The biggest money-losing state boondoggles out there are idiotic urban mass transit scams.
How much you want to bet that states getting money under that pretext find some "emergency", to which those funds get diverted?
What you're saying is probably true.
But according to the bill, the money is going mostly to grant programs - like hiring a company to make road signs and the like. It's pretty clearly defined in the bill where the money should go. And that is the type of stimulus that I can support - it puts money into the system (those companies hire workers, workers spend money, etc etc). What you're saying is possible - maybe even probable. But not a given - and arguments like that are logical fallacies. It's comparable to saying a kid arrested for pot should never be released because he
might kill someone later.