Republicans won’t be satisfied with overturning Roe

The republicans didn't ban abortion. The SCOTUS returned the issue to the states. There is no national abortion ban, nor can there or should there be. You've been listening to democrat panic porn.
Where 12 states have banned it, and more states have tiny windows and impractical restrictions. My state passed a constitutional amendment guaranteeing the right, but in redder states with bans I would have more reservations about voting R.
 
" Anthropocentric Psychosis Characteristics "

* Flamboyant Over Exaggeration Leading To Logical Faux Pas *

A woman has a choice. If she doesn't want to have a baby, she can avoid making one.
An abortion is a choice for not making a baby , as by definition a baby denotes an infant at approximately 3 to 4 months of age when they begin to babble .
 
" Too Many Fools Not Enough Informed Consent From Fee Press "

* Riding Thunder Road *

Where 12 states have banned it, and more states have tiny windows and impractical restrictions. My state passed a constitutional amendment guaranteeing the right, but in redder states with bans I would have more reservations about voting R.
The anti-federalism of statists is a red herring to deprive individual citizens of the enumerated rite of equal protection with a citizen , and a citizen must satisfy a single non trivial requirement of live birth , wherefore equal protection with a citizen requires live birth .

A legitimate us republican is not a traitor against independence of the individual as the basis of us republic , and an individual citizen is entitled to independence from a state as well as from the federate , and progeny is included as a property of self ownership from the principles of individualism and non violence .

The us republicans in name only who maintain an allegiance to democrat ideology for populism , with democracy as tyranny by collective majority and against independence of the individual , as traitors against principles of us republic , seek to deprive individual citizens of self ownership and self determination elements from principles of individualism and non violence .
 
" Fake Outrage Ignores With Cause Developmental Anomalies "

* Anthropocentric Psychopathy Personifying Plastic Dolls With Subjective Introspection *

It was NOT funny to 75 Million murdered babies.
An estimate for the total number of actual hue mammon apes at an age of babbling and killed since the beginning of time is likely more than 75 million , perhaps ask your goad for an explanation .

The onset of sentience and a capacity to suffer and feel pain begins at approximately 29 to 30 weeks of pregnancy , and as an ability to survive an imminent live birth at post natural viability is approximately 36 weeks , then one could assume that a baby ( born , babbling ) being killed would include suffering , and therefore not be funny , whereby empathy for suffering would be valid .

Alternatively , a fetus that has not developed a capacity for sentience is inchoate and empathy for suffering would not be valid , and funny or not funny is an absurd pretense .
 
Where 12 states have banned it, and more states have tiny windows and impractical restrictions. My state passed a constitutional amendment guaranteeing the right, but in redder states with bans I would have more reservations about voting R.
Thank you for making my point. It is in each state's hands--where it belongs. RvW was a national abortion law--isn't that what you democrats falsely claim Trump is trying to get enacted. Strange that the SCOTUS has done just the opposite. So what are you whining about?
 
“Republican senators are giving us a glimpse of the culture war clashes to come. There are already warning signs — including the Texas directive that prohibits parents from legally providing gender-affirming treatment and therapies to their children, as well as various state officials’ questioning whether the Constitution sanctions contraceptive use. Indeed, some Republican senators have gestured toward these future conflicts. In his questions to Jackson, Sen. John Cornyn (R-Tex.) repeatedly sought her views of Obergefell v. Hodges, the court’s 2015 decision legalizing same-sex marriage, pressing her as to whether the decision was properly decided. Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) took her turn at the microphone to criticize Griswold v. Connecticut, the 1965 case that legalized contraception use. It’s not a stretch to imagine this revisionism extending to Loving v. Virginia, the ruling that legalized interracial marriage. A Republican senator recently said he was open to overturning that ruling. He later walked back his comments.

All this underscores that abortion was never the conservatives’ endgame. It is merely a way station on the path to rolling back a wide range of rights — the rights that scaffold the most intimate aspects of our lives and protect the liberty and equality of marginalized groups.”


