Reuters: Half Of Likely Voters Back Temporary Ban On All Muslim Entry To United States.

[bripat9643]

This isn't a winning issue for Hitlery. It's good to watch her self destruct.

Reuters: Half of Likely Voters Back Temporary Ban on All Muslim Entry to United States - Breitbart​

New polling data from Reuters shows a surge in support for a far-reaching temporary ban on any Muslim entry to the United States. In the wake of the terrorist attack in Orlando, 50 percent of likely voters now support a temporary halt on Muslim entry into the United States. Just 42 percent of likely voters oppose a temporary ban.​

 

[bucs90]

Oh shit!!! So half of all Americans are racist??? Just kidding.

Leftists are praying to Allah that another one doesn't happen before November. I'm praying to the real God that another one doesn't happen EVER. We know it will sadly.

 

[candycorn]

Breibart.

For a moment there, I was paying attention.

 

[aaronleland]

Oh shit!!! So half of all Americans are racist??? Just kidding.

Leftists are praying to Allah that another one doesn't happen before November. I'm praying to the real God that another one doesn't happen EVER. We know it will sadly.

You love dead innocents. Especially cops. What else would you post about here?

 

[Agit8r]

Let's check back in a couple of weeks. By then they'll have found a shiny new thing to be freaked out about.

 

[Norman]

Terrible news for the democrat vote plantation.

Erm, I mean you RACISTS!!!

 

[bucs90]

Breibart.

For a moment there, I was paying attention.

Yeah...let's use a fair and impartial source Iike Huffington Post or MSNBC.

 

[GWV5903]

Breibart.

For a moment there, I was paying attention.

It's from Reuters, it's not that hard to confirm unless you really don't care to...

http://polling.reuters.com/#!poll/TM923Y16_4/type/smallest/dates/20160501-20160614/collapsed/true/spotlight/1

 

[gallantwarrior]

Breibart.

For a moment there, I was paying attention.

It's OK, we understand about short attention spans.

 

[Clementine]

It's a Reuters poll, so libs might as well stop bashing Breitbart for reporting it. Or is it just because the left doesn't like polls that are more accurate than libs polling other libs?

It will be interesting in the next several months to see which issues are going to sway votes one way or the other.

Economy, jobs, terrorism, socialism, foreign policy, border control, and gun rights are some issues that will affect how us Independents vote.

If people are unhappy with the way things are now, they won't support Hillary because she'll just offer more of the same shit that doesn't work. I have never been a Trump fan, but he is the first one that is really a Washington outsider who doesn't follow the status quo. So many have run with the promise of shaking things up and no one ever does.

 

[candycorn]

Breibart.

For a moment there, I was paying attention.

It's from Reuters, it's not that hard to confirm unless you really don't care to...

http://polling.reuters.com/#!poll/TM923Y16_4/type/smallest/dates/20160501-20160614/collapsed/true/spotlight/1

And the "half" of those polled is where?

Do you honestly believe for a moment that asking the question the day after a mass shooting by an apparent muslim is fair? I would imagine that 100% of all of those who just had their homes burned down are in favor of quicker responses from the fire department...

 

[candycorn]

Breibart.

For a moment there, I was paying attention.

It's OK, we understand about short attention spans.

Since you have one...I would believe it.

 

[gallantwarrior]

Breibart.

For a moment there, I was paying attention.

It's OK, we understand about short attention spans.

Since you have one...I would believe it.

Oh, wait...you forgot "neener, neener, neener", or something more appropriate to your intellectual level. Feel free to quote me.

 

[GWV5903]

Breibart.

For a moment there, I was paying attention.

It's from Reuters, it's not that hard to confirm unless you really don't care to...

http://polling.reuters.com/#!poll/TM923Y16_4/type/smallest/dates/20160501-20160614/collapsed/true/spotlight/1

And the "half" of those polled is where?

Do you honestly believe for a moment that asking the question the day after a mass shooting by an apparent muslim is fair? I would imagine that 100% of all of those who just had their homes burned down are in favor of quicker responses from the fire department...

So it really didn't matter that is was from Breitbart?

Or I guess you really weren't paying any attention?

No wonder you're so confused all the time...

 

[JBond]

Breibart.

For a moment there, I was paying attention.

Candyass, It was a Reuters survey.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

"Reuters: Half Of Likely Voters Back Temporary Ban On All Muslim Entry To United States."

Which has nothing whatsoever to do with the attack in Orlando.

And a ‘ban’ of Muslims entering the country is idiotic ignorance and bigotry, ‘temporary’ or otherwise.

Just because one is Muslim doesn’t mean he is a ‘terrorist,’ the notion fails as both a hasty generalization fallacy and post hoc fallacy.

Individuals commit acts of terror, not religions.

We are not ‘at war’ with Islam – such hatred and bigotry only benefit America’s enemies.

 

[candycorn]

Breibart.

For a moment there, I was paying attention.

It's from Reuters, it's not that hard to confirm unless you really don't care to...

http://polling.reuters.com/#!poll/TM923Y16_4/type/smallest/dates/20160501-20160614/collapsed/true/spotlight/1

And the "half" of those polled is where?

Do you honestly believe for a moment that asking the question the day after a mass shooting by an apparent muslim is fair? I would imagine that 100% of all of those who just had their homes burned down are in favor of quicker responses from the fire department...

So it really didn't matter that is was from Breitbart?

Or I guess you really weren't paying any attention?

No wonder you're so confused all the time...

The OP is factually incorrect as is a tradition with that source

 

[Picaro]

That poll is indeed sad; the percentages supporting such a ban should be 99%. The 42% opposed are clearly butt stupid or need to be deported themselves.

Polls of Islamic Beliefs Made Over Several Years

Needs updating to the present, so thanks to the OP for the link to the poll.

 

[NYcarbineer]

There were only 111 respondents to that poll, for some reason.

 

[GWV5903]

Breibart.

For a moment there, I was paying attention.

It's from Reuters, it's not that hard to confirm unless you really don't care to...

http://polling.reuters.com/#!poll/TM923Y16_4/type/smallest/dates/20160501-20160614/collapsed/true/spotlight/1

And the "half" of those polled is where?

Do you honestly believe for a moment that asking the question the day after a mass shooting by an apparent muslim is fair? I would imagine that 100% of all of those who just had their homes burned down are in favor of quicker responses from the fire department...

So it really didn't matter that is was from Breitbart?

Or I guess you really weren't paying any attention?

No wonder you're so confused all the time...

The OP is factually incorrect as is a tradition with that source

Whatever, next time just don't say anything when your wrong...