Republican U.S. Representative Issa of California to retire

[a loss for words]

1000 votes in California means the district is toast. He is giving it as the game not being worth the candle.

He fought for preserving California ‘s tax advantages. They are gone and so is he

 

[mascale]

The Low Trump Approval Poll numbers make all Democrat incumbent seats safe. The Low Trump Approval Poll numbers make only a few Republican incumbent seats safe, and one of those was supposed have made Alabama Judge Whatzizname a shoo-in.

Trump's GOP won five, and lost three: So far, at least, in elections that count. Even the White House Press Madame will spin numbers like those to mean that no Republican has anything to worry about in the Mid-Terms: From the Trump approval ratings(?).

A White House from Hollywood has mistakenly been believing its own press releases for months. There is "Fake News(?)," and White House releases, anyone knows, even in the matter of the mess at the bottom of the bird cage.

The only civilization, even, being shown at the White House: Is probably the indoor plumbing, and porcelain.

Real Hollywood Agents know better. South Korea praises Trump in the matter of the recent talks. More likely China gets the credit for the recent talks between North and South Korea, for example. The South, however, will not do well in any matter of gaining any foreign aid from China.

Republicans have long since needed "Our Side" V. "Their Side" kinds of world scenarios: With some nature of basis in, "Nobody on this planet even eats, except 'Our Side.'"

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Many people know for a fact! (These people are Asians, and mostly have never even heard of Israel, much less a one-lunged priestly icon!)

 

[ptbw forever]

Republican U.S. Representative Issa of California to retire - statement

Another one bites the dust--what is with all these Republican lawmakers retiring? Could they be reading the handwriting on the wall?


U.S. Representative Darrell Issa, who as head of the House of Representatives' Oversight Committee pursued the investigation of American deaths in Benghazi, Libya, said on Wednesday he would not seek re-election in November.

"Throughout my service, I worked hard and never lost sight of the people our government is supposed to serve. Yet with the support of my family, I have decided that I will not seek re-election in California's 49th District," he said in a statement.

Issa is from one of the 23 congressional districts won by Democrat Hillary Clinton in the 2016 presidential election that are currently held by Republicans, who are now considered vulnerable in November congressional elections.

He's from marxistfornia....he knew he was going to lose so its better to just retire,let the party spend money on winnable races rather than trying to save a dying state.

Well..he did win 4 terms..and was/is one of the most influential voices in the GOP House. So...even if his district votes in another R--which it probably will--as it is a very Red district--while they did vote for Clinton, Issa was well-liked-his seniority is lost.

No “very red” districts voted for Hillary, moron.

 

[EvilEyeFleegle]

Republican U.S. Representative Issa of California to retire - statement

Another one bites the dust--what is with all these Republican lawmakers retiring? Could they be reading the handwriting on the wall?


U.S. Representative Darrell Issa, who as head of the House of Representatives' Oversight Committee pursued the investigation of American deaths in Benghazi, Libya, said on Wednesday he would not seek re-election in November.

"Throughout my service, I worked hard and never lost sight of the people our government is supposed to serve. Yet with the support of my family, I have decided that I will not seek re-election in California's 49th District," he said in a statement.

Issa is from one of the 23 congressional districts won by Democrat Hillary Clinton in the 2016 presidential election that are currently held by Republicans, who are now considered vulnerable in November congressional elections.

He's from marxistfornia....he knew he was going to lose so its better to just retire,let the party spend money on winnable races rather than trying to save a dying state.

Well..he did win 4 terms..and was/is one of the most influential voices in the GOP House. So...even if his district votes in another R--which it probably will--as it is a very Red district--while they did vote for Clinton, Issa was well-liked-his seniority is lost.

No “very red” districts voted for Hillary, moron.

LoL....how very aware of you..to overlook my acknowledgment of my error..and throw down some shit--how very like you.

I bet you've never actually responded cogently to a post yet..just find some little thing..and jump on it. Much like most of y our ilk--you don't have the intellectual horsepower to debate..so you throw shit.

 

[ptbw forever]

I just took a look, and Issa won his last election by only 1621 votes.

So Applegate will probably give it another shot.

Typical Democrat crooks never give up after losing.

Funny how most Republican challengers tend to be fresh faces because Republicans don’t completely rely on demographic changes to win.

 

[ptbw forever]

Republican U.S. Representative Issa of California to retire - statement

Another one bites the dust--what is with all these Republican lawmakers retiring? Could they be reading the handwriting on the wall?


U.S. Representative Darrell Issa, who as head of the House of Representatives' Oversight Committee pursued the investigation of American deaths in Benghazi, Libya, said on Wednesday he would not seek re-election in November.

"Throughout my service, I worked hard and never lost sight of the people our government is supposed to serve. Yet with the support of my family, I have decided that I will not seek re-election in California's 49th District," he said in a statement.

Issa is from one of the 23 congressional districts won by Democrat Hillary Clinton in the 2016 presidential election that are currently held by Republicans, who are now considered vulnerable in November congressional elections.

He's from marxistfornia....he knew he was going to lose so its better to just retire,let the party spend money on winnable races rather than trying to save a dying state.

Well..he did win 4 terms..and was/is one of the most influential voices in the GOP House. So...even if his district votes in another R--which it probably will--as it is a very Red district--while they did vote for Clinton, Issa was well-liked-his seniority is lost.

No “very red” districts voted for Hillary, moron.

LoL....how very aware of you..to overlook my acknowledgment of my error..and throw down some shit--how very like you.