Republicans’ assault on citizens’ rights and protected liberties has just begun.
I'm an advocate for babies' rights. They're totally helpless and dependent on the adults in the room to nurture them and provide them with a good life. Slaughtering them just doesn't seem like a really good idea to me. I suppose if I was Charles Manson or Jeffrey Dahmer then killing them might not seem so bad but, alas, I'm nothing like them.
 
I'm an advocate for babies' rights. They're totally helpless and dependent on the adults in the room to nurture them and provide them with a good life. Slaughtering them just doesn't seem like a really good idea to me. I suppose if I was Charles Manson or Jeffrey Dahmer then killing them might not seem so bad but, alas, I'm nothing like them.
To leftists, the solution to inconvenient people...and it's a Final one...is always murder.

The legacy of leftism is the mass grave.
 
To leftists, the solution to inconvenient people...and it's a Final one...is always murder.

The legacy of leftism is the mass grave.
Every conservative accusation is a confession. I've never seen a case where that wasn't true.

Dave here is confessing his own lust for genocide here. Not that he was ever good at hiding it. He rubs himself as he dreams of exterminating liberals.
 
Thank you for making my point. It is in each state's hands--where it belongs. RvW was a national abortion law--isn't that what you democrats falsely claim Trump is trying to get enacted. Strange that the SCOTUS has done just the opposite. So what are you whining about?
Dumping it on states is a temporary legal convenience, so SCOTUS and Congress can move on to safer issues. The right of bodily autonomy is still an individual right, so that will be argued in 50 flame wars instead of one national flame war. I could see state legislatures deciding "nope, we're done, we'll kick this down to counties and cities."

Maybe you missed the part about me being a middle of the road voter now voting mostly R.
 
" More Sanctimonious Clap Trap From Traitors Against Us Republic Supporting Sedition Of Dobbs "

* States Do Not Have A Legitimate Interest In Protecting A Rite To Any Thing Which Has Not Met A Live Birth Requirement *

Thank you for making my point. It is in each state's hands--where it belongs. RvW was a national abortion law--isn't that what you democrats falsely claim Trump is trying to get enacted. Strange that the SCOTUS has done just the opposite. So what are you whining about?
According to us 14th amendment an individual is a citizen of the federate and a citizen of a state , and there is a non incidental requirement of live birth to become a citizen of either , and a state does not have the power to abrogate that enumerated requirement , and a state does not have the ability to abrogate the enumerated rite of equal protection with a citizen that consequently requires a live birth .

The dobbs decision is dumbfounded and sedition against us 14th , 9th , 1st and 10th amendments and it is supported by traitors against us republic ; the scotus collaborators should be charged with the crime just as any other despot that would commit sedition and suspend us constitution .

You all sound like a bunch of imbeciles referring to babies .
 
The right of bodily autonomy is still an individual right, so that will be argued in 50 flame wars instead of one national flame war.
Would you rather see a national ban? You are talking out of both sides of your mouth.
I could see state legislatures deciding "nope, we're done, we'll kick this down to counties and cities."
Clearly you have no clue as to the scope of and meaning of various constitutions. Educate yourself and you might even become a conservative. LMAO Truth be known, you want to make everyone in the nation subject to a legalized murder law.
 
" Big Words To Goad Conceited Simpletons "

* Subjective Histrionics Of Anthropocentric Psychopathy *

Murder is not a right.
A law exists because there is an entity capable of stopping an action , or a law exists because there is an entity capable of issuing a retort against an action .

There is not a law against killing in nature as an act of killing is not stopped , and nature does not issue a retort against an act of killing ; such is why theists fabricate a macabre theater for a final day of judgement .

A law against killing as murder is therefore based upon subjective perspective where an entity , such as a state , is capable of and issues a retort against an act of killing .

An act of abortion may be murder to your subjective perspective , however abortion is not an unlawful act from this subjective perspective and abortion is definitely not murder according to us constitution .

The term right as you have applied it is stupidity - Applying THe Term Rights As A Descriptor For Articles Of Constitution Is Slang And A Profound Error In Diction .


