Republican Flip-Flop on Vaccinations

[FA_Q2]

If we had left it alone, let it run its course the same way every other routine flu/cold outbreak does, then it would have done exactly that, and been over with in a few months, at most, just as every other routine cold/flu outbreak always has.

But then that would have deprived corrupt politicians of all the illegitimate power that they have been able to seize and abuse, by exploiting this fake “pandemic”.

It is not a routine flu so no.

That is a counter factual that is not shown through ANY data and considering this has stuck the entire planet, that data would clearly exist.

There certainly were FAR less sever methods like were used in Sweden. Those may or may not turn out to have been a good idea but the one thing we know for sure is that it would not simply have 'gone away.'

 

[Bob Blaylock]

It is not a routine flu so no.

You only believe that because you have stupidly fallen for all the lies, exaggerations, and fearmongering.

Strip away all the blatant bullshit, and what is left of COVID-1984 is, indeed, nothing more than a routine cold/flu outbreak.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

No one is against vaccinations. We are against across the board vaccination mandates without regard to medical history.

 

[FA_Q2]

You only believe that because you have stupidly fallen for all the lies, exaggerations, and fearmongering.

Strip away all the blatant bullshit, and what is left of COVID-1984 is, indeed, nothing more than a routine cold/flu outbreak.

I would point out all the facts such as excess deaths and the like this year but it would be pointless.

You have taken your own supply and there is noting left to salvage from that wreckage.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

I would point out all the facts such as excess deaths and the like this year but it would be pointless.

I will agree with you on one point. Repeating the same old tired lies over and over again, when most people of any intelligence know that they are lies, is indeed pointless.

All that you would accomplish by so doing would be to demonstrate that you are either willfully complicit in all this bullshit, or else simply a useful idiot.

Whichever of these you are, more and more of us are simply growing tired of your kind and all your fearmongering.

 

[YoursTruly]

We only know what we're told. Both sides. So most people just choose a side. It's usually the side of their party. Party loyalist are going to do what their party leaders say.

Seriously pathetic, people.

 

[Rigby5]

It is not a routine flu so no.

That is a counter factual that is not shown through ANY data and considering this has stuck the entire planet, that data would clearly exist.

There certainly were FAR less sever methods like were used in Sweden. Those may or may not turn out to have been a good idea but the one thing we know for sure is that it would not simply have 'gone away.'

Wrong.
Since it is no more contagious than flu, with same R(0)=2, then it has to go away from herd immunity the same.
The way herd immunity works is that if the initial spike it high enough, the virus greedy enough, it burns up the easy hosts, runs out, and dies out.
It has to switch hosts every 12 days.
But if you "flatten the curve", then you prevent the spike from burning up all the easy hosts, you essentially conserve hosts, so then you prevent herd immunity, and make the epidemic last FOREVER!

We do know for sure that all epidemics with such a low R(0) value DO simply "go away".
And they normally ALWAYS just "go away".
The ONLY exception is the last time we tried to "flatten the curve" in 1918, with Spanish flu, and we made that last for more than 2 years.
So we should know better by now to NOT "flatten the curve".
That prevents herd immunity and greatly stretches out how long the epidemic lasts.

And if you do not believe me, then look at where it is being the least problem, which is Africa, where they are doing the least "social distancing", vaccines, etc.

If you then wonder why Fauci claimed we could not go with herd immunity because it would cause 2.4 million deaths, the mistake is for 2 main reasons.
One is that he was getting incorrectly high lethality estimates because only those near death were going to hospitals and being counted as infected.
The only is that he missed that there is a 400 times greater risk of death if over 70 in age, compared with those under 40.
So you have to at least divide Fauci's herd immunity death estimate by 400 because you would only ask for infection volunteers under 40.
Dividing 2.4 million by 400 gives you only 6,000 deaths. It also would be even less due to actually lethality being lower and herd immunity needing a much smaller number if achieved more quickly, before there is as much spread,

 

[Rigby5]

We only know what we're told. Both sides. So most people just choose a side. It's usually the side of their party. Party loyalist are going to do what their party leaders say.

Seriously pathetic, people.

Actually we do have the ability to know more than we are told.
We can use logic to see if there are contractions between the many things we are being told.
For example, we know that anything reproducing has a geometric growth.
We know with covid the R(0) reproduction fact is 2, so it doubles every 12 days.
And we know that then speed is the single most important factor, and that any strategy that give the epidemic more time, is wrong,
And yet we also know that "flattening the curve" just slows down the infection rate, but that gives the infection more time.
It allows the infection to spread much further than it otherwise would, because it has far more opportunity to hitch rides on travelers, than it would if it was only in s shorter period of time.
We know "flattening the curve" is wrong because the reproduction rate is still > than 1, so then it is still growing.
Which means every day, the epidemic will be worse than the day before.
You are not gaining, but losing.
That is an insane and irrational strategy.

 

[Rigby5]

No one is against vaccinations. We are against across the board vaccination mandates without regard to medical history.

We are against mRNA concoctions that clearly are NOT at all vaccines, and cause nothing to be stored in T-cell immunity memory.
The mRNA injections just cause our own cells to start growing spike proteins.
How is that supposed to lead to immunity?
It clearly can not.
All it could do is get the immune system to react to the excess spike proteins and ramp up antibody production temporarily, to clean up the mess.
That is not immunity in any way.

 

[Rigby5]

I would point out all the facts such as excess deaths and the like this year but it would be pointless.

You have taken your own supply and there is noting left to salvage from that wreckage.

First of all, flu also killed about 30,000 per month, just like covid.
The difference is that flu only lasts a little more than a month before herd immunity ends it.
But we prevented covid from ending by "flattening the curve".

Second is that they recored 0 flu this year, and that is not possible.
What is likely is the covid test is inaccurate and flu is coming off as a false positive for covid.

 

[Rigby5]

Everyone SHOULD flip-flop on these mRNA vaccinations.
We were told they worked, so then we should all support them.
When it turned out they did not work and only lasted 6 months, and were a lot more dangerous than a vaccine should be, then we should all be against them.

There should be nothing partisan about it.
They simply do not work as originally claimed.

 

[Synthaholic]