Report: A FISA Warrant Was Issued in October to Investigate Russian Hacking

[American_Jihad]

EXCLUSIVE: FBI ‘Granted FISA Warrant’ Covering Trump Camp’s Ties To Russia
By Louise Mensch
10:18 pm, November 7, 2016

...

EXCLUSIVE: FBI ‘Granted FISA Warrant’ Covering Trump Camp’s Ties To Russia

• 
  

 

[Hutch Starskey]

If, IF a FISA warrant was issued, it was done so legally with the appropriate probable cause that is required. Why would that be grim for Obama? It seems more like it would not bode well for Trump or his people.

and what would be the probable cause? have you seen any yet?

It's required to obtain a FISA warrant, fool.

it certainly is, so what was it?

You or I are not privy to such information.
There had to be cause if there was indeed a warrant. That means Trump is in some shady shit.

You are so naive. The cause was snowflakes pissed off at Hillary losing.

Look retard, if there was indeed a warrant issued, then there had to be probable cause for a judge to sign off on it.

Now, unless you are asserting some sort of conspiracy that the warrant was somehow obtained without probable cause or otherwise illegally, then it must have been part of the process in which case there was sufficient evidence of some nefarity on Trump's part that warranted a further look.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

If, IF a FISA warrant was issued, it was done so legally with the appropriate probable cause that is required. Why would that be grim for Obama? It seems more like it would not bode well for Trump or his people.

and what would be the probable cause? have you seen any yet?

It's required to obtain a FISA warrant, fool.

You didn't answer the question. What would be the probable cause?

Who knows? That's private, so that the investigators can continue to do surveillance on their suspects, and if nothing comes of it, then the people under surveillance are unaware and all of their neighbors and the Public don't know so that the innocent are not unfairly judged by them.

And if the public does find out due to justice dept leaks, and nothing is found, then the justice department owes a public apology to the person....imo.

ROFL! It's already been made public, so how is it "private?" Leaking the information is a criminal offense. A lot more than just an "apology" is required. Putting a wire tap on the opposition candidate is a serious offense. It requires a lot more justification than just some suspicions from some butthurt snowflakes.

There is no evidence of a wiretap, dope.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Things are looking grim for Obama and the Dims. Evidence of the October FISA warrant has turned up. It won't be long until the actual thing is published, and then Obama's goose is cooked.

Report: A FISA Warrant Was Issued in October to Investigate Russian Hacking

Investigative journalists Sara Carter (formerly of the Washington Times, the Washington Examiner, and The Blaze) and John Solomon (formerly of the the Washington Post, the Washington Times, and AP) spoke to sources close to the investigation who have been "watching in horror" at the politicization of intelligence since the election, and wanted to set the record straight.

"What we don't know is who was connected to that FISA," Carter said on Sean Hannity's show Wednesday night. "What was that FISA looking at? That is very highly classified. Nobody wants to talk about that particular FISA, right now. They said it did have to do with the Russian hacking on a very broad level, but it didn't hone in directly on Trump is what I was told," she said.

In addition to the FISA warrant in October, the FBI obtained a separate warrant that same month to look into a computer server tied to then-candidate Donald Trump's businesses in Trump Towers (but not located in Trump Towers). According to the report, the feds used traditional investigative techniques to examine allegations of computer activity tied to two Russian banks and there had been no intercepts of Trump’s phone or emails.

The FBI quickly concluded that "the computer activity in question involved no nefarious contacts, bank transactions or encrypted communications with the Russians."​

A legal warrant is going to be Obama's downfall?

Goddam that's funny.

#1) You don't know that it was legal.

#2) Even a legal warrant can be obtained for nefarious purposes.

Your view that the courts and law enforcement agencies can do know wrong is the ultimate in naivete.

You're ascribing wrongdoing where no such evidence exists. The existence of a warrant hasn't even been confirmed. In fact, just the opposite has been reported.

Your attempts to paint the Obama admin as acting unlawfully is simply retarded given that there is no confirmation by any official, agency or member of Congress that this even occurred at all.

 

[bripat9643]

Things are looking grim for Obama and the Dims. Evidence of the October FISA warrant has turned up. It won't be long until the actual thing is published, and then Obama's goose is cooked.

Report: A FISA Warrant Was Issued in October to Investigate Russian Hacking

Investigative journalists Sara Carter (formerly of the Washington Times, the Washington Examiner, and The Blaze) and John Solomon (formerly of the the Washington Post, the Washington Times, and AP) spoke to sources close to the investigation who have been "watching in horror" at the politicization of intelligence since the election, and wanted to set the record straight.