 
Last edited:
" Conspirator Plans For A Covert Ruse "

* Clueless Drones *

Would you rather see a national ban?
The meme of " abortion is a state issue " is a red herring , as whether the bobble head drones repeating it understand or not , the conspirators for the banter perceive federal law and state law as distinct .

That is , such pundits perceive that dobbs ruling did not apply to federal law for federal employees , or federal systems such as mail ( mifepristone ) , or on federal properties .

Has anyone questioned as to why scRotus has postponed the case of mifepristone distribution by federal mail that was originally set for a docket last june 2024 , and how long should one unassumingly believe its sanctimonious sacrosanct traitors against us republic intend to wait before issuing a verdict ?

The lind seed gramm cracker has proposed outlawing abortion at the federal level to 15 weeks , all while behaving as a closet imbecile that does not acknowledge developmental anomalies of with cause abortion , whether in the mother or in the fetus .

The randy pole wants to modify title 1 section 8 of us code to include the pre-born in the definition of a per son ( countable by census and male ) , against which scRotus committed malfeasance in dobbs , along with sedition against the enumerated rite of equal protection with a us citizen that requires live birth .

* Over Generalization Lunacy *
Truth be known, you want to make everyone in the nation subject to a legalized murder law.
Everyone subject to a law would imply that everyone was impacted by the law .

Truth be known , unless abortion involves you abortion has nothing to do with you .
 
Last edited:
Believing abortion is "baby murder" inevitably leads to thinking it must be banned everywhere, by any available means, without regard for individual rights, state rights, precedents, etc. It's a simple and very effective mental trap with just a two-word slogan.
 
" Antifederalists Promoting Statism Meet Individualists Also Antistatists "

* Repugnicanism Masquerades As A Democrat Seeking Populism For Democracy As Tyranny By Collective Majority Against Independence Of The Individual *

Believing abortion is "baby murder" inevitably leads to thinking it must be banned everywhere, by any available means, without regard for individual rights, state rights, precedents, etc. It's a simple and very effective mental trap with just a two-word slogan.
 
Believing abortion is "baby murder" inevitably leads to thinking it must be banned everywhere, by any available means, without regard for individual rights, state rights, precedents, etc. It's a simple and very effective mental trap with just a two-word slogan.
Nice deflection. Simple gaslighting. You morons claim you don't want a nationwide abortion law in one breath and with the next, you want to be authoritarian and tell us that if we don't allow "baby murder" nationwide then it is an affront to our civil rights. LMAO, try again.
 
" Non Trivial Live Birth Requirement For Citizens Whether State Or Federate Citizenship And Enumerated Equal Protection "

* Retarded Belief In An Assertion That No Action Is Action *

Nice deflection. Simple gaslighting. You morons claim you don't want a nationwide abortion law in one breath and with the next, you want to be authoritarian and tell us that if we don't allow "baby murder" nationwide then it is an affront to our civil rights. LMAO, try again.
A definition of a democrat would be a pundit promoting populism for democracy as tyranny by collective majority that is against independence of the individual .

Yearn democrat pretenses and conjectures are false and not factual .

* More Valid And Compelling Perspectives For Populism *

The credo from a us motto of e pluribus unum , all for one and one for all , espouses principles of individualism and expects principles of non violence .

The principles of non violence premise a definition of violence as illegitimate aggression , where self defense against violence is legitimate aggression .

The principles of individualism premise that violence is illegitimate aggression against elements of self ownership and or self determination of an individual .

The principles of individualism premise the element of self ownership entitles an individual to free roam , to free association and to progeny , while the element of self determination entitles an individual to private property and to willful intents through social civil contracts that are made valid through informed consent .

A foundation of us republic and us republicanism is independence of the individual citizen , as individualism , through equal protection of negative liberties among individuals that is delineated by safety and security .

An individual may be a collective of individuals , whether as a state , or as a federate , or as a corporate , or as a civil litigant .

The literal meaning for an after life is genetic continuance and by principles of individualism , individual citizens determine self ownership through progeny , not a collective of anthropocentric psychopaths pushing democrat idealism .

Zone1 - Anthropocentic Psychosis : How Compelling And To Which Ends Are Its Impacts Within Hue Mammon Society ?

 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom