Republicans in US House Demand Boston Bombing Be Politicized

[KevinWestern]

And therein lies your confusion

It is not Dante's job or for that matter anyone else's job to attempt convincing an ideologue that they are in denial in order to win an argument, or state opinions and truths asking people to look at them. That would be hitting ones head against the proverbial brick wall.

You do know the slimy shit he and others did concerning dead veterans and their families is not considered a 'scandal' by them and their fellow ideologues?

I have always considered Dennis Kucinich a left wing radical because of his record, not because of ideological differences I have had with him. I even helped his people do a few political outreach ads. I don't see Dennis' radical statements and actions as 'scandals' anymore than he does. \
\\
Get IT yet?

Question: I stated that the Congressperson making a single comment three years ago is not sufficient evidence of proving "he's untrustworthy". How does that make me an ideologue?

Question: What actions did "the slimy shit" take against the VA families? All I can gather is that he made a verbal comment...

IS shouting 'fire' in a crowded theater only a verbal comment? See? I can argue like you do.

You choose to focus on the single comment. Dante never said a single comment was what made the guy an asshole or untrustworthy, but if it walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck...

You deny you are an ideologue?

Taking a comment out of context is a sure way of making it look like less or more than what it is depending on your ideologically based motive

I chose to focus on a single comment, because all you provided was a single comment (of evidence) against the senator. Correct?

If you don't agree, what other evidence did you have?

.

 

[Dante]

Question: I stated that the Congressperson making a single comment three years ago is not sufficient evidence of proving "he's untrustworthy". How does that make me an ideologue?

Question: What actions did "the slimy shit" take against the VA families? All I can gather is that he made a verbal comment...

IS shouting 'fire' in a crowded theater only a verbal comment? See? I can argue like you do.

You choose to focus on the single comment. Dante never said a single comment was what made the guy an asshole or untrustworthy, but if it walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck...

You deny you are an ideologue?

Taking a comment out of context is a sure way of making it look like less or more than what it is depending on your ideologically based motive

I chose to focus on a single comment, because all you provided was a single comment (of evidence) against the senator. Correct?

If you don't agree, what other evidence did you have?

.

There is no evidence. This isn't a trial.

There is a public record.

 

[AmericanFirst]

XXXXXXX

who cares what you think

Nobody cares what you think either. So shut up.

 

[Dante]

Republicans in US House Demand Boston Bombing Be Politicized

Under the sleaze tactic of never letting a national tragedy to go un-politicized, the GOP led House will hold hearings.

wtf?



This Right Wing Piece of Shit, Michael Thomas McCaul, Sr. will hold hearings?

Here we are again, in September 2025

Kirk

 

[Dante]

Thing is, he's right, Dante.

and now I remember you

 

[Dante]

What takes up huge amounts of time on FOX News is not mainstream. The framers of the US Constitution made it difficult to change laws by plebiscite for just such instances of public dementia as the right wing (and left wing) usually engages in. See? I used (left wing) that makes me Fair and Balanced. Get IT yet? Dante has never claimed to be anything but a liberal

You will rarely see Dante using the 'majority' opinion fall back argument on hysterical alarmist and controversial issues. It is sad to see you do so, considering what a high opinion you have of yourself and you abilities to argue.

You actually spent the last 11 posts(using your claim) DIRECTLY addressing your belief that there is only one piece of “evidence” backing up a claim. Usually when somebody makes a claim, I try and research it or else how can I argue it. In researching a claim I usually come across other ...what do you call it 'evidence'? LOL ... other things that refute and back up things, but reality always wins out.

A partisan ideologue is usually obvious to spot.

revisit