Talk to the hospitals getting crushed by costs for free healthcare for illegals.
amac.us
So if the Pew study is wrong, don't keep dodging, Slappy, tell us why the Dems/Socialists are in such a hurry to grant citizenship to illegals. Don't try and sidestep the fact that "voters" was an attribute assigned to illegals by the Dems/ Socialists.
What hurry? First off, if they are being naturalized, they have completed the citizenship process. What's your problem with immigrants being naturalized legally now? Isn't this how you want it?
The rush to grant citizenship to illegals is happening in a hurry so Dems/ Socialists will have minions to vote along party lines. Let's not forget Biden- Harris are "naturalizing" criminals. Do you understand that crossing the border without authorization is a crime, at least outside of of the alternate realty of the diseased dem / Socialist mind.
There is no evidence that these newly naturalized citizens will vote Democrat. In fact, quite a few Hispanics are conservatives. Religious ones at that.
The evidence is in the Pew study and elsewhere that tracked historical trends. It's obvious you have nothing but, " because I say so" as a failed attempt at argument.There is no evidence that these newly naturalized citizens will vote Democrat. In fact, quite a few Hispanics are conservatives. Religious ones at that.
All you have is a 10+ year old Pew study that admits....it depended on the election year.
What you are putting forth here is hysteria and speculation. Just recycling alt-right tropes.
Put up better candidates who aren't loons..and you may find yourself winning elections again.
Up to 2012.
As expected, you offered your usual, " because I say so" nonsense. I fully expected you would offer your usual tirade rather than address the issue.Up to 2012.
"In 2012, the Pew Research Center’s National Survey of Latinos found that among Latino immigrants who are not U.S. citizens or legal permanent residents (and therefore likely unauthorized immigrants), some 31% identify as Democrats and just 4% as Republicans. An additional 33% say they are political independents, 16% mention some other political party and 15% say they “don’t know” or refuse to answer the question".
Give me a break. I can't believe you are putting forth this nonsense as fact..or even a trend. Let's forget that the data is over 10 years old. By my hasty math, a full 63% answered independent or "other". Out of that number, I'm sure when the actual time to vote came about that many of them voted Republican.
And that, Hollie, is the data you really need if you are going to make your case that the administration is rushing to naturalized immigrants....who aren't illegal once they are citizens.
Up to 2012.
"In 2012, the Pew Research Center’s National Survey of Latinos found that among Latino immigrants who are not U.S. citizens or legal permanent residents (and therefore likely unauthorized immigrants), some 31% identify as Democrats and just 4% as Republicans. An additional 33% say they are political independents, 16% mention some other political party and 15% say they “don’t know” or refuse to answer the question".
Give me a break. I can't believe you are putting forth this nonsense as fact..or even a trend. Let's forget that the data is over 10 years old. By my hasty math, a full 63% answered independent or "other". Out of that number, I'm sure when the actual time to vote came about that many of them voted Republican.
And that, Hollie, is the data you really need if you are going to make your case that the administration is rushing to naturalized immigrants....who aren't illegal once they are citizens.
OK, now you have an article that's more relevant to the discussion. However, it doesn't appear to make that much of a difference in the end. So what the administration is doing, is simply clearing the backlog created by the last administration.
As expected, you offer mothing relevant. only specious opinion absent any facts. If you put better arguments in place you wouldn't be such a buffoon. As expected you are still sidesteing the reason why Biden -Harris are in such a panic to invent new voters.OK, now you have an article that's more relevant to the discussion. However, it doesn't appear to make that much of a difference in the end. So what the administration is doing, is simply clearing the backlog created by the last administration.
Their definition of immigrants includes both naturalized and undocumented.
"Immigrants overall are twice as likely to say that the Democratic Party (32%) represents their political views better than the Republican Party (16%). The gap is similar among naturalized citizens (37% say the Democratic Party, 21% say the Republican party). Immigrants, including naturalized citizens, also much more likely to say to immigrants as a group have fared better under President Biden than under President Trump.
Still, large shares don’t lean towards either party on these questions. One quarter say neither party represents their personal political views and a similar share (27%) say they’re not sure, and about half (47%) say that when it comes to lives of immigrants, it makes no difference who the president is"
The real issue here is you believe immigrants are being naturalized faster to create voters for Democrats in the upcoming election.
Outside of mass naturalization (which won't happen), that's not possible.
But the fact remains that Republican candidates..suck! They are for the most part...loons.
If you put better candidates up, you'd find these immigrants voting for them...and you'd be winning elections again.
There's no "opinion" here. I am quoting what these articles state.
That was quite the dance. As expected. You offered nothing but, ," because I say so", nothing factual.There's no "opinion" here. I am quoting what these articles state.
What you are doing is called 'flooding the zone". Repeating the same nonsense over and over, hoping that you'll wear people down over time.
You haven't come CLOSE to defending your OP.
There..is..no..panic.
This is what's called a made up problem. To explain away the fact that Republicans have gone down the rat hole and aren't coming out anytime soon.
These articles don't support your OP assertion. Period. You use immigration as a constant crutch and excuse because your candidates are terrible and can't win elections. So you make excuses why you lose.
Wow. Another " becausevI say so" tirade.thevarticles clearly show that immigrants, more often than not, vote democrat. That is the obvious reason why Biden-Harris are on a panic to exploit their illegals as a voting base.These articles don't support your OP assertion. Period. You use immigration as a constant crutch and excuse because your candidates are terrible and can't win elections. So you make excuses why you lose.
No introspection. No evaluation. Just put forth the same crap over and over and hope enough people buy it. Jeez...
Again, there is no panic. Nowhere in your linked articles does it say anything about panic. That is Breitbart speculation and opinion.
Again. There is an obvious panic by the Dems/ Socialists to increase their voter base. Why the need for Biden- Harris "Granting Citizenship at Fastest Rate in a Decade", just before the election?
Absent the NY "Slimes" far leftist garbage,
"In 2012, the Pew Research Center’s National Survey of Latinos found that among Latino immigrants who are not U.S. citizens or legal permanent residents (and therefore likely unauthorized immigrants), some 31% identify as Democrats and just 4% as Republicans. An additional 33% say they are political independents, 16% mention some other political party and 15% say they “don’t know” or refuse to answer the question."
In order to argue the premise, you should have done your homework.
Are unauthorized immigrants overwhelmingly Democrats?
Will there be “an electoral bonanza for Democrats” if the nation’s estimated 11.1 million unauthorized immigrants are eventually granted the right to vote? The data provide some insights.www.pewresearch.org
Why don't you tell us why the dems/ Socialists are in such a frantic rush to grant citizenship to their " newcomers".
"Because I say so". Very impressive.
