Report: A FISA Warrant Was Issued in October to Investigate Russian Hacking

[jc456]

Nice dodge...

foreign/domestic calls are tapped into computers, KEYWORDS in conversations trigger alarms,alarms get attention ... its been that way since 911

if yu dont believe it, call Pakistan and tell whoever answers the phone you have a b--b and are about to blow up a US government building


dare ya

so let's see the transcript that Flynn did that.

so lets see your graduation diploma from Dumbest Shit Ever University

Since that is your amamuater you should post it.

Alma mater dumbass,

it's fixed, I miss hit post

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Things are looking grim for Obama and the Dims. Evidence of the October FISA warrant has turned up. It won't be long until the actual thing is published, and then Obama's goose is cooked.

Report: A FISA Warrant Was Issued in October to Investigate Russian Hacking

Investigative journalists Sara Carter (formerly of the Washington Times, the Washington Examiner, and The Blaze) and John Solomon (formerly of the the Washington Post, the Washington Times, and AP) spoke to sources close to the investigation who have been "watching in horror" at the politicization of intelligence since the election, and wanted to set the record straight.

"What we don't know is who was connected to that FISA," Carter said on Sean Hannity's show Wednesday night. "What was that FISA looking at? That is very highly classified. Nobody wants to talk about that particular FISA, right now. They said it did have to do with the Russian hacking on a very broad level, but it didn't hone in directly on Trump is what I was told," she said.

In addition to the FISA warrant in October, the FBI obtained a separate warrant that same month to look into a computer server tied to then-candidate Donald Trump's businesses in Trump Towers (but not located in Trump Towers). According to the report, the feds used traditional investigative techniques to examine allegations of computer activity tied to two Russian banks and there had been no intercepts of Trump’s phone or emails.

The FBI quickly concluded that "the computer activity in question involved no nefarious contacts, bank transactions or encrypted communications with the Russians."​

If, IF a FISA warrant was issued, it was done so legally with the appropriate probable cause that is required. Why would that be grim for Obama? It seems more like it would not bode well for Trump or his people.

and what would be the probable cause? have you seen any yet?

It's required to obtain a FISA warrant, fool.

it certainly is, so what was it?

You or I are not privy to such information.
There had to be cause if there was indeed a warrant. That means Trump is in some shady shit.

 

[Siete]

foreign/domestic calls are tapped into computers, KEYWORDS in conversations trigger alarms,alarms get attention ... its been that way since 911

if yu dont believe it, call Pakistan and tell whoever answers the phone you have a b--b and are about to blow up a US government building


dare ya

so let's see the transcript that Flynn did that.

so lets see your graduation diploma from Dumbest Shit Ever University

Since that is your amamuater you should post it.

Alma mater dumbass,

it's fixed, I miss hit post

#120

amamuater ... not even ******* close !


too late Gomer.

 

[Interested Outsider]

This looks real bad for Obama, the former Constitutionally ineligible non-natural born Citizen president.

How so?

Either it's the invention of a right wing news site that and Trump has made as ass of himself.

or

There was probable cause for a Judge to grant a FISA warrant at the request of an independent investigating agency.

Either way Obama look just peachy.

 

[easyt65]

Since the Russians never 'hacked the election' and that was the basis on which the Trump investigation began and for Obama to begin collecting personal information on Trump and his team, the investigation itself was bogus.

There has been no evidence to support Trump ever colluded with Russians, no evidence Flynn broke the law, no evidence Sessions broke the law - all of it has been bullshit false accusations. It was enough, however, for Obama to begin his own 'Watergate' on Trump and his team in the middle of an election.

BTW, there is a new thread - it is on how Debbie Wasserman-Schultz ignored the BAN and investigation of the Awan brothers - the 3 Pakistani IT brothers the Democrats hired and who had illegal / un-authorized access to classified House files. Turns out DWS ignored all of this and brought one of them on as her personal advisor....

It turns out he was given access to not only DWS' files but was given access to an IPad that contained usernames, passwords, e-mails, files etc of DNC members...supposed access to what was leaked... which means - if true - the Russians didn't hack SHIT! It means Debbie allowed the 'hack and release' of the DNC's files...



This has got to be too good to be true, though....

 

[Care4all]

Since the Russians never 'hacked the election' and that was the basis on which the Trump investigation began and for Obama to begin collecting personal information on Trump and his team, the investigation itself was bogus.

There has been no evidence to support Trump ever colluded with Russians, no evidence Flynn broke the law, no evidence Sessions broke the law - all of it has been bullshit false accusations. It was enough, however, for Obama to begin his own 'Watergate' on Trump and his team in the middle of an election.

BTW, there is a new thread - it is on how Debbie Wasserman-Schultz ignored the BAN and investigation of the Awan brothers - the 3 Pakistani IT brothers the Democrats hired and who had illegal / un-authorized access to classified House files. Turns out DWS ignored all of this and brought one of them on as her personal advisor....

It turns out he was given access to not only DWS' files but was given access to an IPad that contained usernames, passwords, e-mails, files etc of DNC members...supposed access to what was leaked... which means - if true - the Russians didn't hack SHIT! It means Debbie allowed the 'hack and release' of the DNC's files...

View attachment 116305

This has got to be too good to be true, though....

you actually believe that crud?

 

[bripat9643]

Things are looking grim for Obama and the Dims. Evidence of the October FISA warrant has turned up. It won't be long until the actual thing is published, and then Obama's goose is cooked.

Report: A FISA Warrant Was Issued in October to Investigate Russian Hacking​

And your alleged mind bleev's this means Obama personally ordered Trump's phone lines to be tapped...how?

You know the FISA court is not Obama...right, retard?

It doesn't matter whether he ordered it. One of his servile toadies could have ordered it without being asked, there's no doubt that new knew about it. He failed to do anything about it, and then he took steps to make sure the information was leaked. It doesn't look good for him.

Why would he need to do something about a valid investigation?

What makes you think it's "valid," because you hate Trump?

 

[bripat9643]

Things are looking grim for Obama and the Dims. Evidence of the October FISA warrant has turned up. It won't be long until the actual thing is published, and then Obama's goose is cooked.

Report: A FISA Warrant Was Issued in October to Investigate Russian Hacking

Investigative journalists Sara Carter (formerly of the Washington Times, the Washington Examiner, and The Blaze) and John Solomon (formerly of the the Washington Post, the Washington Times, and AP) spoke to sources close to the investigation who have been "watching in horror" at the politicization of intelligence since the election, and wanted to set the record straight.

"What we don't know is who was connected to that FISA," Carter said on Sean Hannity's show Wednesday night. "What was that FISA looking at? That is very highly classified. Nobody wants to talk about that particular FISA, right now. They said it did have to do with the Russian hacking on a very broad level, but it didn't hone in directly on Trump is what I was told," she said.

In addition to the FISA warrant in October, the FBI obtained a separate warrant that same month to look into a computer server tied to then-candidate Donald Trump's businesses in Trump Towers (but not located in Trump Towers). According to the report, the feds used traditional investigative techniques to examine allegations of computer activity tied to two Russian banks and there had been no intercepts of Trump’s phone or emails.

The FBI quickly concluded that "the computer activity in question involved no nefarious contacts, bank transactions or encrypted communications with the Russians."​

If, IF a FISA warrant was issued, it was done so legally with the appropriate probable cause that is required. Why would that be grim for Obama? It seems more like it would not bode well for Trump or his people.

and what would be the probable cause? have you seen any yet?

It's required to obtain a FISA warrant, fool.

You didn't answer the question. What would be the probable cause?

 

[bripat9643]

And your alleged mind bleev's this means Obama personally ordered Trump's phone lines to be tapped...how?

You know the FISA court is not Obama...right, retard?

It doesn't matter whether he ordered it. One of his servile toadies could have ordered it without being asked, there's no doubt that new knew about it. He failed to do anything about it, and then he took steps to make sure the information was leaked. It doesn't look good for him.

No one ordered Trump's phone to be tapped. Got it yet? Read your own damn link, for chrissakes, instead of IMAGINING shit.

Trump heard a ******* SPECULATION and repeated it as fact. Because he is as retarded as you.

Sure they did

The retard's link in the OP confirms what I said. The dumb **** kicked himself in the mouth.

