She called Arpaio a liar.I’ll vote for anyone that admits the Truth that Obama was a piece of Shit Traitor from a Shit Hole Town & a Shit Hole Party!
So you’ll vote for any right wing liar. Typical.
He has a negative and debatable opinion of your party.
That does not make him a liar.
You calling him a liar, is ironically, a lie.
And certainly Arpaio is a liar.
So no that is not a lie.
Actually she did not call Arpanio a liar, she mis characterized what Original Tree said, with negative spin.
Your low reading comprehension is noted and laughed at.
Glad to go over it again
Treeboy:
I’ll vote for anyone that admits the Truth that Obama was a piece of Shit Traitor from a Shit Hole Town & a Shit Hole Party! [Here Treeboy says he will vote for anyone who blah blah]
Dragonlady So you’ll vote for any right wing liar. Typical. [Here Dragon says Treeboy will vote for any right wing liar-she is not calling Treeboy a liar]
You:
He has a negative and debatable opinion of your party.
That does not make him a liar.
You calling him a liar, is ironically, a lie.
[here you call Dragon a liar- ironically because that is a lie]
My mistake. Sorry, RL quite busy right now, lost the thread of the debate.
But yes, she did strongly implies that Arpaio was a liar, simply because he has a strong negative opinion of Obama and the democratic party.
Her calling him a liar for that, is ironically a lie.