Remembering History In The Not So Distant Past

[rtwngAvngr]

interesting articles RWA...

Yeah, aren't they.

google Benjamin Freedman.

 

[ScreamingEagle]

To give the appearance of non control by jews. They still don't delve into the blatant hypocrisy of the establishment of israel. "We get this land because god and The europeans said so". Land always has to be fought for, and they're doing it now. It's to be expected.

That's quite an involved plan they got going on there just for "appearances". They've been fighting for that land for over 50 years now. Why a jew-controlled media today would support their enemies is beyond me.

We know that the liberal NYT is anti-American and anti-Bush. They have lately been pretty silent on the Israel issue probably to not lose their jewish base in NYC. If the NYT is controlled by jews as claimed, why don't they support Israel and cater to their jewish subscribers? The media jews you speak of must be a truly suicidal strain of jew. It doesn't make sense.

 

[rtwngAvngr]

That's quite an involved plan they got going on there just for "appearances". They've been fighting for that land for over 50 years now. Why a jew-controlled media today would support their enemies is beyond me.

We know that the liberal NYT is anti-American and anti-Bush. They have lately been pretty silent on the Israel issue probably to not lose their jewish base in NYC. If the NYT is controlled by jews as claimed, why don't they support Israel and cater to their jewish subscribers? The media jews you speak of must be a truly suicidal strain of jew. It doesn't make sense.

Well it's like this. To achieve total control, you control "both sides" of the political debate. So while they may not be as pro israel as you may like, they still are not TRULY anti-israel, as they never question the inception of israel and the fairness of that.

So do you believe jews have NO influence in the media? What is your notion of jewish involvement in american media? Is it a "what's that, a newspaper?" scenario? Or a an example of a "media conglomerate? who knew?" situation?

 

[theHawk]

If the media is controlled by the zionist jews as claimed, then why is the liberal media today basically rooting for Hizbollah, not Israel?

I think the liberals are torn on this subject.

Bill O'Reilly had two liberal jew congressmen on last night and called them out on their hypocracy. I don't remember their names, but both were Democrats and over the years critized Bush for his policies, yet they support Isreal which uses far worse interrogation practices than the U.S. It was quite hysterical to watch them dodge the question with saying things like "we represent U.S. interests not Isreal's". Guess these two dumbasses didn't realize they are LAWMAKERS and can push for whatever policy they want. :duh3:

Quite funny to see some of the rabid anti-war liberals suddenly get all gung-ho about fighting terrorism now that its Isreal doing it.

 

[ScreamingEagle]

Well it's like this. To achieve total control, you control "both sides" of the political debate. So while they may not be as pro israel as you may like, they still are not TRULY anti-israel, as they never question the inception of israel and the fairness of that.

So do you believe jews have NO influence in the media? What is your notion of jewish involvement in american media? Is it a "what's that, a newspaper?" scenario? Or a an example of a "media conglomerate? who knew?" situation?

It appears to me that most jews in America support Israel. Otherwise the NYT would not be tip-toeing around the subject. I think it'd be pretty safe to say that most jews in Israel support Israel. So therefore if most jews support Israel that only leaves a few sorry jews who are opposed to Israel who evidently are in this cabal of which you are speaking. Therefore I think it is wrong of you to paint this underhanded media control as a "jewish" conspiracy. If these people were of swedish descent would you call it an "swedish" conspiracy?

btw, do you consider Michael Savage to be a member of this media cabal?

 

[ScreamingEagle]

I think the liberals are torn on this subject.

Bill O'Reilly had two liberal jew congressmen on last night and called them out on their hypocracy. I don't remember their names, but both were Democrats and over the years critized Bush for his policies, yet they support Isreal which uses far worse interrogation practices than the U.S. It was quite hysterical to watch them dodge the question with saying things like "we represent U.S. interests not Isreal's". Guess these two dumbasses didn't realize they are LAWMAKERS and can push for whatever policy they want. :duh3:

Quite funny to see some of the rabid anti-war liberals suddenly get all gung-ho about fighting terrorism now that its Isreal doing it.

I think many jews are facing the same quandry as the old Southern Democrats...they try to remain loyal but their Party has deserted them and their beliefs.

 

[rtwngAvngr]

It appears to me that most jews in America support Israel. Otherwise the NYT would not be tip-toeing around the subject. I think it'd be pretty safe to say that most jews in Israel support Israel. So therefore if most jews support Israel that only leaves a few sorry jews who are opposed to Israel who evidently are in this cabal of which you are speaking. Therefore I think it is wrong of you to paint this underhanded media control as a "jewish" conspiracy. If these people were of swedish descent would you call it an "swedish" conspiracy?

btw, do you consider Michael Savage to be a member of this media cabal?

Most jews support israel, true. The ones in the liberal media get caught in a hard place because most of their time is spent trying to convince people that "nationalism is wrong" and "protecting borders is racist". So now they're just confused, and they're TRYING not to appear to be hypocritical regarding israel.

Yes. The jews have an overwhelming influence in media, forming effectively, a jewish conspiracy. And If they were swedes, I would call it a swedish conspiracy.