"What we don't know is who was connected to that FISA," Carter said on Sean Hannity's show Wednesday night. "What was that FISA looking at? That is very highly classified. Nobody wants to talk about that particular FISA, right now. They said it did have to do with the Russian hacking on a very broad level, but it didn't hone in directly on Trump is what I was told," she said.

In addition to the FISA warrant in October, the FBI obtained a separate warrant that same month to look into a computer server tied to then-candidate Donald Trump's businesses in Trump Towers (but not located in Trump Towers). According to the report, the feds used traditional investigative techniques to examine allegations of computer activity tied to two Russian banks and there had been no intercepts of Trump’s phone or emails.

The FBI quickly concluded that "the computer activity in question involved no nefarious contacts, bank transactions or encrypted communications with the Russians."​

Post a link. LOL

It's not Obama who broke the law. The cheetos days are numbered.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

What law did Trump break? Even if what Obama did is technically legal, it's still an outrage. No president would be allowed to wire tap the home of the opposition party for any reason. Of course, when did Obama ever let trivialities like the Bill of Rights get in his way?

 

[bripat9643]

and what would be the probable cause? have you seen any yet?

It's required to obtain a FISA warrant, fool.

You didn't answer the question. What would be the probable cause?

Who knows? That's private, so that the investigators can continue to do surveillance on their suspects, and if nothing comes of it, then the people under surveillance are unaware and all of their neighbors and the Public don't know so that the innocent are not unfairly judged by them.

And if the public does find out due to justice dept leaks, and nothing is found, then the justice department owes a public apology to the person....imo.

ROFL! It's already been made public, so how is it "private?" Leaking the information is a criminal offense. A lot more than just an "apology" is required. Putting a wire tap on the opposition candidate is a serious offense. It requires a lot more justification than just some suspicions from some butthurt snowflakes.

There is no evidence of a wiretap, dope.

There's plenty of evidence, dope. You just refuse to accept it.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Things are looking grim for Obama and the Dims. Evidence of the October FISA warrant has turned up. It won't be long until the actual thing is published, and then Obama's goose is cooked.

Report: A FISA Warrant Was Issued in October to Investigate Russian Hacking

Investigative journalists Sara Carter (formerly of the Washington Times, the Washington Examiner, and The Blaze) and John Solomon (formerly of the the Washington Post, the Washington Times, and AP) spoke to sources close to the investigation who have been "watching in horror" at the politicization of intelligence since the election, and wanted to set the record straight.

"What we don't know is who was connected to that FISA," Carter said on Sean Hannity's show Wednesday night. "What was that FISA looking at? That is very highly classified. Nobody wants to talk about that particular FISA, right now. They said it did have to do with the Russian hacking on a very broad level, but it didn't hone in directly on Trump is what I was told," she said.

In addition to the FISA warrant in October, the FBI obtained a separate warrant that same month to look into a computer server tied to then-candidate Donald Trump's businesses in Trump Towers (but not located in Trump Towers). According to the report, the feds used traditional investigative techniques to examine allegations of computer activity tied to two Russian banks and there had been no intercepts of Trump’s phone or emails.

The FBI quickly concluded that "the computer activity in question involved no nefarious contacts, bank transactions or encrypted communications with the Russians."​

Post a link. LOL

It's not Obama who broke the law. The cheetos days are numbered.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

What law did Trump break? Even if what Obama did is technically legal, it's still an outrage. No president would be allowed to wire tap the home of the opposition party for any reason. Of course, when did Obama ever let trivialities like the Bill of Rights get in his way?

What law did Trump break?

That's for the investigators to determine.

 

[bripat9643]

Things are looking grim for Obama and the Dims. Evidence of the October FISA warrant has turned up. It won't be long until the actual thing is published, and then Obama's goose is cooked.

Report: A FISA Warrant Was Issued in October to Investigate Russian Hacking​

And your alleged mind bleev's this means Obama personally ordered Trump's phone lines to be tapped...how?

You know the FISA court is not Obama...right, retard?

It doesn't matter whether he ordered it. One of his servile toadies could have ordered it without being asked, there's no doubt that new knew about it. He failed to do anything about it, and then he took steps to make sure the information was leaked. It doesn't look good for him.

Why would he need to do something about a valid investigation?

What makes you think it's "valid," because you hate Trump?

Because a FISA warrant requires probable cause. If a warrant was in fact obtained, that standard would have been met and deemed therefore valid.

I don't know WTF you're talking about.

It has already been explained to you that getting a FISA warrant is easier than falling down. It means nothing. It's really just evidence that the government committed a crime by wire tapping the headquarters of the opposition party. You snowflakes all blubber incessantly about Russia "hacking the election," but here is clear proof that Obama hacked the election.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

It's required to obtain a FISA warrant, fool.

You didn't answer the question. What would be the probable cause?