Man, you guys are ******* stupid beyond belief.

That's what happens when one tries to defend an indefensible fantasy.

You mean like the fantasy that Trump colluded with the Russians to hack the election?

 

[bripat9643]

No one ordered Trump's phone to be tapped. Got it yet? Read your own damn link, for chrissakes, instead of IMAGINING shit.

Trump heard a ******* SPECULATION and repeated it as fact. Because he is as retarded as you.

Sure they did

The retard's link in the OP confirms what I said. The dumb **** kicked himself in the mouth.

Man, you guys are ******* stupid beyond belief.

NYT ran a big story on Trump's aides being wire tapped. Trump used the same phrase. Big f'n deal.

The latest tactic of the snowflakes is to claim that Trump didn't personally perform the wire tap or order it, as if that mattered somehow.

The latest tactic of the snowflakes is to claim that Trump didn't personally perform the wire tap or order it, as if that mattered somehow.

WTF?

What part of my post didn't you understand?

 

[bripat9643]

Trump believing that he is under surveilliance isn't insane. Every one around him is being investigated INCLUDING Ivanka, Jared and Jared's ******* mother.

So piss off that he's a whack job when Trump is reading headlines that his aides are being wire tapped and that those conversations were presented to the White House.

True and that mean's it's very serious & Trump is in Yuuuuge trouble.

The second possibility is that Trump is correct, and the Obama administration did in fact tap his phones. But if this was the case, before the tap could occur it’s highly likely Trump committed a very serious crime, including treason. No president can order a wiretap on his own. For federal agents to obtain a wiretap on Trump, or anyone else, the Justice Department would first have had to convince a federal judge that it had gathered sufficient evidence of probable cause to believe Trump had committed a serious crime or was an agent of a foreign power, depending on whether it was a criminal or foreign intelligence wiretap.

3 Terrifying Reasons For Trump's Latest Rant | The Huffington Post

And Lindsey Graham explains it:

"If it is true, it would be the biggest political scandal since Watergate," Graham said, to shouting. He added that if the Obama administration was able to obtain a warrant lawfully to investigate Trump's ties to Russia, then that would be the biggest scandal since Watergate.

Lindsey Graham offers two ways Trump Tower wiretapping could be bigger than Watergate

Analysis | 5 times Donald Trump’s team denied contact with Russia


Trump aides were in constant touch with senior Russian officials during campaign - CNNPolitics.com

It means nothing of the sort. Since when did a sense of propriety ever stop a pissed off snowflake from attacking a Republican he hates?

 

[bripat9643]

Since the Russians never 'hacked the election' and that was the basis on which the Trump investigation began and for Obama to begin collecting personal information on Trump and his team, the investigation itself was bogus.

There has been no evidence to support Trump ever colluded with Russians, no evidence Flynn broke the law, no evidence Sessions broke the law - all of it has been bullshit false accusations. It was enough, however, for Obama to begin his own 'Watergate' on Trump and his team in the middle of an election.

BTW, there is a new thread - it is on how Debbie Wasserman-Schultz ignored the BAN and investigation of the Awan brothers - the 3 Pakistani IT brothers the Democrats hired and who had illegal / un-authorized access to classified House files. Turns out DWS ignored all of this and brought one of them on as her personal advisor....

It turns out he was given access to not only DWS' files but was given access to an IPad that contained usernames, passwords, e-mails, files etc of DNC members...supposed access to what was leaked... which means - if true - the Russians didn't hack SHIT! It means Debbie allowed the 'hack and release' of the DNC's files...

View attachment 116305

This has got to be too good to be true, though....

you actually believe that crud?

The "Russians hacked the election" theory is what is crud.

 

[bripat9643]

Things are looking grim for Obama and the Dims. Evidence of the October FISA warrant has turned up. It won't be long until the actual thing is published, and then Obama's goose is cooked.

Report: A FISA Warrant Was Issued in October to Investigate Russian Hacking

Investigative journalists Sara Carter (formerly of the Washington Times, the Washington Examiner, and The Blaze) and John Solomon (formerly of the the Washington Post, the Washington Times, and AP) spoke to sources close to the investigation who have been "watching in horror" at the politicization of intelligence since the election, and wanted to set the record straight.