I bet you've never actually responded cogently to a post yet..just find some little thing..and jump on it. Much like most of y our ilk--you don't have the intellectual horsepower to debate..so you throw shit.

LOL

There is no such as “intellectual horsepower” when it comes to supposed rebuttals from your ilk.

Once the baby boomers die off you will see how intellectually wanting your side actually is.

 

[Spare_change]

Democrats have no platform, no integrity, they are only interested in a self-perpetuating paradigm of existence. They would let America be overrun by hordes of freeloaders just for the votes necessary for survival as a political party.

You saw Trump waffle on immigration, right?

Neither party has much of a viable platform, one party is about hate and the other party opposes it, that's about as deep as it goes right now.

Waffle? Seriously?

 

[HappyJoy]

Democrats have no platform, no integrity, they are only interested in a self-perpetuating paradigm of existence. They would let America be overrun by hordes of freeloaders just for the votes necessary for survival as a political party.

You saw Trump waffle on immigration, right?

Neither party has much of a viable platform, one party is about hate and the other party opposes it, that's about as deep as it goes right now.

Waffle? Seriously?

Yep, when you agree to pass a clean DACA bill after you spent the last two years spouting about building a wall that's called waffling.

Of course more likely he just didn't know what the **** he was agreeing to because he's an idiot.

 

[Spare_change]

Democrats have no platform, no integrity, they are only interested in a self-perpetuating paradigm of existence. They would let America be overrun by hordes of freeloaders just for the votes necessary for survival as a political party.

You saw Trump waffle on immigration, right?

Neither party has much of a viable platform, one party is about hate and the other party opposes it, that's about as deep as it goes right now.

Waffle? Seriously?

Yep, when you agree to pass a clean DACA bill after you spent the last two years spouting about building a wall that's called waffling.

Of course more likely he just didn't know what the **** he was agreeing to because he's an idiot.

Quit "wishin' and wantin' ..."

He was very explicit that his definition of a "clean DACA bill" included border security (the dreaded wall). It was "clean" of comprehensive immigration reform issues, such as chained migration, lottery, etc.

You choose to take two words out of a 55 minute discussion ... and try to make it your own.Shame on you - try to be, at least, intellectually honest.

 

[HappyJoy]

Democrats have no platform, no integrity, they are only interested in a self-perpetuating paradigm of existence. They would let America be overrun by hordes of freeloaders just for the votes necessary for survival as a political party.

You saw Trump waffle on immigration, right?

Neither party has much of a viable platform, one party is about hate and the other party opposes it, that's about as deep as it goes right now.

Waffle? Seriously?

Yep, when you agree to pass a clean DACA bill after you spent the last two years spouting about building a wall that's called waffling.

Of course more likely he just didn't know what the **** he was agreeing to because he's an idiot.

Quit "wishin' and wantin' ..."

He was very explicit that his definition of a "clean DACA bill" included border security (the dreaded wall). It was "clean" of comprehensive immigration reform issues, such as chained migration, lottery, etc.

You choose to take two words out of a 55 minute discussion ... and try to make it your own.Shame on you - try to be, at least, intellectually honest.

A clean DACA bill is just that, DACA only, he clearly was in way over his head in that meeting, because he's an idiot, prepared to sign anything.

 

[Spare_change]

Democrats have no platform, no integrity, they are only interested in a self-perpetuating paradigm of existence. They would let America be overrun by hordes of freeloaders just for the votes necessary for survival as a political party.

You saw Trump waffle on immigration, right?

Neither party has much of a viable platform, one party is about hate and the other party opposes it, that's about as deep as it goes right now.

Waffle? Seriously?

Yep, when you agree to pass a clean DACA bill after you spent the last two years spouting about building a wall that's called waffling.

Of course more likely he just didn't know what the **** he was agreeing to because he's an idiot.

Quit "wishin' and wantin' ..."

He was very explicit that his definition of a "clean DACA bill" included border security (the dreaded wall). It was "clean" of comprehensive immigration reform issues, such as chained migration, lottery, etc.

You choose to take two words out of a 55 minute discussion ... and try to make it your own.Shame on you - try to be, at least, intellectually honest.

A clean DACA bill is just that, DACA only, he clearly was in way over his head in that meeting, because he's an idiot, prepared to sign anything.

"wishin' and wantin' .... "

His control of the situation was apparent. No matter how much you oppose it, he is clearly in charge. At least, try to have the integrity to approach the situation with a rational mind.

 

[HappyJoy]

You saw Trump waffle on immigration, right?

Neither party has much of a viable platform, one party is about hate and the other party opposes it, that's about as deep as it goes right now.

Waffle? Seriously?

Yep, when you agree to pass a clean DACA bill after you spent the last two years spouting about building a wall that's called waffling.

Of course more likely he just didn't know what the **** he was agreeing to because he's an idiot.

Quit "wishin' and wantin' ..."

He was very explicit that his definition of a "clean DACA bill" included border security (the dreaded wall). It was "clean" of comprehensive immigration reform issues, such as chained migration, lottery, etc.

You choose to take two words out of a 55 minute discussion ... and try to make it your own.Shame on you - try to be, at least, intellectually honest.

A clean DACA bill is just that, DACA only, he clearly was in way over his head in that meeting, because he's an idiot, prepared to sign anything.

"wishin' and wantin' .... "

His control of the situation was apparent. No matter how much you oppose it, he is clearly in charge. At least, try to have the integrity to approach the situation with a rational mind.

^Speaking of wishin' and wantin'