Who knows? That's private, so that the investigators can continue to do surveillance on their suspects, and if nothing comes of it, then the people under surveillance are unaware and all of their neighbors and the Public don't know so that the innocent are not unfairly judged by them.

And if the public does find out due to justice dept leaks, and nothing is found, then the justice department owes a public apology to the person....imo.

ROFL! It's already been made public, so how is it "private?" Leaking the information is a criminal offense. A lot more than just an "apology" is required. Putting a wire tap on the opposition candidate is a serious offense. It requires a lot more justification than just some suspicions from some butthurt snowflakes.

There is no evidence of a wiretap, dope.

There's plenty of evidence, dope. You just refuse to accept it.

There isn't. Name one official, agency or member of Congress that has been briefed on this that is backing Trump's claim. Hell, name one person that is publicly backing it. His staff haven't even done so.

You and Trump are alone on this.

 

[bripat9643]

The OP link is not the original story. I can't tell you how many times I have told these tards to GO TO THE SOURCE.

You can read the source here: FBI probe of Donald Trump and Russia during election yielded no evidence of crimes

It turns out very badly for the tard who started this topic. In fact, the tard represents EXACTLY what they are talking about:

“We have people spouting off who don’t know the difference between FISA surveillance and a wiretap or a counterintelligence probe versus a special prosecutor, and it has hurts our ability to get to the truth and has wrongly created the impression that intelligence officials have a political agenda,” said one source directly familiar with the drama.



Many of the leaks have surfaced since former President Barack Obama in his waning days in office had his intelligence leadership brief a wider than normal audience about the sensitive Russia surveillance. Those leaks have created a false narrative that the FBI has been predominantly focused on Trump ties to Russia, officials said.

In fact, any FBI activity involving the president’s associates or advisers was mostly ancillary to a wider counterintelligence probe into Russian efforts to influence the election or curry favor with U.S. figures, the sources said.



So, you see, the story that Russia interfered in our election is valid. The claim by Trump that Obama tapped his phone is utter bullshit.

Everybody clear now?

Thanks for the link to facts.

The tip off that the op is fiction (besides the poster) was seeing the name Hannity.

And of course, knowing our ex-prez.

Wishful thinking on the RWNJs part.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Knowing the ex-prez is the reason we know it's true. Obama is a liar who wiped his ass on the Constitution numerous times.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

And your alleged mind bleev's this means Obama personally ordered Trump's phone lines to be tapped...how?

You know the FISA court is not Obama...right, retard?

It doesn't matter whether he ordered it. One of his servile toadies could have ordered it without being asked, there's no doubt that new knew about it. He failed to do anything about it, and then he took steps to make sure the information was leaked. It doesn't look good for him.

Why would he need to do something about a valid investigation?

What makes you think it's "valid," because you hate Trump?

Because a FISA warrant requires probable cause. If a warrant was in fact obtained, that standard would have been met and deemed therefore valid.

I don't know WTF you're talking about.

It has already been explained to you that getting a FISA warrant is easier than falling down. It means nothing. It's really just evidence that the government committed a crime by wire tapping the headquarters of the opposition party. You snowflakes all blubber incessantly about Russia "hacking the election," but here is clear proof that Obama hacked the election.

Your post is evidence of your profound retardation. Do you post from a group home?

 

[bripat9643]

It doesn't matter whether he ordered it. One of his servile toadies could have ordered it without being asked, there's no doubt that new knew about it. He failed to do anything about it, and then he took steps to make sure the information was leaked. It doesn't look good for him.

Why would he need to do something about a valid investigation?

What makes you think it's "valid," because you hate Trump?

Because a FISA warrant requires probable cause. If a warrant was in fact obtained, that standard would have been met and deemed therefore valid.

I don't know WTF you're talking about.

It has already been explained to you that getting a FISA warrant is easier than falling down. It means nothing. It's really just evidence that the government committed a crime by wire tapping the headquarters of the opposition party. You snowflakes all blubber incessantly about Russia "hacking the election," but here is clear proof that Obama hacked the election.

Your post is evidence of your profound retardation. Do you post from a group home?

In other words, you have nothing to counter my post with.

 

[RASTAMEN]

And your alleged mind bleev's this means Obama personally ordered Trump's phone lines to be tapped...how?

You know the FISA court is not Obama...right, retard?

It doesn't matter whether he ordered it. One of his servile toadies could have ordered it without being asked, there's no doubt that new knew about it. He failed to do anything about it, and then he took steps to make sure the information was leaked. It doesn't look good for him.

Why would he need to do something about a valid investigation?

What makes you think it's "valid," because you hate Trump?

Because a FISA warrant requires probable cause. If a warrant was in fact obtained, that standard would have been met and deemed therefore valid.

I don't know WTF you're talking about.