"What we don't know is who was connected to that FISA," Carter said on Sean Hannity's show Wednesday night. "What was that FISA looking at? That is very highly classified. Nobody wants to talk about that particular FISA, right now. They said it did have to do with the Russian hacking on a very broad level, but it didn't hone in directly on Trump is what I was told," she said.

In addition to the FISA warrant in October, the FBI obtained a separate warrant that same month to look into a computer server tied to then-candidate Donald Trump's businesses in Trump Towers (but not located in Trump Towers). According to the report, the feds used traditional investigative techniques to examine allegations of computer activity tied to two Russian banks and there had been no intercepts of Trump’s phone or emails.

The FBI quickly concluded that "the computer activity in question involved no nefarious contacts, bank transactions or encrypted communications with the Russians."​

If, IF a FISA warrant was issued, it was done so legally with the appropriate probable cause that is required. Why would that be grim for Obama? It seems more like it would not bode well for Trump or his people.

and what would be the probable cause? have you seen any yet?

It's required to obtain a FISA warrant, fool.

it certainly is, so what was it?

You or I are not privy to such information.
There had to be cause if there was indeed a warrant. That means Trump is in some shady shit.

You are so naive. The cause was snowflakes pissed off at Hillary losing.

 

[Care4all]

Things are looking grim for Obama and the Dims. Evidence of the October FISA warrant has turned up. It won't be long until the actual thing is published, and then Obama's goose is cooked.

Report: A FISA Warrant Was Issued in October to Investigate Russian Hacking

Investigative journalists Sara Carter (formerly of the Washington Times, the Washington Examiner, and The Blaze) and John Solomon (formerly of the the Washington Post, the Washington Times, and AP) spoke to sources close to the investigation who have been "watching in horror" at the politicization of intelligence since the election, and wanted to set the record straight.

"What we don't know is who was connected to that FISA," Carter said on Sean Hannity's show Wednesday night. "What was that FISA looking at? That is very highly classified. Nobody wants to talk about that particular FISA, right now. They said it did have to do with the Russian hacking on a very broad level, but it didn't hone in directly on Trump is what I was told," she said.

In addition to the FISA warrant in October, the FBI obtained a separate warrant that same month to look into a computer server tied to then-candidate Donald Trump's businesses in Trump Towers (but not located in Trump Towers). According to the report, the feds used traditional investigative techniques to examine allegations of computer activity tied to two Russian banks and there had been no intercepts of Trump’s phone or emails.

The FBI quickly concluded that "the computer activity in question involved no nefarious contacts, bank transactions or encrypted communications with the Russians."​

If, IF a FISA warrant was issued, it was done so legally with the appropriate probable cause that is required. Why would that be grim for Obama? It seems more like it would not bode well for Trump or his people.

and what would be the probable cause? have you seen any yet?

It's required to obtain a FISA warrant, fool.

You didn't answer the question. What would be the probable cause?

Who knows? That's private, so that the investigators can continue to do surveillance on their suspects, and if nothing comes of it, then the people under surveillance are unaware and all of their neighbors and the Public don't know so that the innocent are not unfairly judged by them.

And if the public does find out due to justice dept leaks, and nothing is found, then the justice department owes a public apology to the person....imo.

 

[bripat9643]

This looks real bad for Obama, the former Constitutionally ineligible non-natural born Citizen president.

How so?

Either it's the invention of a right wing news site that and Trump has made as ass of himself.

or

There was probable cause for a Judge to grant a FISA warrant at the request of an independent investigating agency.

Either way Obama look just peachy.

That's called a "false dilemma." Those aren't the only possibilities. It has already been pointed out that the 0.03% of warrant requests are rejected by the FISA judge. Getting a warrant for a wire tap is easier than falling down.

 

[bripat9643]

Things are looking grim for Obama and the Dims. Evidence of the October FISA warrant has turned up. It won't be long until the actual thing is published, and then Obama's goose is cooked.

