Renee Nicole Good was Minneapolis ‘ICE Watch’ ‘warrior’ who trained to resist feds before shooting

[AntonToo]

Ya don't say?
How about you go read Article IV, Section 4 of it, Shitneck?
Then post back with what it says.
I want to know that you know wtf is says.
They say in 8 days justice is coming. Yes it's going to be tumultuous.
The upsetting of the apple cart is coming.

There is NOTHING in Article IV, Section 4 contradicting the right of freedom and protest, nothing permitting unqualified use of lethal force against civilians.

You are posting nutbag bullshit with a side of violent fantasies.

 

[CowboyTed]

"Renee Nicole Good was Minneapolis ‘ICE Watch’ ‘warrior’ who trained to resist feds before shooting


MINNEAPOLIS — Renee Nicole Good, the mom who was killed by a federal agent after veering her car toward him, was an anti-ICE “warrior” and was part of a group of activists who worked to “document and resist” the federal immigration crackdown in Minnesota, The Post can reveal.

Good, who moved to the city last year, linked up with the anti-ICE activists through her 6-year-old son’s woke charter school, which boasts that it puts “social justice first” and prioritizes “involving kids in political and social activism,” multiple local sources said.

“She was a warrior. She died doing what was right,” a mother named Leesa, whose child attends the same school, told The Post at a growing vigil where Good was killed Wednesday.

Exclusive | Renee Nicole Good was Minneapolis ‘ICE Watch’ ‘warrior’ who trained to resist feds before shooting

Good linked up with the anti-ICE activists through her 6-year-old son’s woke charter school, which boasts that it puts “social justice first” and “involving kids in political and social activism,” …

nypost.com

She was trained by the Left to resist law enforcement. It did not work out as planned.

So you believe that is a reason to summarily execute a US Citizen for defending their rights and the rights of others...

That is the difference.

On Jan 6th, officers there didn't open fire on those protestors... Now we see a woman executed for fleeing from a agency who have no right to detain her.. She let car through, she was obstructing..

 

[jc456]

youre dodgeing the question again,,

was she parked like your MSM claims or was she stopped blocking fed agents in the course of their duties??

what she was doing inside the car has nothing to do with it,,

you really need to buy a dictionary

park
[pɑːk]
noun
verb
park (verb)
parks (third person present)
parked (past tense)
parked (past participle)
parking (present participle)

1. bring (a vehicle that one is driving) to a halt and leave it temporarily, typically in a car park or by the side of the road:
   "he parked his car outside her house"
   "she couldn't find anywhere to park"
   

   Similar:​

   • leave
     station
     position
     stop
     pull up
2. informal
   leave (something) in a convenient place until required:

 

[MarathonMike]

So she deserved to die? Is that what you are saying?

She didn't "deserve to die" any more than Ashli Babbitt "deserved to die". Once again, the issue is: DID SHE POSE A THREAT TO THE OFFICER'S LIFE?
In Good's case, the answer is 'YES'. In Babbitt's case, the answer is 'NO'.

 

[CowboyTed]

if your talking about the crazy ***** that got shot in Minnesota that 3 minute video clearly shows her trying to evade arrest and in that act put an agents life in danger to the point he had to kill her,,


do you still agree with reachel madcow that she was parked in the middle of the road and not stopped blocking fed agents in the course of their duties??

Nope...

If you are fleeing, officers have no right to shoot... That is homicide if you kill.

While the first shot can be disputed, the second and third are very clear. No officer life was under threat.

It really doesn't help his case that he called her a ******* ***** after he publicly executed her.

You may not like her politics or what she was doing but this was a public execution, you can't do that... Do you want all political dispute to end up with a public execution?

 

[M14 Shooter]

So you believe that is a reason to summarily execute...

See? Full of shit.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Nope...
If you are fleeing, officers have no right to shoot... That is homicide if you kill.

See? Full of shit.
Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1. The justices held that deadly force "may not be used unless necessary to prevent the escape and the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious bodily harm to the officer or others.

after he publicly executed her.

See? Full of shit.

You may not like her politics or what she was doing but this was a public execution...

See? Full of shit.

 

[CowboyTed]

She didn't "deserve to die" any more than Ashli Babbitt "deserved to die". Once again, the issue is: DID SHE POSE A THREAT TO THE OFFICER'S LIFE?
In Good's case, the answer is 'YES'. In Babbitt's case, the answer is 'NO'.

Get real...

Good was fleeing... We could dispute the first shot but not the second and third.

Babbitt was rushing and had a crowd behind her... Babbitt was also given multiple warnings...

How many warning was Good given after he drew his weapon?

In the end, the officer has no excuses for the second and third shot. He had already broken policy by standing front of the car, that is a big no no under DHS rules because it encourages these outcomes..

 

[progressive hunter]

View attachment 1204841

still dodging the question with childish responses,,

and you say youre not a leftist,,

 

[jc456]

If you are fleeing, officers have no right to shoot

happens in every state in the union. You are confused. If a cop gives an order and you run, they can shoot. It happens in Chitown all the time. They even chase cars that do that and shoot at the car.

