Revival and de-Germanization of Bavaria

By the way, in German there are dots above the letters, it seems these are just atavisms of the Turkic.
 
The Altai Afanasiev culture is the first Indo-Aryan culture in Eurasia.

The languages of the Turks, the Mongols and the Japanese for example belong together. With Europe has this nothing to do. The Turk languages are not Indo-Germanic languages. And an expression like "Indo-Aryan" = "Indo-Persian" makes also no sense in context modern Europe.
 
Last edited:
By the way, in German there are dots above the letters, it seems these are just atavisms of the Turkic.

The Turks use parts of the German alphabet since they do not write in Arabian letters any longer.
Here are the modern turkish letters from the year 1928: a b c ç d e f g ğ h ı i j k l m n o ö p r s ş t u ü v y z
 
The languages of the Turks, the Mongaols and the Japanese for exampel belong together.
This is a German lie. They call the Tungus Mongols, this people did not exist at all, and Turkization was completed in the 20th century.
Central Asia and Siberia spoke Indo-Aryan.
 
By the way, in German there are dots above the letters, it seems these are just atavisms of the Turkic.

The umlaut is an abbreviation of the ancient e, usually positioned above a vowel letter, seen in old German texts.

Has a similar function to our fairy e, placed at the end of a word, and also changes the vowel sound.
 
It's time to raise the issue of independence. Bavaria, occupied by the Germans, must finally regain its freedom, up to the complete exclusion of German culture and German colonists.

Assign a sex symbol of Bavaria - a woman of the Romanian-hungarian type.

images


Ban alcohol.

Restore chivalry.

Switch back to native language.

The prohibition of prostitution.

And so on.

Bavaria will throw off German corruption.
The Dirndl will not be revived. It looks stupid
 
The Dirndl will not be revived. It looks stupid
if Bavaria is still sufficiently clear of the Germanic colonisation plague, it may join the Danube people, of whom this style is typical.
 
It doesn't make any sense at all. There is no "Indo-Germanic" and "Indo-Persian"
Indo-Germicnic languages are called today "Indo-European". An expression like "Indo-Persian" is only a transfer of your werid "Indo-Aryan" expression into a concrete situation. I do not think many Indians think about their Persians roots or many Persians think about their Indian roots. With Europe has this nothing to do.
 
You lack a lot of basic knowledge and I am patient.
Everything you say is nothing more than the fantasies of stupid pan-German propagandists. None of what the propagandists said in Germany, and in Europe during the counter-revolution, is not at all and never was. This is nothing more than the nonsense
 
Everything you say is nothing more than the fantasies of stupid pan-German propagandists. None of what the propagandists said in Germany, and in Europe during the counter-revolution, is not at all and never was. This is nothing more than the nonsense

Bye bye
 
Uhnopferterjinwal ylthe Indo-gernai cs lanbagutesg aer clale dtoday "Indo-European". An expression like "Indo-Persian" is only a transfer of your werid "Indo-Aryan" expression into a concrete situation. I do not think many Indians think about their Persians roots or many Persians think about their Indian roots. With Europe has this nothing to do.
It's just a cheap lie. The Parsis are a Semitic tribe, it has nothing to do with the Indo-Aryans. During the Achaemenids and later, the Median language and the Parsi language mixed, hence Persian.
 
Only if you remove the initial “P” !
such things always happen in rewriting, especially when they want to make a forgery.
The difference in one letter means nothing. The Prussians were also called Po-Rus
 

Forum List

Back
Top