Report: A FISA Warrant Was Issued in October to Investigate Russian Hacking

Investigative journalists Sara Carter (formerly of the Washington Times, the Washington Examiner, and The Blaze) and John Solomon (formerly of the the Washington Post, the Washington Times, and AP) spoke to sources close to the investigation who have been "watching in horror" at the politicization of intelligence since the election, and wanted to set the record straight.

"What we don't know is who was connected to that FISA," Carter said on Sean Hannity's show Wednesday night. "What was that FISA looking at? That is very highly classified. Nobody wants to talk about that particular FISA, right now. They said it did have to do with the Russian hacking on a very broad level, but it didn't hone in directly on Trump is what I was told," she said.

In addition to the FISA warrant in October, the FBI obtained a separate warrant that same month to look into a computer server tied to then-candidate Donald Trump's businesses in Trump Towers (but not located in Trump Towers). According to the report, the feds used traditional investigative techniques to examine allegations of computer activity tied to two Russian banks and there had been no intercepts of Trump’s phone or emails.

The FBI quickly concluded that "the computer activity in question involved no nefarious contacts, bank transactions or encrypted communications with the Russians."​

If, IF a FISA warrant was issued, it was done so legally with the appropriate probable cause that is required. Why would that be grim for Obama? It seems more like it would not bode well for Trump or his people.

and what would be the probable cause? have you seen any yet?

It's required to obtain a FISA warrant, fool.

You didn't answer the question. What would be the probable cause?

Who knows? That's private, so that the investigators can continue to do surveillance on their suspects, and if nothing comes of it, then the people under surveillance are unaware and all of their neighbors and the Public don't know so that the innocent are not unfairly judged by them.

And if the public does find out due to justice dept leaks, and nothing is found, then the justice department owes a public apology to the person....imo.

ROFL! It's already been made public, so how is it "private?" Leaking the information is a criminal offense. A lot more than just an "apology" is required. Putting a wire tap on the opposition candidate is a serious offense. It requires a lot more justification than just some suspicions from some butthurt snowflakes.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Things are looking grim for Obama and the Dims. Evidence of the October FISA warrant has turned up. It won't be long until the actual thing is published, and then Obama's goose is cooked.

Report: A FISA Warrant Was Issued in October to Investigate Russian Hacking

Investigative journalists Sara Carter (formerly of the Washington Times, the Washington Examiner, and The Blaze) and John Solomon (formerly of the the Washington Post, the Washington Times, and AP) spoke to sources close to the investigation who have been "watching in horror" at the politicization of intelligence since the election, and wanted to set the record straight.

"What we don't know is who was connected to that FISA," Carter said on Sean Hannity's show Wednesday night. "What was that FISA looking at? That is very highly classified. Nobody wants to talk about that particular FISA, right now. They said it did have to do with the Russian hacking on a very broad level, but it didn't hone in directly on Trump is what I was told," she said.

In addition to the FISA warrant in October, the FBI obtained a separate warrant that same month to look into a computer server tied to then-candidate Donald Trump's businesses in Trump Towers (but not located in Trump Towers). According to the report, the feds used traditional investigative techniques to examine allegations of computer activity tied to two Russian banks and there had been no intercepts of Trump’s phone or emails.

The FBI quickly concluded that "the computer activity in question involved no nefarious contacts, bank transactions or encrypted communications with the Russians."​

A legal warrant is going to be Obama's downfall?

Goddam that's funny.

 

[bripat9643]

Things are looking grim for Obama and the Dims. Evidence of the October FISA warrant has turned up. It won't be long until the actual thing is published, and then Obama's goose is cooked.

Report: A FISA Warrant Was Issued in October to Investigate Russian Hacking

Investigative journalists Sara Carter (formerly of the Washington Times, the Washington Examiner, and The Blaze) and John Solomon (formerly of the the Washington Post, the Washington Times, and AP) spoke to sources close to the investigation who have been "watching in horror" at the politicization of intelligence since the election, and wanted to set the record straight.

"What we don't know is who was connected to that FISA," Carter said on Sean Hannity's show Wednesday night. "What was that FISA looking at? That is very highly classified. Nobody wants to talk about that particular FISA, right now. They said it did have to do with the Russian hacking on a very broad level, but it didn't hone in directly on Trump is what I was told," she said.

