Repealing the ACA would increase federal budget deficits by $137 billion over the 2016–2025 period

[sartre play]

1.Take Obama name off it just use ACA
2. STOP using it for a political foot ball
3. fix the wrong, no congress person who took money from ins co work on the fix
4 bipartisan group make it work for all

 

[owebo]

The claim in the title is from the Congressional Budget Office.

Before you make a fool of yourself, click the damn link and read the report.

You snowflakes are going to be devastated....

 

[owebo]

1.Take Obama name off it just use ACA
2. STOP using it for a political foot ball
3. fix the wrong, no congress person who took money from ins co work on the fix
4 bipartisan group make it work for all

Obamacare is not a football.....it's just dead....like roadkill....

 

[AntonToo]

1.Take Obama name off it just use ACA
2. STOP using it for a political foot ball
3. fix the wrong, no congress person who took money from ins co work on the fix
4 bipartisan group make it work for all

Democrats have long offered to work with Republicans on implementing fixes to ACA. But response has consistently been - not interested in being constructive! Repeal! Repeal! Repeal!

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

1.Take Obama name off it just use ACA
2. STOP using it for a political foot ball
3. fix the wrong, no congress person who took money from ins co work on the fix
4 bipartisan group make it work for all

Democrats have long offered to work with Republicans on implementing fixes to ACA. But response has consistently been - not interested in being constructive! Repeal! Repeal! Repeal!

The proper response

 

[WillReadmore]

The claim in the title is from the Congressional Budget Office.

Before you make a fool of yourself, click the damn link and read the report.

And 30 million less people will be covered. How does this make sense to anyone?

Single payer is the only real solution.

Single payer =100% taxpayers. No freebies. You agree?

Except for the US, every industrialized nation in the world has health care that is roughly described as single payer.

Your question here is somewhat vague. What is a "freebie"? Also, not every country has a single payer system that covers absolutely everything.

Please be more transparent, as your post comes off as if you are trying to trick someone.

 

[owebo]

The claim in the title is from the Congressional Budget Office.

Before you make a fool of yourself, click the damn link and read the report.

And 30 million less people will be covered. How does this make sense to anyone?

Single payer is the only real solution.

Single payer =100% taxpayers. No freebies. You agree?

Except for the US, every industrialized nation in the world has health care that is roughly described as single payer.

Your question here is somewhat vague. What is a "freebie"? Also, not every country has a single payer system that covers absolutely everything.

Please be more transparent, as your post comes off as if you are trying to trick someone.

Perhaps one day those nations will evolve to our standard.....

 

[WillReadmore]

1.Take Obama name off it just use ACA
2. STOP using it for a political foot ball
3. fix the wrong, no congress person who took money from ins co work on the fix
4 bipartisan group make it work for all

Obamacare is not a football.....it's just dead....like roadkill....

Health care is NOT a football, all right.

So, before destroying what we have, there is a DUTY to show what will be the replacement.

 

[owebo]

1.Take Obama name off it just use ACA
2. STOP using it for a political foot ball
3. fix the wrong, no congress person who took money from ins co work on the fix
4 bipartisan group make it work for all

Obamacare is not a football.....it's just dead....like roadkill....

Health care is NOT a football, all right.

So, before destroying what we have, there is a DUTY to show what will be the replacement.

Obamacare is not healthcare....so.....

 

[WillReadmore]

The claim in the title is from the Congressional Budget Office.

Before you make a fool of yourself, click the damn link and read the report.

And 30 million less people will be covered. How does this make sense to anyone?

Single payer is the only real solution.

Single payer =100% taxpayers. No freebies. You agree?

Except for the US, every industrialized nation in the world has health care that is roughly described as single payer.

Your question here is somewhat vague. What is a "freebie"? Also, not every country has a single payer system that covers absolutely everything.

Please be more transparent, as your post comes off as if you are trying to trick someone.

Perhaps one day those nations will evolve to our standard.....

They are covering their entire population and they are spending substantially less than we are on health care.

So, why would they choose to go to OUR system, which costs more and leaves many uncovered, causing us pay in terms of support for ERs, paying for bankruptcy (where health cost is a major cause), etc.?

 

[Papageorgio]

The claim in the title is from the Congressional Budget Office.

Before you make a fool of yourself, click the damn link and read the report.

From the Report: For many reasons, the budgetary and economic effects of repealing the ACA could differ substantially in either direction from the central estimates presented in this report. The uncertainty is sufficiently great that repealing the ACA could reduce deficits over the 2016–2025 period—or could increase deficits by a substantially larger margin than the agencies have estimated. However, CBO and JCT’s best estimate is that repealing the ACA would increase federal budget deficits by $137 billion over that 10-year period.

 

[WillReadmore]

1.Take Obama name off it just use ACA
2. STOP using it for a political foot ball
3. fix the wrong, no congress person who took money from ins co work on the fix
4 bipartisan group make it work for all

Obamacare is not a football.....it's just dead....like roadkill....

Health care is NOT a football, all right.

So, before destroying what we have, there is a DUTY to show what will be the replacement.

Obamacare is not healthcare....so.....

...so...??

 

[owebo]

1.Take Obama name off it just use ACA
2. STOP using it for a political foot ball
3. fix the wrong, no congress person who took money from ins co work on the fix
4 bipartisan group make it work for all

Obamacare is not a football.....it's just dead....like roadkill....

Health care is NOT a football, all right.

So, before destroying what we have, there is a DUTY to show what will be the replacement.

Obamacare is not healthcare....so.....

...so...??

Exactly....clueless snowflake....

 

[WillReadmore]

1.Take Obama name off it just use ACA
2. STOP using it for a political foot ball
3. fix the wrong, no congress person who took money from ins co work on the fix
4 bipartisan group make it work for all

Obamacare is not a football.....it's just dead....like roadkill....

Health care is NOT a football, all right.

So, before destroying what we have, there is a DUTY to show what will be the replacement.

Obamacare is not healthcare....so.....

...so...??

Exactly....clueless snowflake....

I thought you had something to say.

Sorry.

 

[WillowTree]

The claim in the title is from the Congressional Budget Office.

Before you make a fool of yourself, click the damn link and read the report.

And 30 million less people will be covered. How does this make sense to anyone?

Single payer is the only real solution.

Single payer =100% taxpayers. No freebies. You agree?

Except for the US, every industrialized nation in the world has health care that is roughly described as single payer.

Your question here is somewhat vague. What is a "freebie"? Also, not every country has a single payer system that covers absolutely everything.

Please be more transparent, as your post comes off as if you are trying to trick someone.

A freebie is that which you do not pay for aka federal income taxes aka 47% of Americans!

 

[WillowTree]

1.Take Obama name off it just use ACA
2. STOP using it for a political foot ball
3. fix the wrong, no congress person who took money from ins co work on the fix
4 bipartisan group make it work for all

Obamacare is not a football.....it's just dead....like roadkill....

Health care is NOT a football, all right.

So, before destroying what we have, there is a DUTY to show what will be the replacement.

Nope! Democrats did not show Obamacare before they passed it. Remember Pelosi? Hello?

 

[BlueGin]

Of course the left loons always forget to mention that the folks that actually sign up don't even meet federal estimates. And the folks that sign up and never pay premiums are completely ignored.

Costs, changes led Obamacare enrollment to fall short of earlier estimates

Bullshit point. Uninsured rates are still way way down from what they were before Obamacare.

Still? Don't exaggerate numbers and you won't be corrected.

Problem solved.

 

[BlueGin]

The claim in the title is from the Congressional Budget Office.

Does anyone believe this? I mean seriously! If we are going to debate something, it will take at least 2 USMB to deflect this crapola. Come on lefties, the least you could do is be real!

Naw, I believe it. Of course they would cut the taxes once the law is repealed. However, folks that have gotten used to the medicaid expansion would immediately file civil liberties and civil rights suits, and thus, those benefits would not be cut immediately.

Tax cuts with no corresponding benefit cuts? Hence, a budget deficit.

Because of the cuts in Medicare payments to doctors, Obamacare actually reduced budget deficits. You can be sure that part of O-care will stay in place.

Because of the cuts in payments to doctors, the doctors have refused medicare patients. Thst money will have to be restored.

That and bogus Medicare fines.

 

[BlueGin]

1.Take Obama name off it just use ACA
2. STOP using it for a political foot ball
3. fix the wrong, no congress person who took money from ins co work on the fix
4 bipartisan group make it work for all

Democrats have long offered to work with Republicans on implementing fixes to ACA. But response has consistently been - not interested in being constructive! Repeal! Repeal! Repeal!

The proper response

Exactly

 

[bripat9643]

The claim in the title is from the Congressional Budget Office.

Before you make a fool of yourself, click the damn link and read the report.