What's unique about jews is a feeling of separateness from their host nation, a "better than" feeling, knowing they have automatic dual citizenship in israel, if they just fly there. They are the chosen people, a light unto the world. Just ask them.

 

[ScreamingEagle]

Most jews support israel, true. The ones in the liberal media get caught in a hard place because most of their time is spent trying to convince people that "nationalism is wrong" and "protecting borders is racist". So now they're just confused, and they're TRYING not to appear to be hypocritical regarding israel.

Yes. The jews have an overwhelming influence in media, forming effectively, a jewish conspiracy. And If they were swedes, I would call it a swedish conspiracy.

What's unique about jews is a feeling of separateness from their host nation, a "better than" feeling, knowing they have automatic dual citizenship in israel, if they just fly there. They are the chosen people, a light unto the world. Just ask them.

Yeah, it's hard to be both an anti-American, anti-Bush, liberal socialist new world order kinda person and also be a supporter of nationalist Israel. Don't really see how someone can be two-faced about it.

So you would then consider all swedes to be part of the conspiracy? I doubt it. This is what the "jewish conspiracy" people are implying and posting all over the internet -- a very racial implication. Frankly, I wouldn't be surprised if many of these people spawning such theories were islamofascists. (I'm not saying that there couldn't be several jewish people trying to control the media output.)

I doubt that jews are the only ones who may feel that way (although I sure don't see many opting to move to Israel). There are plenty of non-jewish people who have dual citizenship.

 

[rtwngAvngr]

Yeah, it's hard to be both an anti-American, anti-Bush, liberal socialist new world order kinda person and also be a supporter of nationalist Israel. Don't really see how someone can be two-faced about it.

Well IN the new world order, Israel is the central state which controls all others, thus they're bolstering Iraeli identity and denigrating others. It's elitist and totalitarian, and it's just hard to hide in those moments when it comes to the fore.

So you would then consider all swedes to be part of the conspiracy?

If there was a swedish conspiracy I would call it that.

I doubt it. This is what the "jewish conspiracy" people are implying and posting all over the internet -- a very racial implication.

Yes. They are very elitist and racist. They are the chosen people, we are to learn from them, their identity is worth preserving and is noble, everyone else's is to be shamed. It's duplicitous and self-serving. And the JEWISH designation is rarely abandoned, even if they never go to synagogue.

Frankly, I wouldn't be surprised if many of these people spawning such theories were islamofascists. (I'm not saying that there couldn't be several jewish people trying to control the media output.)

No. the islamofascists are elitist theocrats as well.

I doubt that jews are the only ones who may feel that way (although I sure don't see many opting to move to Israel). There are plenty of non-jewish people who have dual citizenship.

Yes. But it's not as automatic. Nor is the centrality of their former, or ethnic homeland in a mythological future new world order a core part of their religioethnic identity.

If you doubt what I say, check this site:

http://www.moshiach.com

 

[Hagbard Celine]

Well IN the new world order, Israel is the central state which controls all others, thus they're bolstering Iraeli identity and denigrating others. It's elitist and totalitarian, and it's just hard to hide in those moments when it comes to the fore.

If there was a swedish conspiracy I would call it that.

Yes. They are very elitist and racist. They are the chosen people, we are to learn from them, their identity is worth preserving and is noble, everyone else's is to be shamed. It's duplicitous and self-serving. And the JEWISH designation is rarely abandoned, even if they never go to synagogue.

No. the islamofascists are elitist theocrats as well.


Yes. But it's not as automatic. Nor is the centrality of their former, or ethnic homeland in a mythological future new world order a core part of their religioethnic identity.

If you doubt what I say, check this site:

http://www.moshiach.com

The Swedes DO have a conspiracy. A conspiracy that involves us all. A conspiracy that involves...meatballs.

And the Jews aren't the chosen people anymore. Not after Jebus came and fulfilled the law. Now all people can find God, not just Jews. If you believe in all that hocus pocus that is.

 

[rtwngAvngr]

The Swedes DO have a conspiracy. A conspiracy that involves us all. A conspiracy that involves...meatballs.

And the Jews aren't the chosen people anymore. Not after Jebus came and fulfilled the law. Now all people can find God, not just Jews. If you believe in all that hocus pocus that is.

But they still believe it's their duty to convince us jesus worship is idolatry.

We're all just boot lickin noahides

 

[ScreamingEagle]

Well IN the new world order, Israel is the central state which controls all others, thus they're bolstering Iraeli identity and denigrating others. It's elitist and totalitarian, and it's just hard to hide in those moments when it comes to the fore.

If there was a swedish conspiracy I would call it that.

Yes. They are very elitist and racist. They are the chosen people, we are to learn from them, their identity is worth preserving and is noble, everyone else's is to be shamed. It's duplicitous and self-serving. And the JEWISH designation is rarely abandoned, even if they never go to synagogue.

No. the islamofascists are elitist theocrats as well.


Yes. But it's not as automatic. Nor is the centrality of their former, or ethnic homeland in a mythological future new world order a core part of their religioethnic identity.

If you doubt what I say, check this site:

http://www.moshiach.com

What are you saying? America is on the wrong side of the Israeli war?

You never did answer about Savage. Being he's #1 in talk radio, is he also part of the program?