In addition to the FISA warrant in October, the FBI obtained a separate warrant that same month to look into a computer server tied to then-candidate Donald Trump's businesses in Trump Towers (but not located in Trump Towers). According to the report, the feds used traditional investigative techniques to examine allegations of computer activity tied to two Russian banks and there had been no intercepts of Trump’s phone or emails.

The FBI quickly concluded that "the computer activity in question involved no nefarious contacts, bank transactions or encrypted communications with the Russians."​

A legal warrant is going to be Obama's downfall?

Goddam that's funny.

#1) You don't know that it was legal.

#2) Even a legal warrant can be obtained for nefarious purposes.

Your view that the courts and law enforcement agencies can do know wrong is the ultimate in naivete.

 

[Care4all]

Since the Russians never 'hacked the election' and that was the basis on which the Trump investigation began and for Obama to begin collecting personal information on Trump and his team, the investigation itself was bogus.

There has been no evidence to support Trump ever colluded with Russians, no evidence Flynn broke the law, no evidence Sessions broke the law - all of it has been bullshit false accusations. It was enough, however, for Obama to begin his own 'Watergate' on Trump and his team in the middle of an election.

BTW, there is a new thread - it is on how Debbie Wasserman-Schultz ignored the BAN and investigation of the Awan brothers - the 3 Pakistani IT brothers the Democrats hired and who had illegal / un-authorized access to classified House files. Turns out DWS ignored all of this and brought one of them on as her personal advisor....

It turns out he was given access to not only DWS' files but was given access to an IPad that contained usernames, passwords, e-mails, files etc of DNC members...supposed access to what was leaked... which means - if true - the Russians didn't hack SHIT! It means Debbie allowed the 'hack and release' of the DNC's files...

View attachment 116305

This has got to be too good to be true, though....

you actually believe that crud?

The "Russians hacked the election" theory is what is crud.

They did not hack, the votes in the election.

They did hack the DNC, and disseminated those DNC emails at the precise time needed to affect the Democratic convention...and they did hack John Podesta and disseminated his emails as their October surprise and within 2 hours of when the Donald Trump Access Hollywood tape on ***** grabbing and trying to get a married woman to sleep with him, to distract from that....

If the Trump campaign itself were the ones who stole the emails and released them on to wikileaks, they could not have picked two better times than where and when the Russians and wikileaks distributed them!!! the Russians knew what they were doing, orrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr, they had a little help from their 'friends'.

 

[oreo]

Trump believing that he is under surveilliance isn't insane. Every one around him is being investigated INCLUDING Ivanka, Jared and Jared's ******* mother.

So piss off that he's a whack job when Trump is reading headlines that his aides are being wire tapped and that those conversations were presented to the White House.

True and that mean's it's very serious & Trump is in Yuuuuge trouble.

The second possibility is that Trump is correct, and the Obama administration did in fact tap his phones. But if this was the case, before the tap could occur it’s highly likely Trump committed a very serious crime, including treason. No president can order a wiretap on his own. For federal agents to obtain a wiretap on Trump, or anyone else, the Justice Department would first have had to convince a federal judge that it had gathered sufficient evidence of probable cause to believe Trump had committed a serious crime or was an agent of a foreign power, depending on whether it was a criminal or foreign intelligence wiretap.

3 Terrifying Reasons For Trump's Latest Rant | The Huffington Post

And Lindsey Graham explains it:

"If it is true, it would be the biggest political scandal since Watergate," Graham said, to shouting. He added that if the Obama administration was able to obtain a warrant lawfully to investigate Trump's ties to Russia, then that would be the biggest scandal since Watergate.

Lindsey Graham offers two ways Trump Tower wiretapping could be bigger than Watergate

Analysis | 5 times Donald Trump’s team denied contact with Russia


Trump aides were in constant touch with senior Russian officials during campaign - CNNPolitics.com

It means nothing of the sort. Since when did a sense of propriety ever stop a pissed off snowflake from attacking a Republican he hates?

If Republicans can do 8 investigations into Benghazi it's not real hard to imagine what Democrats will be doing with this in 2018 when they take over--LOL They have the phone records to prove it.