skookerasbil
Platinum Member
Interestingly, the warmist community for all of their brilliance with the science is profoundly naïve when it comes to the psychology of global warming......as if it doesn't matter ( "the science is on our side").
Not a surprise then to see what the research on human perceptions on global warming concludes.....
"Global warming may directly focus attention on rising temperatures, which encourages the anecdotal use of unusually cold weather as disconfirming evidence, whereas “climate change” puts the emphasis on the systemic transformation of weather patterns, which accommodate cooler temperatures.
In the case of evaluating climate change, people may rely on the outdoor temperature when constructing their beliefs, rather than considering the scientific reports they have encountered; thus avoiding a complex decision by implicitly selecting a simpler evaluation criterion
Judgments about climate change are malleable, and can be influenced by irrelevant environmental information."
Heuristics and constructed beliefs in climate change perception: Effect of outdoor temperature, question construction, and cognitive primes - Center for Research on Environmental Decisions
Offuckingcourse people construct their beliefs when they go outside and are in immediate need of nut sack warmers. To the AGW k00ks, it means NOTHING...........but to the rest of the world, it means everything.
So the same dynamics that shape some opinions when the temperature is hot, also shapes opinions when the temperature is ball biting cold. That's the way it is.......shall we call it..........an "inconvenient truth" of you are an AGW climate crusader!
You wonder why after 25 years of the AGW crowd bomb throwing they have had zero effect on public policy in terms of the climate?
Only to the members of the religion is human perception of its environment not a factor in beliefs related to global warming.

Not a surprise then to see what the research on human perceptions on global warming concludes.....
"Global warming may directly focus attention on rising temperatures, which encourages the anecdotal use of unusually cold weather as disconfirming evidence, whereas “climate change” puts the emphasis on the systemic transformation of weather patterns, which accommodate cooler temperatures.
In the case of evaluating climate change, people may rely on the outdoor temperature when constructing their beliefs, rather than considering the scientific reports they have encountered; thus avoiding a complex decision by implicitly selecting a simpler evaluation criterion
Judgments about climate change are malleable, and can be influenced by irrelevant environmental information."
Heuristics and constructed beliefs in climate change perception: Effect of outdoor temperature, question construction, and cognitive primes - Center for Research on Environmental Decisions
Offuckingcourse people construct their beliefs when they go outside and are in immediate need of nut sack warmers. To the AGW k00ks, it means NOTHING...........but to the rest of the world, it means everything.
So the same dynamics that shape some opinions when the temperature is hot, also shapes opinions when the temperature is ball biting cold. That's the way it is.......shall we call it..........an "inconvenient truth" of you are an AGW climate crusader!
You wonder why after 25 years of the AGW crowd bomb throwing they have had zero effect on public policy in terms of the climate?

Only to the members of the religion is human perception of its environment not a factor in beliefs related to global warming.


Last edited: