Manonthestreet
Diamond Member
- May 20, 2014
- 37,329
- 27,080
- 2,945
Facts inconvenient as usual...grifter says whatNot good enough.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Facts inconvenient as usual...grifter says whatNot good enough.
No, reparations aren't based on skin color
Moving away from racism means fixxing the damage and inequality caused by racism
Since reparations are not just for slavery, go do some research, then come back and explain how reparations violate the equal protection clause.
Reparations are not just for slavery. Now people were asked to explain how reparations violated the equal protection clause. Can you do that? If not, leave.
Anything being explained to you will be shut down by a racist rant of jibber jabbering bs
Whites have never been denied constitutional rights or opporttunity in this country based on race.Who gets these reparations?
Again, who gets these reparations?
Every race has and will deal with racism.
So you can't explain it.Anything being explained to you will be shut down by a racist rant of jibber jabbering bs
You've explained nothing.Facts inconvenient as usual...grifter says what
No, you really haven't.I did.
See post #13.
Again.Explain how reparations violates the equal protection clause, I have not ask your opinion about who all has suffered from racism.
Math be de mos racist they is.
This doesn't explain how reparations violates equal protection. For this to do so, there would have to be no record of human rights violations against blacks since the Equal Protection Clause was put in effect and that has not happened. Meanwhile whites who have been harmed by government action have recieved reparations along with other groups. In short, there is no logical opposition to reparations using the Equal Protection Clause."Reparations" are based on skin color, obviously that is racist.
Thought we were supposed to be moving away from racism.
Are blacks not included on the lists in link?
It is based on human rights violations committed based on race. Those human rights violations were racist by definition.Again.
It's based on race.
That's racist, by definition.
I’ll explain:I'm reading some crazy posts about how reparations are unconstitutional because they violate the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment. Never mind that reparations are paid nearly daily,
![]()
The United States pays reparations every day—just not to Black America
Cornell William Brooks and Linda Bilmes explore the issue of restorative justice for the multifaceted, intergenerational harms Black Americans have suffered.www.hks.harvard.edu
Now that the issue is being advocated by blacks, the usual same sorry segment of the white community seeks excuses as to why blacks can't get reparations.
The equal protection clause took effect in 1866. Reparations have been paid since that date. So what is the equal protection clause?
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Equal Protection Clause - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Now given our history, I would like somebody white to explain to me how reparations violates the equal protection clause as opposed to doing exactly what the equal protection clause was intended to do.
This doesn't explain how reparations violates equal protection. For this to do so, there would have to be no record of human rights violations against blacks since the Equal Protection Clause was put in effect and that has not happened. Meanwhile whites who have been harmed by government action have recieved reparations along with other groups. In short, there is no logical opposition to reparations using the Equal Protection Clause.
It is based on human rights violations committed based on race. Those human rights violations were racist by definition.