 

[progressive hunter]

Nope...

If you are fleeing, officers have no right to shoot... That is homicide if you kill.

While the first shot can be disputed, the second and third are very clear. No officer life was under threat.

It really doesn't help his case that he called her a ******* ***** after he publicly executed her.

You may not like her politics or what she was doing but this was a public execution, you can't do that... Do you want all political dispute to end up with a public execution?

how much time elapsed between the first and second shot??

 

[jc456]

happens in every state in the union. You are confused. If a cop gives an order and you run, they can shoot. It happens in Chitown all the time. They even chase cars that do that and shoot at the car.

NEW STUDY: Time to Stop—Why Even the Most Disciplined Officers Can’t Stop Faster than Humanly Possible - Force Science

Lon Bartel’s new study reveals humans may not stop shooting instantly, even when the threat ends—even under perfect lab conditions.

www.forcescience.com

 

[progressive hunter]

happens in every state in the union. You are confused. If a cop gives an order and you run, they can shoot. It happens in Chitown all the time. They even chase cars that do that and shoot at the car.

happening and legal are two different things,,

its not legal for a cop to just shoot someone if they run away without some kind of underlying threat,,

North Charleston Officer Faces Murder Charge After Video Shows Him Shooting Man In Back - ACLU of South Carolina

A white North Charleston police officer was arrested on a murder charge after a video surfaced Tuesday of the lawman shooting eight times at a 50-year-old black man as the man ran away. North Charleston Officer Faces Murder Charges After Video Shows Him Shooting A Man In Back | Andrew Knapp The...

www.aclusc.org

 

[jc456]

happening and legal are two different things,,

its not legal for a cop to just shoot someone if they run away without some kind of underlying threat,,

North Charleston Officer Faces Murder Charge After Video Shows Him Shooting Man In Back - ACLU of South Carolina

A white North Charleston police officer was arrested on a murder charge after a video surfaced Tuesday of the lawman shooting eight times at a 50-year-old black man as the man ran away. North Charleston Officer Faces Murder Charges After Video Shows Him Shooting A Man In Back | Andrew Knapp The...

www.aclusc.org

most encounters are a threat in the scenario we are using.

 

[jc456]

happening and legal are two different things,,

its not legal for a cop to just shoot someone if they run away without some kind of underlying threat,,

North Charleston Officer Faces Murder Charge After Video Shows Him Shooting Man In Back - ACLU of South Carolina

A white North Charleston police officer was arrested on a murder charge after a video surfaced Tuesday of the lawman shooting eight times at a 50-year-old black man as the man ran away. North Charleston Officer Faces Murder Charges After Video Shows Him Shooting A Man In Back | Andrew Knapp The...

www.aclusc.org

Chicago police fire shots during traffic stop on city's West Side​

MSN

 

[jc456]

happening and legal are two different things,,

its not legal for a cop to just shoot someone if they run away without some kind of underlying threat,,

North Charleston Officer Faces Murder Charge After Video Shows Him Shooting Man In Back - ACLU of South Carolina

A white North Charleston police officer was arrested on a murder charge after a video surfaced Tuesday of the lawman shooting eight times at a 50-year-old black man as the man ran away. North Charleston Officer Faces Murder Charges After Video Shows Him Shooting A Man In Back | Andrew Knapp The...

www.aclusc.org

Federal agents shoot woman in Chicago neighborhood after allegedly being rammed, boxed in by cars, DHS says

The woman, as well as a man whom authorities say was involved in the chaos, were facing charges Sunday morning.

www.cbsnews.com

 

[progressive hunter]

most encounters are a threat in the scenario we are using.

like the typical leftist you had to add the "scenario we are using"

you clearly said it was legal to shoot someone in the back if they run away and it happens in every state,
now youve changed your wording to include "scenario we are using"

its getting very hard to keep up with you moving the goal posts,,

 

[jc456]

like the typical leftist you had to add the "scenario we are using"

you clearly said it was legal to shoot someone in the back if they run away and it happens in every state,
now youve changed your wording to include "scenario we are using"

its getting very hard to keep up with you moving the goal posts,,

You clarified it, I responded

 

[CowboyTed]

See? Full of shit.
Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1. The justices held that deadly force "may not be used unless necessary to prevent the escape and the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious bodily harm to the officer or others.

See? Full of shit.

See? Full of shit.

Sorry... Try that in court...

Good was trying to drive away... Where are you going that she was a serious threat of death to others...
Yes you can try but it will not fly.. She was clearly backing up and turning away... This shows intend to get away, not to harm... The officer was trained told to not step in front of a car as not to put himself in danger...

Let's make it clear... You can't behave like this as a Federal Officer...

Personally I think the officer's best defence is to say that he was conditioned to think this by threats to his employment, brain washing, false information, lies,.... His frame of mind was wrong and this was due to the tree and information coming from the white house... I think Ross was a pawn in this, people like Stephen Miller are the ones responsible..

 

[M14 Shooter]

Sorry... Try that in court...

See? You're full of shit.
That WAS the court.