and our ideas. It is, I believe, this faith in our fellow citizens as individuals and as people that lies at the heart of the liberal faith, for liberalism is not so much a party creed or a set of fixed platform promises as it is an attitude of mind and heart, a faith in man's ability through the experiences of his reason and judgment to increase for himself and his fellow men the amount of Justice and freedom and brotherhood which all human life deserves. [Applause.]


I believe also in the United States of America, in the promise that it contains and has contained throughout our history of producing a society so abundant and creative and so free and responsible that it cannot only fulfill the aspirations of its citizens...
 
Of course he would. He was a loud, proud Liberal, which are persona non grata in the GOP.
:auiqs.jpg:

if by a "Liberal," they mean someone who looks ahead and not behind, someone who welcomes new ideas without rigid reactions, someone who cares about the welfare of the people - their health, their housing, their schools, their jobs, their civil rights, and their civil liberties - someone who believes that we can break through the stalemate and suspicions that grip us in our policies abroad, if that is what they mean by a "Liberal," then I'm proud to say that I'm a "Liberal." [Applause.]


But first, I would like to say what I understand the word, "Liberal," to mean and explain in the process why I consider myself to be a "Liberal," and what it means in the presidential election of 1960.


In short, having set forth my views - I hope for all time - 2 nights ago in Houston, on the proper relationship between church and state, I want to take this opportunity to set forth my views on the proper relationship between the state and the citizen. This is my political credo:


I believe in human dignity as the source of national purpose, in human liberty as the source of national action, and the human heart as the source of national compassion, and in the human mind as the source of our invention and our ideas. It is, I believe, this faith in our fellow citizens as individuals and as people that lies at the heart of the liberal faith, for liberalism is not so much a party creed or a set of fixed platform promises as it is an attitude of mind and heart, a faith in man's ability through the experiences of his reason and judgment to increase for himself and his fellow men the amount of Justice and freedom and brotherhood which all human life deserves. [Applause.]


I believe also in the United States of America, in the promise that it contains and has contained throughout our history of producing a society so abundant and creative and so free and responsible that it cannot only fulfill the aspirations of its citizens...
All that word salad to prove you're clueless.
Kennedy was pro civilian militia and pro second amendment.
By calling attention to 'a well regulated militia,' 'the security of the nation,' and the right of each citizen 'to keep and bear arms,' our founding fathers recognized the essentially civilian nature of our economy... The Second Amendment still remains an important declaration of our basic civilian-military relationships in which every citizen must be ready to participate in the defense of his country. For that reason I believe the Second Amendment will always be important.

John F. Kennedy
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top