It has already been explained to you that getting a FISA warrant is easier than falling down. It means nothing. It's really just evidence that the government committed a crime by wire tapping the headquarters of the opposition party. You snowflakes all blubber incessantly about Russia "hacking the election," but here is clear proof that Obama hacked the election.

Trump will be proven to be a Manchurian Candidate.

 

[RASTAMEN]

 

[boedicca]

Looking grim? How so ?

Trump hobnobbing with the Russian spies is looking grim.

The Russian ambassador visited the White House 22 times during Obabble's reign of incompetence & terror. Now, that's a whole lotta hobnobbin', fo shizzle!

 

[boedicca]

It doesn't matter whether he ordered it. One of his servile toadies could have ordered it without being asked, there's no doubt that new knew about it. He failed to do anything about it, and then he took steps to make sure the information was leaked. It doesn't look good for him.

Why would he need to do something about a valid investigation?

What makes you think it's "valid," because you hate Trump?

Because a FISA warrant requires probable cause. If a warrant was in fact obtained, that standard would have been met and deemed therefore valid.

I don't know WTF you're talking about.

It has already been explained to you that getting a FISA warrant is easier than falling down. It means nothing. It's really just evidence that the government committed a crime by wire tapping the headquarters of the opposition party. You snowflakes all blubber incessantly about Russia "hacking the election," but here is clear proof that Obama hacked the election.

Trump will be proven to be a Manchurian Candidate.

How do you sleep at night being so consumed with your paranoid delusions?

 

[bripat9643]

It doesn't matter whether he ordered it. One of his servile toadies could have ordered it without being asked, there's no doubt that new knew about it. He failed to do anything about it, and then he took steps to make sure the information was leaked. It doesn't look good for him.

Why would he need to do something about a valid investigation?

What makes you think it's "valid," because you hate Trump?

Because a FISA warrant requires probable cause. If a warrant was in fact obtained, that standard would have been met and deemed therefore valid.

I don't know WTF you're talking about.

It has already been explained to you that getting a FISA warrant is easier than falling down. It means nothing. It's really just evidence that the government committed a crime by wire tapping the headquarters of the opposition party. You snowflakes all blubber incessantly about Russia "hacking the election," but here is clear proof that Obama hacked the election.

Trump will be proven to be a Manchurian Candidate.

Please keep you wet dreams to yourself. That's really more information than we want to know.

 

[edthecynic]

EXCLUSIVE: FBI ‘Granted FISA Warrant’ Covering Trump Camp’s Ties To Russia
By Louise Mensch
10:18 pm, November 7, 2016
EXCLUSIVE: FBI ‘Granted FISA Warrant’ Covering Trump Camp’s Ties To Russia

Louise Mensch

✔@LouiseMensch
Breitbart and Russia are 100% linked. Bannon has been pushing Russia's line since Andrew Breitbart "died suddenly" https://twitter.com/zackstanton/status/835151361755000832 …

10:42 AM - 24 Feb 2017
Louise Mensch

✔@LouiseMensch
I absolutely believe that Andrew Breitbart was murdered by Putin, just as the founder of RT was murdered by Putin.

10:44 AM - 24 Feb 2017

 

[bripat9643]

EXCLUSIVE: FBI ‘Granted FISA Warrant’ Covering Trump Camp’s Ties To Russia
By Louise Mensch
10:18 pm, November 7, 2016
EXCLUSIVE: FBI ‘Granted FISA Warrant’ Covering Trump Camp’s Ties To Russia

Louise Mensch

✔@LouiseMensch
Breitbart and Russia are 100% linked. Bannon has been pushing Russia's line since Andrew Breitbart "died suddenly" https://twitter.com/zackstanton/status/835151361755000832 …

10:42 AM - 24 Feb 2017
Louise Mensch

✔@LouiseMensch
I absolutely believe that Andrew Breitbart was murdered by Putin, just as the founder of RT was murdered by Putin.

10:44 AM - 24 Feb 2017

I thought all the snowflake douche bags were denying that any such warrant was never issued.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Why would he need to do something about a valid investigation?

What makes you think it's "valid," because you hate Trump?

Because a FISA warrant requires probable cause. If a warrant was in fact obtained, that standard would have been met and deemed therefore valid.

I don't know WTF you're talking about.

It has already been explained to you that getting a FISA warrant is easier than falling down. It means nothing. It's really just evidence that the government committed a crime by wire tapping the headquarters of the opposition party. You snowflakes all blubber incessantly about Russia "hacking the election," but here is clear proof that Obama hacked the election.

Your post is evidence of your profound retardation. Do you post from a group home?

In other words, you have nothing to counter my post with.

It's been countered repeatedly yet you continue. Hence the retardation.